Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Viscous Fiber (Guar) on Postprandial Motor Activity in Human Small Bowel

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both caloric value and chemical composition ofa meal have been shown to regulate postprandial smallbowel motility in dog. In the same species, duration ofand contractile activity within the postprandial period also depends on mean viscosity. It isunknown, however, whether meal viscosity and fibercontent also regulate small bowel motor activity in man.In human volunteers, we therefore studied the effect of guar gum on small bowel motor response toliquid and solid meals. Twenty-six prolonged ambulatorysmall bowel manometry studies were performed in 12volunteers. A total of 620 hr of recording were analyzed visually for phase III of the MMC and avalidated computer program calculated the incidence andamplitude of contractions after ingestion of water (300ml), a pure glucose drink (300 ml/330 kcal) or a solid meal (530 kcal) with and without 5 g of guargum. Addition of 5 g of guar gum did not significantlydelay reappearance of phase III after ingestion of water(59 ± 11 vs 106 ± 21 min; P = 0.09).However, guar gum significantly prolonged duration ofpostprandial motility pattern both after the glucosedrink (123 ± 19 vs 199 ± 24 min; P <0.05) and after the solid meal (310 ± 92 vs 419± 22 min; P = 0.005). Contractile activity during these periods was not affected by guargum. This was true for mean incidence of contractionsafter water (1.9 ± 0.3 vs 1.8 ± 0.5min-1), after the glucose drink (1.6 ±0.4 vs 1.7 ± 0.3 min-1) and after the solid meal (2.4 ± 0.4 vs 2.6 ±0.4 min-1). Likewise, mean amplitude ofcontractions was not affected by guar gum after water(22.8 ± 1.4 vs 20.9 ± 1.9 mm Hg), afterthe glucose drink (20.5 ± 1.4 vs 21.3 ±1.2), and after the solid meal (20.3 ± 1.5 vs 21.5± 1.6 mm Hg). Thus a guar gum-induced increase inchyme viscosity markedly prolonged duration ofpostprandial motor activity in the human small bowel.Contractile activity within the postprandial period, however, wasnot affected. We suggest that the postprandial motilitypattern persisted longer after the more viscous meals,because gastric emptying and intestinal transit were delayed by guar gum. We conclude that itis essential to define meal viscosity and fiber contentwhen studying postprandial small bowelmotility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Sarna SK: Cyclic motor activity; migrating motor complex: 1985. Gastroenterology 89:894–913, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wingate DL: Backwards and forwards with the migrating complex. Dig Dis Sci 26:641–666, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ouyang A, Sunshine AG, Reynolds JC: Caloric content of a meal affects duration but not contractile pattern of duodenal motility in man. Dig Dis Sci 34:528–536, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  4. v Schönfeld J, Evans DF, Wingate DL: Chemically different, but equicaloric nutrient liquids elicit a similar motor response in the human small bowel of ambulatory subjects. Gastroenterology 104:A596, 1993 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  5. v Schönfeld J, Evans DF, Wingate DL: Daytime and nightime small bowel motor activity after solid meals of different caloric value in man. Gut 40:614–618, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Wever I, Eeckhout C, Vantrappen G, Hellemans J: Disruptive effect of test meals on interdigestive motor complex in dogs. Am J Physiol 235:E661–E665, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schang JC, Dauchel J, Sava P, Angel F, Bouchet P, Lambert A, Grenier JF: Specific effects of different food components on intestinal motility. Electromyographic study in dogs. Eur Surg Res 10:425–432, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kellow JE, Borody TJ, Phillips SF, Tucker RL, Haddad AC: Human interdigestive motility: Variations in patterns from esophagus to colon. Gastroenterology 91:386–395, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  9. Soffer EE, Adrian TE: Effect of meal composition and sham feeding on duodenojejunal motility in humans. Dig Dis Sci 37:1009–1114, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bueno L, Praddaude F, Fioramonti J, Ruckebusch Y: Effect of dietary fibre on gastrointestinal motility and jejunal transit time in dogs. Gastroenterology 80:701–707, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. Russell J, Bass P: Effects of laxative and nonlaxative hydrophilic polymers on canine small intestinal motor activity. Dig Dis Sci 31:281–288, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  12. v Schönfeld J, Evans DF, Wingate DL: The effect of barium sulphate on small bowel motility in man. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:877–880, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrlein HJ, Schmid HR, Feinle C: Characteristic motor patterns of phase II and behaviour of phase III in the fed state. J Gastrointest Motil 4:317–327, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benson MJ, Castillo FD, Wingate DL, Demetrakopoulos J, Spyrou NM: The computer as referee in the analysis of human small bowel motility. Am J Physiol 264:G645–G654, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Soest PJ: Dietary fibres: their definition and nutritional properties. Am J Clin Nutr 31:S12–S20, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cherbut C, Albina E, Champ M, Doublier JL, Lecannu G: Action of guar gums on the viscosity of digestive contents and on the gastrointestinal motor function in pigs. Digestion 46:205–213, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  17. Madsen JL, Dahl K: Human migrating myoelectric complex in relation to gastrointestinal transit of a meal. Gut 31:1003–1005, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kerlin P, Zinsmeister A, Phillips S: Relationship of motility to flow of contents in the human small intestine. Gastroenterology 82:701–706, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  19. Read NW, Al-Janabi MN, Edwards CA, Barber DC: Relationship between postprandial motor activity in the human small intestine and the gastrointestinal transit of food. Gastroenterology 86:721–727, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blackburn NA, Redfern JS, Jarjis H, Holgate AM, Hanning I, Scarpello JHB, Johnson IT, Read NW: The mechanism of action of guar gum in improving glucose tolerance in man. Clin Sci 66:329–336, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holt S, Heading RC, Carter DC, Prescott LF, Tothill P: Effect of gel fibre on gastric emptying and absorption of glucose and paracetamol. Lancet 1:636–639, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lembcke B, Ebert R, Ptok M, Caspary WF, Creutzfeldt W, Schicha H, Emrich D: Role of gastrointestinal transit in the delay of absorption by viscous fibre (guar). Hepato-Gastroenterol 31:183–186, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  23. Meyer JH, Gu YG, Jehn D, Taylor IL: Intragastric vs intraintestinal viscous polymers and glucose tolerance after liquid meals of glucose. Am J Clin Nutr 48:260–266, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meyer JH, Gu Y, Elashoff J, Reedy T, Dressman J, Amidon G: Effects of viscosity and fluid outflow on postcibal gastric emptying of solids. Am J Physiol 250:G161–G164, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer JH, Elashoff J, Porter-Fink V, Dressman J, Amidon GL: Human postprandial gastric emptying of 1-3-millimeter spheres. Gastroenterology 94:1315–1325, 1988

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schonfeld, J.V., Evans, D.F. & Wingate, D.L. Effect of Viscous Fiber (Guar) on Postprandial Motor Activity in Human Small Bowel. Dig Dis Sci 42, 1613–1617 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018888726646

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018888726646

Navigation