Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Factors affecting blood clearance and in vivo distribution of polyelectrolyte complexes for gene delivery

Abstract

Self-assembling polycation/DNA complexes represent a promising synthetic vector for gene delivery. However, despite considerable versatility and transfectional activity in vitro, such materials are quickly eliminated from the bloodstream following intravenous injection (plasma α half-life typically less than 5 min). For targeted systemic delivery a more prolonged plasma circulation of the vector is essential. Here we have examined factors contributing to rapid elimination of poly(L-lysine) (pLL)/DNA complexes from the bloodstream, and implicate the binding of proteins to the polyelectrolyte complexes as a likely cause for their blood clearance. pLL/DNA complexes reisolated from serum associate with several proteins, depending on their net charge, although the major band on SDS-PAGE co-migrates with albumin. Serum albumin binds to pLL/DNA complexes in vitro, forming a ternary pLL/DNA/albumin complex which regains some ethidium bromide fluorescence and fails to move during agarose electrophoresis. Albumin also causes increased turbidity of complexes, and reduces their zeta potential to the same level (−16 mV) as is measured in serum. We propose that rapid plasma elimination of polycation/DNA complexes results from their binding serum albumin and other proteins, perhaps due to aggregation and phagocytic capture or accumulation of the ternary complexes in fine capillary beds.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marshall E . Less hype, more biology needed for gene therapy Science 1995 270: 1751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedmann T . Overcoming the obstacles to gene therapy Scientific American 1997 June: 80–85

  3. Velu T . Gene transfer and therapy in Europe: research, development and clinical trials Publication of the European Union: Brussels 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seymour LW . Passive tumor targeting of soluble macromolecules and drug conjugates Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 1992 9: 135–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takakura Y, Hashida M . Macromolecular carrier systems for targeted drug delivery: pharmacokinetic considerations and biodistribution Pharm Res 1996 13: 820–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Graham RW . Encapsulated transmembrane carrier systems for gene therapy Proceedings of the Keystone Symposium on Synthetic Non-viral Gene Delivery Systems 1998 135: (Abstr. 212)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dash PR, Toncheva V, Schacht E, Seymour LW . Synthetic polymers for vectorial delivery of DNA: characterisation of polymer–DNA complexes by photon correlation spectroscopy, stability to nuclease degradation and disruption by polyanions in vitro J Cont Release 1997 48: 269–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolfert MA et al. Characterization of vectors for gene therapy formed by self-assembly of DNA with synthetic block co-polymers Hum Gene Ther 1996 7: 2123–2133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolfert MA, Seymour LW . Chloroquine and amphipathic helices show synergistic transfection activity Gene Therapy 1998 5: 409–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolfert MA, Seymour LW . Atomic force microscopic analysis of the influence of the molecular weight of poly(L)lysine on the size of polyelectrolyte complexes formed with DNA Gene Therapy 1996 3: 269–273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ward CM, Seymour LW . A novel assay for determination of polycation concentration using turbidometry J Bioact Compat Polym 1998 (in press)

  12. Li S, Huang L . In vivo gene transfer via intravenous administration of cationic lipid-protamine–DNA (LPD) complexes Gene Therapy 1997 4: 891–900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu F, Qi H, Huang L, Liu D . Factors controlling the efficiency of cationic lipid-mediated transfection in vivo via intravenous administration Gene Therapy 1997 4: 517–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Plank C, Mchtler K, Szoka FC, Wagner E . Activation of the complement system by synthetic DNA complexes: a potential barrier for intravenous gene delivery Hum Gene Ther 1996 7: 1437–1446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiou HC et al. Enhanced resistance to nuclease degradation of nucleic acids complexed to asialoglycoprotein-polylysine carriers Nucleic Acids Res 1994 22: 5439–5446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oja CD, Semple SC, Chonn A, Cullis P . Influence of dose on liposome clearance Biochim Biophys Acta 1996 1281: 31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Semple SC, Chonn A, Cullis P . Influence of cholesterol on the association of plasma proteins with liposomes Biochemistry 1996 35: 2521–2525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boussif O et al. A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo – polyethyleneimine Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995 92: 7297–7301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boussif O, Zanta MA, Behr JP . Optimised galenics improve in vitro gene transfer with cationic molecules up to a thousand fold Gene Therapy 1996 3: 1074–1080

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Semple SC, Chonn A, Cullis PR . Influence of cholesterol on the association of plasma proteins with liposomes Biochemistry 1996 35: 2521–2525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu QR, Liu DX . Co-existence of serum-dependent mechanisms for liposome clearance and involvement of non-Kupffer cells in liposome uptake by mouse liver Biochem Biophys Acta 1996 1284: 153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawabata K, Takakura Y, Hashida M . The fate of plasmid DNA after intravenous injection in mice: involvement of scavenger receptors in its hepatic uptake Pharm Res 1995 12: 825–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Seymour LW et al. N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers targeted to the hepatocyte galactose receptor: pharmacokinetics in DBA2 mice Br J Cancer 1991 63: 859–866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kooistra T, Duursma AM, Bouma JMW, Gruber M . Endocytosis and breakdown of ribonuclease oligomers by sinusoidal rat liver cellsin vivo Biochim Biophys Acta 1979 587: 282–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Emancipator K, Elin RJ, Fleisher TA . Comparison of two automated nephelometers J Clin Lab Anal 1992 6: 399–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Merril CR . Gel staining techniques Meths Enzymol 1990 182: 477–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dash, P., Read, M., Barrett, L. et al. Factors affecting blood clearance and in vivo distribution of polyelectrolyte complexes for gene delivery. Gene Ther 6, 643–650 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300843

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300843

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links