Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Predicting the Oral Bioavailability of 19-Nortestosterone Progestins In Vivo from Their Metabolic Stability in Human Liver Microsomal Preparations In Vitro

Wilhelm Kuhnz and Hille Gieschen
Drug Metabolism and Disposition November 1998, 26 (11) 1120-1127;
Wilhelm Kuhnz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hille Gieschen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

It was the aim of this study to investigate whether assessment of the metabolic stability of selected progestins of the 19-nortestosterone type in human microsomal liver preparations was a suitable approach to predict the oral bioavailability of these drugs in humans. The Michaelis-Menten parametersVmax andKM,app for norethisterone, levonorgestrel, gestodene, desogestrel, 3-keto-desogestrel, norgestimate, and dienogest were determined in in vitroincubations with human liver microsomes. Using these data, both thein vitro intrinsic clearance (CLint) and, after application of a suitable scaling factor, the scaled in vivo CLint were calculated. For progestins for which human in vivo data were available, the in vitro results were correlated with in vivo CLint values and oral bioavailability. A comparison of the scaled in vivo CLint values with the correspondingin vivo CLint values showed a reasonable correlation, although the latter values were generally approximately 2-fold higher than the former. Excluding desogestrel, which is subject to substantial intestinal metabolism in vivo, there was a linear relationship (r = −0.986) between increasing in vitro CLint values for the progestins and decreasing bioavailability in vivo. Other methods of assessing the metabolic stability of the progestins in vitro, such as evaluation of metabolic half-lives at single initial concentrations, showed either no correlation or a less satisfactory correlation with bioavailability data.

Progestins of the 19-nortestosterone type, such as norethisterone, levonorgestrel, gestodene, desogestrel, norgestimate, and dienogest, are still the most widely used progestogenic components in combination oral contraceptives. They differ in potency and are also characterized by different pharmacological profiles. There is an ongoing search for new progestins that not only provide sufficient contraceptive efficacy without affecting lipoproteins, coagulation factors, or carbohydrate metabolism in an unfavorable manner but also offer the potential for additional therapeutic benefits. At early stages in the drug discovery process, a suitable candidate must be selected from a limited number of structurally related drugs that may have similar pharmacological properties in the various in vitro systems and animal models used. At that point, information on the oral bioavailability of these drugs in humans would provide an important and particularly useful selection criterion. However, at that early stage in drug development, results from clinical studies are not yet available; therefore, there is a need for in vitromethods that would allow prediction of the oral bioavailability in humans. For these progestins, which are almost completely metabolized by the liver and which are not excreted unchanged to a significant extent, the metabolic stability in human liver preparations may represent a suitable tool to obtain this information. There have been many attempts to use in vitro methods for the prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters, such asCL1 and bioavailability, and the underlying concepts have been reviewed only recently (Houston, 1994; Hoener, 1994; Obach et al., 1997).

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether assessment of the metabolic stability of selected 19-nortestosterone progestins in human microsomal liver preparations is a suitable approach to predict the oral bioavailability of these drugs in humans. Because the bioavailability of a number of these progestins was determined in previous clinical pharmacokinetic studies, comparison of these results obtained in vivo with the corresponding metabolic stabilityin vitro would allow assessment of the predictive value of the in vitro system for this particular class of compounds. In addition, different methods of data evaluation were applied to identify the most efficient approach during early drug candidate selection.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Microsomal Preparations.

The following progestins, which were synthesized at Schering AG, were included in this study: norethisterone, levonorgestrel, gestodene, desogestrel, 3-keto-desogestrel, norgestimate, and dienogest. For protein binding analysis, [3H]levonorgestrel (1.81 Tbq/mmol) and [3H]gestodene (2.05 Tbq/mmol), with radiochemical purities of at least 99%, were obtained from the Department of Isotope Chemistry (Schering AG). All other chemicals and organic solvents were of analytical grade and were obtained from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany), Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany), Baker (Groβ-Gera, Germany), or Riedel de Haen (Berlin, Germany).

Pooled liver microsomes from 31 Caucasian subjects and 1 Hispanic subject (17 female and 15 male donors) were obtained as a stock suspension (20 mg of protein/ml) from the International Institute for the Advancement of Medicine (Exton, PA). The microsomal preparation was characterized with respect to the activity of individual CYP isozymes.

Microsomal Studies. Dependence of the Turnover Rate on the Incubation Period and Protein Concentration.

To establish conditions that are linear with respect to time and enzyme concentration, each progestin was incubated, at low (2 μM) and intermediate (15 μM) concentrations, with 0.7 mg of microsomal protein for 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min. In addition, the compounds were incubated with protein concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 1.0 mg/ml, for a fixed time period of 15 or 30 min.

Final Incubation Conditions to Determine K M,app and V max and Sample Preparation.

The incubation mixture (final volume, 1 ml of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) contained 0.2 mg of microsomal protein and an NADPH-regenerating system (0.6 mM NADP, 8 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 1.4 unit of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 38 mM KCl, and 5 mM MgCl2). After a preincubation period of 3 min at 37°C, the reaction was started by the addition of 25 μl of a methanolic solution of the progestin. Each substrate concentration was incubated in triplicate for 15 min at 37°C, except for norgestimate, which was incubated for only 10 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 2 ml of the precipitating solution (ice-cold acetone/methanol, 3:1, v/v). Samples were extracted for 20 min by end-over-end rotation and, after centrifugation and decantation, the liquid phase was dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The dried residues were stored at −18°C. The recovery was examined for each progestin over a range of 0.1 to 100 μM and was between 76 and 101%.

Analysis of Progestins in Microsomal Preparations by HPLC.HPLC Conditions.

HPLC analyses were performed using a Spherisorb ODS-2 column (125 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Merck). The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of acetonitrile and water, and the composition was adjusted for each progestin (between 35:65 and 80:20, v/v). The eluent was monitored by UV detection at either 205, 248, or 300 nm, depending on the absorption maximum of the individual progestin. The compounds were separated at ambient temperature by isocratic elution at a flow rate of 0.8–1.5 ml/min.

Quantitative Determination of Progestins.

The dry residues were redissolved in 150–500 μl (typically 250 μl) of mobile phase, and aliquots of 50–150 μl were injected into the HPLC system. For each compound, calibration standards were prepared from methanolic stock solutions (0.25 mg/ml). These stock solutions were further diluted with buffer, yielding final calibration standards ranging from 0.1 to 100 μM. Calibration standards were extracted in the same way as the samples. In one case (desogestrel), the standard curve was prepared from incubation medium containing 0.2 mg of microsomes but no NADP, because of differences in the recovery of the progestin from standard and test samples. External standardization based on peak areas was used for quantification. Standards and samples were each analyzed in duplicate.

Quality Control.

Each sample set included a standard curve, samples from the in vitro experiments, and three or four quality control samples for one progestin. The quality controls were prepared by spiking the phosphate buffer that was used in the incubation experiments with defined amounts of the progestins to be analyzed. The following quality controls were analyzed: 2, 15, 30, and 100 μM (norethisterone and dienogest); 2, 15, and 30 μM (3-keto-desogestrel, gestodene, and norgestimate); 2, 30, and 40 μM (levonorgestrel); or 8 and 15 μM (desogestrel). The quality controls were processed in the same way as the samples and were analyzed singly. The deviation of the measured values from the nominal concentrations (accuracy) was between 89 and 108%. The lower limit of quantitation was set at 0.1 μM for each of the progestins investigated. This was also the lowest concentration of each standard curve, and the signal/noise ratio was >3 in each case.

Testosterone Metabolism.

Each assay was controlled for CYP enzyme activity using testosterone (100 μM) as the substrate and using the same incubation conditions as for the investigated progestins. Enzyme activity was evaluated qualitatively as the production of 6β-hydroxytestosterone, which was analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC using a Spherisorb ODS-2 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 3 μm; Merck) and acetonitrile/water (44:55, v/v) as the mobile phase. A flow gradient (0.5–1.0 ml/min) was applied, and the eluent was monitored by UV detection at 248 nm.

Protein Binding of Levonorgestrel and Gestodene in the Incubation Medium.

Two milliliters of an incubation mixture containing 0.2 mg of microsomes/ml but no NADPH were spiked with gestodene (or levonorgestrel), at a 50 μM (40 μM) concentration, plus3H-labeled gestodene (or levonorgestrel) (approximately 50,000 cpm). The mixture was maintained at 37°C for 1 hr. Aliquots of 300 μl were transferred to an MPS2 ultrafiltration unit (Amicon) and centrifuged for 20 min at 1500g, using a fixed-angle rotor. Aliquots of 50 μl of both incubation medium and ultrafiltrate were each mixed with 4.5 ml of scintillation cocktail (Atomlight; NEN), and the total radioactivity was measured in a liquid scintillation counter. Each sample was analyzed repeatedly (incubation medium, three times; ultrafiltrate, five times). The free fraction of each progestin was calculated from the radioactivity present in the ultrafiltrate and the incubation medium. No correction was made for nonspecific binding to the ultrafiltration device.

Data Analysis. Calculation of KM,appand VmaxValues.

