Elsevier

Toxicology

Volume 313, Issues 2–3, 16 November 2013, Pages 73-82
Toxicology

Tools and perspectives for assessing chemical mixtures and multiple stressors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2012.11.009Get rights and content

Abstract

The present paper summarizes the most important insights and findings of the EU NoMiracle project with a focus on (1) risk assessment of chemical mixtures, (2) combinations of chemical and natural stressors, and (3) the receptor-oriented approach in cumulative risk assessment. The project aimed at integration of methods for human and ecological risk assessment. A mechanistically based model, considering uptake and toxicity as a processes in time, has demonstrated considerable potential for predicting mixture effects in ecotoxicology, but requires the measurement of toxicity endpoints at different moments in time. Within a novel framework for risk assessment of chemical mixtures, the importance of environmental factors on toxicokinetic processes is highlighted. A new paradigm for applying personal characteristics that determine individual exposure and sensitivity in human risk assessment is suggested. The results are discussed in the light of recent developments in risk assessment of mixtures and multiple stressors.

Introduction

Chemical risk assessment has traditionally focused on single stressors. This can partly be explained by the fact that the acute pollution problems of the 20th century were caused by a limited number of chemicals that were emitted in relatively large quantities by a limited number of well-defined sources. Consequently, risk assessments focused on particular substances or sources. The main questions addressed were “Can this substance cause adverse effects?” or “Can this production plant cause adverse effects?” These assessments typically try to capture the chain of events that starts with the emission of a substance into the environment and ends with the emergence of adverse health effects. This approach has been very effective in reducing environmental problems that are caused by single stressors and/or sources, e.g. lead, asbestos and chlorinated insecticides.

Now the overt pollution problems have largely been solved, awareness is growing that exposure to single chemicals is the exception rather than the rule. In everyday life, humans and other living organisms are rarely exposed to single stressors, but to a mixture of different stressors; either concurrently, sequentially, or both. Although researchers and risk assessors have always recognized the need to address this problem, progress has been slow because of lacking knowledge, experimental limitations, and scarce funding (Callahan and Sexton, 2007).

One of the reasons for the growing interest in mixtures and cumulative risks is that some health problems are on the rise without an obvious explanation. It is estimated that 7.4% of the married women in the USA between 15 and 44 years of age are infertile (Chandra et al., 2005). The diagnoses of autism, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders (ADD and ADHD) and the prevalence of childhood brain cancer and acute lymphocytic leukemia have all increased over the past 30 years (Jahnke et al., 2005, Trasande and Landrigan, 2004). Air pollution and early life exposure to environmental pollutants are commonly cited as possible causes. Furthermore, a range of health issues is suspected to be related to cumulative stress. For example, neuro-developmental disorders can be caused by heavy metals, dioxins, PCBs and pesticides (Brent, 2004); childhood cancer could be related to a number of physical, chemical and biological agents (e.g. parental tobacco smoke, parental occupational exposure to solvents; Trasande and Landrigan, 2004). As a consequence, several national and international institutions have recognized the need to evaluate risks from mixtures and multiple stressors (NRC, 1994, PCCRARM, 1997, Mileson et al., 1999, US EPA, 2000, US EPA, 2003, ATSDR, 2004, WHO, 2009, European Scientific Committees, 2011).

Cumulative risk assessment can be defined as “an analysis, characterization, and possible quantification of the combined risks to health or the environment from multiple agents or stressors” (US EPA, 2003). The conventional methods for risk assessment of single stressors need to be adapted and extended to deal with the specific challenges posed by mixtures and multiple stressors. This requires new knowledge, e.g. about the complex exposure patterns of individuals and populations, and about the potential interactions between stressors. Novel exposure tools are required that focus on the exposed individual or population, instead of the traditional tools that focus on single substances or pollution sources (Loos et al., 2010a). Measurement data on exposures to mixtures and multiple stressors need to be combined with data on the prevalence of adverse health effects in populations and ecosystems in order to identify potential causal relationships (Rappaport, 2011). Furthermore, methods are needed to predict the effects of concurrent or sequential exposures to mixtures and multiple stressors, preferably based on data from single compounds because these are widely available. We need to understand how and why stressors interact because it is not feasible to test all possible combinations of stressors in the laboratory. Those tests that are necessary need to be performed according to intelligent testing strategies to optimize the use of resources and limit the use of laboratory animals. Collaboration between human and ecological experts in toxicology and risk assessment is desirable because both fields struggle with similar issues and can benefit from each other's strengths (Ragas et al., 2011a). In addition to interactions between chemicals, there are possible interactions with other stressors, such as climate variables (Schlink et al., 2002, Leitte et al., 2009), which need to be addressed.

