Skip to main content
Log in

Drug Interaction Studies with Dexlansoprazole Modified Release (TAK-390MR), a Proton Pump Inhibitor with a Dual Delayed-Release Formulation

Results of Four Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Centre Studies

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective: Most proton pump inhibitors are extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes, as are many other drugs, giving rise to potential drug-drug interactions. Dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) [TAK-390MR] is a modified-release formulation of dexlansoprazole (TAK-390), an enantiomer of lansoprazole, which employs an innovative Dual Delayed Release™ technology designed to prolong the plasma dexlansoprazole concentration-time profile following once-daily oral administration. As with lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole is metabolized mainly by CYP3A and CYP2C19. Based on in vitro studies, dexlansoprazole has the potential to inhibit activity of these isoenzymes and also may induce human hepatic CYP1A and CYP2C9 activity. To determine whether dexlansoprazole has an effect on these isoenzymes in vivo, drug interaction studies with dexlansoprazole MR were conducted.

Methods: Four separate randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover, placebo-controlled, single-centre studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the effect of dexlansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of four test substrates (diazepam, phenytoin, theophylline [administered as intravenous aminophylline] and warfarin), which were selected based on in vitro and/or in vivo data that suggest a potential drug interaction with CYP isoenzymes or potentially coadministered narrow therapeutic index drugs. In each study, dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg or placebo was administered once daily for 9 or 11 days in each period. Subjects received a single dose of test substrate in each study period. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the test substrates were estimated using noncompartmental methods. A conclusion of no effect of dexlansoprazole MR on the test substrate was made if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of the central values for the observed maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of test substrate administered with dexlansoprazole MR versus placebo were within 0.80–1.25 based on an analysis of variance model. The potential for a pharmacodynamic interaction was also assessed for warfarin using prothrombin time, measured as the international normalized ratio. Routine safety assessments were conducted in these studies.

Results: Mean Cmax and AUC values were generally similar for each test substrate when administered with multiple once-daily doses of dexlansoprazole MR or placebo. The 90% CIs for the bioavailability of these test substrates administered with dexlansoprazole MR relative to that obtained when the substrates were administered with placebo were within the bioequivalency range of 0.80–1.25, indicating that multiple doses of dexlansoprazole MR had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs. Additionally, dexlansoprazole MR had no effect on the pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Administration of these drugs with dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg or placebo was well tolerated; the only serious adverse event, which led to a subject’s discontinuation from the study, was considered unrelated to study drugs.

Conclusions: Coadministration of dexlansoprazole MR with diazepam, phenytoin or theophylline did not affect the pharmacokinetics of these drugs, and therefore is unlikely to alter the pharmacokinetic profile of other drugs metabolized by CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP1A2 and perhaps CYP3A. Additionally, dexlansoprazole MR coadministered with warfarin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of the warfarin enantiomers and had no effect on the anticoagulant activity of warfarin. Dexlansoprazole MR was well tolerated in these trials of healthy subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II
Fig. 1
Table III
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005 Jan; 100(1): 190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerson LB, Triadafilopoulos G. Proton pump inhibitors and their drug interactions: an evidence-based approach. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001 May; 13(5): 611–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blume H, Donath F, Warnke A, et al. Pharmacokinetic drug interaction profiles of proton pump inhibitors. Drug Saf 2006; 29(9): 769–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reilly JP. Safety profile of the proton-pump inhibitors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999 Dec 1; 56(23 Suppl. 4): SI 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li XQ, Andersson TB, Ahlstrom M, et al. Comparison of inhibitory effects of the proton pump-inhibiting drugs omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole on human cytochrome P450 activities. Drug Metab Dispos 2004 Aug; 32(8): 821–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simon W. Pantoprazole: which cytochrome P450 isoenzymes are involved in its biotransformation? [abstract]. Gut 1995; 37: A1177

    Google Scholar 

  7. Humphries TJ, Merritt GJ. Drug interactions with agents used to treat acid-related diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999 Aug; 13Suppl. 3: 18–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Caraco Y, Tateishi T, Wood AJ. Interethnic difference in omeprazole’s inhibition of diazepam metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995 Jul; 58(1): 62–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson T, Cederberg C, Edvardsson G, et al. Effect of omeprazole treatment on diazepam plasma levels in slow versus normal rapid metabolizers of omeprazole. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990 Jan; 47(1): 79–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gugler R, Jensen JC. Omeprazole inhibits oxidative drug metabolism: studies with diazepam and phenytoin in vivo and 7-ethoxycoumarin in vitro. Gastroenterology 1985 Dec; 89(6): 1235–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nexium® (esomeprazole magnesium). Full prescribing information. Wilmington (DE): AstraZeneca LP, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saltiel E, Fask A. Prevalence of potential proton-pump inhibitor drug interactions: a retrospective review of prescriptions in community pharmacies. Clin Ther 1999 Oct; 21(10): 1812–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McCarthy DM, McLaughlin TP, Griffis DL, et al. Impact of cotherapy with some proton pump inhibitors on medical claims among HMO patients already using other common drugs also cleared by cytochrome P450. Am J Ther 2003 Sep-Oct; 10(5): 330–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramirez FC. Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly. Cleve Clin J Med 2000 Oct; 67(10): 755–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Meer FJ, Rosendaal FR, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Bleeding complications in oral anticoagulant therapy: an analysis of risk factors. Arch Intern Med 1993 Jul 12; 153(13): 1557–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prevacid® (lansoprazole). Full prescribing information. Lake Forest (IL): TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., 2007