Because, in the present study, only disappearance rates for the progestins were evaluated, the Michaelis-Menten constant was designatedKM,app, because more than one enzyme is involved in the metabolism of these drugs.KM,app andVmax were determined by nonlinear regression analysis according to the Michaelis-Menten method (rate of substrate degradation as a function of substrate concentration).

Calculation of In VitroCLint from Michaelis-Menten Parameters.

The ratio of Vmax andKM,app was used to calculate in vitro CLint, which was expressed as milliliters per minute per milligram of microsomal protein.InvitroCLint=VmaxKM,app Equation 1

Calculation of In VitroCLint from Dose and AUC.

With initial drug concentrations of 2 and 15 μM, the incubation reactions were stopped after 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60 min, and the concentrations of the progestins were analyzed. The concentration-time curves that were obtained for each progestin were evaluated model-independently (TOPFIT 2.1; Goedecke, Schering AG, Thomae) to calculate the necessary pharmacokinetic parameters. The terminal rate constant λz was calculated by regression analysis, and the corresponding in vitro half-life (t1/2) was obtained according to the following equation:t1/2=ln 2λz Equation 2The AUC was calculated asAUC=AUC0–tlast+Clastλz Equation 3where tlast is the total incubation time (60 min) and Clast is the drug concentration measured at tlast. Thein vitro CLint (expressed as milliliters per minute per milligram of microsomal protein) was calculated asInvitroCLint=DAUC Equation 4where D is the initial amount of drug in the incubation medium.

Scaling of In VitroCLint to In VivoCLint.

To transform the microsomal in vitro CLint to an in vivo CLint value, a suitable scaling factor is required. Assuming that 1 g of liver contains approximately 50 mg of microsomal protein and the liver of a 70-kg human weighs approximately 1,400 g, one obtains a scaling factor (SF) of 70,000 mg. Multiplication of the in vitro CLint by this scaling factor yields the scaled in vivo CLint, expressed as milliliters per minute or liters per hour.ScaledinvivoCLint=SF×invitroCLint Equation 5

Calculation of CLint in HumansIn Vivo from Total CL.

The CLint in humans can be derived from the total in vivo CL after the iv administration of drug, assuming that CL is identical toCLH . Based on the well-stirred (venous equilibrium) liver model, CLH is given by the following equation:CLH=QH×fu×CLintQH+fu×CLint Equation 6which can be transformed intoInvivoCLint=CLHfu1−CLHQH Equation 7where fu is the free fraction of the drug and QH is either the hepatic blood flow (90 liters/hr) or the hepatic plasma flow (49 liters/hr), depending on whether CLH was determined from whole blood or plasma. The pharmacokinetic parameters for the progestins obtained during pharmacokinetic studies in healthy young women are summarized in table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

CLint values, bioavailability (f), and other pharmacokinetic parameters for selected progestins, determinedin vivo during clinical pharmacokinetic studies with healthy young women

Calculation of Bioavailability Based on Scaled In VivoCLint.

In cases where the first-pass effect is solely or mainly attributable to hepatic metabolism, the oral bioavailability (f) of a drug is almost exclusively dependent on the hepatic extraction ratio (E),f=1−E Equation 8where E is given by eq. 9.E=CLint×fuQH+CLint×fu Equation 9For CLint ≪QH , eq. 9 can be reduced toE=CLHQH Equation 10Under the same assumption, eq. 6 forCLH can be reduced toCLH=fu×CLint Equation 11and, combining eqs. 10 and 11,E=fu×CLintQH Equation 12Thus, f can be calculated from eqs. 8 and 12, using the free fraction of the drug in serum (table 1), the scaledin vivo CLint, and the hepatic plasma flow (table 2). The parameters derived from in vitro studies (scaled in vivo CLint, in vitro CLint, and in vitro half-lives) were correlated with in vivo parameters (in vivo CLint and bioavailability) by linear regression analysis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Michaelis-Menten parameters KM,app andVmax, in vitro CLint, and scaledin vivo CLint values for selected progestins

Results

Optimal conditions, ensuring linearity of rates of drug disappearance from the incubation medium with respect to time and microsomal protein concentration, were established at a microsomal protein content of 0.2 mg/sample and an incubation period of 15 min (except for norgestimate, which was incubated for 10 min). The CYP enzyme activity of the microsomal incubations was assessed by incubation with testosterone and was qualitatively confirmed in each assay by the presence of 6β-hydroxytestosterone at the end of the incubation period.