In November 2004, the EU research project NoMiracle was launched (http://www.nomiracle.jrc.ec.europa.eu). The main aim of the project was to gather new knowledge for the improvement of current risk assessment methods and the development of novel methods for cumulative risk assessment. The work was conducted until 30 October 2009. Thirty eight institutions from 17 European countries participated in the project. The consortium consisted of scientists with expertise in human toxicology, epidemiology, aquatic and terrestrial ecotoxicology, risk assessment, environmental chemistry, biochemistry, toxicogenomics, physics, mathematical modeling, geographical informatics, and social and economic sciences. Box 1 shows the main goals of the NoMiracle project. The themes of NoMiracle were rather broad, allowing for interdisciplinary collaboration.

The project resulted in more than 200 scientific reports and 200 peer-reviewed papers covering a large diversity of topics such as the identification of exposure scenarios, sorption behavior of substances, environmental degradation, analytical methods, fate modeling, toxicokinetics, mixture toxicity, effects of multiple stressors, in vitro test systems, probabilistic risk assessment methods, exposure modeling, risk perception and risk visualization. Six open international workshops and conferences were held. An international workshop on mixture toxicity was organized together with the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) and resulted in a book on mixture toxicity (Van Gestel et al., 2010). The main results of the NoMiracle project were published as a special issue of Science of the Total Environment (Løkke et al., 2010). The new methods and models that were developed are publicly available in the NoMiracle Tool Box (http://www.nomiracle.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Lists/Toolbox/).

The present paper summarizes the most important insights and findings of the EU NoMiracle project within three major fields of the project, namely: (1) risk assessment of chemical mixtures, (2) combinations of chemical and natural stressors, and (3) the receptor-oriented approach in cumulative risk assessment. The results of the NoMiracle project are discussed in the light of recent developments in risk assessment of mixtures and multiple stressors. The paper concludes with an outlook for the future and a number of research and policy recommendations.

Section snippets

Mixture experiments

The NoMiracle consortium set up a series of (eco)toxicity tests with chemical mixtures. The chemicals were taken from a priority list that focused on metals, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and specifically acting pesticides (e.g. organophosphate and neonicotinamide pesticides). Species used for testing included the Vibrio fischeri Microtox™ system, Tubifex tubifex, chironomidae, Danio rerio, Daphnia magna, Mytilus galloprovincialis, Lumbricus rubellus, Folsomia candida, Caenorhabditis elegans

Combinations of chemical and natural stressors

In real-world environments it is not unusual for organisms and humans to be exposed to several stressful factors of natural origin besides those of polluting chemicals. These natural factors may in aquatic ecosystems include anoxia and pH changes which have serious consequences for many species (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). In the terrestrial environment extreme climatic conditions, such as heat waves, drought, flooding or extreme cold are also important stressors. With current concerns over

The receptor-oriented approach

Risk management aims to control events that can result in adverse effects in humans or ecosystems. In the case of single chemicals, these events can be presented by a single chain, starting with the production and emission of the chemical of concern and ending with the adverse effects (Fig. 3). When the relationships between the links of the chain are known, data and measures relating to one link can be translated relatively easily into implications for other links. This explains why

Discussion

The NoMiracle project covered a broad field. In this review we have focused on three important topics for the assessment of risks associated with multiple stressors, namely the need for novel tools for (1) risk assessment of chemical mixtures, (2) combinations of chemical and natural stressors, and (3) the receptor-oriented approach in cumulative risk assessment.

Within the risk assessment of chemical mixtures, there is much discussion on the occurrence and frequency of nonadditive effects,

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding source

EU FP6 integrated project NoMiracle Contract No. 003956.

Acknowledgements

The studies were supported by the EU 6th Framework program for Research and Technological Development under the Integrated Project NoMiracle (Novel Methods for Integrated Risk assessment of Cumulative Stressors in Europe; http://nomiracle.jrc.it), Contract No. 003956.

References (106)

  • M. Faust et al.

    Predicting the joint algal toxicity of multi-component s-triazine mixtures at low-effect concentrations of individual toxicants

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2001)
  • M. Faust et al.

    Joint algal toxicity of 16 dissimilarly acting chemicals is predictable by the concept of independent action

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2003)
  • K.V. Fisker et al.

    No costs on freeze tolerance in genetically copper adapted earthworm populations (Dendrobaena octaedra)

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C: Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol.

    (2011)
  • J. Gomezeyles et al.

    The measurement and modelling of mixture toxicity of imidacloprid and thiacloprid on the soil dwelling nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and the earthworm Eisenia fetida

    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

    (2009)
  • D. Hering et al.

    The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2010)
  • M. Holmstrup et al.

    Interactions between effects of environmental chemicals and natural stressors: a review

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2010)
  • K. Jørgensen et al.

    The effects of density-fluctuations on the partitioning of foreign molecules into lipid bilayers – application to anesthetics and insecticides

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1991)
  • R. Laskowski et al.

    Interactions between toxic chemicals and natural environmental factors – a meta-analysis and case studies

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2010)
  • A.M. Leitte et al.

