Elsevier

Antiviral Research

Volume 85, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 176-189
Antiviral Research

Review
Pharmacokinetics and drug–drug interactions of antiretrovirals: An update

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.07.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Current antiretroviral treatment has allowed HIV infection to become a chronic manageable condition with many HIV patients living longer. However, available antiretrovirals are not without limitations, for example the development of resistance and adverse effects. Consequently, new drugs in existing and novel classes are urgently required to provide viable treatment options to patients with few remaining choices. Darunavir, etravirine, maraviroc and raltegravir have been recently approved for treatment-experienced patients and other agents such as rilpivirine, vicriviroc and elvitegravir are currently under phase III study. Clinical studies are necessary to optimise potential treatment combinations and to manage drug–drug interactions to help avoid toxicity or therapy failure. This review aims to summarise the pharmacokinetics and key drug–drug interaction studies for newly available antiretrovirals and those in development. Further information regarding drug–drug interactions of well established antiretrovirals and those recently approved are readily available online at sites such as http://www.hiv-druginteractions.org, http://www.clinicaloptions.com/hiv, http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu.

This article forms part of a special issue of Antiviral Research marking the 25th anniversary of antiretroviral drug discovery and development, Vol 85, issue 1, 2010.

Introduction

The advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) targeting two distinct areas of the HIV lifecycle (reverse transcriptase and protease) has had a dramatic effect on the morbidity and mortality of HIV-infected individuals. However the global burden of HIV remains high with an estimated 33 million adults and children living with the disease at the end of 2007. Current treatment, when available, is not without limitations such as high pill burden, occurrence of adverse events and particularly development of resistance and cross-resistance between drug classes. The need for newer antiretrovirals in existing classes and development of therapies aimed at novel targets are paramount in order to provide broader treatment options to those with few choices remaining, as a result of multiple regimen failures or contraction of resistant virus.

Encouragingly, a number of agents have recently gained approval in existing and new drug classes whilst others are still at the developmental stage. Additions to established classes include the protease inhibitor darunavir and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) etravirine and rilpivirine (formally TMC-278), although the latter is not yet licensed for clinical use. Maraviroc is the first antiretroviral approved to selectively target the CCR5 receptor and raltegravir is the first in the class of integrase inhibitors, providing two additional targets to combat the virus. Also of interest is the development of another integrase inhibitor (elvitegravir) and two new pharmacoenhancers, GS-9350 (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) and SPI-452 (Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), which although in early stages of development are well tolerated and demonstrate potent inhibition of CYP3A metabolism without any antiviral activity (Gulnik et al., 2009, Mathias et al., 2009a).

Despite intensive research efforts a cure for HIV infection remains elusive. However as a result of improved antiretroviral treatment, the disease has become a chronic manageable illness in Western countries with infected patients generally living longer. Patients therefore not only require medications for HIV infection but also for related or unrelated co-morbidities, providing further challenges for healthcare providers and patients alike. Drug–drug interactions are common as a result of interacting metabolic pathways and it is of great importance that drug–drug interactions of newly available therapies are investigated to determine optimal treatment combinations and provide maximum therapeutic effect.

In basic terms, pharmacokinetics can be defined as ‘what the body does to the drug’, implying the absorption, distribution in tissues and cells, and elimination (or clearance) via hepatic and/or renal pathways. The concentrations of drug obtained over time can be related to the response or effect of the drug (pharmacodynamics) which can be beneficial (i.e. therapeutic) or potentially toxic (increased side-effects). Plasma concentrations can be used as a surrogate marker to link antiretroviral pharmacokinetics to antiviral response in the form of reduction in viral load, which has been demonstrated for protease inhibitors. However, with some antiretrovirals the relationship is not clear. For example, plasma pharmacokinetic parameters have yet to be definitively related to virological response for raltegravir, and CCR5-receptor occupancy demonstrates a better relationship with virological suppression than plasma concentrations for maraviroc (Jacqmin et al., 2008, Rosario et al., 2008). With newer antiretrovirals acting at novel target sites, the classical example of a plasma pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationship may not apply. Drug–drug interactions can clearly impact on the efficacy or toxicity of antiretrovirals and/or co-medications by altering drug concentrations either below a recommended threshold for therapeutic effect or above a cut-off for toxicity.

The present review will focus on the pharmacokinetics and known drug–drug interactions of newly available antiretrovirals. A number of agents currently under development will also be briefly discussed. Well established antiretrovirals have been extensively studied and reviewed elsewhere. Furthermore, information on drug–drug interactions of older antiretrovirals is summarised and readily accessible through online resources such as http://www.hiv-druginteractions.org, http://www.clinicaloptions.com/hiv, http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu.

Section snippets

Protease inhibitors

It remains important to develop antiretrovirals in existing drug classes that are active against resistant viral strains in order to improve treatment options for failing patients or those naïve to treatment but harbouring virus resistant to recommended first-line therapy.

CCR5-receptor antagonists

HIV utilises host chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 during entry into host cells (Allen et al., 2007, Lederman et al., 2006). HIV can be categorised according to the chemokine receptor it binds, for example virus that only binds CCR5 is termed the R5 strain. Likewise, X4 strains only bind CXCR4 and dual tropic R5/X4 strains can use both receptors (Berger et al., 1999, Briz et al., 2006). Chemokine receptors therefore provide a novel therapeutic target with blockage of the receptor preventing

Conclusion

The pharmacokinetics and key drug–drug interaction data for newly available antiretrovirals and those under development have been described and summarised. Understanding of antiretroviral pharmacology is important, particularly with emergence of novel drug classes, in order to determine optimal treatment strategies and to manage co-morbidities. Some of the newer antiretrovirals, e.g. maraviroc and raltegravir have little effect on co-medications, however interactions via undetermined mechanisms

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR - Department of Health) and the Northwest Development Agency for providing infrastructural support.

