Skip to main content
Log in

Guidance in the Setting of Drug Particle Size Specifications to Minimize Variability in Absorption

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To provide guidance in setting particle size specifications for poorly soluble drugs to minimize variability in absorption.

Methods. A previously reported computer method was used to simulate the percent of dose absorbed as a function of solubility, absorption rate constant, dose, and particle size.

Results. The simulated percent of dose absorbed was tabulated over a realistic range of solubilities, absorption rate constants, and doses using drug particle sizes that might be typically found in a dosage form.

Conclusions. The greatest effect of particle size on absorption was simulated for low dose- low solubility drugs. In general, the sensitivity of absorption to particle size decreased with increasing dose or solubility. At a solubility of 1 mg/mL, particle size had practically no effect on the percent of dose absorbed over the range of doses simulated (1–250 mg).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. B. Dressman and D. Fleisher. J. Pharm. Sci. 75:109–116 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. J. Hintz and K. C. Johnson. Int. J. Pharm. 51:9–17 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. T. K. Lu, M. E. Frisella, and K. C. Johnson. Pharm. Res. 10:1308–1314 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. H. Yalkowsky and S. Bolton. Pharm. Res. 7:962–966 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Hegasy and K. D. Ramsch. United States Patent Number 5,264,446. Nov. 23, 1993.

  6. H. E. Paul, K. J. Hayes, M. F. Paul, and A. R. Borgmann. J. Pharm. Sci. 56:882–885 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. S. Ridolfo, L. Thompkins, L. D. Bechtol, and R. H. Carmichael. J. Pharm. Sci. 68:850–852 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. J. Jounela, P. J. Pentikäinen, and A. Sothmann. Europ. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 8:365–370 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Kabasakalian, M. Katz, B. Rosendrantz, and E. Townley. J. Pharm. Sci. 59:595–600 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. L. Ali, K. Florey, Ed., Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. H. Kleinbloesem, P. van Brummelen, J. A. van de Linde, P. J. Voogd, and D. D. Breimer. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 35:742–749 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. K. Liedtke, S. Ebel, B. Mißler, W. Haase, and L. Stein. Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 30:833–836 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. F. Nash, R. H. Carmichael, A. S. Ridolfo, and C. T. Spradlin. J. Rheumatol. (suppl 6) 7:12–19 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, K.C., Swindell, A.C. Guidance in the Setting of Drug Particle Size Specifications to Minimize Variability in Absorption. Pharm Res 13, 1795–1798 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016068705255

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016068705255

Navigation