Elsevier

Toxicology

Volume 254, Issue 3, 30 December 2008, Pages 184-191
Toxicology

Review
Induction of drug metabolism: Species differences and toxicological relevance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.002Get rights and content

Abstract

A large number of drugs and other chemicals have been shown to induce hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) forms in experimental animals and humans. Most CYP forms are induced by receptor-mediated mechanisms leading to an increase in gene transcription. Important nuclear receptors involved in the induction of CYP1A, CYP2B, CYP3A and CYP4A subfamily forms comprise, respectively, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, the constitutive androstane receptor, the pregnane X receptor and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. Hepatic CYP form induction can be assessed by in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro methods. Significant species differences can exist in the enzyme induction response to a given chemical and also in the toxicological consequences of induction. Hepatic CYP form induction in humans may lead to clinically important drug–drug interactions. In rodents hepatic CYP form induction can be associated with the formation of tumours by non-genotoxic modes of action in the liver, thyroid and other tissues.

Introduction

Enzyme induction is a process in which a chemical (e.g. a drug) induces (i.e. initiates or enhances) the expression of an enzyme. Mammalian cytochrome P450 (CYP) forms have a major role in the oxidative metabolism of drugs, other xenobiotics and certain endogenous compounds (Ioannides, 2008, Parkinson, 2001). CYP-dependent enzyme activities can be either induced or inhibited by a variety of chemicals including some therapeutic agents (Dickins, 2004, Lin, 2006, Pelkonen et al., 1998).

The concept of induction of hepatic drug and xenobiotic metabolising enzymes has been known for many years. Early examples of known inducers include phenobarbitone (phenobarbital) and other drugs, pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Conney, 1967, Parke, 1968). It is now well established that hepatic xenobiotic metabolising enzymes in both experimental animals and humans can be induced by a wide range of therapeutic agents, pesticides, food additives, industrial chemicals, natural products and environmental pollutants (Conney, 1986, Okey, 1990, Pelkonen et al., 1998). Moreover, hepatic xenobiotic metabolising enzymes can also be stimulated by cigarette smoking, alcohol intake and by dietary factors including consumption of a high protein/low carbohydrate diet, barbecued meat, cruciferous vegetables and herbal preparations such as St. John’s Wort (Hewitt et al., 2007a, Parkinson, 2001, Pelkonen et al., 1998, Verhoeven et al., 1997).

This review will consider hepatic CYP forms, mechanisms of induction of CYP forms, methods to assess CYP form induction and species differences in response. The consequences of CYP form induction with respect to drug–drug interactions in humans and liver and thyroid tumour formation in experimental animals will be described.

Section snippets

Hepatic CYP forms

Mammalian hepatic CYP forms are found in the mitochondria (involved in steroid hormone biosynthesis and vitamin D metabolism) and in the endoplasmic reticulum (Parkinson, 2001). Hepatic CYP forms involved in the metabolism of therapeutic agents and other chemicals are primarily localised in the endoplasmic reticulum and following homogenisation of the liver and differential centrifugation of the liver whole homogenate, are recovered in the microsomal fraction. In human liver microsomal CYP

Mechanisms of induction of hepatic CYP forms

Most CYP forms are induced by receptor-mediated mechanisms leading to an increase in gene transcription (Dickins, 2004, Lin, 2006, Ma, 2008). Important nuclear receptors involved in the induction of CYP1A, CYP2B, CYP3A and CYP4A subfamily forms comprise, respectively, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), the pregnane X receptor (PXR) and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα). The AhR is a member of the Per-Arnt Sim (PAS) family

Methods to assess induction of hepatic CYP forms

As described in Section 5, species differences can exist between the effects of CYP form inducers in rodents and humans. Hence, while a rodent CYP form inducer may also have the potential to induce CYP forms in human liver this will need to be confirmed by studies with human systems. Should a compound be a potent inducer of hepatic CYP2B or CYP4A forms in rodents, this may result in tumour formation in bioassay studies (see Section 7).

