Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Rapid Characterization of the Major Drug-Metabolizing Human Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 Enzymes Expressed in Escherichia coli

Dermot F. McGinnity, Sarah J. Griffin, Graeme C. Moody, Mike Voice, Stephen Hanlon, Thomas Friedberg and Robert J. Riley
Drug Metabolism and Disposition September 1999, 27 (9) 1017-1023;
Dermot F. McGinnity
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah J. Griffin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graeme C. Moody
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mike Voice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Hanlon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Friedberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert J. Riley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The major drug-metabolizing human hepatic cytochrome P-450s (CYPs; CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4) coexpressed functionally inEscherichia coli with human NADPH-P-450 reductase have been validated as surrogates to their counterparts in human liver microsomes (HLM) using automated technology. The dealkylation of ethoxyresorufin, dextromethorphan, and erythromycin were all shown to be specific reactions for CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 that allowed direct comparison with kinetic data for HLM. For CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, the kinetics for the discrete oxidations of naproxen and diazepam were compared to data obtained using established, commercial CYP preparations. Turnover numbers of CYPs expressed in E. coli toward these substrates were generally equal to or even greater than those of the major commercial suppliers [CYP1A2 (ethoxyresorufin), E. coli 0.6 ± 0.2 min−1 versus B lymphoblasts 0.4 ± 0.1 min−1; CYP2C9 (naproxen), 6.7 ± 0.9 versus 4.9 min−1; CYP2C19 (diazepam), 3.7 ± 0.3 versus 0.2 ± 0.1 min−1; CYP2D6 (dextromethorphan), 4.7 ± 0.1 versus 4.4 ± 0.1 min−1; CYP3A4 (erythromycin), 3 ± 1.2 versus 1.6 min−1]. The apparentKm values for the specific reactions were also similar (Km ranges for expressed CYPs and HLM were: ethoxyresorufin 0.5–1.0 μM, dextromethorphan 1.3–5.9 μM, and erythromycin 18–57 μM), indicating little if any effect ofN-terminal modification on the E. coli-expressed CYPs. The data generated for all the probe substrates by HLM and recombinant CYPs also agreed well with literature values. In summary, E. coli-expressed CYPs appear faithful surrogates for the native (HLM) enzyme, and these data suggest that such recombinant enzymes may be suitable for predictive human metabolism studies.

Recent clinical experiences with several compounds have highlighted the importance of assessing the potential for inhibition (Honig et al., 1993; Ahmad and Wolfe, 1995) or induction of drug metabolism (Parkinson, 1996 and references therein) and has promoted heavy investment in the early prediction of the extent and route of candidate drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic parameters in humans. In addition, with the increasingly large number of compounds generated as a result of the emergence of combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening techniques, it is becoming important to develop rapid and relatively high throughput in vitro drug metabolism models with which to assess and eradicate such unfavorable properties from a series of potential drug candidates.

Currently, a combined in vitro approach using both heterologous expression systems (eventually for all xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes) and human hepatic tissue fractions is recommended as the most thorough route to developing safe drugs with appropriate metabolic properties (Parkinson, 1996). Identifying the specific cytochrome P-450 (CYP)1 enzyme involved in the metabolism of drug candidates is a labor- and time-intensive process involving correlation analyses within a bank of human liver microsomes (HLM), chemical and antibody isoform-selective inhibition, and confirmation with expressed enzymes.

As confidence in the application of recombinant enzymes to such studies has increased, their use as first line approaches in human hepatic CYP inhibition screens for drug candidates (Remmel and Burchell, 1993;Crespi and Penman, 1997; Crespi et al., 1997; Moody et al., 1999) and for the prediction of HLM kinetics (Becquemont et al., 1998) has been proposed.

Many CYP isoforms have now been expressed in various heterologous cell lines including bacteria, yeast, cultured insect, and mammalian cells (Waterman et al., 1995; Gonzalez and Korzekwa, 1995). E. coli expression systems offer many advantages over the major commercially available materials including generally stable and easy to manipulate plasmid constructs; the expressed enzyme is easily replenished at a high yield and at relatively low cost. Furthermore, although a high level of expression may require some modification of the N-terminal amino acid sequence of the CYP protein (Larson et al., 1991; Waterman, 1993), recent data have indicated that functional expression can still be achieved with the major drug-metabolizing CYPs with properties similar to the human hepatic microsomal enzymes (Blake et al., 1996; Iwata et al., 1998). The availability of an in-house panel of characterized human hepatic CYP enzymes would obviate the reliance on expensive commercial supplies and provide local control of expression levels, supply, interbatch variability, and quality.

With any expressed enzyme system, it is extremely important to have confidence that the recombinant CYPs are surrogates for the human microsomal enzymes by comparative analysis of the kinetic properties of these enzymes. This characterization and validation could include an assessment of substrate and inhibitor selectivity together with comparative kinetic analyses, which represents a substantial undertaking. This process is facilitated markedly through the application of automation technology, which enables a comprehensive in-house characterization of enzyme activities and eliminates awkward interlaboratory comparisons (Moody et al., 1999).

This laboratory has recently developed fully automated inhibition screens for the major human hepatic CYPs (Moody et al., 1999). As part of an extensive collaboration between academia and major pharmaceutical companies, this paper describes the validation of the major drug-metabolizing human CYP isoforms CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 expressed in E. coli. These enzymes have been characterized with respect to their kinetic properties and comparisons have been made with their counterparts in HLM as well as the most widely used commercially available recombinant CYP preparations and to the wider literature.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals.

All chemicals and reagents used were of the highest available commercial grade. Ampicillin, diazepam, erythromycin, dextromethorphan, naproxen, ethoxyresorufin, resorufin, δ-aminolevulinic acid, glycerol, and β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced form (β-NADPH) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (Poole, UK). Isopropylthio-β-d-galactoside was purchased from Gibco BRL (Grand Island, NY). Bactotryptone, yeast extract, and bactopeptone were purchased from Difco (Detroit, MI).

