Skip to main content
Log in

Preclinical findings with iotrolan: a short review

  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iotrolan is a non-ionic hexa-iodinated dimeric contrast agent suitable for Ct enhancement, angiography, urography and the opacofocation of body cavities. It is more hydrophilic than any other X-ray contrast agent and is sweet to tast. Iotrolan 280 is isotnoc to blood and its pharmacokinetics are almost identical to other urographic contrast agents. The experiments reported in this review show very little protein binding, enzyme inhibition or injury to membranes of human erythrocytes, rat mast cells or cultured human enfothelial cells. Osmotically induced side effects, such as vascular pain, endothelial damage, disturbance of the blood-brain barner, vaso-contruction and hemodilution are greatly reduced or absent. In various studies in rats and dogs, the mechanical and electrical function of the heart and myocardial perfusion remained almost unaffected. In rats, renal tolerance of iotrolan was superior to that of a non-ionic monomer when the contrast agents were-infused into the renal arteries. The renal tolerance after intravenous injection depends on the anomal species and experimental conditions, with favorable results in most cases. The intravenous, LD 50 is very high and seems to be restricted more by physical overload of the animals tahn b osmotic or chemotoxic effects. Due to reduced osmotic diultion the contrast efficacy is slightly better than higher osmolality agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sovak M, Ranganathan R, Speck U (1982) Nonionic dimer: development and initial testing of an intrathecal contrast agent. Radiology 142: 115–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krause W, Miklautz H, Kollenkirchen U, Heimann G (1994) Physicochemical parameters of X-ray contrast media. Invest Radiol 29: 72–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mützel W, Press WR, Weinmann HJ (1989) Physicochemical properties and general pharmacology of the nonionic dimer iotrolan. In: Taenzer V, Wende S (eds) Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 28–32

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evill CA, Wilcox J, Hassam RM, Benness GT, Arozoo E (1988) Examination of the nephrographic potential of iotrol by computed tomography. Invest Radiol 23: 216–220

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nauert C, Mützel W (1989) Experimental urography in dogs: diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behaviour of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media. In: Taenzer V, Wende S (eds) Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 82–87

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scholz P, Weinmann HJ, Mützel W, Staks T (1989) Pharmacokinetics of iotrolan after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers. In: Taenzer V, Wende S (eds) Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 211–214

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weimann HJ, Scholz P, Mützel W (1989) Tissue distribution and excretion of iotrolan after intravenous and suboccipital injections in animals. In: Taenzer V, Wende S (eds) Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 206–210

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dawson P, Howell M (1986) The non-ionic dimers: a new class of contrast agents. Br J Radiol 59: 987–991

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bien S, Schumacher M, Detmar M (1987) Nucleolysis and diskography — an experimental study on interaction of chymopapain and contrast medium. Neuroradiology 29: 483–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mutzel W, Siefert HM, Speck U (1980) Biochemical-pharmacologic properties of iohexol. Acta Radiologica 362 (suppl): 111–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Speck U, Mützel W, Mannesmann G, Pfeiffer H, Siefert HM (1980) Pharmacology of nonionic dimers. Invest Radiol 5: 317–322

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan DML, Bettmann MA (1989) Effects of X-ray contrast media and radiation on human vascular endothelial cells in vitro. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 12: 154–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sovak M, Ranganathan R, Kerber CW, Bickford R, Alksne JF (1983) Iotrol, a new myelographic agent: 2. Comparative electroencephalographic evaluation by spectrum analysis. AJNR 4: 319–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Speck U, Press WR, Mützel W (1988) Osmolality-related effects of injections into the central nervous system. Invest Radiol 23 (suppl 1):S114-S117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Speck U, Siefert HM, Klink G (1980) Contrast media and pain in peripheral arteriography. Invest Radiol 15 (suppl):S335-S339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thiesen B, Mützel W (1990) Effects of angiographic contrast media on venous endothelium of rabbits. Invest Radiol 25: 121–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilcox J, Evill CA, Sage MR (1986) Effects of intracarotid ionic and non-ionic contrast material on the blood-brain barrier in a rabbit model. Neuroradiology 28: 271–274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson AJ, Evill CA, Sage MR (1991) Effects of nonionic contrast media on the blood-brain barrier: osmolality versus chemotoxicity. Invest Radiol 26: 1091–1094

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gomi N (1992) Vasoconstriction by angiographic contrast media in isolated canine arteries. Br J Radiol 65: 961–967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fleetwood G, Bettmann MA, Gordon JL (1990) The effects of radiographic contrast media on myocardial contractility and coronary resistance: osmolality, ionic concentration, and viscosity. Invest Radiol 25: 254–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hayakawa K, Yamashita K (1988) Contrast media-induced ventricular fibrillation. Invest Radiol 23 (suppl 1):S144-S146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lanzer P, Dean PB, Lipton MJ, Sievers R, Botvinick E, Higgins CB (1985) Effects of intravenous administration of a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium on the coronary circulation: comparison with monomeric ionic and nonionic media. Invest Radiol 20: 746–750

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Benness G, Evill C, Wilcox J, Hassam R, Arozoo E (1989) Renal excretion and computed tomography enhancement of iotrolan and iopamidol in dogs: In: Taenzer V, Wende S (eds) Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 88–90

    Google Scholar 

  24. Speck U, Press WR, Mützel W (1983) Albuminuria following renal arteriography with various ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the rat. In: Taenzer V, Zeitler E (eds) Urography, angiography and computerized tomography. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 25–29

    Google Scholar 

  25. Oldroyd S, Haylor J, Morcos SK, El Nahas AM (1994) Reduced depression of renal function by iotrolan in the isolated rat kidney. Eur J Radiol 18: 64–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tervahartiala P, Kivisaari L, Kivisaari R, Virtanen I (1992) Contrast media-induced renal morphologic lesions during experimental hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis. Invest Radiol 12: 1064–1068

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ueda J, Nygren A, Hansell P, Ulfendahl HR (1993) Effect of intravenous contrast media on proximal and distal tubular hydrostatic pressure in the rat kidney. Acta Radiol 34: 83–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ueda J, Nygren A, Hansell P, Erikson U (1992) Influence of contrast media on single nephron glomerular filtration rate in rat kidney. Acta Radiol 33: 596–599

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinmann HJ, Mützel W (1983) Experimental studies on the early distribution of contrast media. In: Felix R, Frommhold W, Lissner J, Maeney TF, Niendorf HP, Zeitler E (eds) Contrast media in digital radiography. Excerpta Medica, Tokyo, pp 94–103

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nauert C, Langer M, Mützel W (1989) Hemorrheologic effects of iotrolan after intra-arterial injection in rabbits: comparison with other types of contrast media: In: Taenzer V, Wende S (eds) Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 40–45

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Speck, U. Preclinical findings with iotrolan: a short review. Eur. Radiol. 5 (Suppl 2), S8–S13 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02343254

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02343254

Key words

Navigation