Regional left ventricular wall motion, about two to three weeks after acute myocardial infarction (MI), is perhaps the best clinical measure of myocardial salvage and limitation of infarct size by thrombolytic therapy. Normal or only slightly depressed wall motion at the site of infarction indicates significant limitation of infarct size, whereas markedly abnormal wall motion indicates irreversible myocardial damage. Early studies found significant improvement in regional wall motion in only 40 percent of patients undergoing successful intracoronary thrombolytic therapy after the onset of symptoms of acute MI. Why only 40 percent of these reperfused patients demonstrated salvage of ischemic myocardium could not be answered at that time. Animal experiments show that the duration of coronary occlusion is an important factor in determining myocardial salvage after reperfusion. To study whether this time dependency also exists under clinical circumstances in patients with coronary artery disease, the relationship between regional wall motion (as an index of infarct size) and the time to thrombolytic therapy after the onset of symptoms (as an index of duration of coronary occlusion) was examined. After showing that such time dependency does indeed exist in patients with acute MI, the efficacy and safety of intravenous bolus injections of urokinase were then demonstrated.