The 14C-labeled probe substrates [N-methyl-14C]diazepam, [O-methyl-14C]dextromethorphan, and [O-methyl-14C]naproxen (specific radioactivity 55 mCi/mmol, chemical purity ≥98.5%, radiochemical purity ≥99.4%) were synthesized as described previously (Moody et al., 1999). [N-methyl-14C]erythromycin (specific radioactivity 55 mCi/mmol, radiochemical purity >97%) was purchased from NEN Life Science Products (Boston, MA).

Construction and Expression of Plasmids in E. coli.

The LINK consortium, a collaboration between UK-based academia and industry, provided stocks of transformed cells with human CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 individually coexpressed with human NADPH-P-450 reductase in E. coli. The strategy for expressing CYP1A2 (in strain JM109) and CYP2C9 (in strain DH5α) was similar to that described for CYP2D6 (Pritchard et al., 1998) and involved coexpressing each CYP with NADPH-P-450 reductase from separate compatible plasmids using ampicillin and chloramphenicol as the respective selection markers. For optimal expression of CYP1A2 and CYP2C9 the first eight codons of each CYP cDNA were replaced with eight codons of the bovine pregnenolone and progesterone 17α-hydroxylase sequence (hereafter referred to as 17α) to generate the constructs 17α-CYP1A2 and 17α-CYP2C9 (Pritchard et al., 1998).

For the expression of ompA-2C19 (in strain DH5α) and ompA-2D6 (in strain JM109) the bacterial ompA leader sequence was fused in-frame to the start of the respective CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 cDNA using polymerase chain reaction fusion and subcloned into pCW (Pritchard et al., 1998). Coexpression with NADPH-P-450 reductase using the two-plasmid system was as described previously (Pritchard et al., 1998). For the one-plasmid CYP2C19 system, both the CYP2C19 and reductase cDNAs were subcloned head-to-tail into pCW, each with its own tac tacpromoter, using a procedure similar to that described by Blake et al. (1996).

For optimal expression of CYP3A4 (in strain JM109) a construct consisting of ompA leader followed by the two first amino acids of the mature ompA (ala-pro), followed by full length CYP3A4, was also coexpressed with NADPH-P-450 reductase from separate compatible plasmids using ampicillin and chloramphenicol as the respective selection markers.

All transformed cells were stored as glycerol stocks at −80°C. Expression of the recombinant proteins and preparation of the respective E. coli membranes were carried out essentially as described previously (Pritchard et al., 1998). Single colonies were inoculated from LB-agar plates into 1 liter of modified Terrific Broth media (containing 12 g bactotryptone, 24 g yeast extract, 2 g bactopeptone, and 4 ml glycerol) containing the appropriate selection marker (25 mg chloramphenicol/liter, 50 mg ampicillin/liter). Expression cultures were shaken at 37°C until the O.D. at 600 nm reached 0.7, when isopropylthio-β-d-galactoside (1 mM) and δ-aminolevulinic acid (0.5 mM) were added and the temperature decreased to 30°C. Cells were left for 16 h before harvesting. Harvesting of cells, preparation of spheroplasts, and membrane fractions were performed exactly as reported previously (Pritchard et al., 1998). CYP contents were estimated spectrally by the method ofOmura and Sato, (1964). Protein concentrations were measured using the Randox Laboratories Ltd. (Crumlin Co., Antrim, UK) protein kit based on pyrogallol red complexing with protein in an acid environment containing molybdate ions (Watanabe et al., 1986).

Commercial CYP Sources.

Microsomes prepared from human B-lymphoblastoid cells coexpressing recombinant human NADPH-P-450 reductase and human CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 and microsomes from insect cells transfected with a baculovirus containing the cDNA for human CYP2C19 together with cytochrome b5 (Supersomes) were purchased from Gentest Corp. (Woburn, MA). Similarly, microsomes prepared from insect cells transfected with a baculovirus expressing CYP2C19 and rabbit NADPH-P-450 reductase were purchased from PanVera Corp. (Madison, WI). Pooled HLM (batch numbers 217, 219, and 220) were supplied by IIAM (Leics, UK).

Manual Enzyme Assays.

Ethoxyresorufin O-deethylation (EROD; Riley et al., 1995), naproxen O-demethylation (Rodrigues et al., 1996), dextromethorphan O-demethylation (Rodrigues et al., 1994) and erythromycin N-demethylation (Riley and Howbrook, 1998) assays were used as probe reactions for CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4, respectively, and based on methods described previously. [14C]-diazepam N-demethylation has been developed as an assay for CYP2C19 activity in this laboratory (Moody et al., 1999).

Substrate Selectivity.

The isoform selectivity of these probe substrate reactions was investigated in incubations with E. coli membranes expressing CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 (all at 50 pmol P-450/ml) in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.4 in a final volume of 200 μl. Each radiometric assay included 0.05 to 0.1 μCi of [14C]naproxen, [14C]dextromethorphan, [14C]diazepam, or [14C]erythromycin. An appropriate amount of cold substrate was added to give final substrate concentrations of dextromethorphan (30 and 3 μM), diazepam (100 and 20 μM), naproxen (2 mM and 300 μM), and erythromycin (300 and 40 μM). Substrate concentrations were chosen to reflect Kmand Vmax conditions.

For the fluorometric assay, ethoxyresorufin was used at final concentrations of 3 and 1 μM. The probe substrate in ethanol was aliquoted and the solvent evaporated under a stream of nitrogen, before addition of protein. All incubations were carried out at 37°C and reactions were started, after preincubation for 2 min, with the addition of 1 mM NADPH. Incubation times were 15 min for EROD, naproxenO-demethylation, diazepam N-demethylation, and dextromethorphan O-demethylation, and 10 min for erythromycin N-demethylation (Table1). Reactions were terminated by the addition of 50 μl of ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (10% w/v) and solid phase extraction (SPE) was carried out using disposable Supelclean Envi-Carb 1-ml cartridges (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) as detailed elsewhere (Riley and Howbrook, 1998; Moody et al., 1999) and eluents were counted for 4 min using a Packard 2200CA Tri-Carb Liquid Scintillation Analyzer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Experimental conditions for the five probe assays using different enzyme sources

Automated Km andVmax Determination.

Km and Vmaxdetermination assays were performed by a robotic sample processor (RSP; Genesis RSP 150; Tecan, Reading, UK). All of the assays performed by the RSP were programmed by the user and are not default program-supplied with the hardware.

