Nicotine-induced behavioral disinhibition and ethanol preference correlate after repeated nicotine treatment

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(01)00903-7Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of repeated daily nicotine (0.35 mg/kg; 15 days) treatment on behavioral inhibition and locomotor activity in the elevated plus-maze and on voluntary ethanol consumption. When challenged with nicotine before the test, rats pretreated with repeated nicotine spent more time on and made more entries onto the open arms of an elevated plus-maze than did vehicle-pretreated animals. The ethanol preference and intake, measured during 3 h after a nicotine injection, was also higher in the nicotine-pretreated animals. In ethanol consumption experiments, there was a positive correlation between the % time and % entries made onto open arms vs. the ethanol preference and intake. However, no correlation between the total number of entries made in the elevated plus-maze and the measures of ethanol consumption was observed. These findings suggest that the ability of repeated nicotine administration to increase ethanol consumption is related to development of a nicotine-induced reduction of inhibitory control rather than development of locomotor sensitization.

Introduction

Drugs of abuse produce a variety of neurochemical effects which are drug-specific, but a common feature appears to be their ability to activate the mesolimbic dopamine system Di Chiara and Imperato, 1988, Koob, 1992 and to stimulate locomotor activity (Wise and Bozarth, 1987). In experimental animals, repeated treatment with most addictive drugs, including nicotine, progressively enhances the drug-induced effects mediated via this dopamine pathway, leading to a long-lasting behavioral and neurochemical sensitization Post and Rose, 1976, Segal and Mandell, 1974, Clarke and Kumar, 1983, Kalivas et al., 1993, Nestler and Aghajanian, 1997, Pierce and Kalivas, 1997, Balfour et al., 1998. The neurobiological processes underlying drug-induced sensitization have been proposed to be involved in transforming the wanting of a drug into craving, and may thus involve an enhancement of the incentive motivational qualities of the drugs and other drug-associated (conditioned) stimuli (Robinson and Berridge, 1993). Supporting this theory, previous drug experience increases subsequent self-administration Horger et al., 1990, Horger et al., 1992, Piazza et al., 1990, Pierre and Vezina, 1997, and enhances the rewarding and reinforcing effects of the drug itself and that of conditioned stimuli Lett, 1989, Shippenberg and Heidbreder, 1995, Taylor and Horger, 1999. However, few studies have demonstrated a direct relationship between locomotor sensitization to dependence producing drugs and drug intake. Therefore, it is possible that the role of sensitization in drug-taking behavior is permissive rather than causally related to the increased drug-intake observed after repeated drug exposure, and that other neural mechanisms are more directly related to the quantity of drug consumed.

The role of inhibitory control and impulsivity has lately received increased attention in the research on drug abuse Jentsch and Taylor, 1999, Olausson et al., 1999, Olausson et al., 2000, Robbins and Everitt, 1999, Rogers et al., 1999, Söderpalm and Svensson, 1999. It is well established that drug addicts abusing different kinds of dependence-producing drugs display decreased inhibitory control when assessed in different neuropsychological tests Allen et al., 1998, Lejoyeux et al., 1998, Bickel et al., 1999, Kirby et al., 1999. It is possible that this inhibitory control deficit may contribute to the inability of the drug addict to control the drug use. Repeated drug exposure has been proposed to impair inhibitory control that, in addition to the effects on incentive motivation, may be involved in the compulsive drug-seeking and drug-intake encountered in drug addicts Jentsch and Taylor, 1999, Olausson et al., 1999, Olausson, 2000.

We have previously demonstrated that repeated intermittent treatment with compounds acting at peripheral or both peripheral and central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, including nicotine, increases voluntary ethanol consumption in rats Blomqvist et al., 1996, Ericson et al., 2000a. Interestingly, these same treatments were recently found to promote the development of nicotine-induced behavioral disinhibition in the elevated plus-maze Olausson et al., 1999, Ericson et al., 2000b, but, with the exception of nicotine, not locomotor sensitization to nicotine. Therefore, interestingly, there appears to be a dissociation between the effects of nicotinergic compounds on locomotor sensitization and behavioral disinhibition. Moreover, these data provide circumstantial evidence that this dissociation is reflected also in the relation between these effects and voluntary ethanol intake, and behavioral disinhibition appears more closely related to the intake of ethanol in rats than locomotor sensitization. Consequently, it is possible that the neuronal mechanisms underlying nicotine-induced behavioral disinhibition after repeated nicotine treatment are more closely related to those involved in the increased voluntary ethanol consumption observed after such treatments rather than to those mediating sensitization to the locomotor stimulatory effects of nicotine. Therefore, this study was designed to directly investigate the relationship between the nicotine-induced behavioral disinhibition and voluntary ethanol consumption. In order to do so, we used a dose of nicotine (0.35 mg/kg s.c.) that we previously have found to produce both locomotor sensitization and behavioral disinhibition as well as to increase ethanol intake. The effects of repeated treatment with this nicotine dose on nicotine-induced behavioral inhibition and locomotor activity in the elevated plus-maze and on voluntary ethanol consumption were examined and the data subjected to correlation analysis.

Section snippets

Animals

Male Wistar rats (n=28) weighing 225–250 g at the start of the experiments were supplied by B&K Universal (Sollentuna, Sweden) and used in all experiments. The rats were housed in separate cages under constant cage temperature (20°C), humidity (40–50%) and a controlled reversed 12-h light–dark cycle (light on at 6 p.m. and off at 6 a.m.). The rats had free access to food and tap water at all times, and a 6% v/v ethanol solution during certain periods of the experiments (see Experimental design

Behavioral inhibition

In the elevated plus-maze experiments, there was main effects of pretreatment on all dependent measures, e.g. the % time (F(1,24)=5.136; P≤0.05; Fig. 1), the % entries (F(1,24)=5.015; P≤0.05; Fig. 1) and total entries (F(1,24)=6.348; P≤0.05; Fig. 1). The nicotine-treated animals spent more time on and made more entries onto open arms of the elevated plus-maze after a nicotine challenge compared to vehicle-treated animals receiving a single dose of nicotine. The total number of entries made in

Discussion

The present study was designed to elucidate the tentative relationship between the effects of repeated nicotine treatment on nicotine-induced effects on behavioral inhibition and ethanol consumption. In line with our previous findings Olausson et al., 1999, Ericson et al., 2000b, repeated daily treatment with nicotine (0.35 mg/kg s.c.) for 15 consecutive days increased the percentage of time spent on and entries made onto the open arms of the elevated plus-maze after a nicotine injection

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable technical assistance of Mrs. Gun Andersson, Mr. Kenn Johannessen, Dr. Anders I. Svensson and Dr. Lennart Svensson. The present study was financially supported by NIDA (DA 10765), the Swedish Medical Research Council (grants no. 11583 and 4247), the Swedish Match Foundation, the Swedish Alcohol Monopoly Foundation, the Swedish Medical Society, the Swedish Society for Medical Research, the Lars Hierta Memory Foundation; the Swedish Lundbeck

References (53)

  • D LeMarquand et al.

    Serotonin and alcohol intake, abuse, and dependence: findings of animal studies

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • P Olausson et al.

    Effects of serotonergic manipulations on the behavioral sensitization and disinhibition associated with repeated amphetamine treatment

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (2000)
  • S Pellow et al.

    Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat

    J. Neurosci. Methods

    (1985)
  • P.V Piazza et al.

    Stress- and pharmacologically-induced behavioral sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration

    Brain Res.

    (1990)
  • R.C Pierce et al.

    A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like psychostimulants

    Brain Res. Rev.

    (1997)
  • T.E Robinson et al.

    The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction

    Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.

    (1993)
  • R.D Rogers et al.

    Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers, patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan-depleted normal volunters: Evidence for monoaminergic mechanisms

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (1999)
  • D.S Segal et al.

    Long-term administration of d-amphetamine: progressive augmentation of motor activity and stereotypy

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1974)
  • B Söderpalm et al.

    Biphasic effects of clonidine on conflict behavior: involvement of different alpha-adrenoceptors

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1988)
  • B Söderpalm et al.

    Naloxone reverses disinhibitory/aggressive behavior in 5,7-DHT lesioned rats; involvement of GABAA receptors

    Neuropharmacology

    (1999)
  • B Söderpalm et al.

    Effects of 5-HT1A receptor agonists and L-5-HTP in Montgomery's conflict test

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1989)
  • L Svensson et al.

    Effects of the 5-HT agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, on ethanol preference in the rat

    Alcohol

    (1989)
  • J Balldin et al.

    Effect of citalopram on alcohol intake in heavy drinkers

    Alcohol.: Clin. Exp. Res.

    (1994)
  • W.K Bickel et al.

    Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers

    Psychopharmacology

    (1999)
  • P.B Clarke et al.

    The effects of nicotine on locomotor activity in non-tolerant and tolerant rats

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (1983)
  • G Di Chiara et al.

    Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (45)

    • The incentive amplifying effects of nicotine: Roles in alcohol seeking and consumption

      2022, Advances in Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Importantly, these data suggest that longer-term intake-specific effects may be divorced from the other more immediate effects, where intake is heightened when it is temporally separated from the drinking event (Alen et al., 2009). Thus, procedures that generally employ longer nicotine exposure periods across days better facilitate alcohol intake in the home cage (Blomqvist, Ericson, Johnson, Engel, & Soderpalm, 1996; Olausson, Ericson, Lof, Engel, & Soderpalm, 2001; Smith, Horan, Gaskin, & Amit, 1999). Taken together, it is likely that the intake specific processes surrounding nicotine are a result longer-term exposure periods, which eventually come to interact with the various appetitive and conditioning properties in various drug-taking settings.

    • Progressive modulation of accumbal neurotransmission and anxiety-like behavior following protracted nicotine withdrawal

      2018, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, the specific effect protracted nicotine withdrawal has on GABAergic transmission and behaviors related to GABAergic transmission, such as anxiety-like behaviors, is not well understood. Even though several studies have shown that both acute and chronic nicotine can influence these types of behaviors (Ericson et al., 2000b; Kolokotroni et al., 2011; Olausson et al., 2001a, 1999, 2001b), the molecular events inducing the behavioral effect are more enigmatic. In order to define the time-scale for nicotine-induced neuroadaptations in nAc, a brain region heavily implicated in reward and addiction (Di Chiara and Imperato, 1988), we explored if a three-week non-volitional nicotine exposure period would be sufficient to induce changes in accumbal neurotransmission, without being obscured by effects induced by voluntary drug-seeking behaviors in a self-administration paradigm.

    • Interactions of Alcohol and Nicotine: CNS Sites and Contributions to Their Co-abuse

      2017, Addictive Substances and Neurological Disease: Alcohol, Tobacco, Caffeine, and Drugs of Abuse in Everyday Lifestyles
    • Nicotine and ethanol co-use in Long-Evans rats: Stimulatory effects of perinatal exposure to a fat-rich diet

      2015, Alcohol
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also, a specific paradigm involving sequential administration of the two drugs may yield results reflecting the effect of one drug on intake of the other, rather than the co-use of these drugs. This is suggested by studies showing that the injection of nicotine can stimulate the drinking of ethanol and that rats prone to drinking excess ethanol are subsequently found to self-administer more nicotine (Bito-Onon et al., 2011; Lê et al., 2000, 2003, 2006; Olausson et al., 2001). Our model, which involves the IV method of self-administration of both drugs and their simultaneous administration, eliminates both of these possible confounding factors while showing greater self-administration of the nicotine/ethanol mixture as compared to nicotine or ethanol alone.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Göteborg University, Blå Stråket 7, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.

    View full text