References (148)

  • S. Abel et al.

    Effects of CYP3A4 inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of maraviroc in healthy volunteers

    Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (2008)
  • S. Abel et al.

    Assessment of the absorption, metabolism and absolute bioavailability of maraviroc in healthy male subjects

    Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (2008)
  • S. Abel et al.

    Assessment of the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of maraviroc, a novel CCR5 antagonist, in healthy volunteers

    Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (2008)
  • S.J. Allen et al.

    Chemokine: receptor structure, interactions, and antagonism

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (2007)
  • M.S. Anderson et al.

    Minimal pharmacokinetic interaction between the human immunodeficiency virus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor etravirine and the integrase inhibitor raltegravir in healthy subjects

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2008)
  • M.S. Anderson et al.

    Effect of raltegravir (RAL) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral contraceptives

  • K. Andries et al.

    TMC125, a novel next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor active against nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2004)
  • P. Baede et al.

    Drug interactions with TMC125, a potent next generation NNRTI

  • E.A. Berger et al.

    Chemokine receptors as HIV-1 coreceptors: roles in viral entry, tropism, and disease

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (1999)
  • R. Bethell et al.

    In vitro interactions between apricitabine and other deoxycytidine analogues

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2007)
  • V. Briz et al.

    HIV entry inhibitors: mechanisms of action and resistance pathways

    J. Antimicrob. Chemother.

    (2006)
  • P. Cahn et al.

    Superior activity of apricitabine compared to 3TC over 21 days in treatment experienced HIV-1 infected patients failing therapy with M184 V and NRTI resistance

  • P. Cahn et al.

    Efficacy and tolerability of 10-day monotherapy with apricitabine in antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-infected patients

    AIDS

    (2006)
  • P. Cahn et al.

    Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of apricitabine, a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in patients with HIV-1 infection

    Clin. Drug Invest.

    (2008)
  • ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009a....
  • ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009b. Safety and efficacy of GS-9350-boosted atazanavir compared to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir...
  • ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009c. Study of the safety and efficacy of elvitegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil...
  • S. Cox et al.

    Apricitabine—a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV infection that is refractory to existing drugs

    Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs

    (2009)
  • H.M. Crauwels et al.

    TMC278, a next-generation NNRTI, does not alter the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil

  • H.M. Crauwels et al.

    The effect of TMC278, a next generation NNRTI, on CYP3A activity in vivo

  • K. Das et al.

    Roles of conformational and positional adaptability in structure-based design of TMC125-R165335 (etravirine) and related non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors that are highly potent and effective against wild-type and drug-resistant HIV-1 variants

    J. Med. Chem.

    (2004)
  • J. Davis et al.

    An open, randomized, two-period, crossover study in two cohorts to investigate the effect of steady-state TMC125 (etravirine) and the combination of TMC125/darunavir/ritonavir on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of oral maraviroc in healthy subjects

  • M.P. de Béthune et al.

    TMC278, a new potent NNRTI, with an increased barrier to resistance and favourable pharmacokinetic profile

  • S. De Meyer et al.

    TMC114, a novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor active against protease inhibitor-resistant viruses, including a broad range of clinical isolates

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2005)
  • E. DeJesus et al.

    Antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, and dose response of the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor GS-9137 (JTK-303) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients

    J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.

    (2006)
  • G. Fatkenheuer et al.

    Subgroup analyses of maraviroc in previously treated R5 HIV-1 infection

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2008)
  • A. Ghosal et al.

    Identification of human liver cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in biotransformation of vicriviroc, a CCR5 receptor antagonist

    Drug Metab. Dispos.

    (2007)
  • F. Goebel et al.

    Short-term antiviral activity of TMC278 – a novel NNRTI – in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected subjects

    AIDS

    (2006)
  • O. Goethals et al.

    Resistance mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase selected with elvitegravir confer reduced susceptibility to a wide range of integrase inhibitors

    J. Virol.

    (2008)
  • J. Guillemont et al.

    Synthesis of novel diarylpyrimidine analogues and their antiviral activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1

    J. Med. Chem.

    (2005)
  • R. Gulick et al.

    ACTG 5211: phase II study of the safety and efficacy of vicriviroc (VCV) in HIV-infected treatment-experienced subjects: 48 week results

  • R.M. Gulick et al.

    Maraviroc for previously treated patients with R5 HIV-1 infection

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2008)
  • S. Gulnik et al.

    Preclinical and early clinical evaluation of SPI-452, a new pharmacokinetic enhancer

  • W.D. Hanley et al.

    Effect of tipranavir + ritonavir on pharmacokinetics of raltegravir

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (2009)
  • W.D. Hardy et al.

    Efficacy and safety of maraviroc in treatment-experienced patients infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week combined analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 and 2 studies

  • D. Hazuda et al.

    Emerging pharmacology: inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus integration

    Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.

    (2009)
  • R. Hoetelmans et al.

    Effect of food and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of TMC278 as oral tablet formulation

  • R. Hoetelmans et al.

    Pharmacokinetic interaction between the novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) TMC278 and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in healthy volunteers

  • R. Hoetelmans et al.

    The effect of TMC114, a potent next-generation HIV protease inhibitor, with low-dose ritonavir on atorvastatin pharmacokinetics

  • R.M. Hoetelmans et al.

    Pharmacokinetic interaction between TMC114/ritonavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy volunteers

    Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text