Comparison of sulfamethoxazole alone and combined with trimethoprim in urinary tract infections

Infection. 1979;7(1):14-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01640549.

Abstract

In a double blind, randomized study, sulfamethoxazole was compared alone and in combination with trimethoprim as commonly used in therapeutic regimes for the treatment of uncomplicated acute urinary tract infections in out-patients. The cure of sulfamethoxazole alone was 92.2%, and for sulfamethoxazole plus trimethoprim 97.6%. The rate of side-effects for the former was 5%, for the latter 21.8%. If the failure rate plus the rate of occurrence of rash, which necessitated discontinuing the drug, are combined, it appears that 8.8% of the patients were at a disadvantage receiving sulfamethoxazole compared to 9.7% for the combination of sulfamethoxazole plus trimethoprim. When considering the cure rate and rate of side-effects together, therefore, the position of sulfamethoxazole alone as a suitable drug in this type of infection is defended.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Sulfamethoxazole / administration & dosage*
  • Sulfamethoxazole / adverse effects
  • Sulfamethoxazole / therapeutic use
  • Trimethoprim / administration & dosage*
  • Trimethoprim / adverse effects
  • Trimethoprim / therapeutic use
  • Urinary Tract Infections / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Trimethoprim
  • Sulfamethoxazole