To examine whether binding of the progestins to microsomal proteins is likely to have an influence on the rate of metabolism in vitro, the free fractions of gestodene and levonorgestrel in the incubation medium were determined by ultrafiltration. These two drugs were chosen because they are the ones that are most extensively bound to serum proteins in vivo. In vitro, approximately 82% of gestodene was free and only approximately 18% was bound to protein. For levonorgestrel, the free and protein-bound fractions were approximately 47 and 53%, respectively. Because the two progestins were not extensively bound to microsomal proteins, total instead of free concentrations were used for further calculation ofCLint values.

The parameters KM,app andVmax obtained for the different progestins, as well as the corresponding in vitro CLint and scaled in vivo CLint values, are presented in table 2. Thein vitro CLint values were in the range of 0.046 (dienogest) to 0.309 ml/min/mg (norgestimate). For those progestins that had been administered iv to women, the in vivo CLint was calculated from totalCL values (table 1) according to eq. 7. The correlation of these in vivo CLint values with the scaled in vivo CLint values is presented in fig. 1. There was a linear relation (r = 0.769) between scaled in vivo CLint and corresponding in vivo CLint values; however, the latter were approximately twice as high as the scaled values.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Correlation between scaled in vivo CLint values and the corresponding in vivoCLintvalues derived from total CL values obtained after iv administration of the progestins to healthy young women.

The regression line is presented together with the corresponding equation and the correlation coefficient.

A correlation between the in vitro CLint values and the oral bioavailability of the investigated progestins in humans is presented in fig.2. When desogestrel was excluded, the regression line was characterized by a correlation coefficient ofr = −0.986.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Correlation between in vitroCLint values (calculated on the basis ofVmax andKM, app ) for selected progestins and their oral bioavailability in humans.

The regression lines are presented together with the corresponding equations and the correlation coefficients (thick line, complete data set; thin line, data set with desogestrel excluded).

In a second approach, CLint values were calculated on the basis of dose and AUC at two different drug concentrations (table 3). At a 2 μM drug concentration, the in vitro CLint values were in the range of 0.013 (desogestrel) to 0.066 ml/min/mg (norgestimate); at a concentration of 15 μM, the in vitro CLintvalues were in the range of 0.009 (dienogest) to 0.027 ml/min/mg (norgestimate). The correlation between the in vitro CLint values and the oral bioavailabilityin vivo is presented in fig.3. When desogestrel was excluded, the regression line was characterized by correlation coefficients of −0.922 and −0.989 at drug concentrations of 2 and 15 μM, respectively. The results obtained with this approach at a 15 μM concentration were comparable to those obtained before using the Michalis-Menten parameters (fig. 2); however, the absoluteCLint values differed by a factor of approximately 10 between the two data sets. Another way of assessing the metabolic stability of the progestins is to determine the disappearance half-life of drug in vitro. This was performed for each progestin at two initial concentrations (2 and 15 μM). Drug levels in the incubation medium declined, in a logarithmic-linear fashion, over the complete incubation time of 60 min; this allowed straightforward determination of the corresponding half-lives. Only for desogestrel, a somewhat more irregular time course for the drug levels was observed at a 2 μM concentration (fig.4). The results are presented in table 3, and the correlation between in vitro half-lives and oral bioavailability is shown in fig. 5. Obviously, only a poor correlation was obtained between the two parameters at the low concentration of 2 μM (r = 0.439); a somewhat better correlation was obtained at 15 μM (r = 0.843).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

CLint values and in vitro half-lives for selected progestins, derived from human liver microsomal incubations with either 2 or 15 μM drug concentrations and an incubation time of 60 min

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Correlation between the oral bioavailability of selected progestins in humans and the in vitroCLint values derived with initial drug concentrations of 2 μM (A) and 15 μM (B) in the incubation medium.

The regression lines are presented together with the corresponding equations and the correlation coefficients (thick lines,complete data set; thin lines, data set with desogestrel excluded).

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Semilogarithmic presentation of the drug concentration-time curves (mean values) for selected progestins in the microsomal incubation medium during the complete incubation period of 60 min (A, 2 μM; B, 15 μM initial substrate concentration).

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

Correlation of in vitrohalf-lives for selected progestins (A, 2 μM;B, 15 μM) with their oral bioavailability in healthy young women.

The regression lines are presented together with the corresponding equations and correlation coefficients (thick lines,complete data set; A, thin line, data set with desogestrel excluded; B, thin line, data set with norgestimate and 3-keto-desogestrel excluded).

Discussion

Human liver microsomes have become readily available, and they can be used for in vitro studies of drug metabolism at early stages in drug development. However, it must be kept in mind that microsomal preparations may provide a suitable model only for drugs for which mainly phase I reactions are involved in drug disposition and conjugation reactions are not rate-limiting. These requirements are met by most of the progestins of the 19-nortestosterone type. Because the oral bioavailability in humans is known for a number of these progestins (Back et al., 1978, 1987a,b; Orme et al., 1991; Hümpel et al., 1987; Täuberet al., 1989; Oettel et al., 1995), these data can be compared with the results obtained from in vitrometabolism studies, to assess the value of the in vitromodel for predicting bioavailability.

