Next Article in Journal
Taste Masked Microspheres of Ofloxacin: Formulation and Evaluation of Orodispersible Tablets
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy and Safety of Dorocontin® versus Sustac® in the Treatment of Stable Angina Pectoris: A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparative Trial
 
 
Scientia Pharmaceutica is published by MDPI from Volume 84 Issue 3 (2016). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Austrian Pharmaceutical Society (Österreichische Pharmazeutische Gesellschaft, ÖPhG).
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Antihypertensive Activity of Candesartan Cilexetil Nanosuspension: Formulation, Characterization and Pharmacodynamic Study

by
Chetan DETROJA
,
Sandip CHAVHAN
and
Krutika SAWANT
*
Drug Delivery Laboratory, Centre of Relevance and Excellence in NDDS, G.H. Patel Building of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara-390002, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sci. Pharm. 2011, 79(3), 635-652; https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1103-17
Submission received: 24 March 2011 / Accepted: 5 July 2011 / Published: 5 July 2011

Abstract

The objective of the present investigation was to enhance the oral bioavailability of practically insoluble Candesartan cilexetil [CC] by preparing nanosuspension. The nanosuspension was prepared by media milling using zirconium oxide beads and converted to solid state by spray drying. The spray dried nanosuspension of CC [SDCN] was evaluated for particle size, zeta potential, saturation solubility, crystallanity, surface morphology and dissolution behavior. SDCN showed particle size of 223.5±5.4 nm and zeta potential of −32.2±0.6 mV while saturation solubility of bulk CC and SDCN were 125±6.9 μg/ml and 2805±29.5 μg/ml respectively, showing more than 20 times increase in solubility. Differential Scanning Calorimetry [DSC] and X-ray diffraction [XRD] analysis showed that crystalline state of CC remained unchanged in SDCN. Dissolution studies in phosphate buffer pH 6.5 containing 0.7% Tween 20 showed that 53±5% of bulk drug dissolved in 15 min whereas SDCN was almost completely dissolved exhibiting higher dissolution velocity and solubility. Transmission electron microscopy [TEM] revealed that nanocrystals were not of uniform size, and approximately of oval shape. Pharmacodynamic study based on deoxycorticosterone acetate [DOCA] salt model was performed in rats to evaluate in-vivo performance, which showed 26.75±0.33% decrease in systolic blood pressure for nanosuspension while plain drug suspension showed 16.0±0.38% reduction, indicating that increase in dissolution velocity and saturation solubility leads to enhancement of bioavailability of SDCN when compared to bulk CC suspension. Thus, the results conclusively demonstrated a significant enhancement in antihypertensive activity of candesartan when formulated as nanosuspension.
Keywords: Candesartan; Saturation solubility; Nanosuspension; Bioavailability; DOCA salt model Candesartan; Saturation solubility; Nanosuspension; Bioavailability; DOCA salt model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

DETROJA, C.; CHAVHAN, S.; SAWANT, K. Enhanced Antihypertensive Activity of Candesartan Cilexetil Nanosuspension: Formulation, Characterization and Pharmacodynamic Study. Sci. Pharm. 2011, 79, 635-652. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1103-17

AMA Style

DETROJA C, CHAVHAN S, SAWANT K. Enhanced Antihypertensive Activity of Candesartan Cilexetil Nanosuspension: Formulation, Characterization and Pharmacodynamic Study. Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2011; 79(3):635-652. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1103-17

Chicago/Turabian Style

DETROJA, Chetan, Sandip CHAVHAN, and Krutika SAWANT. 2011. "Enhanced Antihypertensive Activity of Candesartan Cilexetil Nanosuspension: Formulation, Characterization and Pharmacodynamic Study" Scientia Pharmaceutica 79, no. 3: 635-652. https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1103-17

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop