Skip to main content
Log in

Cellular Pharmacokinetics: Effects of Cytoplasmic Diffusion and Binding on Organ Transit Time Distribution

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distribution between well-stirred compartments is the classical paradigm in pharmacokinetics. Also in capillary–issue exchange modeling a barrier-limited approach is mostly adopted. As a consequence of tissue binding, however, drug distribution cannot be regarded as instantaneous even at the cellular level and the distribution process consists of at least two components: transmembrane exchange and cytoplasmic transport. Two concepts have been proposed for the cytoplasmic distribution process of hydrophobic or amphipathic molecules, (i) slowing of diffusion due to instantaneous binding to immobile cellular structures and (ii) slow binding after instantaneous distribution throughout the cytosol. The purpose of this study was to develop a general approach for comparing both models using a stochastic model of intra- and extravascular drug distribution. Criteria for model discrimination are developed using the first three central moments (mean, variance, and skewness) of the cellular residence time and organ transit time distribution, respectively. After matching the models for the relative dispersion the remaining differences in relative skewness are predicted, discussing the relative roles of membrane permeability, cellular binding and cytoplasmic transport. It is shown under which conditions the models are indistinguishable on the basis of venous organ outflow concentration–time curves. The relative dispersion of cellular residence times is introduced as a model-independent measure of cytoplasmic equilibration kinetics, which indicates whether diffusion through the cytoplasm is rate limiting. If differences in outflow curve shapes (their relative skewness) cannot be detected, independent information on binding and/or diffusion kinetics is necessary to avoid model misspecification. The method is applied to previously published hepatic outflow data of enalaprilat, triiodothyronine, and diclofenac. It provides a general framework for the modeling of cellular pharmacokinetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. B. Bassingthwaighte and C. A. Goresky. Modeling in the analysis of solute and water exchange in the microvasculature. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 2, Vol. 4 American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, 1984, pp. 549-626.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. A. Goresky, W. H. Ziegler, and G. G. Bach. Capillary exchange modeling. Barrier-limited and flow-limited distribution. Circ. Res. 27:739-764 (1970).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A. J. Schwab, F. Barker III, C. A. Goresky, and K. S. Pang. Transfer of enalaprilat across rat liver cell membranes is barrier-limited. Am. J. Physiol. 258:G461-G475 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Weiss, O. Kuhlmann, G.-J. Krauss, and M. S. Roberts. Hepatocellular distribution and elimination kinetics of diclofenac in the isolated perfused rat liver (Abstract). Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 357:R6 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. A. Luxon and R. A. Weisiger. A new method for quantitating intracellular transport: application to the thyroid hormone 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine. Am. J. Physiol. 263:G733-G741 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Weiss, A. Koester, Z. Wu, and M. S. Roberts. Distribution kinetics of diazepam, lidocaine and antipyrine in the isolated perfused rat hindlimb. Pharm. Res. 14:1640-1643 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Weiss and M. S. Roberts. Tissue distribution kinetics as determinant of transit time dispersion of drugs in organs: Application of a stochastic model to the rat hindlimb. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 24:173-196 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. F. R. Haselton, R. J. Roselli, R. E. Parker, and T. R. Harris. An effective-diffusivity model of pulmonary capillary exchange: General theory, limiting cases, and sensitivity analysis. Math. Biosci. 70:237-263 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Weiss. Generalizations in linear pharmacokinetics using properties of certain classes of residence time distributions. I. Log-convex drug disposition curves. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 14:635-657 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Weiss. Residence time distributions in pharmacokinetics: Behavioral and structural models. In Advanced Methods of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Systems Analysis, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, 1991, pp. 89-101.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Crank. The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 1975.

  12. H. P. Kao, J. R. Abney, and A. S. Verkman. Determinants of the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm. J. Cell Biol. 120:175-184 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. R. A. Weisiger. When is a carrier not a membrane carrier? The cytoplasmic transport of amphipathic molecules. Hepatology 24:1288-1295 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. B. A. Luxon and R. A. Weisiger. Sex differences in intracellular fatty acid transport: role of cytoplasmic binding proteins. Am. J. Physiol. 265:G831-G841 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Weiss and A. Ring. Interpretation of general measures of distribution kinetics in terms of a mammillary compartmental model. J. Pharm. Sci. 86:1491-1493 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. R. J. Stock, E. V. Cilento, and R. S. McCuskey. A quantitative study of fluorescein isothioxyanate-dextran transport in the microcirculation of the isolated perfused rat liver. Hepatology 9:75-82 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Weiss. On the degree of solute mixing in liver models of drug elimination. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 25:363-375 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Weiss, C. Stedtler, and M. S. Roberts. On the validity of the dipersion model of hepatic drug elimination when intravascular transit time densities are long-tailed. Bull. Math. Biol. 59:911-929 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Weiss, L. N. Ballinger, and M. S. Roberts. Kinetic analysis of vascular marker distribution in perfused rat livers after regeneration following partial hepatectomy. J. Hepatol. 29:476-481 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Weiss. A note on the interpretation of tracer dispersion in the liver. J. Theoret. Biol. 184:1-6 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Weiss. Pharmacokinetics in organs and the intact body: model validation and reduction. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 7:119-127 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B. A. Luxon. Inhibition of binding to fatty acid binding protein reduces the intracellular transport of fatty acids. Am. J. Physiol. 271:G113-G120 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. B. A. Luxon, D. C. Holly, M. T. Milliano, and R. A. Weisiger. Sex differences in multiple steps in hepatic transport of palmitate support a balanced uptake mechanism. Am. J. Physiol. 274:G52-G61 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. K. S. Pang, F. Barker, A. Simard, A. J. Schwab, and C. A. Goresky. Sulfation of acetaminophen by the perfused rat liver: the effect of red blood cell carriage. Hepatology 22:267-285 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiss, M. Cellular Pharmacokinetics: Effects of Cytoplasmic Diffusion and Binding on Organ Transit Time Distribution. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 27, 233–256 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020990912291

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020990912291

Navigation