Elsevier

NeuroToxicology

Volume 25, Issue 6, December 2004, Pages 905-914
NeuroToxicology

The Neurotoxic Effects of 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and Methamphetamine on Serotonin, Dopamine, and GABA-ergic Terminals: An In-Vitro Autoradiographic Study In Rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2004.06.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Damage to serotonin (5-HT) terminals following doses of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is well documented, and this toxicity is thought to be related to dopamine release that is potentiated by the 5-HT2A/2C agonist effects of the drug [Neurotoxicology 19 (3) (1998) 427]. Although MDMA and methamphetamine (METH) have some similar dopaminergic activities, they differ in their 5-HT agonistic properties. It is reasoned that the study of the resultant toxicity following equimolar doses of MDMA and METH on both dopamine and 5-HT terminals should offer a comparison of the ability of these drugs to induce neurotoxicity. In order to measure the toxic effects to the brain, rats were given equimolar doses of MDMA (40 mg/kg/day) and METH (32 mg/kg/day) in subcutaneously implanted osmotic minipumps for a period of 5 days, and in-vitro autoradiography using [3H]-paroxetine, [3H]-mazindol, [3H]-methylspiperone, and [3H]-flunitrazepam, was performed on brain sections. The results showed that METH was more toxic to 5-HT terminals than MDMA in forebrain regions, including the anterior cingulate, caudate nucleus, nucleus accumbens, and septum. METH was also more toxic than MDMA to dopamine terminals in the habenula, and posterior retrosplenial cortex. Therefore, we find that METH was more toxic to 5-HT and dopamine terminals in specific brain regions in both pre and post-synaptic sites following continuous equimolar dosing.

Section snippets

INTRODUCTION

The abuse of the popular “rave” drug 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is at an all time high (Yacoubian et al., 2003) and there is much debate concerning the neurotoxic effects of this phenethylamine. Because the chemical structures and pharmacological properties of MDMA and methamphetamine (METH) share some similarities, a comparison of the drugs neurotoxic abilities can yield further understanding of the danger involved in taking these compounds. Moreover, researching the toxic

METHODS

Female Sprague–Dawley rats bred at UCLA weighing between 212 and 264 g were individually housed, maintained on a reverse 12 h cycle, and had food and water available ad-libitum. Animals were randomly separated into either control (n = 8), MDMA (n = 8), or METH-treated groups (n = 7), were anesthetized with halothane, had Alzet osmotic minipumps (Alza Corp.) model 2mL1 surgically implanted sub-cutaneously, and had the incision closed with wound clips. The minipumps were filled with (±)-MDMA HCl in

[3H]-Paroxetine

A two-way RM ANOVA showed that there were significant differences between the drug-treated groups, F(2, 196) = 61.3, P < 0.0001, and brain regions, F(14, 196) = 13.28, P < 0.0001, and that there was a significant interaction between them, F(28, 196) = 3.43, P < 0.0001. All brain regions with the exception of the median raphe showed significantly different amounts of binding between the drug-treated, and control groups (see Fig. 1). There were differing amounts of binding in the median raphe

DISCUSSION

The METH-treated animals appeared to have more damage to presynaptic 5-HT terminals in the frontal area of the brain than the MDMA-treated animals, as evidenced by decreased [3H]-paroxetine binding. It has been shown that MDMA damages the fine axons emanating from the dorsal, but not the large thicker beaded axons emanating from the median raphe, which may account for the differences seen here (Callahan et al., 2001, Molliver et al., 1990). It may be that the sites measured in the rostral

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of studies on MDMA have shown degeneration in the neocortex, striatum, and hippocampus (Commins et al., 1986, O’Hearn et al., 1988). These areas, as well as a multitude of other brain regions, were examined in a systematic rostral to caudal fashion in MDMA and METH-treated animals. It was found that forebrain areas including the anterior cingulate, caudate, nucleus accumbens, and hippocampus may be more susceptible to the toxic effects of these drugs. Moreover, METH treatment

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Gaylord Ellison for his generosity in support of this study. Research sponsored by NIDA Grant DA 07344.

All experiments performed in concordance with The University of California at Los Angeles Animal Research Committee.

References (42)

  • Azmitia EC. Nimodipine attenuated NMDA- and MDMA-induced toxicity of fetal serotonergic neuron: evidence for a generic...
  • G.S. Battaglia et al.

    3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine destroys serotonin terminals in rat brain: quantification of neurodegeneration by measurement of [3H]-paroxetine-labeled serotonin uptake sites

    J Pharm Exp Ther

    (1987)
  • B.T. Callahan et al.

    Long-term impairment of anterograde axonal transport along fiber projections originating in the rostral raphe nuclei after treatment with fenfluramine or methylenedioxymethamphetamine

    Synapse

    (2001)
  • A.K. Cho et al.

    Stereochemical differences in the metabolism of MDMA in vivo and in vitro: a pharmakokinetic analysis

    Drug Metabol Dispos

    (1990)
  • A.K. Cho et al.

    Relevance of pharmacokinetic parameters in animal models of methamphetamine abuse

    Synapse

    (2001)
  • M.I. Colado et al.

    The hyperthermic and neurotoxic effects of MDMA and MDA in the dark agouti rat: a model of the CYP2D6 poor metabolizers phenotype

    Br. J Pharm

    (1995)
  • D.L. Commins et al.

    Biochemical and histological evidence that methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is toxic to neurons in the rat brain

    J Pharm Exp Ther

    (1986)
  • I. DeSouza et al.

    An appraisal of the pharmacological and toxicological effects of a single oral administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in the rat

    Pharm Toxicol

    (1996)
  • G. Ellison et al.

    Long-term changes in brain following continuous phencyclidine administration: an autoradiographic study using flunitrazepam, ketanserin, mazindol, quinuclidinyl benzilate, piperidyl-3,4-3H (N)-TCP, and AMPA receptor ligands

    Pharmacol Toxicol

    (1999)
  • R.M. Faccioso et al.

    Dimorphic features of the different (-containing GABA-A receptor subtypes in the cortico-basal ganglia system of two distantly related mammals (hedgehog and rat)

    Exp Brain Res

    (2000)
  • G.A. Gudelsky et al.

    Neuropharmacology and neurotoxicity of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine

    Methods Mol Med

    (2003)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Neurotoxicity of methamphetamine: Main effects and mechanisms

      2021, Experimental Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Large doses of METH also negatively impact serotonerigc systems in the dorsal striatum where striatal serotonin (5-HT) levels (Fukumura et al., 1998: Armstrong and Noguchi, 2004) and tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) activity (Bakhit et al., 1981; Bakhit and Gibb, 1981) are reduced after injections of the drug. METH-induced abnormalities in 5-HT have also been reported in the nucleus accumbens (Nac), cortex, hippocampus, and hypothalamus (Hotchkiss and Gibb, 1980; Bakhit et al., 1981; Bakhit and Gibb, 1981; Baldwin et al., 1993; Armstrong and Noguchi, 2004). A very recent paper by Schweppe et al. (2020) reported that rats challenged with toxic doses of METH showed reduction in striatal and hippocampal DA, 5-HT, brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and TrkB even as long as 75 days after the drug injections.

    • Effects of methamphetamine exposure on anxiety-like behavior in the open field test, corticosterone, and hippocampal tyrosine hydroxylase in adolescent and adult mice

      2018, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, MA infusions directly into the hippocampus result in increased MA seeking behavior and self-administration, and these responses are blocked by DA D1/D5 receptor antagonists in the hippocampus [31]. There is evidence in humans that MA use affects the hippocampus [8] and MA induces long-term reductions in DA transporter levels in the hippocampus in rats [32]. The hippocampal DA system also modulates anxiety-like behavior [33].

    • Neurotransmitter Receptors

      2018, Comprehensive Toxicology: Third Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Tel.: +1-314-362-2483.

    View full text