CommentaryTarget-mediated drug disposition and dynamics
Introduction
Nonlinear conditions in drug disposition and pharmacological effects are encountered frequently, and dose-dependent pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) processes complicate the characterization of drug concentration-effect and -toxicity relationships [1], often with significant clinical implications [2]. The fundamental principle that governs this behavior is that of capacity-limitation, where limited densities of enzymes or other proteins result in saturable processes and disproportionate changes in net drug exposure or responses with increasing dose. Levy introduced the term target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) in reference to the observation that for some drugs, the capacity-limited substance responsible for their complex nonlinear pharmacokinetics was in fact the pharmacological target of the compound [3]. Whereas plasma concentrations of most drugs greatly exceed receptor or target concentrations, agents exhibiting TMDD are bound with high affinity and to a significant degree (relative to dose), such that this interaction influences the temporal profile of plasma drug concentrations. Although originally posed to describe the effects of extensive drug–target binding in tissues, TMDD has received considerable interest owing in part to its role in saturable clearance mechanisms for specific peptide and protein pharmaceuticals (e.g., receptor-mediated endocytosis) [4], [5]. The utilization of lower doses of these potent compounds, coupled with the means for detecting relatively low drug concentrations in biological fluids offered by advanced analytical methods, further increases the probability of observing this phenomenon.
The pharmacokinetic characteristics imparted by TMDD are now well recognized; however, systematic approaches for understanding the pharmacodynamic implications of TMDD are still in early development. For some compounds, there is an apparent disconnect between the time-course of target-occupancy and the pharmacological response [3]. Pertinent aspects of the in vivo pharmacological properties of drugs derive from the integration of PK/PD systems [6], and progress in comprehending the significance of TMDD will most likely be made through an iterative consideration of experimental data and mechanism-based modeling. This paradigm should yield opportunities for the rational design of new analogues and/or delivery systems for drugs with TMDD properties, as well as clinical dosing regimens that optimize pharmacotherapy across populations and for individual patients.
Section snippets
General pharmacological expectations
The pharmacokinetic consequences of TMDD may be subtle or pronounced, but in either case, the effects are important and it is convenient to categorize compounds based on whether or not binding to the pharmacological target significantly contributes to the elimination of the drug. Classic examples of small molecular weight compounds that demonstrate TMDD characteristics, but for which saturable elimination mechanisms are not implicated, include various angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)
PK/PD systems analysis
Noncompartmental analysis of plasma drug concentration–time data represents a useful starting point in characterizing the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs, and curve-fitting single-dose data is a common method for resolving the slopes, heights, area, and moment (SHAM) properties of such curves that are used to calculate primary pharmacokinetic parameters [21], [22]. This approach may be applied to initially identify the dose-dependent properties of TMDD. Natalizumab is a humanized mAb
Future considerations
Appreciation for TMDD properties and the pharmacodynamic implications of such systems will indubitably increase following the acquisition of much needed experimental data coupled with the continued development and refinement of mechanism-based PK/PD models of this phenomenon. Major goals continue to include the identification of drug and system specific parameters that control exposure-response relationships, as well as patient specific characteristics or covariates that account for
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Dr. William J. Jusko and Dr. Gerhard Levy for introducing him to the concepts of TMDD and pharmacodynamics, many insightful discussions, and various collaborative projects in these fields of study. The author also acknowledges Dr. Wojciech Krzyzanski for his derivation of the equilibrium model of TMDD and for his thoughtful comments and suggestions. Part of this work was supported by Grant GM57980 (to W.J.J.) from the National Institutes of Health and presented at The
References (72)
- et al.
Pharmacokinetic aspects of biotechnology products
J Pharm Sci
(2004) - et al.
Antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
J Pharm Sci
(2004) - et al.
Comparative pharmacokinetics of coumarin anticoagulants XLIX: nonlinear tissue distribution of S-warfarin in rats
J Pharm Sci
(1989) - et al.
Tissue distribution and warfarin sensitivity of Vitamin K epoxide reductase
Biochem Pharmacol
(1988) - et al.
Microsomal warfarin binding and Vitamin K 2,3-epoxide reductase
Biochem Pharmacol
(1989) - et al.
SHAM, a method for biexponential curve resolution using initial slope, height, area and moment of the experimental decay type curve
J Theor Biol
(1975) - et al.
Methotrexate pharmacokinetics
J Pharm Sci
(1971) - et al.
Comparative pharmacokinetics of coumarin anticoagulants L: Physiologic modeling of S-warfarin in rats and pharmacologic target-mediated warfarin disposition in man
J Pharm Sci
(2003) - et al.
A steady state model for analyzing the cellular binding, internalization and degradation of polypeptide ligands
Cell
(1981) - et al.
Effects of cellular pharmacology on drug distribution in tissues
Biophys J
(1995)
Lymphatic transport of proteins after subcutaneous administration
J Pharm Sci
Precursor-dependent indirect pharmacodynamic response model for tolerance and rebound phenomena
J Pharm Sci
Wavelet analysis of dynamic PET data: application to the parametric imaging of benzodiazepine receptor concentration
Neuroimage
Folate receptor-mediated drug targeting: from therapeutics to diagnostics
J Pharm Sci
Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics: experimental observations and theoretical considerations
Biopharm Drug Dispos
Nonlinear pharmacokinetics: clinical implications
Clin Pharmacokinet
Pharmacologic target-mediated drug disposition
Clin Pharmacol Ther
The integration of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: understanding dose-response
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol
Pharmacokinetics of repeated single oral doses of enalapril maleate (MK-421) in normal volunteers
Biopharm Drug Dispos
Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of the aldose reductase inhibitor imirestat in man
Pharm Res
Saturable tissue binding and imirestat pharmacokinetics in rats
Pharm Res
Pharmacokinetics of an ACE inhibitor, S-9780, in man: evidence of tissue binding
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan in healthy human subjects
Clin Pharmacol Ther
Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of selegiline and desmethylselegiline suggest saturable tissue binding
Clin Neuropharmacol
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in the development of therapeutic proteins
Clin Pharmacokinet
Close association between clearance of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and G-CSF receptor on neutrophils in cancer patients
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
Binding and internalization of recombinant human erythropoietin in murine erythroid precursor cells
Blood
Changes in erythropoietin pharmacokinetics following busulfan-induced bone marrow ablation in sheep: evidence for bone marrow as a major erythropoietin elimination pathway
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
Pharmacokinetics of murine anti-human CD3 antibodies in man are determined by the disappearance of target antigen
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
Guidelines for collection and analysis of pharmacokinetic data
Blocking adhesion molecules as therapy for multiple sclerosis: natalizumab
Nat Rev Drug Discov
A safety and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous natalizumab in patients with MS
Neurology
Noncompartmental vs. compartmental approaches to pharmacokinetic analysis
Methodological issues in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling
Clin Pharmacokinet
Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung
Biochem Z
Pharmacokinetics of capacity-limited systems
J Clin Pharmacol
Cited by (192)
Efficacy and safety of iscalimab, a novel anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, in moderate-to-severe myasthenia gravis: A phase 2 randomized study
2024, Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceSystem Analysis of Target-Mediated Drug Disposition (TMDD) Models
2022, IFAC-PapersOnLineImpact of enzyme turnover on the dynamics of the Michaelis–Menten model
2022, Mathematical BiosciencesADME of Biologicals and New Therapeutic Modalities
2022, Comprehensive PharmacologyAnalyze impact of tumor-associated kinetics on antibody delivery in solid tumors with a physiologically based pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics model
2021, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and BiopharmaceuticsCitation Excerpt :These compartments represent three tumor layers defined based on their relative access to extravasated mAb (Fig. 1B). The target-mediated binding kinetics were described separately for each tumor compartment [14,15]. The apparent extravasation flux was assumed to be the driving force for antibody delivery from tumor microvessels through the three sequentially accessible tumor compartments.