TABLE 3

Allele frequencies in whites, African Americans, Asians, and two study populations of mixed ethnicity

*10 denotes a “collective” CYP2D6*10 assignment made by testing for 100T only. Combination of additional assays (see Fig 1 and Table 2) allowed further discrimination of collective CYP2D6*10 alleles as indicated.


Allele

WA (n = 418)a

AA (n = 562)

AA-SC (n = 252)

AS (n = 76)

DIV Infant (n = 310)b

DIV Tissue (n = 162)c
Total “*10 8 20 12 20 19 9
*10 8 17d 10 7 15 2
*10x2 0 0 0 0 N.D.e 0
*36 0 3 1 1 4 (AA) 1 (AA)
*36x2 0 0 0 0 0 0
*36+*10 0 0 1 10 N.D. 2
*36 or *36x2f n/a n/a 0 1 N.A. 1 (Oth)
*10 or *36+*10 1 3 (Oth)
Frequency of *36 in %g 0 0.53 0.79 2.63 2.5 (AA) 2.0 (AA)





0 (CA)
3.33 (Oth)
  • WA, white American; AA, African American; AA-SC, African American with sickle cell disease; AS, Asian; DIV, ethnically diverse; Oth, ethnicity other or unknown; N.D., not determined; N.A., not applicable.

  • a Number of chromosomes genotyped.

  • b Ethnic diversity of infant samples (n = number of chromosomes) was WA, n = 126; AA, n = 160; AS, n = 8, Hispanic, n = 10; admixed or Oth, n = 6.

  • c DNA samples were derived from a tissue bank: WA, n = 76; AA, n = 50; AS, n = 2, Hispanic, n = 2; N.A., n = 2; Oth, n = 30

  • d The presence of a gene duplication could not be determined in three subjects because of a lack of DNA or compromised DNA quality.

  • e Not all total `*10' alleles could be tested for the presence of a gene duplication in this cohort because of compromised DNA quality in genomic DNA samples (derived from buccal brushings) in a subset of samples

  • f Long-range PCR and diagnostic CYP2D6*36 assays are compatible with either a CYPD6*36/*36+*10 or *36x2/*10 genotype.

  • g Allele frequency contains CYP2D6*36 and CYP2D6*36 or CYP2D6*36x2 as indicated in footnote f.