Skip to main content
Log in

Age and Indication for Referral to Capsule Endoscopy Significantly Affect Small Bowel Transit Times: The Given Database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of age and selected indications for capsule endoscopy on small bowel transit times. Data on 67 clinical studies (790 subjects with different gastrointestinal pathologies [49.5% males; mean age, 51.9 ± 18.33 years; range, 18–91 years] and 87 healthy volunteers) were retrieved from the company (Given Imaging, Ltd.)-sponsored database. All subjects swallowed the PillCam SB Capsule after a 12-hr fast. The capsule reached the cecum in all 877 participants. Indications for referral for capsule endoscopy were as follows: 372 obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, 96 suspected Crohn’s disease, 65 celiac disease, 54 irritable bowel syndrome, and 116 familial adenomatous polyposis, intestinal lymphoma, or ulcerative colitis. One group consisted of patients <40 years old (n = 235), and the other patients 40 years old (n = 555). The younger group, volunteers, and Crohn’s disease patients had significantly shorter small bowel transit times than the others (P < 0.001). Gastric emptying indirectly influenced capsule transit time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P (2000) Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 405:417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scapa E, Jacob H, Lewkowic S, Migdal M, Gat D, Gluckhovski A, Fireman Z (2002) Results of the first clinical studies performed in Israel with wireless capsule endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:2776–2779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Costamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME, Foschia F, Mutignani M, Perri V, Vecchioli A, Brizi MG, Picciocchi A, Marano P (2002) A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology 123:1385–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ell C, Remke S, May A, Helou L, Henrich R, Mayer G (2002) The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 34:685–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fireman Z, Mahajna E, Broide E, Shapiro M, Fish L, Sternberg A, Kopelman Y, Scapa E: Diagnosing small bowel Crohn’s disease with wireless capsule endoscopy. Gut 52:390–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mylonaki M, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2003) Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut 502:1122–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chong AKD, Taylor ACF, Miller AM, Desmond PVD (2003) Initial experience with capsule endoscopy at major referral hospital. Med J Aust 178:537–540

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartmann D, Schilling D, Bolz G, Hahne M, Jakobs R, Siegel E, Weickert U, Adamek HE, Riemann JF (2003) Capsule endoscopy versus push enteroscopy in patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Z Gastroenterol 41:377–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eliakim R, Fischer D, Suissa A, Yassin K, Katz D, Guttman N, Migdal M (2003) Wireless capsule video endoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool in comparison to barium follow-through and computerized tomography in-patients with suspected Crohn’s disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:363–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Swain P (2003) Wireless capsule endoscopy. Review. Gut 52(Suppl 4):iv48–iv50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fireman Z, Fish L, Mahajna E, Kopelman Y, Sternberg A, Scapa E (2004) Effect of colon preparation on gastric and small bowel (SB) transit time of capsule endoscopy. IMAJ 6:521–523

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Selby W (2005) Complete small-bowel transit in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy: determining factors and improvement with metoclopramide. Gastrointest Endosc 61:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Niv Y, Niv G (2004) Capsule endoscopy: role of bowel preparation in successful visualization. Scand J Gastroenterol 39:1005–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Viazis N, Sgouros S, Papaxoinis K, Vlachogiannakos J, Bergele C, Sklavos P, Panani A, Avgerinos A (2004) Bowel preparation increases the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 60:534–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Husebye E (1999) The pattern of small bowel motility: physiology and implication in organic disease and functional disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 11:141–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kellow JE, Borody TJ, Phillips SF (1986) Human interdigestive motility: variations in patterns from esophagus to colon. Gastroenterology 91:386–340

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Esther Eshkol is thanked for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zvi Fireman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fireman, Z., Kopelman, Y., Friedman, S. et al. Age and Indication for Referral to Capsule Endoscopy Significantly Affect Small Bowel Transit Times: The Given Database. Dig Dis Sci 52, 2884–2887 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-9789-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-9789-1

Keywords

Navigation