    Respiratory health, effects of ambient air pollution and its modification by air humidity in Drobeta-Turnu Severin, Romania

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2009)
  • M. Loos et al.

    Eco-SpaCE: an object-oriented, spatially explicit model to assess the risk of multiple environmental stressors on terrestrial vertebrate populations

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2010)
  • M. Loos et al.

    Receptor-oriented approaches in wildlife and human exposure modelling: a comparative study

    Environ. Modell. Softw.

    (2010)
  • O.A. Ogunbayo et al.

    The interaction of the brominated flame retardant: tetrabromobisphenol A with phospholipid membranes

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2007)
  • G.J. Oostingh et al.

    A high-throughput screening method based on stably transformed human cells was used to determine the immunotoxic effects of fluoranthene and other PAHs

    Toxicol. In Vitro

    (2008)
  • A.M.J. Ragas et al.

    Cumulative risk assessment of chemical exposures in urban environments

    Environ. Int.

    (2011)
  • C. Röder-Stolinski et al.

    Styrene induces an inflammatory response in human lung epithelial cells via oxidative stress and NF-κB activation

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (2008)
  • R.C. Santore et al.

    Application of the biotic ligand model to predicting zinc toxicity to rainbow trout, fathead minnow, and Daphnia magna

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C: Toxicol. Pharmacol.

    (2002)
  • U. Schlink et al.

    Truncated Lévy flights and agenda-based mobility are useful for the assessment of personal human exposure

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2011)
  • G. Skovlund et al.

    Does lipophilicity of toxic compounds determine effects on drought tolerance of the soil collembolan Folsomia candida?

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2006)
  • D.J. Spurgeon et al.

    Systems toxicology approaches for understanding the joint effects of environmental chemical mixtures

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2010)
  • C.J. Topping et al.

    ALMaSS, an agent-based model for animals in temperate European landscapes

    Ecol. Modell.

    (2003)
  • T. Vandenbrouck et al.

    Nickel and binary metal mixture responses in Daphnia magna: Molecular fingerprints and (sub)organismal effects

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2009)
  • M.S. Warne et al.

    The number of components in a mixture determines whether synergistic and antagonistic or additive toxicity predominate: the funnel hypothesis

    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

    (1995)
  • R. Altenburger et al.

    Predictability of the toxicity of multiple chemical mixtures to Vibrio fischeri: mixtures composed of similarly acting chemicals

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry)

    Guidance Manual for the Assessment of Joint Toxic Action of Chemical Mixtures

    (2004)
  • J. Baas et al.

    Modeling the effects of binary mixtures on survival in time

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (2007)
  • J. Baas et al.

    Prediction of daphnid survival after in situ exposure to complex mixtures

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2009)
  • T. Backhaus et al.

    Predictability of the toxicity of a multiple mixture of dissimilarly acting chemicals to Vibrio fischeri

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • A.M. Bindesbøl et al.

    Changes in membrane phospholipids as a mechanistic explanation for decreased freeze tolerance in earthworms exposed to sublethal copper concentrations

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2009)
  • A.M. Bindesbøl et al.

    Stress synergy between environmentally realistic levels of copper and frost in the earthworm Dendrobaena octaedra

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • A. Boobis et al.

    Critical analysis of literature on low-dose synergy for use in screening chemical mixtures for risk assessment

    Crit. Rev. Toxicol.

    (2011)
  • R.L. Brent

    Environmental causes of human congenital malformations: the pediatrician's role in dealing with these complex clinical problems caused by a multiplicity of environmental and genetic factors

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • M. Callahan et al.

    If cumulative risk assessment is the answer, what is the question?

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2007)
  • N. Cedergreen et al.

    A review of independent action compared to concentration addition as reference models for mixtures of compounds with different molecular target sites

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (2008)
  • A. Chandra et al.

    Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics

    Vital Health Stat.

    (2005)
  • S. Dimitrov et al.

    Baseline model for identifying the bioaccumulation potential of chemicals

    SAR QSAR Environ. Res.

    (2005)
  • J.L.C.M. Dorne

    Human variability in hepatic and renal elimination: implications for risk assessment

    J. Appl. Toxicol.

    (2007)
  • W. Drost et al.

    Mixture toxicity of s-triazines to Lemna minor under conditions of simultaneous and sequential exposure

    Fresen. Environ. Bull.

    (2003)
  • European Scientific Committees, 2011. Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures – (Preliminary Opinion Approved for...
  • J.M. Gohlke et al.

    Genetic and environmental pathways to complex diseases

    BMC Syst. Biol.

    (2009)
  • C.J. Gordon

    Role of environmental stress in the physiological response to chemical toxicants

    Environ. Res.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Tel.: +31 24 3653284.

    2

    Tel.: +31 45 5762679.

    3

    Tel.: +45 30 18 31 52.

    View full text