Controversy
Epirubicin and doxorubicin: a comparison of their characteristics, therapeutic activity and toxicity

https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-7372(93)90036-QGet rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (123)

  • H.T. Mouridsen et al.

    Adriamycin versus epirubicin in advanced soft tissue sarcomas

  • S.W. Banham et al.

    High-dose epirubicin chemotherapy in untreated poorer prognosis small-cell lung cancer

    Respir. Med.

    (1990)
  • J. Jassem et al.

    Combination chemotherapy with vincristine, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in small-cell lung carcinoma

    Eur. J. Cancer

    (1992)
  • A. Martoni et al.

    Activity of high-dose epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

    Eur. J. Cancer

    (1991)
  • F. Arcamone et al.

    Adriamycin, 14-Hydroxydaunomycin, a new antitumour antibiotic from S peucetius var. caesius

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (1969)
  • F. Arcamone et al.

    Structure and physicochemical properties of Adriamycin (Doxorubicin)

  • G. Bonadonna et al.

    Clinical evaluation of Adriamycin, a new antitumour antibiotic

    BMJ

    (1969)
  • A. Di Marco

    Adriamycin, the therapeutic activity on experimental tumours

  • R.H. Blum et al.

    Adriamycin, a new anticancer drug with significant clinical activity

    Ann. Intern. Med.

    (1974)
  • S.K. Carter

    Adriamycin, a review

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (1975)
  • T. Skovsgaard et al.

    Adriamycin, an antitumour antibiotic: a review with special reference to daunomycin

    Dan. Med. Bull.

    (1975)
  • G. Casinelli et al.

    La Daunomicina: Un nuovo antiobiotico ad attivita citostatica, isolamento e proprieta

    Gior. Microbiol.

    (1963)
  • G. Bonadonna

    Present role of doxorubicin (Adriamycin) in the treatment of neoplastic disease

    Clin. Trials J.

    (1987)
  • F. Arcamone et al.

    Chemistry and pharmacology of new antitumour anthracyclines

  • F. Arcamone

    New antitumour anthracyclines

    Lloydia

    (1977)
  • S. Penco

    Antitumour anthracyclines: new developments

    Process Biochem.

    (1980)
  • F. Arcamone et al.

    Synthesis and antitumour properties of new glycosides of daunomycinone and adriamycinone

    J. Med. Chem.

    (1975)
  • A.M. Casazza et al.

    Antitumour activity, toxicity and pharmacological properties of 4′epiadriamycin

  • F. Arcamone

    Properties of antitumour anthracyclines and new developments in their application: Cain memorial award lecture

    Cancer Res.

    (1985)
  • V. Malatesta et al.

    Chelation of copper(II) ions by doxorubicin and 4′-epidoxorubicin: an e.s.r. study

    Anti-Cancer Drug Design

    (1985)
  • F. Arcamone et al.

    Chemistry of epirubicin

  • N.R. Bachur et al.

    Cellular Pharmcodynamics of several anthracycline antibiotics

    J. Med. Chem.

    (1976)
  • D.J. Kerr et al.

    In vitro chemosensitivity testing using the multicellular tumour spheroid model

    Cancer Drug Delivery

    (1987)
  • D.J. Kerr

    Aspects of cytotoxic drug penetration; thesis for submission for the degree of MD, Department of Medical Biology, University of Glasgow

  • E. Groos et al.

    Intravesical chemotherapy: Studies on the relationship between pH and cytotoxicity

    Cancer

    (1986)
  • O. Cantoni et al.

    Comparative effects of doxorubicin and 4′-epi-doxorubicin on nucleic acid metabolism and cytotoxicity in a human tumour cell line

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (1990)
  • I. Facchetti et al.

    Influence of lipophilicity on cytotoxicity of anthracyclines in LoVo and Lovo/Dx human cell lines

    Anti-cancer Drug Design

    (1991)
  • U. Tidefelt et al.

    Comparison of the intracellular pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and 4′-epi-doxorubicin in patients with acute leukemia

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (1989)
  • U. Tidefelt et al.

    Intracellular uptake and cytotoxic effect in vitro of doxorubicin and epirubicin in human leukemic and normal haematopoietic cells

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (1991)
  • P. Whelan

    The use of 4′-epirubicin intravesically for the treatment of difficult-to-control superficial bladder cancer

  • J. Robert et al.

    Comparative pharmacokinetics and metabolism of doxorubicin and epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer

    Cancer Treat. Rep.

    (1985)
  • C.M. Camaggi et al.

    Biliary excretion and pharmacokinetics of 4′-epidoxorubicin (epirubicin) in advanced cancer patients

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (1986)
  • K. Mross et al.

    Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of epidoxorubicin and doxorubicin in humans

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1988)
  • C.M. Camaggi et al.

    Epirubicin and doxorubicin comparative metabolism and pharmacokinetics; a cross-over study

    Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.

    (1988)
  • R.S. Benjamin et al.

    Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of adriamycin in man

    Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.

    (1973)
  • R.S. Benjamin et al.

    Adriamycin chemotherapy-efficacy, safety, and pharmacologic basis of an intermittent single high-dosage schedule

    Cancer

    (1974)
  • A.M. Hoyumpa et al.

    Is glucuronidation truly preserved in patients with liver disease?

    Hepatology

    (1991)
  • C.J. Twelves et al.

    Weekly epirubicin for breast cancer with liver metastases and abnormal liver biochemistry

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1989)
  • C. Twelves et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of epirubicin (EPI) in patients with abnormal liver biochemistry

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1990)
  • N.A. Dobbs et al.

    Comparative pharmacokinetics and metabolism of doxorubicin (DOX) and epidoxorubicin (EPI) in relation to liver biochemistry tests

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1991)
  • Cited by (187)

    • A druggable pocket on PSMD10<sup>Gankyrin</sup> that can accommodate an interface peptide and doxorubicin

      2022, European Journal of Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Doxorubicin and epirubicin both have moderate binding affinities for PSMD10Gankyrin, indicating that the interaction occurs mainly through the anthracycline ring and the hydroxyl group of C4’ has very little/no role in the interaction (Fig. 4) at least as seen from equilibrium studies. Doxorubicin and epirubicin, are potent anti-cancer drugs used in the treatment of cancers, especially breast cancer (Khasraw et al., 2012; Paul Launchbury and Habboubi, 1993). The main target for these drugs is DNA topoisomerase II and the drugs bind to DNA topoisomerase II or intercalate to DNA.

    • Ofloxacin@Doxorubicin-Epirubicin functionalized MCM-41 mesoporous silica–based nanocarriers as synergistic drug delivery tools for cancer related bacterial infections

      2022, Bioorganic Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Regarding both epirubicin [40] and doxorubicin [41], these drugs are also positively charged at physiological pH, resulting in attractive electrostatic interactions. The pKa values of 8.22 and 8.34 for doxorubicin, and 7.7 and 8.08 for epirubicin, indicate that these molecules exist mainly in a cationic form within a pH range from about 5 to 9 [42]. This suggests that these drugs will have a more positive charge than ofloxacin, resulting in higher loading percentages.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text