The components of the radiometric assays have been described in detail elsewhere (Moody et al., 1999). Assays were carried out in 0.1 M phosphate pH 7.4; in addition, the kinetics of erythromycinN-demethylation by CYP3A4 was determined in TSE buffer.

With the exception of [14C]dextromethorphan, the 0.1 μCi of probe radioactive substrate (in ethanol) was dispensed manually into a glass vial and the solvent evaporated under a steady stream of nitrogen, before addition of protein. Incubations contained 100 μl protein and probe 14C-substrate mixture, 10 μl cold substrate, where appropriate, at different stock concentrations (for the dextromethorphan assay, serial dilution of14C-substrate alone was used), 70 μl of the appropriate buffer, and reactions were started by the addition 20 μl NADPH (10 mM) giving a final volume of 200 μl. Control incubations from which NADPH had been omitted were also included. After the appropriate incubation time, reactions were quenched by the addition of 50 μl of trichloroacetic acid (10% w/v).

Dilution of substrate for Km andVmax assays by the RSP were programmed as follows: 1) the primary stock of each substrate (naproxen, diazepam, [14C] dextromethorphan, and erythromycin) was prepared manually in acetonitrile and diluted serially by the RSP (acetonitrile) to give six secondary solutions; 2) each of these secondary solutions was further diluted 1:5 in the appropriate buffer to generate tertiary solutions; and 3) finally, 10 μl of each of the tertiary solutions were spiked into the incubation mix (200 μl total volume to give final concentrations). The final organic solvent concentration in all incubations was 1% (v/v), which demonstrated minimal inhibition (data not shown). All reactions were conducted under conditions shown to be linear with respect to time and protein concentration (Table 1).

SPE.

Fully automated positive pressure SPE was performed and samples counted using the liquid scintillation analyzer as described elsewhere (Moody et al., 1999).

All determinations were performed in duplicate. Where S.D.s are presented, the experiment has been performed a minimum of three times.Vmax, turnover numbers (TNs), andKm values for the probe substrate reactions catalyzed by each enzyme source were calculated from both Hanes plots and by nonlinear regression analysis (Fig.1). There was no significant difference in Results but the values quoted are those derived by the Hanes plots which are presented for visual clarity.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Hanes plots of the five probe assays using different enzyme sources.

The kinetic determination was carried out as described inMaterials and Methods. The activity of the isoforms at different substrate concentrations for probe reactions. a, CYP1A2-EROD. b, CYP2C9-naproxen O-demethylation. c, CYP2C19-diazepamN-demethylation. d, CYP2D6-dextromethorphanO-demethylation. e, CYP3A4-erythromycinN-demethylation. Full kinetic plots were determined using E. coli membranes expressing each individual CYP (■), B-lymphoblasts expressing CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 (▪), baculosomes expressing CYP2C19 (●), and for the three specific probe reactions (CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4) HLM (○). Data shown are from one experiment typical of at least three, performed in duplicate.

Results

E. coli Expression of CYP and NADPH P-450-Reductase.

Expression levels of holo-CYP determined by CO-reduced difference spectroscopy were similar to those recorded by Pritchard et al. (1997, 1998). Typical levels of spectrally active CYP (coexpressed with NADPH-reductase) recovered in E. coli membrane fractions were approximately 60 pmol P-450/mg protein for CYP2C19 and between 300 and 500 pmol P-450/mg protein for CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4. NADPH-P-450 reductase activities were typically between 100 and 600 nmol cytochrome creduced · min−1 · mg−1protein.

Catalytic Activities of Recombinant CYPs.

The catalytic activities of the CYPs were determined with membrane fractions of E. coli transformed with plasmids carrying the individual CYP and NADPH P-450-reductase. Time and protein concentration linearity profiles of all five probe assays with the different enzyme sources were determined (data not shown). Based on these data, Table 1 summarizes the experimental conditions that were adopted routinely for all assays and enzyme sources. Under these restrictions, the uppermost CYP content and incubation time (up to 15 min) were utilized to increase assay sensitivity. However, because of dissimilar CYP expression levels between enzyme sources, the overall protein concentration was variable (see Table 1).

Substrate Selectivity.

Table 2 demonstrates the importance of examining substrate selectivity at several substrate concentrations. EROD and erythromycin N-demethylation were found to be specific reactions for CYP1A2 and CYP3A4, respectively, with minor contributions from other isoforms. Similarly, at a substrate concentration at or near the Km for CYP2D6 (3 μM), dextromethorphan O-demethylation was metabolized almost exclusively by CYP2D6 (CYP2C19 activity was some 12% of that catalyzed by CYP2D6), whereas oxidation by low-affinity CYP2C isoforms was more dominant at a substrate concentration of 30 μM. TheO-demethylation of naproxen was catalyzed principally by CYP2C9 but also by CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 (at 2 mM), whereas at a substrate concentration at or near the Km for CYP2C9 (300 μM) catalysis by CYP1A2 was predominant. Diazepam (100 μM) wasN-demethylated by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 under the conditions used with negligible catalysis from the other CYPs. At 20 μM diazepam, the relative rate of metabolism by CYP3A4 was much less (approximately 30% that of CYP2C19).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Selectivity of probe substrate catalysis by the five major human hepatic CYPs

Kinetics of HLM and Recombinant Human CYPs.

Vmax, TN, andKm values for the probe substrate reactions were calculated and intrinsic clearance (Clint) values estimated fromVmax/Km.

