Development Stage & Question | Data Available | Modeling Approach | Outcome and impact | comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Compound-1 | Clinical development. | • In vitro metabolic phenotyping | • PBPK model | • Refined mechanistic understanding of disposition | Shardlow et al., 2013 |
Can PBPK modeling inform the optimal ketoconazolea drug interaction study design for a drug with an extended t1/2? | • Human mass balance | • CL based on in vitro CLint | • Supported improved clinical study design for subsequent studies | ||
• Phase I human PK | • Fa, ka, and Vdss based on in vivo data | ||||
• DDI study with ketoconazole | • Retrospective simulation of Comp-1 –ketoconazole DDI was used to build confidence in the model | ||||
• Simulations were used to compare alternative dosing regimens | |||||
Compound -2 | Clinical development. | • Metabolism in recombinant system | • PBPK | • Provided high confidence in ability of model to accurately predict DDI with potent CYP3A4 inducers | In-house example. |
What is the DDI risk for compound that is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 in vitro? | • In vitro metabolic phenotyping | • CL based on IVIVE and in vitro phenotyping | • Supported additional simulations of DDI with moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors | J & J (Janssen R&D in-house example) | |
• Metabolism in human hepatocytes | • Clinical PK data in healthy subjects and in ketoconazole DDI trial used to verify model relevance | ||||
• Human mass balance | • Sensitivity analysis conducted on fu,gut | ||||
• DDI study with ketoconazole | |||||
Compound -3 | Discovery to early development | • Human mass balance | • Static model | • Allowed DDI prediction when PBPK model and extensive in vitro and in vivo data were not available | Lu et al., 2007, 2010 |
Can DDI of CYP3A victim drug with strong and moderate CYP3A inhibitor be predicted using in vitro data and static model? | • Reaction phenotyping | • Measured in vitro fACYP and fmCYP linked to represent the factor of (1/(1+ I/Ki) | |||
• P450 activity remaining (fACYP) in the presence of ketoconazole or fluconazole (human hepatocyte suspended in human plasma) | • fA,CYP corrected by comparing extracellular inhibitor concentration (determined in vitro) with in vivo Cmax | ||||
• Calculated steady-state DDIs compared with clinical observations | |||||
Compound -4 | Clinical development | • Metabolic phenotyping (HLM) | • PBPK model | • Improved mechanistic understanding of the observed DDIs | In-house example. |
What is the risk of DDI for a compound primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 in vitro? Can PBPK model explain the observed clinical data and make predictions of the outcome of novel scenarios (DDI and pediatrics)? | • Rat QWBA | • CL based on in vivo CLIV and retrograde extrapolation of in vivo CLint | • Suggested previously unexpected role of efflux transport in fraction absorbed—which was subsequently verified by an in vitro study | J & J (Janssen R&D in-house example) | |
• Human mass balance study data available | • Predicted Vss consistent with intravenous dose data and rat QWBA | • Supported design of clinical pediatric study | |||
• Phase I human PK | • Model was verified using observed clinical PK data from single, multiple-dose and three clinical DDI studies | ||||
• DDI studies (with three inhibitors) | |||||
Compound -5 | Clinical Development | • In vitro metabolism (HLM and hepatocytes) | • PBPK model | • Guided selection of single-dose over proposed multiple-dose study to maximize DDI potential | Novartis in-house example |
What is the DDI effect of ketoconazole and rifampin on comp-4 after a single dose and at steady state, respectively, in clinical trials? | • In vitro phenotyping (HLM and rhCYP) | • CL based on clinical data | |||
• Rat ADME data | • Vdss predicted from physiochemical data | ||||
• Clinical DDI with rifampin or ketoconazole | • Sensitivity analysis for fu,gut conducted | ||||
• Model verified with clinical DDI data | |||||
Compound- 6 | Before FIH | • In vitro metabolism (HLM and hepatocytes—across species) | • PBPK model | • Exclusion of CYP2C9*3 genotype in FIH trials due to safety risk for the compound in this population | Novartis in-house example |
Should PMs of CYP2C9 be excluded from FIH trials? | • In vitro phenotyping (HLM and rhCYP) | • CL based on rhCYP2C9*1, *2, *3 kinetic data | |||
• rhCYP2C9*1, *2, *3 kinetics | |||||
• Rat ADME data |
↵a Historically, ketoconazole was preferred as a clinically administered potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. However, a recent FDA memo FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA limits usage of Nizoral(ketoconazole) oral tablets because of potentially fatal liver injury and risk of drug interactions and adrenal gland problems. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm362415.htm and industry white paper (PMID: 26044116) have proposed that alternative inhibitors be administered in clinical DDI studies
PBPK, physiologically based pharmacokinetic; PK, pharmacokinetics; P450, cytochrome P450; FA, fraction absorbed; ka, absorption rate constant; CL, clearance; Vdss, steady-state volume of distribution; CLint, intrinsic clearance; IVIVE, in vitro-in vivo extrapolation; fm, fraction metabolized; fA, fraction activity remaining ; HLM, human liver microsomes; fu,gut, fraction unbound enterocytes; rh, recombinant human; QWBA, quantitative whole body autoradiography; FIH, first in human; ADME, absorption distribution metabolism excretion; PM, poor metabolizer.