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aciphex® (rabeprazole sodium). Full prescribing information. Tokyo: Eisai Co. Ltd, 2007

  18. Protonix® (pantoprazole sodium). Full prescribing information. Philadelphia (PA): Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2007

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prilosec® (omeprazole). Full prescribing information. Wilmington (DE): AstraZeneca LP, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zegerid® (omeprazole bicarbonate). Full prescribing information. San Diego (CA): Santarus, Inc., 2006

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang W, Wu J, Atkinson S. Pharmacokinetics, pharmaco-dynamics, and safety evaluation of a single and multiple 60 mg, 90 mg, and 120 mg oral doses of modified-release TAK-390 (TAK-390MR) and 30 mg oral doses of lansoprazole in healthy subjects [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2007; 132Suppl. 52: A87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu KH, Kim MJ, Jung WM, et al. Lansoprazole enantiomer activates human liver microsomal CYP2C9 catalytic activity in a stereospecific and substrate-specific manner. Drug Metab Dispos 2005 Feb; 33(2): 209–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Curi-Pedrosa R, Daujat M, Pichard L, et al. Omeprazole and lansoprazole are mixed inducers of CYP1A and CYP3A in human hepatocytes in primary culture. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994 Apr; 269(1): 384–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Granneman GR, Karol MD, Locke CS, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between lansoprazole and theophylline. Ther Drug Monit 1995 Oct; 17(5): 460–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Inomata S, Nagashima A, Itagaki F, et al. CYP2C19 genotype affects diazepam pharmacokinetics and emergence from general anesthesia. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005 Dec; 78(6): 647–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Andersson T, Rohss K, Bredberg E, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001 Oct; 15(10): 1563–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SY, Lee ST, Kim JW. Contributions of CYP2C9/CYP2C19 genotypes and drug interaction to the phenytoin treatment in the Korean epileptic patients in the clinical setting. J Biochem Mol Biol 2007 May 31; 40(3): 448–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Horsmans Y, Van den Berge V, Bouckaert A, et al. Phenytoin hydroxylation in a healthy Caucasian population: bimodal distribution of hydroxyphenytoin urinary excretion. Pharmacol Toxicol 1997; 8(6): 276–9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sarkar MA, Hunt C, Guzelian PS, et al. Characterization of human liver cytochromes P-450 involved in theophylline metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos 1992 Jan-Feb; 20(1): 31–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Priskorn M, Sidhu JS, Larsen F, et al. Investigation of multiple dose citalopram on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic warfarin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 44: 199–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dingemanse J, Meyerhoff C, Schadrack J. Effect of the catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitor entacapone on the steadystate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002 May; 53(5): 485–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Reynolds KK, Valdes R, Hartung BR, et al. Individualizing warfarin therapy. Personalized Med 2007; 4(1): 11–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lefebvre RA, Flouvat B, Karolac-Tamisier S, et al. Influence of lansoprazole treatment on diazepam plasma concentration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 52(5): 458–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Prichard PJ, Walt RP, Kitchingman GK, et al. Oral phenytoin pharmacokinetics during omeprazole therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 24(4): 543–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dilger K, Zheng Z, Klotz U. Lack of drug interaction between omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and theophylline. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48(3): 438–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Study No. (C03-057). Lake Forest (IL): Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc., 2004. (Data on file)

  37. Juurlink DN, Mamdani M, Kopp A, et al. Drug-drug interactions among elderly patients hospitalized for drug toxicity. JAMA 2003 Apr 2; 289(13): 1652–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Andersson T, Hassan-Alin M, Hasselgren G, et al. Drug interaction studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40(7): 523–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sutfin T, Balmer K, Bostrom H, et al. Stereoselective interaction of omeprazole with warfarin in healthy men. Ther Drug Monit 1989; 11(2): 176–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Unge P, Svedberg LE, Nordgren A, et al. A study of the interaction of omeprazole and warfarin in anticoagulated patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1992 Dec; 34(6): 509–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors are employees of Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA (TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc., Lake Forest, IL, USA, is now a part of Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.). All authors participated in the development and writing of this article and approved the final manuscript for publication. The authors take full responsibility for the content of the article and wish to acknowledge the assistance in manuscript preparation provided by Eileen Gallagher of Complete Healthcare Communications, Inc., Chadds Ford, PA, USA, and funded by Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc. We also thank our colleague Michael Mayer for his editorial review and comments. All studies (T-P105-132 [warfarin], T-P105-133 [phenytoin], T-P105-134 [diazepam] and T-P105-139 [theophylline]) were sponsored by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Vakily.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vakily, M., Lee, R.D., Wu, J. et al. Drug Interaction Studies with Dexlansoprazole Modified Release (TAK-390MR), a Proton Pump Inhibitor with a Dual Delayed-Release Formulation. Clin. Drug Investig. 29, 35–50 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2165/0044011-200929010-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/0044011-200929010-00004

Keywords

Navigation