Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Long-range chromatin regulatory interactions in vivo

Abstract

Communication between distal chromosomal elements is essential for control of many nuclear processes. For example, genes in higher eukaryotes often require distant enhancer sequences for high-level expression. The mechanisms proposed for long-range enhancer action fall into two basic categories. Non-contact models propose that enhancers act at a distance to create a favorable environment for gene transcription1,2,3, or act as entry sites4 or nucleation points5 for factors that ultimately communicate with the gene. Contact models propose that communication occurs through direct interaction between the distant enhancer and the gene by various mechanisms that 'loop out' the intervening sequences6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Although much attention has focused on contact models, the existence and nature of long-range interactions is still controversial and speculative, as there is no direct evidence that distant sequences physically interact in vivo14. Here, we report the development of a widely applicable in situ technique to tag and recover chromatin in the immediate vicinity of an actively transcribed gene. We show that the classical enhancer element, HS2 of the prototypical locus control region (LCR) of the β-globin gene cluster, is in close physical proximity to an actively transcribed HBB (β-globin) gene located over 50 kb away in vivo, suggesting a direct regulatory interaction. The results give unprecedented insight into the in vivo structure of the LCR–gene interface and provide the first direct evidence of long-range enhancer communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: RNA TRAP.
Figure 2: Measurement of the spread of biotin deposition.
Figure 3: Quantitative real-time PCR analyses of Hbb-b1-targeted RNA TRAP.
Figure 4: Quantitative real-time PCR analyses of Hbb-b2-targeted RNA TRAP.
Figure 5: Schematic representation of LCR–gene arrangement.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin, D.I., Fiering, S . & Groudine, M. Regulation of β-globin gene expression: straightening out the locus. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6, 488–495 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bender, M.A. et al. Independent formation of DNase I hypersensitive sites in the murine β-globin locus control region. Blood 95, 3600–3604 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Francastel, C., Schubeler, D., Martin, D.I. & Groudine, M. Nuclear compartmentalization and gene activity. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1, 137–143 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moreau, P. et al. The SV40 72 base repair repeat has a striking effect on gene expression both in SV40 and other chimeric recombinants. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 6047–6068 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bulger, M. & Groudine, M. Looping versus linking: toward a model for long-distance gene activation. Genes Dev. 13, 2465–2477 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi, O.R. & Engel, J.D. Developmental regulation of β-globin gene switching. Cell 55, 17–26 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mueller-Storm, H.P., Sogo, J.M. & Schaffner, W. An enhancer stimulates transcription in trans when attached to the promoter via a protein bridge. Cell 58, 767–777 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanscombe, O. et al. Importance of globin gene order for correct developmental expression. Genes Dev. 5, 1387–1394 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tuan, D., Kong, S. & Hu, K. Transcription of the hypersensitive site HS2 enhancer in erythroid cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 11219–11223 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Engel, J.D. Developmental regulation of human β-globin gene transcription: a switch of loyalties? Trends Genet. 9, 304–309 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wijgerde, M., Grosveld, F. & Fraser, P. Transcription complex stability and chromatin dynamics in vivo. Nature 377, 209–213 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blackwood, E.M. & Kadonaga, J.T. Going the distance: a current view of enhancer action. Science 281, 61–63 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Bruin, D., Zaman, Z., Liberatore, R.A. & Ptashne, M. Telomere looping permits gene activation by a downstream UAS in yeast. Nature 409, 109–113 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Engel, J.D. & Tanimoto, K. Looping, linking, and chromatin activity: new insights into β-globin locus regulation. Cell 100, 499–502 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bender, M.A., Bulger, M., Close, J. & Groudine, M. β-globin gene switching and DNase I sensitivity of the endogenous β-globin locus in mice do not require the locus control region. Mol. Cell 5, 387–393 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuan, D.Y., Solomon, W.B., London, I.M. & Lee, D.P. An erythroid-specific, developmental-stage-independent enhancer far upstream of the human “β-like globin” genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 2554–2558 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Collis, P., Antoniou, M. & Grosveld, F. Definition of the minimal requirements within the human β-globin gene and the dominant control region for high level expression. EMBO J. 9, 233–240 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fraser, P., Pruzina, S., Antoniou, M. & Grosveld, F. Each hypersensitive site of the human β-globin locus control region confers a different developmental pattern of expression on the globin genes. Genes Dev. 7, 106–113 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bender, M.A. et al. Targeted deletion of 5′ HS1 and 5′ HS4 of the β-globin locus control region reveals additive activity of the DNase I hypersensitive sites. Blood 98, 2022–2027 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trimborn, T., Gribnau, J., Grosveld, F. & Fraser, P. Mechanisms of developmental control of transcription in the murine α- and β-globin loci. Genes Dev. 13, 112–124 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Farrell, C.M. et al. A large upstream region is not necessary for gene expression or hypersensitive site formation at the mouse β-globin locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14554–14559 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Iborra, F.J., Pombo, A., Jackson, D.A. & Cook, P.R. Active RNA polymerases are localized within discrete transcription “factories” in human nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 109, 1427–1436 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gribnau, J. et al. Chromatin interaction mechanism of transcriptional control in vivo. EMBO J. 17, 6020–6027 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Julien, J.P., Meyer, D., Flavell, D., Hurst, J. & Grosveld, F. Cloning and developmental expression of the murine neurofilament gene family. Brain Res. 387, 243–250 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W. Reik for critical review of the manuscript and T. Collins and F. Kemp for their assistance. D.C. is supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Studentship. P.F. is a Senior Fellow of the Medical Research Council. This work was supported in part by the Medical Research Council and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Fraser.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, D., Chakalova, L., Osborne, C. et al. Long-range chromatin regulatory interactions in vivo. Nat Genet 32, 623–626 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1051

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1051

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing