TABLE 6

Comparison of fm,UGT in each animal species

Compoundfm, UGTa
MouseRatMonkeyDogHumanb
Ketoprofen0.0100.8530.3500.1630.900
ImipramineND0.0140.0400.0050.100
Lorazepam0.4360.0850.5300.7850.810
Levofloxacin0.2290.6440.8200.061<0.015
Zidovudine0.0340.0200.0800.1340.850
Diclofenac0.2610.0650.2900.5220.150
Furosemide0.0050.0520.6710.1700.140
Raloxifene0.2430.2140.3800.1960.900
Gemfibrozil0.1730.3660.3500.6900.400
Mycophenolic acid0.9660.0960.5400.9900.900
Indomethacin0.0010.0040.9400.0100.217
Telmisartan0.1180.3960.4700.990NA
Percentage of compounds within
    2-fold30204040
    3-fold40407040
    4-fold60407050
  • NA, not available; ND, not detected.

  • a Preclinical fm,UGT values were derived from the recovery of glucuronide excreted in bile and urine (n = 2–3).

  • b Clinical fm,UGT values were obtained from the literature as follows: ketoprofen, zidovudine, and gemfibrozil (Kilford et al., 2009); imipramine and furosemide (Soars et al., 2002); lorazepam (Greenblatt, 1981); levofloxacin (Fish and Chow, 1997); diclofenac (Stierlin et al., 1979); raloxifene and mycophenolic acid (Cubitt et al., 2009); and indomethacin (Duggan et al., 1972).