TABLE 5

Omeprazole and esomeprazole as CYP2C19 inhibitors

PPISubstrateInhibition TypeParameter(s)a% Inhibitionpredictedb% Inhibitionin vivo (90% CI)c
Ki,uKI,ukinactCmaxCmax,uCmax.portalCmax,portal,u
μMμMmin1
OmeprazoleDiazepamReversible4.07<130<138 (28, 49)d 46 (28, 61)e
(S)-Mephenytoin6.35<1211
CEC0.63327412
(S)-Mephenytoin (HLM)3.38<1343
DiazepamMetabolism-Dependent3.400.0398626966638 (28, 49)d 46 (28, 61)e
(S)-Mephenytoin2.300.04892389877
(S)-Mephenytoin (HLM)0.840.03094519885
DiazepamMetabolism-Dependent + Reversible4.03.400.0398726976638 (28, 49)d 46 (28, 61)e
(S)-Mephenytoin6.32.300.04892389877
(S)-Mephenytoin (HLM)3.30.840.03095519885
EsomeprazoleDiazepamReversible2.3696871779 (52, 99)
(S)-Mephenytoin0.689199642
CEC0.396429968
(S)-Mephenytoin (HLM)1.77589021
DiazepamMetabolism-Dependent1.700.0769993999779 (52, 99)
(S)-Mephenytoin2.300.204999610099
(S)-Mephenytoin (HLM)0.720.04999959998
DiazepamMetabolism-Dependent + Reversible2.31.700.076100931009879 (52, 99)
(S)-Mephenytoin0.62.300.2041009710099
(S)-Mephenytoin (HLM)1.70.720.0491009510098
  • a Unless otherwise indicated, the Ki,u is the IC50 obtained with rCYP2C19 (Table 2) divided by 2 (not corrected for fu,inc since binding to rCYP2C19 was negligible: fu,inc >0.97). For (S)-mephenytoin with HLM only, the Ki,u is the IC50 obtained with HLM, corrected for fu,inc and then divided by 2. Because time-dependent shifts in IC50 were noted, the HLM- and rCYP2C19-derived parameters (kinact and KI) were used to estimate the contribution of metabolism-dependent inhibition. KI was also corrected for fu,inc.

  • b Percentage of inhibitionpredicted was determined as described under Materials and Methods. Cmax (Cmax,u) values for each PPI were based on those reported for a specific diazepam drug interaction; 0.3 (0.02) μM after 20 mg of oral omeprazole, and 5.2 (0.16) μM after 30 mg of oral esomeprazole (see Supplemental Table S2). Cmax,portal values were 1.7 μM (omeprazole) and 15.5 μM (esomeprazole). Corresponding Cmax,portal,u values were 0.1 μM (omeprazole) and 0.47 μM (esomeprazole).

  • c Percentage of inhibitionin vivo was calculated based on the reported effect of each PPI on the AUC of diazepam (see Materials and Methods, eqs. 17 and 18).

  • d Percentage of inhibitionin vivo was calculated based on the AUCi/AUCc ratio reported by Ishizaki et al. (1995).

  • e Percentage of inhibitionin vivo was calculated based on the AUCi/AUCc ratio reported by Andersson et al. (1990).