A suitable parameter for the in vitro-in vivocorrelation is CLint, which can be defined as the maximal metabolic capacity of the eliminating organ (liver) for a particular drug in the absence of any flow or diffusion restrictions of drug supply. CLint can be expressed as the quotient of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme parametersVmax and KM , and this concept has been applied to a variety of drugs in an ever-increasing number of studies using microsomes, hepatocytes, or liver slices (Houston, 1994; Hoener, 1994; Obach et al., 1997; Lin et al., 1980; Rane et al., 1977;Sidelmann et al., 1996).

In the present study, these parameters were derived for each progestin in the in vitro experiments under conditions where the metabolic disposition rate was linear with respect to incubation time and amount of microsomal protein. The importance of nonspecific binding to microsomal proteins in vitro and its implications forin vitro-in vivo correlations have been emphasized recently (Obach, 1996). In the present study, however, no correction of the CLint values was deemed necessary, because levonorgestrel and gestodene, which are both >95% bound to serum proteins in vivo, showed only negligible or moderate nonspecific binding to liver microsomes in vitro(Kuhnz et al., 1994a).

To scale the in vitro CLint to a scaled in vivo CLint, an appropriate, biologically meaningful, scaling factor must be chosen. A range of approximately 40–60 mg of microsomal protein/g of liver was found in the literature for microsomal protein recovery from liver tissue; therefore, a value of 50 mg was used in the present study (Houston, 1994; Lin et al., 1980; Rane et al., 1977). Assuming that 1 g of liver tissue contains approximately 50 mg of microsomal protein and the average weight of a human liver is approximately 1,400 g (Lentner, 1981), a scaling factor of 70,000 mg can be calculated. A comparison of the scaled in vivo CLint values and the corresponding in vivo CLint values, which were derived from total CL values obtained after iv administration of these progestins to human volunteers, reveals a linear relation with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.769 (fig. 1). However, the slope of the regression line (2.2) indicates an underestimation ofin vivo CLint, by a factor of approximately 2, with microsomal data. This was noted by other investigators who used microsomal preparations to predict in vivo CL, and the underestimation was thought to be partly attributable to a loss of enzyme activity during microsomal preparation or perhaps to product inhibition as a consequence of the absence of phase II reactions (Houston, 1994). This may also apply to the present study, because in vivo the metabolites of the progestins are mainly conjugated with sulfuric and glucuronic acid before excretion.

There was also a linear relation between in vitro CLint and the oral bioavailability of the progestins. For desogestrel, a CLint value far lower than anticipated from the low oral bioavailability observedin vivo was obtained. If desogestrel was excluded, a reasonably good correlation (r = −0.986) was obtained (fig. 2). It should be noted that accurate human bioavailability data are not available for norgestimate or desogestrel, because both progestins are prodrugs that are readily and almost completely metabolized to their active metabolites. Therefore, an arbitrary oral bioavailability of 5% was assumed for the purpose of the present investigation.

Obviously, in the case of desogestrel, the metabolic stability in human microsomal preparations is not a good predictor of the oral bioavailability in vivo. The explanation for this is probably that, in contrast to the other progestins, desogestrel undergoes considerable first-pass metabolism during passage through the intestinal wall, before the first liver passage. This is supported by a study investigating the metabolic degradation of desogestrel in human gut mucosa in vitro (Madden et al., 1989). Desogestrel undergoes both phase I and phase II metabolism. In addition to the formation of 3-keto-desogestrel and other hydroxylated metabolites, direct sulfation of desogestrel was observed. If this also occurs in vivo, then the present results obtained with liver microsomes only illustrate the fact that this model is not applicable to desogestrel, because one of the requirements described above (no substantial extrahepatic metabolism) is not met. Although there are also reports that demonstrate the in vitro metabolic degradation of norgestimate incubated with human gut mucosa (mainly deacetylation of the parent drug and only minor formation of 3-keto-norgestimate), the extent of intestinal first-pass metabolismin vivo is, in contrast to desogestrel, probably negligible, compared with the contribution of the liver to the total first-pass effect (Madden and Back, 1991). In particular, direct sulfation of norgestimate has not been observed and is very unlikely to occur, because the molecule does not contain a free hydroxyl group.

