Review
Vascular and metabolic effects of treatment of combined hyperlipidemia: Focus on statins and fibrates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.04.080Get rights and content

Abstract

Combined hyperlipidemia results from overproduction of hepatically synthesized apolipoprotein B in very low-density lipoproteins in association with reduced lipoprotein lipase activity. Thus, this condition is typically characterized by concurrent elevations in total cholesterol and triglycerides with decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. High levels of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, most prominently carried by low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, are an important risk factor for coronary heart disease. Statin therapy is highly effective at lowering LDL cholesterol. Despite the benefits of statin treatment for lowering total and LDL cholesterol, many statin-treated patients still have initial or recurrent coronary heart disease events. In this regard, combined therapy with statins and fibrates is more effective in controlling atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with combined hyperlipidemia than either drug alone. Furthermore, statins and fibrates activate PPARα in a synergistic manner providing a molecular rationale for combination treatment in coronary heart disease. Endothelial dysfunction associated with cardiovascular diseases may contribute to insulin resistance so that there may also be additional beneficial metabolic effects of combined statin/fibrates therapy. However, there has been little published evidence that combined therapy is synergistic or even better than monotherapy alone in clinical studies. Therefore, there is a great need to study the effects of combination therapy in patients. When statins are combined with gemfibrozil therapy, this is more likely to be accompanied by myopathy. However, this limitation is not observed when fenofibrate, bezafibrate, or ciprofibrate are used in combination therapy.

Introduction

Combined hyperlipidemia is typically characterized by elevations in total cholesterol and triglycerides with decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. This common disorder results from overproduction of hepatically synthesized apolipoprotein B in very low-density lipoproteins. High levels of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, most prominently carried by low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, are an important risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Statin therapy is highly effective at lowering total and LDL cholesterol. Nevertheless, many statin-treated patients still have initial or recurrent CHD events even with reduction in their LDL cholesterol levels. Indeed, in intervention studies with statins, subgroup analysis of patients with varying baseline lipid levels shows that interactions between relative risk reduction and baseline triglycerides and HDL cholesterol levels are not significant when analyzed as continuous variables (by contrast with LDL cholesterol levels) [1], [2], [3].

Many studies show positive associations between serum triglycerides and CHD risk [4], [5]. Importantly, low HDL cholesterol levels predict risk for CHD independent of other prognostic factors [6], [7]. The Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial (VA-HIT) Study shows that compared with placebo, gemfibrozil therapy increases mean HDL cholesterol level by 6% and reduces the mean triglyceride level by 31% and the mean total cholesterol level by 4% in patients with CHD whose primary lipid abnormality is low HDL cholesterol level. LDL cholesterol levels do not differ significantly between the groups. Gemfibrozil therapy reduces relative risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction or death from coronary causes by 22% and the combined outcome of death from CHD, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke by 24% [8].

Several studies report that combined therapy with statins and fibrates is more effective in controlling atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with combined hyperlipidemia than either drug alone [9], [10], [11], [12]. Unfortunately, the combination of statins and the most extensively studied fibrate, gemfibrozil, is more likely to be accompanied by severe myopathy [13], [14]. This may be because gemfibrozil significantly affects the pharmacokinetic of statins resulting in increased plasma levels of statins [7], [15], [16]. Interestingly, other recent studies demonstrate that this limitation is not observed with statin and other fibrates in combination therapy [10], [11], [14], [17], [18], [19].

CHD is frequently associated with insulin resistance and disorders of metabolic homeostasis including obesity and combined hyperlipidemia. Endothelial dysfunction associated with cardiovascular diseases may contribute to insulin resistance [20], [21]. Endothelial dysfunction associated with metabolic syndrome and other insulin resistant states is characterized by impaired nitric oxide (NO) release from endothelium with decreased blood flow to insulin target tissues [22]. Insulin signaling pathways regulating glucose transport in skeletal muscle also regulate production of NO in endothelium. Pro-inflammatory signaling stimulated by glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity in dysmetabolic states contributes to shared mechanisms of insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction. The molecular and cellular mechanisms that mediate insulin resistance and endothelia dysfunction are multiple and reflect complex interactions between inflammatory and metabolic pathways [21], [23]. Interestingly, insulin-stimulated increases in blood flow account for up to 40% of the increase in insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in skeletal muscle [22]. The central role of NO in regulating the metabolic actions of insulin is evident by the presence of insulin resistance and hypertension in eNOS knockout mice [24], [25]. Thus, improvement in endothelial function is predicted to improve insulin sensitivity and this may be one mechanism by which statins and fibrates decrease the incidence of CHD.

Excess body fat is frequently associated with dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Adiponectin is one of a number of proteins secreted by adipose cells that may couple regulation of insulin sensitivity with energy metabolism and serve to link obesity with insulin resistance [26]. Decreased plasma adiponectin levels are observed in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease [27], [28]. Thus, decreased levels of adiponectin may play a key role in the development of insulin resistance. It is controversial whether statin therapy can improve or worsen insulin resistance in humans [29], [30], [31]. By contrast, fibrates improve insulin sensitivity in animal models through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α [32], [33]. Moreover, a recent clinical study reports that fenofibrate improves insulin sensitivity in patients with metabolic syndrome [34], [35]. Therefore, effects of statins, fibrates, or combination therapy to raise adiponectin levels may be an important benefit resulting from the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia.

Laboratory studies also demonstrate synergistic effects of statins combined with fibrates. Statins inhibit the Rho-signaling pathway and activate PPARα  [36] and acute anti-inflammatory properties of statins involve PPARα via inhibition of the protein kinase C signaling pathway [37]. Indeed, fibrate and statins synergistically increase the transcriptional activities of PPARα/retinoid X receptor (RXR) α and decrease the transactivation of nuclear transcription factor NF-κB [38]. Therefore, evidence that statins combined with fibrates activate PPARα in a synergistic manner provides a molecular rationale for combination treatment with statins and fibrates in CHD.

Because the mechanisms underlying the biological actions of statin and fibrate therapies are distinct, combined therapy with statins and fibrates therapies may be more effective in controlling atherogenic dyslipidemia and improving insulin sensitivity in patients with combined hyperlipidemia than either drug alone. Furthermore, there is evidence that statins combined with fibrates activate PPARα in a synergistic manner providing a better effect. In this review, we will discuss the safety and vascular and metabolic effects of statins combined with fibrates in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

Section snippets

Effects on lipoproteins and lipoprotein particles

Several studies report that combined therapy with statins and fibrates is more effective in controlling atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with combined hyperlipidemia than either drug alone (Table 1) [9], [10], [11], [12]. In one study, the effects of combined simvastatin/ciprofibrate on lipoprotein patterns were compared with each drug alone in patients with combined hyperlipidemia [9]. After a 4-week placebo period, patients were randomly assigned to receive simvastatin (20 mg daily, n = 

Metabolic effects of combined therapy

The adipocyte is an active endocrine secretory cell releasing free fatty acids and producing cytokines including TNF-α, interleukins, PAI-1, leptin, and adiponectin. Adiponectin is the most abundant adiopocytokine secreted by adipose cells that may couple regulation of insulin sensitivity with energy metabolism and serve to link obesity with insulin resistance [26]. Adiponectin stimulates production of NO [91], reduces expression of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, and decreases

Drug toxicity and interactions of combined therapy

Combination therapy increases the risk of muscle damage, with an incidence of 0.12%. Risk factors that predispose patients to myopathy caused by combination statin–fibrate therapy include increased age, female gender, renal or liver disease, diabetes, hypothyroidism, debilitated status, surgery, trauma, excessive alcohol intake, and heavy exercise. Although such a combination does increase the risk of myopathy, with an incidence of approximately 0.12%, this small risk of myopathy rarely

Clinical implications and future prospects

Statins and synthetic PPARα ligand fibrate therapies that reduce cardiovascular events in randomized clinical trials improve lipoprotein profiles, endothelium-dependent dilation, and reduce vascular inflammation, thrombus formation, and plaque rupture (Fig. 3). Distinct biological actions of statins and fibrates may improve endothelium-dependent vascular function and insulin sensitivity by different mechanisms. Experimental studies demonstrate synergistic effects of statins combined with

References (109)

  • M. Guerre-Millo et al.

    Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activators improve insulin sensitivity and reduce adiposity

    J Biol Chem

    (2000)
  • I. Inoue et al.

    Fibrate and statin synergistically increase the transcriptional activities of PPARalpha/RXRalpha and decrease the transactivation of NFkappaB

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (2002)
  • V.G. Athyros et al.

    Safety and efficacy of long-term statin–fibrate combinations in patients with refractory familial combined hyperlipidemia

    Am J Cardiol

    (1997)
  • D. Devroey et al.

    The benefit of fibrates in the treatment of ‘bad HDL-C responders to statins’

    Int J Cardiol

    (2005)
  • C. Seiler et al.

    Exercise-induced vasomotion of angiographically normal and stenotic coronary arteries improves after cholesterol-lowering drug therapy with bezafibrate

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1995)
  • K.K. Koh et al.

    Role of inflammatory markers and the metabolic syndrome: insights from therapeutic interventions

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • R. Kleemann et al.

    Evidence for anti-inflammatory activity of statins and PPARalpha activators in human C-reactive protein transgenic mice in vivo and in cultured human hepatocytes in vitro

    Blood

    (2004)
  • T.E. Strandberg et al.

    Effect of statins on C-reactive protein in patients with coronary artery disease

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • T.D. Wang et al.

    Efficacy of fenofibrate and simvastatin on endothelial function and inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: relations with baseline lipid profiles

    Atherosclerosis

    (2003)
  • J.B. Muhlestein et al.

    The reduction of inflammatory biomarkers by statin, fibrate, and combination therapy among diabetic patients with mixed dyslipidemia: the DIACOR (Diabetes and Combined Lipid Therapy Regimen) study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • K.K. Koh et al.

    Vascular effects of diet and statin in hypercholesterolemic patients

    Int J Cardiol

    (2004)
  • E. Ascer et al.

    Atorvastatin reduces proinflammatory markers in hypercholesterolemic patients

    Atherosclerosis

    (2004)
  • J.W. Son et al.

    Effects of statin on plaque stability and thrombogenicity in hypercholesterolemic patients with coronary artery disease

    Int J Cardiol

    (2003)
  • J.L. Isaacsohn et al.

    Effects of lovastatin therapy on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen levels

    Am J Cardiol

    (1994)
  • M. Davidson et al.

    Comparison of one-year efficacy and safety of atorvastatin versus lovastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia

    Am J Cardiol

    (1997)
  • P.N. Durrington et al.

    Effects of two different fibric acid derivatives on lipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer, fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor and paraoxonase activity in type IIb hyperlipoproteinaemia

    Atherosclerosis

    (1998)
  • J.L. Zambrana et al.

    Comparison of bezafibrate versus lovastatin for lowering plasma insulin, fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 concentrations in hyperlipemic heart transplant patients

    Am J Cardiol

    (1997)
  • A. Saklamaz et al.

    The beneficial effects of lipid-lowering drugs beyond lipid-lowering effects: a comparative study with pravastatin, atorvastatin, and fenofibrate in patients with type IIa and type IIb hyperlipidemia

    Metabolism

    (2005)
  • N. Marx et al.

    Macrophages in human atheroma contain PPARgamma: differentiation-dependent peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma(PPARgamma) expression and reduction of MMP-9 activity through PPARgamma activation in mononuclear phagocytes in vitro

    Am J Pathol

    (1998)
  • H. Chen et al.

    Adiponectin stimulates production of nitric oxide in vascular endothelial cells

    J Biol Chem

    (2003)
  • M.H. Gannage-Yared et al.

    Pravastatin does not affect insulin sensitivity and adipocytokines levels in healthy nondiabetic patients

    Metabolism

    (2005)
  • F.M. Sacks et al.

    Effect of pravastatin on coronary disease events in subgroups defined by coronary risk factors: the Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project

    Circulation

    (2000)
  • Influence of pravastatin and plasma lipids on clinical events in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS)

    Circulation

    (1998)
  • MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2002)
  • J.E. Hokanson et al.

    Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies

    J Cardiovasc Risk

    (1996)
  • A. Patel et al.

    Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration. On behalf of the Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration Group. Serum triglycerides as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in the Asia-Pacific region

    Circulation

    (2004)
  • W.P. Castelli et al.

    Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The Framingham Study

    JAMA

    (1986)
  • H.B. Rubins

    Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

    N Engl J Med

    (1999)
  • A.G. Kontopoulos et al.

    Effects of simvastatin and ciprofibrate alone and in combination on lipid profile, plasma fibrinogen and low density lipoprotein particle structure and distribution in patients with familial combined hyperlipidaemia and coronary artery disease

    Coron Artery Dis

    (1996)
  • V.G. Athyros et al.

    Atorvastatin and micronized fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes with combined hyperlipidemia

    Diabetes Care

    (2002)
  • A. Shek et al.

    Statin–fibrate combination therapy

    Ann Pharmacother

    (2001)
  • J.A. Staffa et al.

    Cerivastatin and reports of fatal rhabdomyolysis

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • T. Prueksaritanont et al.

    Mechanistic studies on metabolic interactions between gemfibrozil and statins

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2002)
  • W.J. Pan et al.

    Lack of a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and pravastatin in healthy volunteers

    J Clin Pharmacol

    (2000)
  • J.A. Kim et al.

    Reciprocal relationships between insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction: molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms

    Circulation

    (2006)
  • S.H. Han et al.

    Reciprocal relationships between abnormal metabolic parameters and endothelial dysfunction

    Curr Opin Lipidol

    (2007)
  • M.A. Vincent et al.

    Molecular and physiologic actions of insulin related to production of nitric oxide in vascular endothelium

    Curr Diab Rep

    (2003)
  • J. Kim et al.

    The union of vascular and metabolic actions of insulin in sickness and in health

    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol

    (2005)
  • R.R. Shankar et al.

    Mice with gene disruption of both endothelial and neuronal nitric oxide synthase exhibit insulin resistance

    Diabetes

    (2000)
  • H. Duplain et al.

    Insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase

    Circulation

    (2001)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Metabolic syndrome and its components in postmenopausal women living in southern Italy, Apulia region

      2017, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews
    • Fibrates therapy: Rational use fenofibrate 2016. Executive summary

      2016, Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis
    • Vascular and metabolic effects of omega-3 fatty acids combined with fenofibrate in patients with hypertriglyceridemia

      2016, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptors activated by fatty acids and their derivatives. PPARα mediates hypolipidemic actions of fibrates and regulates expression of key proteins involved in many stages of atherogenesis including vascular inflammation [8]. These direct vascular effects of fibrates may contribute to reduction of cardiovascular events as well as to improving regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism that help explain clinical benefits observed in large human intervention trials.

    • Fibrate therapy and flow-mediated dilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials

      2016, Pharmacological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, PPARα agonists reduce the release of matrix metalloproteinases by monocyte/macrophages [48]. Direct anti-atherogenic actions of PPARα agonists at the vascular wall [49] seem to be mediated by a reduction in the expression of inflammatory genes regulated by NF-κB [50⿿52]. Finally, treatment with fibrates can improve FMD via regulating the balance between vasodilation and vasoconstriction.

    • Part IV. Non-lipid effects of fenofibrate therapy

      2016, Clinica e Investigacion en Arteriosclerosis
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text