Hepatic CYP induction in experimental animals can be

Species differences in hepatic CYP form induction

Although the induction of hepatic CYP forms observed in rodent safety evaluation studies may indicate a potential for induction of CYP forms in human liver, significant species differences in the induction of hepatic CYP forms have been reported (Dickins, 2004, Hewitt et al., 2007a, Hewitt et al., 2007b, Lin, 2006). Moreover, the transcription factors described above are known to be the molecular basis of such species differences. For example, the observed species differences between both CAR

Clinical consequences of hepatic CYP form induction

Therapeutic agents which produce hepatic CYP induction may stimulate their own metabolism by autoinduction. For compounds active in their parent form induction may increase elimination and hence reduce the desired pharmacological effect, whereas for prodrugs enhanced formation of the active metabolite(s) may result in an increased pharmacological effect.

An important consequence of drug–drug interactions is where one drug produces induction which results in the enhanced metabolism of a

Formation of tumours in rodents by CYP form inducers

The induction of hepatic microsomal CYP forms in rodents (i.e. rats and mice) by non-genotoxic NCEs can be associated in chronic studies with the formation of tumours in the liver and other tissues. For example, CYP2B inducers can produce liver and thyroid tumours and CYP4A inducers liver, pancreas and testis tumours (Holsapple et al., 2006, Klaunig et al., 2003, Meek et al., 2003). Hepatic CYP form induction in rodent liver should thus be considered part of a pleiotropic response to the

Conflict of interest

There are no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Gordon G. Gibson, who was a valued colleague of both authors and who died shortly after the British Toxicology Society (BTS) meeting at which this paper was presented. Gordon Gibson will be remembered for his eminent work on the application of molecular biology techniques to the study of the metabolism and toxicity of xenobiotics. Along with Professor Peter Goldfarb he set up the first molecular toxicology group in the UK at the University of

References (90)

  • B.G. Lake et al.

    Species differences in hepatic peroxisome proliferation, cell replication and transforming growth factor β1 gene expression in the rat, Syrian hamster and guinea pig

    Mutat. Res.

    (2000)
  • E.L. LeCluyse

    Human hepatocyte culture systems for the in vitro evaluation of cytochrome P450 expression and regulation

    Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2001)
  • P. Maurel

    The use of adult human hepatocytes in primary culture and other in vitro systems to investigate drug metabolism in man

    Adv. Drug Del. Rev.

    (1996)
  • J.T. Moore et al.

    Functional and structural comparison of PXR and CAR

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2003)
  • L.B. Moore et al.

    Orphan nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor share xenobiotic and steroid ligands

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • A.B. Okey

    Enzyme induction in the cytochrome P-450 system

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (1990)
  • A. Parkinson et al.

    The effects of gender, age, ethnicity, and liver cirrhosis on cytochrome P450 enzyme activity in human liver microsomes and inducibility in cultured human hepatocytes

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (2004)
  • V.O. Pustylnyak et al.

    Comparative study of CYP2B induction in the liver of rats and mice by different compounds

    Life Sci.

    (2007)
  • L. Richert et al.

    Effects of clofibric acid on mRNA expression profiles in primary cultures of rat, mouse and human hepatocytes

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (2003)
  • D.-Y. Ryu et al.

    Regulation of hepatic CYP1A isozymes by piperonyl butoxide and acenaphthylene in the mouse

    Chem. -Biol. Interact.

    (1997)
  • D.T.H. Verhoeven et al.

    A review of mechanisms underlying anticarcinogenicity by brassica vegetables

    Chem. -Biol. Interact.

    (1997)
  • J. Whysner et al.

    Phenobarbital mechanistic data and risk assessment: enzyme induction, enhanced cell proliferation, and tumor promotion

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (1996)
  • L. Xu et al.

    2,3,7,8,Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin induction of cytochrome P4501A in cultured rat and human hepatocytes

    Chem. Biol. Interact.

    (2000)
  • T.K. Baker et al.

    Modulation of gap junctional intercellular communication in rodent, monkey and human hepatocyte by nongenotoxic compounds

    Prog. Clin. Biol. Res.

    (1995)
  • A.R. Boobis et al.

    IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a cancer mode of action for humans

    Crit. Rev. Toxicol.

    (2006)
  • C.C. Capen

    Toxic responses of the endocrine system

  • C. Cheung et al.

    Diminished hepatocellular proliferation in mice humanized for the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α

    Cancer Res.

    (2004)
  • A.H. Conney

    Pharmacological implications of microsomal enzyme induction

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (1967)
  • S. Coecke et al.

    The use of long-term hepatocyte cultures for detecting induction of drug metabolising enzymes: the current status. ECVAM Hepatocytes and Metabolically Competent Systems Task Force Report 1

    ATLA

    (1999)
  • S.M. Cohen et al.

    Evaluating the human relevance of chemically induced animal tumors

    Toxicol. Sci.

    (2004)
  • S.M. Cohen et al.

    The human relevance of information on carcinogenic modes of action: overview

    Crit. Rev. Toxicol.

    (2003)
  • P.G. Curran et al.

    The effect of hepatic enzyme-inducing drugs on thyroid hormones and the thyroid gland

    Endocr. Rev.

    (1991)
  • M. Degawa et al.

    Species differences among experimental rodents in induction of P450IA family enzymes by 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine

    Jpn. J. Cancer Res.

    (1992)
  • M. Dickins

    Induction of cytochromes P450

    Curr. Top. Med. Chem.

    (2004)
  • B.A. Diwan et al.

    Enhancement of thyroid and hepatocarcinogenesis by 1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene in rats at doses that cause maximal induction of CYP2B

    Carcinogenesis

    (1996)
  • R.J. Edwards et al.

    Induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes in cultured precision-cut human liver slices

    Drug Metab. Dispos.

    (2003)
  • W. El-Sankary et al.

    Use of a reporter gene assay to predict and rank the potency and efficacy of CYP3A4 inducers

    Drug Metab. Dispos.

    (2001)
  • S. Gerbal-Chaloin et al.

    Induction of CYP2C genes in human hepatocytes in primary culture

    Drug Metab. Dispos.

    (2001)
  • G.G. Gibson et al.

    Cytochrome P-450 induced by clofibrate. Purification and properties of a hepatic cytochrome P-450 relatively specific for the 12- and 11-hydroxylation of dodecanoic acid (lauric acid)

    Biochem. J.

    (1982)
  • R.A. Graham et al.

    Cloning, tissue expression, and regulation of Beagle dog CYP4A genes

    Toxicol. Sci.

    (2006)
  • T. Hays et al.

    Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) in bezafibrate-induced hepatocarcinogenesis and cholestasis

    Carcinogenesis

    (2005)
  • N.J. Hewitt et al.

    Induction of hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes: methods, mechanisms, recommendations, and in vitroin vivo correlations

    Xenobiotica

    (2007)
  • N.J. Hewitt et al.

    Primary hepatocytes: current understanding of the regulation of metabolic enzymes and transporter proteins, and pharmaceutical practice for the use of hepatocytes in metabolism, enzyme induction, transporter, clearance, and hepatotoxicity studies

    Drug Metab. Rev.

    (2007)
  • R.N. Hill et al.

    Risk assessment of thyroid follicular cell tumors

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (1998)
  • M.P. Holsapple et al.

    Mode of action in relevance of rodent liver tumors to human cancer risk

    Toxicol. Sci.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (119)

    • Quantitative protein profiling of phenobarbital-induced drug metabolizing enzymes in rat liver by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples

      2021, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Phenobarbital induces phase I DMEs by activating nuclear receptors, constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), and pregnancy X receptor (PXR). While there is cross-talk between nuclear receptor functions, Cyp2b and Cyp3a forms are known to be induced by CAR and PXR, respectively (Graham & Lake, 2008). The present protein expression data also indicated prominent induction of Cyp2b2 and Cyp3a1.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text