Two other approaches to evaluate the metabolic stability of the progestins in microsomal preparations and to correlate these data with the oral bioavailability were tested. One approach was to use only one initial concentration of the progestin in the incubation medium and to measure the disappearance of the drug at regular time intervals. From the drug concentration-time course, the terminal half-life of disposition, the AUC, and the in vitro CLint were calculated. The in vitro CLint values on the one hand and the in vitro half-lives on the other hand were correlated with the oral bioavailability of the progestins.

It is a prerequisite for this kind of study that the drug concentration in the microsomal incubation is well below the apparentKM,app value. However, for the characterization and selection of new drug candidates during early development, certain limitations must be accepted. Firstly, theKM,app values of new drug candidates are not known a priori; secondly, a specific and highly sensitive analytical method (for contraceptive steroids, usually radioimmunoassay) is not available at this stage of development. A realistic approach must take into account these limitations; therefore, we chose HPLC as an analytical tool that is readily available for drug analysis and allows rapid throughput of samples. Because the limit of quantitation of this method was 0.1 μM for the progestins investigated, two different initial drug concentrations (2 and 15 μM), which were thought to be high enough to allow drug concentrations to be measured over the entire incubation period, were chosen. For the progestins investigated, maximal serum concentrations observed in women are between 15 and 200 nM, well below the chosenin vitro concentrations (Kuhnz et al., 1992a,c,1993; Oettel et al., 1995). If one also takes into account the fact that these progestins are highly bound to serum proteins and only 1–10% are present in free form, it becomes obvious that thein vitro concentrations of the progestins were approximately 1000-fold higher than the free in vivo concentrations. On the other hand, 1–20 nM concentrations of the progestins can be measured only by highly sensitive and specific analytical methods (e.g. radioimmunoassay or GC/MS), which are usually not available and cannot be easily established within a reasonable time for each drug candidate at an early stage of development.

The quality of the correlation between the oral bioavailability and thein vitro CLint values was strongly dependent on the initial drug concentration used (fig. 3). When desogestrel was excluded from the evaluation, a similarly good correlation (r = −0.989) was obtained at the 15 μM drug concentration, compared with that previously established fromVmax andKM,app values. At the 2 μM concentration, however, the progestins with intermediate bioavailability (norethisterone and 3-keto-desogestrel) were almost indistinguishable in their in vitro CLint values from the progestins with almost complete bioavailability (gestodene, levonorgestrel, and dienogest).

The situation becomes even less favorable when only the in vitro half-lives are correlated with the corresponding oral bioavailabilities of the progestins. The drug concentrations used (2 and 15 μM) were, except for 3-keto-desogestrel and norgestimate, well below the KM,app values of the progestins, but even when these two drugs were excluded from the evaluation only a poor correlation was obtained (fig. 5). At the 2 μM concentration, for example, the half-life of norethisterone (a progestin that exhibits a considerable first-pass effect in vivo) is longer than the half-lives of gestodene and dienogest, both of which are almost completely bioavailable. Furthermore, levonorgestrel and gestodene differ in their half-lives by almost a factor of 2, although both progestins are nearly completely bioavailable. At the initial drug concentration of 15 μM, there is at least a gross separation between progestins with high, intermediate, and low bioavailabilities; however, the data points are more scattered than with the previous two approaches using in vitro CLint values.

The principal problem in using in vitro concentrations that are close to or even above the KM,appvalue has already been mentioned; however, it remains unclear why, in the present study, better correlations with in vivo data were obtained with the 15 μM concentration, compared with the 2 μM concentration. Adequate metabolic turnover of substrate was achieved at both concentrations for each of the progestins. One possible explanation may be that at 2 μM substrates bind preferentially to high-affinity enzymes with low turnover rates, whereas at a higher substrate concentration other enzymes with lower affinities but higher turnover rates may also be saturated and contribute significantly to the total turnover rate. In any case, there was not a satisfactory correlation between in vitro half-life and oral bioavailability in vivo with either 2 or 15 μM concentrations. On the other hand, positive experiences have been reported by others, who determined the in vitro half-lives for a large variety of compounds at a single low initial concentration of 1 μM and used these data to predict in vivo CL in humans. Their results based on in vitrohalf-life data were fairly comparable to those obtained from enzyme kinetic data (Obach et al., 1997).

In conclusion, the present study has shown that the in vitromodel of human hepatic microsomal preparations is a suitable tool for the prediction of the oral bioavailability of 19-nortestosterone progestins in vivo. This applies for progestins with low, moderate, and high bioavailabilities, which are predominantly metabolized by the liver. The limits of the model are reached in cases (like desogestrel) where there is a substantial contribution of intestinal metabolism to the first-pass effect in vivo. To obtain reliable and meaningful results, it is recommended thatCLint values be calculated from Michaelis-Menten enzyme parameters, which were determined under linear conditions. Other approaches, such as simple half-life determinations at single initial drug concentrations, are less time-consuming but may lead to erroneous results if the single drug concentration chosen is inappropriate.