Table 3 summarizes the catalytic activities and Km measurements with different CYP sources for each reaction and compares these data with literature values. In general, all data are within the range of quoted literature values. Table 4 compares the Clint values determined from the commercial andE. coli source of CYPs. The activity of CYP1A2 in HLM and CYP1A2 expressed in E. coli and B-lymphoblasts was examined by determination of EROD activity. Vmax andKm values for HLM were determined to be 20 ± 3 pmol · min−1 · mg−1and 0.5 μM, respectively. TN andKm values for B-lymphoblasts expressing CYP1A2 were 0.4 ± 0.1 min−1 and 0.5 ± 0.3 μM, respectively. E. coli membranes expressing CYP1A2 generated similar values to B-lymphoblasts (TN of 0.6 ± 0.2 min−1 and Km of 1.0 ± 0.3 μM).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Comparison of turnover number and Km values determined in our laboratory with literature values for the five major human hepatic CYPs

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Comparison of Clint between commercial enzyme sources and E. coli membranes expressing CYPs

Naproxen O-demethylation was used as the probe reaction for CYP2C9. Because the involvement of multiple CYPs had been proposed previously (Tracy et al., 1997) and the overall shape of the HLM Michaelis-Menten plot was suggestive of multienzyme catalysis (data not shown), the data were fitted to a two-enzyme model. The estimatedVmax and Kmvalues for the high-affinity component were 350 pmol · min−1 · mg−1and 400 μM and 600 pmol · min−1 · mg−1and 2 mM for the low-affinity component. The TN andKm values for naproxenO-demethylation by B-lymphoblasts expressing CYP2C9 were 4.9 min−1 and 116 μM, respectively; E. coli membranes expressing CYP2C9 generated a higher TN (6.7 ± 0.9 min−1) and Kmof 307 ± 65 μM.

Diazepam N-demethylation was used as the probe reaction for CYP2C19 (Ono et al., 1996; Jung et al., 1997). Again the overall shape of the HLM Michaelis-Menten plot was suggestive of multienzyme catalysis (data not shown) and the data were fitted to a two-enzyme model. The estimated Vmax andKm values were 350 pmol · min−1 · mg−1and 100 μM for the high-affinity component and 1400 pmol · min−1 · mg−1and 1.5 mM for the low-affinity component. The TN andKm values for diazepamN-demethylation by baculosomes expressing CYP2C19 were 1.0 ± 0.2 min−1 and 17 ± 2 μM, respectively. The TN for B-lymphoblasts expressing solely CYP2C19 was markedly lower (0.2 min−1) than for the cell line coexpressing CYP2C19 and cytochrome b5 (1.6 min−1) and similar to CYP2C19 and human NADPH-P-450 reductase expressed on separate plasmids in E. coli (TN = 0.1 min−1). Membranes isolated from this strain typically had a NADPH-P-450 reductase activity of 100 nmol min−1mg−1. However, the TN in E. colicontaining CYP2C19 and human NADPH-P-450 reductase expressed on a single plasmid was approximately 40-fold higher (3.7 min−1) and the Kmwas similar to the other cell lines (31 ± 3 μM). The activity of NADPH-P-450 reductase in this strain was typically 500 nmol · min−1 · mg−1. These values correlate well with diazepam N-demethylase activity reported in HepG2 cells expressing CYP2C19 (TN of 1.8 min−1 andKm of 21 μM) (Jung et al., 1997) and inE. coli cells expressing CYP2C19 (TN of 2.3 min−1 and Km of 32 μM; Ono et al., 1996).

Dextromethorphan O-demethylation was used as the probe reaction for CYP2D6 and the Vmax andKm values for HLM were determined to be 122 ± 32 pmol · min−1 · mg−1and 5.9 ± 0.4 μM, respectively. TN andKm values for B-lymphoblasts expressing CYP2D6 were 4.4 ± 0.1 min−1 and 1.3 ± 0.1 μM, respectively. E. coli membranes expressing CYP2D6 generated a TN (4.7 ± 0.1 min−1) similar to B-lymphoblasts and a Km value of 2.3 ± 0.2 μM.

The activity of CYP3A4 in HLM, E. coli, and B-lymphoblasts was examined by determining erythromycinN-demethylation. Vmax andKm values for HLM were calculated to be 205 ± 151 pmol · min−1 · mg−1and 57 ± 27 μM, respectively (n = 3 pooled preparations). TN and Km values for B-lymphoblasts expressing CYP3A4 in 0.1 M phosphate pH 7.4 were 1.6 ± 0.1 min−1 and 38 ± 6 μM, respectively. Similar values were obtained in TSE buffer (1.6 ± 0.1 min−1 and 36 ± 5 μM). However, CYP3A4 expressed in E. coli membranes appeared markedly more active in 0.1 M phosphate pH 7.4 (TN of 2.5 ± 0.1 min−1, Km of 18 ± 1 μM) compared with TSE buffer (0.32 ± 0.04 min−1), although theKm (26 ± 13 μM) remained constant.

Discussion

This study describes the characterization and validation of the five major drug-metabolizing human hepatic CYPs functionally coexpressed with human NADPH P-450-reductase in E. coli. This laboratory has recently developed fully automated inhibition screens for these enzymes using both HLM and recombinant human CYPs and has demonstrated that their inhibition characteristics are remarkably similar (Moody et al., 1999). This report now details an efficient investigation into the kinetic properties of CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 expressed in E. coli using this automated technology and comparison of the data with results obtained for HLM, recombinant CYPs from the major commercial sources, and the wider literature.

For the last 20 to 30 years the predominant in vitro tool for drug metabolism studies has been HLM, which have supplied qualitative (e.g., identifying which CYP isoform metabolizes the compound of interest) and quantitative (e.g., predicted Clint) information. Recent improvements in transplant technology suggest there will no longer be an inexhaustible supply of good quality human liver for the increasing amount of drug metabolism studies required by the pharmaceutical industry. As the biochemistry of the CYP family of enzymes is more fully understood, increased emphasis on cloning, expression, and the subsequent use of these enzymes is commonplace. Although initial use of expressed enzymes in vitro was as confirmation of HLM data (Aoyama et al., 1990; Tassaneeyakul et al., 1992;Rodrigues et al., 1994), sufficient confidence has recently been gained for recombinant CYP isoforms to be proposed as a first line approach (Becquemont et al., 1998; Moody et al., 1999). A major advantage of using recombinant enzymes is the potential to have a relatively low cost, inexhaustible supply of enzymes. However, assurance is required that such recombinant enzymes are faithful surrogates for HLM CYPs.

In general, the apparent Km values,Vmax, and Clintestimates agreed very well for the different sources of recombinant enzymes. For isoform-specific substrates such as ethoxyresorufin, erythromycin, and at low concentrations, dextromethorphan, the apparentKm values were also equivalent to HLM and available literature data (Tables 3 and 4), demonstrating that nonspecific binding appears to be consistent for the substrates studied. The specificity of each probe reaction at high and low substrate concentrations was also determined for the five major drug-metabolizing human CYPs expressed in E. coli. At a substrate concentration at or near the Kmfor CYP1A2, EROD catalysis by the other major human hepatic CYP isoforms studied is negligible and this reaction is specific for CYP1A2. Indeed, under Vmax conditions for CYP1A2, of the isoforms studied, only CYP2C19 catalyzed this reaction to a minor extent (approximately 10% of CYP1A2).

In HLM, naproxen O-demethylation was characterized by a two-enzyme model, although this may be an oversimplification. Indeed,Korzekwa et al. (1998) have defined the atypical kinetics observed with naproxen metabolism by CYP2C9 in much more detail and invoked simultaneous binding of more than one substrate molecule to the enzyme, which was not apparent from our more limited data. Nevertheless, using recombinant CYP2C9 in E. coli membranes, the apparentKm and TN obtained compared well with the high-affinity HLM component and other expression systems (Table 3). Detailed kinetic analysis suggested that CYP1A2 may exhibit a lowerKm for naproxen O-demethylation than CYP2C9 but also a lower Vmax, a result in agreement with Tracy et al. (1997). Thus naproxenO-demethylation is suitable as a probe reaction for analysis of recombinant CYP2C9 but, even at low concentrations, not as a specific marker for CYP2C9 activity in HLM. The kinetics of the specific CYP2C9 probe, tolbutamide 4-hydroxylation, were also shown to be comparable in E. coli membranes (TN 2.5 min−1 and Km 179 μM) and B-lymphoblasts (TN 2.8 min−1 andKm 75 μM) expressing CYP2C9 and agreed well with literature values (data not shown).

Interestingly, initial data obtained with the Gentest materials indicated that diazepam N-demethylation might be highly dependent on the presence of cytochrome b5. Moreover, the apparent Km and TN for theE. coli-expressed CYP2C19 originating from the one plasmid construct compared well with the commercial baculovirus expression system coexpressing rabbit reductase, which suggested a pivotal role of the substantially greater NADPH P-450-reductase levels in the former system. Indeed, in vitro activities of the CYP2C family have been reported previously to be highly dependent on the supply of electrons via reductase and b5 (Richardson et al., 1995;Crespi and Miller, 1997; Chang et al., 1997; Venkatakrishnan et al., 1998). Diazepam N-demethylation, underVmax conditions for the high-affinity CYP2C19, is catalyzed significantly by CYP3A4. At a substrate concentration nearer the pharmacological levels (20 μM) metabolism by CYP3A4 was still apparent. As the relative abundance of CYP3A may be up to 20-fold higher than CYP2C19 in an average human liver (Shimada et al., 1994; Jung et al., 1997; Inoue et al., 1997), the contribution of CYP3A4 to diazepam N-demethylation in HLM may be significant depending on the relative levels of these two enzymes. In HLM, two apparent Km andVmax values for this reaction were determined by fitting the data to a simple two-enzyme model confirming the complex, multienzyme catalysis of diazepamN-demethylation in HLM (Yasumori et al., 1993; Andersson et al., 1994; Zomorodi and Houston, 1996).

Dextromethorphan was O-demethylated by CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 under Vmax conditions for CYP2D6. However, at a substrate concentration at or near theKm for CYP2D6 (3 μM) the rate of dextromethorphan O-demethylation by CYP2C19 was approximately one-tenth of CYP2D6 activity whereas the catalysis by CYP2C9 is negligible. Thus at low dextromethorphan concentrations, this reaction would be almost exclusively CYP2D6-dependent in HLM. However, the low-affinity CYP2C19 (Moody et al., 1999) and CYP2C9 may represent the residual dextromethorphan O-demethylation pathway in poor metabolizers (Kroemer and Eichelbaum, 1995; Mahgoub et al., 1977).

This report confirms that erythromycin N-demethylation is catalyzed almost exclusively by the CYP3A family (Cook et al., 1993). Indeed, at a substrate concentration of 40 μM (∼Km for CYP3A4), catalysis by the other human hepatic CYPs studied was negligible. Interestingly, erythromycinN-demethylase activity in E. coli membranes expressing CYP3A4 was reduced in TSE buffer (0.32 ± 0.04 min−1) compared with 0.1 M phosphate pH 7.4 (2.5 ± 0.1 min−1). Other reports have also determined CYP3A4 activities to be dependent on the buffer composition (Maenpaa et al., 1998) and yet this phenomenon appears to be substrate (Shet et al., 1993; Yamazaki et al., 1995) and expression system-specific (see Table 3). The selective effect on TN may indicate that the buffer composition alters the local membrane environment and electron flow via the interaction with NADPH P-450-reductase rather than effecting a conformational change of the CYP3A4 active site (Ingelman-Sundberg et al., 1996; Table 3). Indeed, the critical nature of this interaction was suggested further with data from a one-plasmid CYP3A4 system, which exhibited much higher levels of human NADPH P-450-reductase (1600 nmol · min−1 · mg−1). This recombinant system showed nonlinear product formation with respect to time for several substrates, perhaps as a result of excess reactive oxygen species production (data not shown).

In conclusion, this paper demonstrates the characterization and validation of the five major drug-metabolizing human hepatic CYPs coexpressed with human NADPH P-450-reductase in E. coli. These expression systems have been validated with respect to five probe assays using predominantly marketed drug substrates and expedited by automation. The kinetic parameters of these recombinant enzymes were similar to their HLM counterparts, where directly comparable, and thus they would appear to be faithful surrogates. In addition, the activities of the optimized E. coli-expressed CYPs are equal to or even greater than the most widely used commercial sources. The data also suggest a pivotal role for the levels of coexpressed human NADPH P-450-reductase expression, which may be isoform- and substrate-dependent. These data make available this panel of enzymes for more detailed biochemical and pharmacological investigations and enhanced throughput screening. This laboratory has already advocated these materials as a first line screen for early CYP inhibition analysis, and work to expand their applications in the prediction of the routes and rates of human oxidative metabolism is ongoing.

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrew Mather of Radiochemical Synthesis at Astra Charnwood for the supply of [N-methyl-14C] diazepam and [O-methyl-14C]naproxen and Dr. Marco Skrinjar of Astra Draco for the gift of [O-methyl-14C]dextromethorphan.

Footnotes

  • Send reprint requests to: Dr. Robert Riley, Department of Physical & Metabolic Sciences, AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood, Bakewell Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire. LE11 5RH UK. E-mail:Rob.Riley{at}charnwood.gb.astra.com

  • We acknowledge support for this project from the Biotechnology & Biological Research Council, UK-Department of Trade and Industry, and the LINK consortium of pharmaceutical companies: Astra, Glaxo-Wellcome, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Parke-Davis, Pfizer, Roche Products, Sanofi-Winthrop, Servier, Smith-Kline Beecham, Wyeth-Ayerst, and Zeneca.

  • Abbreviations used are::
    CYP
    cytochrome P-450
    TN
    turnover number
    HLM
    human liver microsome(s)
    Clint
    intrinsic clearance
    EROD
    ethoxyresorufinO-deethylation
    β-NADPH
    β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced form
    RSP
    robotic sample processor
    SPE
    solid phase extraction
    • Received March 17, 1999.
    • Accepted June 15, 1999.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ahmad SR,
    2. Wolfe SM
    (1995) Cisapride and torsades de pointes. Lancet 345:508.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Andersson T,
    2. Miners JO,
    3. Veronese ME,
    4. Birkett DJ
    (1994) Diazepam metabolism by human liver microsomes is mediated by both S-mephenytoin hydroxylase and CYP3A isoforms. Br J Clin Pharmacol 38:131–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Aoyama T,
    2. Korzekwa K,
    3. Nagata K,
    4. Gillette J,
    5. Gelboin HV,
    6. Gonzalez FJ
    (1990) Estradiol metabolism by complementary deoxyribonucleic acid-expressed human cytochrome P450s. Endocrinology 126:3101–3106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Becquemont L,
    2. Le Bot MA,
    3. Riche C,
    4. Funck-Brentano C,
    5. Jaillon P,
    6. Beaune P
    (1998) Use of heterologously expressed human cytochrome P450 1A2 to predict tacrine-fluvoxamine drug interaction in man. Pharmacogenetics 8:101–108.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Blake JAA,
    2. Pritchard M,
    3. Ding S,
    4. Smith GCM,
    5. Burchell B,
    6. Wolf CR,
    7. Friedberg T
    (1996) Coexpression of a human P450 (CYP3A4) and P450 reductase generates a highly functional monooxygenase system in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 397:210–214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Chang TKH,
    2. Yu L,
    3. Goldstein JA,
    4. Waxman DJ
    (1997) Identification of the polymorphically expressed CYP2C19 and the wild-type CYP2C9-ILE359 allele as low Km catalysts of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide activation. Pharmacogenetics 7:211–221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ching MS,
    2. Blake CL,
    3. Ghabrial H,
    4. Wynne Ellis S,
    5. Lennard MS,
    6. Tucker GT,
    7. Smallwood R
    (1995) A potent inhibition of yeast-expressed CYP2D6 by dihydroquinidine, quinidine, and its metabolites. Biochem Pharmacol 50:833–837.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Clarke SE,
    2. Ayrton JC,
    3. Chenery RJ
    (1994) Characterization of the inhibition of P4501A2 by furafylline. Xenobiotica 24:517–526.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Cook CS,
    2. Hauswald C,
    3. Oppermann JA,
    4. Schoenhard GL
    (1993) Involvement of cytochrome P4503A in the metabolism of potassium canrenoate to an epoxide: Mechanism of inhibition of the epoxide formation by spiranalactone and its sulfur-containing metabolite. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 266:1–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Crespi CL,
    2. Miller VP
    (1997) The R144C change in the CYP2C9*2 allele alters interaction of the cytochrome P450 with NADPH:cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase. Pharmacogenetics 7:203–210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Crespi CL,
    2. Miller VP,
    3. Penman BW
    (1997) Microtiter plate assays for inhibition of human, drug-metabolizing cytochromes P450. Anal Biochem 248:188–190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Crespi CL,
    2. Penman BW
    (1997) Use of cDNA-expressed human cytochrome P450 enzymes to study potential drug-drug-interactions. Adv Pharmacol 43:171–188.
  13. ↵
    1. Eugster HP,
    2. Probst M,
    3. Wurgler FE,
    4. Sengstag S
    (1993) Caffeine, estradiol and progesterone interact with human CYP1A1 and CYP1A2. Drug Metab Dispos 21:43–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. ↵
    1. Fisher CW,
    2. Caudle DL,
    3. Martin-Wixtron C,
    4. Quattrochi LC,
    5. Tukey RH,
    6. Waterman MR,
    7. Estabrook RW
    (1992) High level expression of functional human cytochrome P450 IA2 in Escherichia coli. FASEB J 6:759–764.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. ↵
    1. Gonzalez FJ,
    2. Korzekwa KR
    (1995) Cytochrome P450 expression systems. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 35:369–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Gorski JC,
    2. Jones DR,
    3. Wrighton SA,
    4. Hall SD
    (1994) Characterisation of dextromethorphan N-demethylation by human liver microsomes: Contribution of the cytochrome P450 3A subfamily. Biochem Pharmacol 48:173–182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Honig PK,
    2. Wortham DC,
    3. Zamani K,
    4. Conner DP,
    5. Mullin JC,
    6. Cantilena LR
    (1993) Terfenadine-ketoconazole interaction: Pharmacokinetic and electrocardiographic consequences. JAMA 269:1513–1518.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Ingelman-Sundberg M,
    2. Hagbjork A-L,
    3. Ueng Y-F,
    4. Yamazaki H,
    5. Guengerich FP
    (1996) High rates of substrate hydroxylation by human cytochrome P450 3A4 in reconstituted membranous vesicles: Influence of membrane charge. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 221:318–322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Inoue K,
    2. Yamazaki H,
    3. Imiya K,
    4. Akasaka S,
    5. Guengerich FP,
    6. Shimada T
    (1997) Relationship between CYP2C9 and 2C19 genotypes and tolbutamide methyl hydroxylation and S-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylation activities in livers of Japanese and Caucasian populations. Pharmacogenetics 7:103–113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Iwata H,
    2. Fujita K,
    3. Kushida H,
    4. Suzuki A,
    5. Konno Y,
    6. Makamura K,
    7. Fujino A,
    8. Kamataki T
    (1998) High catalytic activity of human cytochrome P450 co-expressed with human NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase in Escherichia coli. Biochem Pharmacol 55:1315–1325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Jacqz-Aigrain E,
    2. Funck-Brentano C,
    3. Cresteil T
    (1993) CYP2D6 and CYP3A-dependent metabolism of dextromethorphan in humans. Pharmacogenetics 3:197–204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Jung F,
    2. Richardson TH,
    3. Raucy JL,
    4. Johnson EF
    (1997) Diazepam metabolism by cDNA-expressed human 2C P450s: Identification of P4502C18 and P4502C19 as low Km diazepam N-demethylases. Drug Metab Dispos 25:133–139.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Kerry NL,
    2. Somogyi AA,
    3. Bochner F,
    4. Mikus G
    (1994) The role of CYP2D6 in primary and secondary oxidative metabolism of dextromethorphan: In vitro studies using human liver microsomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 38:243–248.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Korzekwa KR,
    2. Krishnamachary N,
    3. Shou M,
    4. Ogai A,
    5. Parise RA,
    6. Rettie AE,
    7. Gonzalez FJ,
    8. Tracy TS
    (1998) Evaluation of atypical cytochrome P450 kinetics with two-substrate models: Evidence that multiple substrates can simultaneously bind to cytochrome P450 active sites. Biochemistry 37:4137–4147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Kroemer HK,
    2. Eichelbaum M
    (1995) ‘It’s the genes, stupid’. Molecular bases and clinical consequences of genetic cytochrome P450 2D6 polymorphism. Life Sci 56:2285–2298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Larson JR,
    2. Coon MJ,
    3. Porter TD
    (1991) Alcohol-inducible cytochrome P-450IIE1 lacking the hydrophobic NH2-terminal segment retains catalytic activity and is membrane-bound when expressed in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 266:7321–7324.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Maenpaa J,
    2. Hall SD,
    3. Ring BJ,
    4. Strom SC,
    5. Wrighton SA
    (1998) Human cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) mediated midazolam metabolism: The effect of assay conditions and regioselective stimulation by α-napthoflavone, terfenadine and testosterone. Pharmacogenetics 8:137–155.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Mahgoub A,
    2. Idle JR,
    3. Dring LG,
    4. Lancaster R,
    5. Smith RL
    (1977) Polymorphic hydroxylation of debrisoquine in man. Lancet 2:584–586.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Miners JO,
    2. Coulter S,
    3. Tukey RH,
    4. Veronese ME,
    5. Birkett DJ
    (1996) Cytochromes P450, 1A2 and 2C9 are responsible for the human hepatic O-demethylation of R- and S-naproxen. Biochem Pharmacol 51:1003–1008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Moody GC,
    2. Griffin SJ,
    3. Mather AN,
    4. McGinnity DF,
    5. Riley RJ
    (1999) Fully automated analysis of activities catalysed by the major human liver cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes: Assessment of human CYP inhibition potential. Xenobiotica 29:53–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Omura T,
    2. Sato R
    (1964) The carbon monoxide-binding pigment of liver microsomes. I. Evidence for its hemoprotein nature. J Biol Chem 239:2370–2378.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Ono S,
    2. Hatanaka T,
    3. Miyazawa S,
    4. Tsutsui M,
    5. Aoyama T,
    6. Gonzalez FJ,
    7. Satoh T
    (1996) Human liver microsomal diazepam metabolism using cDNA-expressed cytochrome P450s: Role of CYP2B6, 2C19 and the 3A subfamily. Xenobiotica 26:1155–1166.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Parkinson A
    (1996) An overview of current cytochrome P450 technology for assessing the safety and efficacy of new materials. Toxicol Pathol 24:45–57.
  34. ↵
    1. Pastrakuljic A,
    2. Tang BK,
    3. Roberts EA,
    4. Kalow W
    (1997) Distinction of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 activity by selective inhibition using fluvoxamine and isosafrole. Biochem Pharmacol 53:531–538.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Pritchard MP,
    2. Ossetian R,
    3. Li DN,
    4. Henderson CJ,
    5. Burchell B,
    6. Wolf CR,
    7. Friedberg T
    (1997) A general strategy for the expression of recombinant human cytochrome P450s in Escherichia coli using bacterial signal peptides: Expression of CYP3A4, CYP2A6 and CYP2E1. Arch Biochem Biophys 345:342–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Pritchard PM,
    2. Glancey MJ,
    3. Blake JAR,
    4. Gilham DE,
    5. Burchell B,
    6. Wolf CR,
    7. Friedberg T
    (1998) Functional co-expression of CYP2D6 and human NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase in Escherichia coli. Pharmacogenetics 8:33–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Remmel RP,
    2. Burchell B
    (1993) Validation and use of cloned, expressed human drug-metabolizing enzymes in heterologous cells for analysis of drug metabolism and drug-drug interactions. Biochem Pharmacol 46:559–566.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Richardson T,
    2. Jung F,
    3. Griffin KJ,
    4. Wester M,
    5. Raucy JL,
    6. Kemper B,
    7. Bornheim LM,
    8. Hassett C,
    9. Omiecinski CJ,
    10. Johnson EF
    (1995) A universal approach to the expression of human and rabbit cytochrome P450s of the 2C subfamily of Escherichia coli. Arch Biochem Biophys 323:87–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Riley RJ,
    2. Howbrook D
    (1998) In vitro analysis of the activity of the major human hepatic CYP enzyme (CYP3A4) using [N-methyl 14C]erythromycin. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 38:189–193.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. Riley RJ,
    2. Lambert C,
    3. Cooper AE,
    4. Richmond H,
    5. Hall M,
    6. Jordan MC,
    7. Logan CJ,
    8. Clark B
    (1995) Induction of rodent hepatic drug-metabolizing enzyme activities by the novel anticonvulsant remacemide hydrochloride. Drug Metab Dispos 23:922–928.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  41. ↵
    1. Rodrigues AD,
    2. Kukulka MJ,
    3. Roberts EM,
    4. Ouellet D,
    5. Rodgers TR
    (1996) [O-methyl 14C] naproxen O-demethylase activity in human liver microsomes: Evidence for the involvement of cytochrome P4501A2 and P4502C9/10. Drug Metab Dispos 24:126–136.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  42. ↵
    1. Rodrigues AD,
    2. Kukulka MJ,
    3. Surber BW,
    4. Thomas SB,
    5. Uchic JT,
    6. Rotert GA,
    7. Michel G,
    8. Thome-Kromer B,
    9. Machinist JM
    (1994) Measurement of liver microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP2D6) activity using [O-methyl 14C] dextromethorphan. Anal Biochem 219:309–320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Sandhu P,
    2. Baba T,
    3. Guengerich FP
    (1993) Expression of modified cytochrome P450 2C10 (2C9) in Escherichia coli, purification and reconstitution of catalytic activity. Arch Biochem Biophys 306:443–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Schmider J,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Fogelman SM,
    4. von Moltke LL,
    5. Shader RI
    (1997) Metabolism of dextromethorphan in vitro: Involvement of cytochromes P450 2D6 and 3A3/4, with a possible role of 2E1. Biopharm Drug Dispos 18:227–240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Shet MS,
    2. Fisher CW,
    3. Holmans PL,
    4. Estabrook RW
    (1993) Human cytochrome P450 3A4: Enzymatic properties of a purified recombinant fusion protein containing NADPH-P450 reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11748–11752.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Shimada T,
    2. Yamazaki H,
    3. Mimura M,
    4. Yukiharu I,
    5. Guengerich FP
    (1994) Interindividual variations in human liver cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the oxidation of drugs, carcinogens and toxic chemicals: Studies with liver microsomes of 30 Japanese and 30 Caucasians. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 270:414–423.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Tassaneeyakul W,
    2. Mohamed Z,
    3. Birkett DJ,
    4. McManus ME,
    5. Veronese ME,
    6. Tukey RH,
    7. Quattrochi LC,
    8. Gonzalez FJ,
    9. Miners JO
    (1992) Caffeine as a probe for human cytochromes P450: Validation using cDNA-expression, immunoinhibition and microsomal kinetic and inhibitor techniques. Pharmacogenetics 2:173–183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Tracy TS,
    2. Marra C,
    3. Wrighton SA,
    4. Gonzalez FJ,
    5. Korzekwa KR
    (1997) Involvement of multiple cytochrome P450s in naproxen O-demethylation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 52:293–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Venkatakrishnan K,
    2. von Moltke LL,
    3. Greenblatt DJ
    (1998) Relative quantities of catalytically active CYP2C9 and 2C19 in human liver microsomes: Application of the relative activity factor approach. J Pharm Sci 87:845–853.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Wang RW,
    2. Newton DJ,
    3. Scheri TD,
    4. Lu AYH
    (1997) Human cytochrome P4503A4-catalysed testosterone 6β-hydroxylation and erythromycin N-demethylation: Competition during catalysis. Drug Metab Dispos 25:502–507.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Watanabe N,
    2. Kamei S,
    3. Ohkubo A,
    4. Yamanaka M,
    5. Ohsawa S,
    6. Makino K,
    7. Tokuda K
    (1986) Urinary protein as measured with a pyrogallol red-molybdate complex, manually and in a Hitachi 726 automated analyzer. Clin Chem 32:1551–1554.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Waterman MR
    (1993) Heterologous expression of cytochrome P-450 in Escherichia coli. Biochem Soc Trans 21:1081–1085.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Waterman MR,
    2. Jenkins CM,
    3. Pikuleva I
    (1995) Genetically engineered bacterial cells and applications. Toxicol Lett 82–83:807–813.
  54. ↵
    1. Williams FM,
    2. Mutch E,
    3. Woodhouse KW,
    4. Lambert D,
    5. Rawlins MD
    (1986) Ethoxyresorufin O-deethylation by human liver microsomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 22:263–268.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Yamazaki H,
    2. Ueng Y-F,
    3. Shimada T,
    4. Guengerich FP
    (1995) Roles of divalent metal ions in oxidations catalyzed by recombinant cytochrome P450 3A4 and replacement of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase with other flavoproteins, ferredoxin, and oxygen surrogates. Biochemistry 34:8380–8939.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Yasumori T,
    2. Nagata K,
    3. Yang SK,
    4. Chen L-S,
    5. Murayama N,
    6. Yamazoe Y,
    7. Kato R
    (1993) Cytochrome P450 mediated metabolism of diazepam in human and rat: Involvement of human CYP2C in N-demethylation in the substrate concentration-dependent manner. Pharmacogenetics 3:291–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Zomorodi K,
    2. Houston JB
    (1996) Diazepam-omeprazole inhibition interaction: An in vitro investigation using human liver microsomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 42:157–162.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 27 (9)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 27, Issue 9
1 Sep 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rapid Characterization of the Major Drug-Metabolizing Human Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 Enzymes Expressed in Escherichia coli
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Rapid Characterization of the Major Drug-Metabolizing Human Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 Enzymes Expressed in Escherichia coli

Dermot F. McGinnity, Sarah J. Griffin, Graeme C. Moody, Mike Voice, Stephen Hanlon, Thomas Friedberg and Robert J. Riley
Drug Metabolism and Disposition September 1, 1999, 27 (9) 1017-1023;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Rapid Characterization of the Major Drug-Metabolizing Human Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 Enzymes Expressed in Escherichia coli

Dermot F. McGinnity, Sarah J. Griffin, Graeme C. Moody, Mike Voice, Stephen Hanlon, Thomas Friedberg and Robert J. Riley
Drug Metabolism and Disposition September 1, 1999, 27 (9) 1017-1023;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • AKRs and GUSs in Testosterone Disposition
  • Olanzapine Glucuronidation in Humanized Mice
  • rs2242480 Regulates the Expression of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics