Elsevier

Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Volume 115, Issue 3, 12 February 2008, Pages 483-488
Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Pharmacokinetic comparisons of schizandrin after oral administration of schizandrin monomer, Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract and Sheng-Mai-San to rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.10.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Sheng-Mai-San (SMS) is a famous traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) recipe, containing Radix Ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Mey., Araliaceae), Radix Ophiopogonis (Ophiopogon japonicus (Thunb.) Ker-Gawl., Liliaceae) and Fructus Schisandrae (Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill., Magnoliaceae), and has been used more than one thousand years. In this research, pharmacokinetics of one component of this TCM recipe was studied. Schizandrin is the main absorbed effective ingredient of Fructus Schisandrae and its pharmacokinetics were studied following oral administration of pure schizandrin, Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract, and SMS decoction in rats with approximately the same dose of 5 mg/kg. At different time points (0, 0.083, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h) after administration, the concentrations of schizandrin in rat plasma were determined by LC–MS, and main pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. It was found that both AUC0-tn and T1/2 of schizandrin in Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract and in SMS decoction were increased significantly (p < 0.05) comparing with that in monomer. The content assay also revealed that the concentrations of lignans would increase when SMS decocting, comparing with Fructus Schisandrae. These results indicate that some ingredients in SMS may increase the dissolution of schizandrin when decocting in vitro, and delay its elimination and enhance its bioavailability in rat.

Introduction

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which uses natural therapeutic agents under the guidance of the theory of traditional Chinese medical science and has been applied by TCM practitioners for years, attracts extra attention in recent years. Studies on standardizations of compound prescriptions are essential, and pharmacokinetics is usually considered as one of the limited points in this process. Because of the complexity of chemicals and unknown effective ingredients in compound prescriptions, pharmacokinetic studies of TCM are faced with many difficulties. However, there were more and more reports on that appeared lately. Most of the published reports selected one or several representative compounds as the targets to investigate the pharmacokinetics of the whole prescription (Rath et al., 2004, Liao et al., 2005) and elucidate the mechanism of compatibility of compound recipe through pharmacokinetic processes. Several papers focused on how the individual component in the compound prescription interact with other ingredients (Zuo et al., 2003, Bochu et al., 2005, Di et al., 2006, Lu et al., 2007).

Sheng-Mai-San (SMS), a traditional Chinese formula containing Radix Ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Mey., Araliaceae), Radix Ophiopogonis (Ophiopogon japonicus (Thunb.) Ker-Gawl., Liliaceae) and Fructus Schisandrae (Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill., Magnoliaceae), is officially recorded in Chinese Pharmacopoeia (State Pharmacopoeia Committee, 2005). It has long been used for the treatment of loss of essence-energy and excessive body fluid, and is especially prescribed for coronary artery disease in China (Wang et al., 2002). Fructus Schisandrae is called in mandarin “wu-wei-zi”, in Japanese “Gomishi” and in Korean “Omicha”. It is always used as an antihepatotoxic, antioxidative, detoxical, antiasthmatic, anticarcinogenic, antidiabetic, sedative and tonic agent, and lignans are usually considered as the main pharmacological effective compounds (Wagner and Bauer, 1996, Hancke et al., 1999) in it. Among them, schizandrin has been used as a phytochemical marker for the quality control of Fructus Schisandrae in Chinese Pharmacopoeia.

Pharmacokinetic studies on lignans, such as schizandrin (Cui and Wang, 1992, Ikeya et al., 1995, Ono et al., 1995, Xu et al., 2005, Xu et al., 2007), γ-schizandrin (Gu et al., 2001, Wang et al., 2004a, Wang et al., 2004b) and gomisin A (Matsuzaki et al., 1991) in some prescriptions, have been carried out. However, the pharmacokinetic influence of other herbs on them in Fructus Schisandrae (herb–herb interaction) was seldom reported. The pharmacokinetic effect of the combination with Radix Salvia Miltiorrhizae (Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge., Labiate) on lignans (Wang et al., 2004a, Wang et al., 2004b) was studied and the result indicated that metabolic rates of schizandrin and γ-schizandrin in mouse were lower than that of non-combination. The aim of this research is to study the possible pharmacokinetic differences of the compounds after oral administration of monomer, Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract and SMS decoction to rats and explore whether there are some herb-herb interactions on lignans in SMS by determining the absorbed lignans in SMS decoction.

Section snippets

Materials

Radix Ginseng, Radix Ophiopogonis and Fructus Schisandrae were kindly provided by Professor Dan-Ni Zhu (Department of Chinese Prescription, China Pharmaceutical University), and authenticated by Dr. Qiang Wang (Department of Pharmacognosy, China Pharmaceutical University). Schizandrin (purity > 98.0%) was bought from China Chendu Scholar Bio-Tech. Co. Ltd. Bifendate (DDB, internal standard), deoxyschizandrin and γ-schizandrin (Fig. 1) were purchased from the NICPBP (National Institute for the

Content of the main lignans in Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract and SMS decoction

The contents of schizandrin, deoxyschizandrin and γ-schizandrin in Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract and SMS decoction were given in Table 2. It was indicated that the contents of the three lignan compounds in SMS decoction were all about double as much as in Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract.

The absorbed components of Fructus Schisandrae in rats

As shown in Fig. 2, schizandrin, the retention time of which was 8 min, was an ingredient that newly appeared in the concentrated rat plasma after administering of Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract or

Discussion

To study the pharmacokinetics of the main effective ingredients of Fructus Schisandrae in SMS, the contents of them in Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract and its compound preparation were assayed first. Schizandrin, deoxyschizandrin and γ-schizandrin were the three main lignans in Fructus Schisandrae. After comparing their contents in the two decoction, it was found that the concentrations of them in SMS decoction were all about double as much as in Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract,

Conclusions

The result obtained from this study suggested that some ingredients in Radix Ginseng and Radix Ophiopogonis could increase the dissolution of schizandrin and other lignans when decocting, which leading to a higher content of lignans in decoction when used the same quantity of Fructus Schisandrae. Schizandrin was the main absorbed lignan compound of Fructus Schisandrae in rat plasma, and the differences of its pharmacokinetics between pure schizandrin, Fructus Schisandrae aqueous extract and SMS

Acknowledgements

This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China (No. 30572228, 30630076), the “Eleventh-five Years” Supporting Programs from the Ministry of Science and Technology of P.R. China (2006BAI08B04-05), Jiangsu International Cooperation Fund (BZ2004042), and Jiangsu Nature Science Fund (BK2005098, BK2006152).

References (26)

  • Z.G. Li et al.

    Determination of schizandrin, deoxyschizandrin and γ-schizandrin in Jiangmeiling capsules by HPLC

    Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine

    (2004)
  • Q.F. Liao et al.

    LC–MS determination and pharmacokinetic studies of Ursolic acid in rat plasma after administration of the traditional Chinese medicine preparation Lu-Ying extract

    Yakugaku Zasshi

    (2005)
  • Y.R. Lu et al.

    Studies on changes of chmical constituents of Radix Sophorae Flavescentis in complex formulas of traditional Chinese medicine

    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi

    (1996)
  • Cited by (83)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text