Acknowledgments

The expert technical help of B. Salomon and G. Al-Yacoub in performing the microsomal incubations and the drug analyses is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

  • Send reprint requests to: Dr. Wilhelm Kuhnz, Pharmacokinetics FC/HT, Schering AG, 13342 Berlin, Germany.

  • Abbreviations used are::
    CL
    plasma clearance
    CYP
    cytochrome P450
    CLH
    hepatic clearance
    CLint
    intrinsic clearance
    • Received February 13, 1998.
    • Accepted June 11, 1998.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Back DJ,
    2. Breckenridge AM,
    3. Crawford FE,
    4. McIver M,
    5. Orme MLE,
    6. Park BK,
    7. Rowe PH,
    8. Smith E
    (1978) Pharmacokinetics of norethindrone in women. 2. Single dose pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 24:448–453.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Back DJ,
    2. Breckenridge AM,
    3. Gay FE,
    4. McIver M,
    5. Orme MLE,
    6. Park BK,
    7. Rowe PH,
    8. Smith E
    (1977) Pharmacokinetics of norethisterone in women. Br J Clin Pharmacol 4:729–730, p..
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Back DJ,
    2. Grimmer SFM,
    3. Rogers S,
    4. Stevenson PJ,
    5. Orme MLE
    (1987a) Comparative pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and ethinyloestradiol following intravenous, oral and vaginal administration. Contraception 36:471–479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Back DJ,
    2. Grimmer SFM,
    3. Shenoy N,
    4. Orme MLE
    (1987b) Plasma concentrations of 3-keto-desogestrel after oral administration of desogestrel and intravenous administration of 3-keto-desogestrel. Contraception 35:619–626.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Dibbelt L,
    2. Knuppen R,
    3. Kuhnz W,
    4. Jütting G
    (1992) Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of gestodene under treatment with a low-dose combination oral contraceptive for three months. Drug Res 42:1146–1152.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hammond GL,
    2. Lähteenmäki PLA,
    3. Lähteenmäki P,
    4. Luukkainen T
    (1982) Distribution and percentages of non-protein bound contraceptive steroids in human serum. J Steroid Biochem 17:375–380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Heuner A,
    2. Kuhnz W,
    3. Heger-Mahn D,
    4. Richert K,
    5. Hümpel M
    (1995) A single-dose and 3-month clinical-pharmacokinetic study with a new combination oral contraceptive. Adv Contracept 11:207–225.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hoener BA
    (1994) Predicting the hepatic clearance of xenobiotics in humans from in vitro data. Biopharm Drug Dispos 15:295–304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Houston JB
    (1994) Utility of in vitro drug metabolism data in predicting in vivo metabolic clearance. Biochem Pharmacol 47:1469–1479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hümpel M,
    2. Wendt H,
    3. Pommerenke G,
    4. Weiss C,
    5. Speck U
    (1987) Investigations of pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel to specific consideration of a possible first-pass effect in women. Contraception 17:207–220.
  11. ↵
    1. Kuhnz W,
    2. Al-Yacoub G,
    3. Fuhrmeister A
    (1992a) Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol in 9 women who received a low-dose oral contraceptive over a treatment period of 3 months and, after a wash-out phase, a single oral administration of the same contraceptive formulation. Contraception 46:455–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kuhnz W,
    2. Al-Yacoub G,
    3. Fuhrmeister A
    (1992b) Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel in 12 women who received a single oral dose of 0.15 mg levonorgestrel and, after a wash-out phase, the same dose during one treatment cycle. Contraception 46:443–454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kuhnz W,
    2. Al-Yacoub G,
    3. Power J,
    4. Ormesher SE,
    5. Back DJ,
    6. Jütting G
    (1992c) Pharmacokinetics and serum protein binding of 3-keto-desogestrel in women during three cycles of treatment with a low-dose combination oral contraceptive. Drug Res 42:1142–1146.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kuhnz W,
    2. Baumann A,
    3. Staks T,
    4. Dibbelt L,
    5. Knuppen R,
    6. Jütting G
    (1993) Pharmacokinetics of gestodene and ethinylestradiol in 14 women during three months of treatment with a new tri-step combination oral contraceptive: serum protein binding of gestodene and influence of treatment on free and total testosterone levels in the serum. Contraception 48:303–322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kuhnz W,
    2. Gansau C,
    3. Fuhrmeister A
    (1992d) Pharmacokinetics of gestodene in 12 women who received a single oral dose of 0.075 mg gestodene and, after a wash-out phase, the same dose during one treatment cycle. Contraception 46:20–40.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Kuhnz W,
    2. Schütt B,
    3. Power J,
    4. Back DJ
    (1992e) Pharmacokinetics and serum protein binding of gestodene and 3-keto-desogestrel in women after single oral administration of two different contraceptive formulations. Drug Res 42:1139–1141.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kuhnz W,
    2. Schütt B,
    3. Woloszczak R
    (1994a) Influence of changes in the concentration of sex hormone-binding globulin in human serum on the protein binding of the contraceptive steroids levonorgestrel, 3-keto-desogestrel and gestodene. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 48:573–580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Kuhnz W,
    2. Staks T,
    3. Jütting G
    (1994b) Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol in 14 women during three months of treatment with a tri-step combination oral contraceptive: serum protein binding of levonorgestrel and influence of treatment on free and total testosterone levels in serum. Contraception 50:563–579.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Lentner C
    , ed (1981) Geigy Scientific Tables (Ciba-Geigy, Basel), 1:220.
  20. ↵
    1. Lin JH,
    2. Sugiyama Y,
    3. Awazu S,
    4. Hanano M
    (1980) Kinetic studies on the deethylation of ethoxybenzamide: a comparative study with isolated hepatocytes and liver microsomes of rat. Biochem Pharmacol 29:2825–2830.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Madden S,
    2. Back DJ
    (1991) Metabolism of norgestimate by human gastrointestinal mucosa and liver microsomes in vitro. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 38:497–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Madden S,
    2. Back DJ,
    3. Martin CA,
    4. Orme MLE
    (1989) Metabolism of the contraceptive steroid desogestrel by the intestinal mucosa. Br J Clin Pharmacol 27:295–299.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Obach RS
    (1996) The importance of nonspecific binding in in vitro matrices, its impact on enzyme kinetic studies of drug metabolism reactions, and implications for in vitro-in vivo correlations. Drug Metab Dispos 24:1047–1049.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Obach RS,
    2. Baxter JG,
    3. Liston TE,
    4. Silber BM,
    5. Jones BC,
    6. MacIntyre F,
    7. Rance DJ,
    8. Wastall P
    (1997) The prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters from preclinical and in vitro metabolism data. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 283:46–58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Oettel M,
    2. Bervoas-Martin S,
    3. Elger W,
    4. Golbs S,
    5. Hobe G,
    6. Kaufmann G,
    7. Mathieu M,
    8. Moore C,
    9. Puri C,
    10. Ritter P,
    11. Reddersen G,
    12. Schön R,
    13. Strauch G,
    14. Zimmermann H
    (1995) A 19-norprogestin without a 17α-ethinyl group. I. Dienogest from a pharmacokinetic point of view. Drugs Today 31:499–516.
  26. ↵
    1. Orme MLE,
    2. Back DJ,
    3. Ward S,
    4. Green S
    (1991) The pharmacokinetics of ethynylestradiol in the presence and absence of gestodene and desogestrel. Contraception 43:305–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Rane A,
    2. Wilkinson GR,
    3. Shand DG
    (1977) Prediction of hepatic extraction ratio from in vitro measurements of intrinsic clearance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 200:420–424.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Sidelmann UG,
    2. Cornett C,
    3. Tjornelund J,
    4. Hansen SH
    (1996) A comparative study of precision cut liver slices, hepatocytes, and liver microsomes from the Wistar rat using metronidazole as a model substance. Xenobiotica 26:709–722.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Täuber U,
    2. Tack JW,
    3. Matthes H
    (1989) Single dose pharmacokinetics of gestodene in women after intravenous and oral administration. Contraception 40:461–479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 26, Issue 11
1 Nov 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predicting the Oral Bioavailability of 19-Nortestosterone Progestins In Vivo from Their Metabolic Stability in Human Liver Microsomal Preparations In Vitro
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Predicting the Oral Bioavailability of 19-Nortestosterone Progestins In Vivo from Their Metabolic Stability in Human Liver Microsomal Preparations In Vitro

Wilhelm Kuhnz and Hille Gieschen
Drug Metabolism and Disposition November 1, 1998, 26 (11) 1120-1127;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Predicting the Oral Bioavailability of 19-Nortestosterone Progestins In Vivo from Their Metabolic Stability in Human Liver Microsomal Preparations In Vitro

Wilhelm Kuhnz and Hille Gieschen
Drug Metabolism and Disposition November 1, 1998, 26 (11) 1120-1127;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Series-Compartment Models of Hepatic Elimination
  • Warfarin PBPK Model with TMDD Mechanism
  • Identification of payload-containing catabolites of ADCs
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics