TABLE 2

Comparison of uptake rates (CLint,uptake) for plated rat hepatocytes and suspended cells.

SubstrateBDDCS ClassaUptake TransporterbCLint,uptake (μl/min × 106 cells)
Plated CellsSuspended Cells
AtenololcIIINone1.2 ± 0.2***3.9 ± 0.4
MetoprololcINone10 ± 2**27 ± 3
AtorvastatinIIOATPs30 ± 330 ± 4
BosentanIIOATPs11.5 ± 318 ± 3
Estrone-3-sulfatedIIINTCP/OATs/OATPs75 ± 9**210 ± 32
FexofenadineIIIOATPs3 ± 0.5**6 ± 1
TerfenadinecIINone153 ± 19**324 ± 53
MontelukastIIOATPs145 ± 20143 ± 14
  • Mean 6 S.D. is shown, n = 3. Statistical significance was tested with the two-tailed Student's t test. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.

  • a BDDCS class as described by Benet et al. (2011).

  • b Transporter data are from the University of Tokyo and University of California–San Francisco and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (UCSF-FDA) online transporter databases (Ozawa et al., 2004; Morrissey et al., 2012); http://bts.ucsf.edu/fdatransportal.

  • c Compounds with predominantly passive uptake.

  • d As no dose value can be assigned to estrone-3-sulfate, no true BDDCS class assignation can be given, except to note that it is a highly soluble compound with little passive permeability.