TABLE 1

Accuracy in classification of midazolam DDIs (AUC ratio <2) based on predictions obtained using the dynamic model

All studies were reported as successfully predicted when assessed via the traditional two-fold measure approach.

InhibitorActual AUC Ratio and DDI ClassificationCorrect Classification of Predicted DDI Using Dynamic Model
Atomoxetine1.0NI
Atorvastatin1.4W× (NI)
Chlorzoxazone1.7W× (NI)
Cimetidine1.4W× (NI)
Cimetidine1.4W× (NI)
Cimetidine1.5W× (NI)
Fluconazole1.9W
Flumazenil0.97I× (NI)
Fluvoxamine1.7W× (NI)
Gatifloxacin1.1NI
Parecoxib1.1NI× (I)
Ranitidine1.2NI
Ranitidine1.3W× (NI)
Ranitidine1.7W× (NI)
Azithromycin1.3W
Carbamazepine0.04I
Rifampin0.05I
Nitrendipine0.93I× (NI)
Simvastatin1.1NI
Terbinafine0.76I× (NI)
Valdecoxib1.1NI
Fluoxetine0.84I× (W)
Fluvoxamine1.39W× (NI)
  • I, NI, and W represent induction, no interaction, and weak inhibition interactions, respectively; ✓ represents the correct classification predicted; and × represents incorrect prediction, with the incorrect classification in parenthesis.