Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Drug Interactions with Calcium Channel Blockers: Possible Involvement of Metabolite-Intermediate Complexation with CYP3A

Bennett Ma, Thomayant Prueksaritanont and Jiunn H. Lin
Drug Metabolism and Disposition February 2000, 28 (2) 125-130;
Bennett Ma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomayant Prueksaritanont
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiunn H. Lin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The inhibitory effects of six commonly used calcium channel blockers on three major cytochrome P-450 activities were examined and characterized in human liver microsomes. All six compounds reversibly inhibited CYP2D6 (bufuralol 1′-hydroxylation) and CYP2C9 (tolbutamide methyl hydroxylation) activities. The IC50 values for the inhibition of CYP2D6 and CYP2C9 for nicardipine were 3 to 9 μM, whereas those for all others ranged from 14 to >150 μM. Except for nifedipine, all calcium channel blockers showed increased inhibitory potency toward CYP3A activities (testosterone 6β-hydroxylation and midazolam 1′-hydroxylation) after 30-min preincubation with NADPH. IC50 values for the inhibition of testosterone 6β-hydroxylase obtained in the NADPH-preincubation experiment for nicardipine (1 μM), verapamil (2 μM), and diltiazem (5 μM) were within 10-fold, whereas those for amlodipine (5 μM) and felodipine (13 μM) were >200-fold of their respective plasma concentrations reported after therapeutic doses. Similar results also were obtained based on midazolam 1′-hydroxylase activity. Unlike the observations with mibefradil, a potent irreversible inhibitor of CYP3A, the NADPH-dependent inhibition of CYP3A activity by nicardipine and verapamil was completely reversible on dialysis, whereas that by diltiazem was partially restored (80%). Additional experiments revealed that nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem formed cytochrome P-450-iron (II)-metabolite complex in both human liver microsomes and recombinant CYP3A4. Nicardipine yielded a higher extent of complex formation (∼30% at 100 μM), and was a much faster-acting inhibitor (maximal inhibition rate constant ∼2 min−1) as compared with verapamil and diltiazem. These present findings that the CYP3A inhibition caused by nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem is, at least in part, quasi-irreversible provide a rational basis for pharmacokinetically significant interactions reported when they were coadministered with agents that are cleared primarily by CYP3A-mediated pathways.

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs)1have been used widely for the treatment of hypertension, angina pectoris, and other cardiovascular diseases since first introduced in the 1960s. With such widespread use, there have been a number of reports on significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions associated with CCBs (Hunt et al., 1989; Kirch et al., 1990; Schlanz et al., 1991; Rosenthal and Ezra, 1995; Lamberg et al., 1998). Most recently, numerous cases have been reported in patients receiving mibefradil, a newly introduced CCB, which ultimately motivated the voluntary withdrawal of the compound from the market (Welker et al., 1998). Inhibition of cytochrome P-450 (P-450) activities by CCBs has been suggested as one of possible explanations for such interactions. However, little has been reported in the literature on inhibitory effects of CCBs on human P-450s' activities other than those of CYP3A. Close examination of the data available on CYP3A indicated that, except for mibefradil, CCBs are not very potent P-450 inhibitors. Values for IC50or Ki for inhibition of CYP3A activities in human liver microsomes ranged from ∼10 μM for nicardipine to 100 μM for diltiazem (Tjia et al., 1989; Pichard et al., 1990; Wrighton and Ring, 1994; Zhao and Ishizaki, 1997). These values are over 100-fold greater than typical plasma concentrations of CCBs reported after clinical doses (Kelly and O'Malley, 1992). Recently, diltiazem has been shown to be a quasi-irreversible inhibitor of CYP3A both in vitro and in vivo in rats (Bensoussan et al., 1995). Although these results have not been confirmed with human liver microsomes, they appeared consistent with several significant drug interactions reported for diltiazem in vivo (Lin and Lu, 1998). To date, there have been limited data on mechanisms of CYP3A inhibition by other CCBs in animals or humans.

Chemically, CCBs (Fig. 1) are classified into three classes, benzothiazepines (e.g., diltiazem), dihydropyridines (e.g., amlodipine, felodipine, nicardipine, and nifedipine), and phenylalkylamines (e.g., verapamil). Like diltiazem, most of these CCBs contain an amine functional group and undergoN-dealkylation; both features are common for metabolic intermediate (MI) complexing agents such as diltiazem and several other amine-containing compounds (Pershing and Franklin, 1982; Bensoussan et al., 1995). However, possible formation of such a complex has not been reported for any of the amine-containing phenylalkylamines and dihydropyridines.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Structures of CCBs.

In this study, we examined and characterized the in vitro inhibition profiles of six commonly used CCBs (amlodipine, diltiazem, felodipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, and verapamil) on three major P-450 isozymes (CYP3A, CYP2D6, and CYP2C9) in human liver microsomes. Mibefradil, the CCB recently shown to be a potent mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP3A (Prueksaritanont et al., 1999), also was included in the study for comparison. In addition, the ability of diltiazem, as well as the amine-containing dihydropyridine nicardipine and phenylalkylamine verapamil, to form the MI complex with human P-450 enzymes was examined using human liver microsomes and recombinant P-450 enzymes.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Reagents.

Testosterone, midazolam, tolbutamide, diltiazem, nicardipine, nifedipine, verapamil, troleandomycin (TAO), 17α-ethynylestradiol, quinidine, sulfaphenazole, and NADPH were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO), whereas 6β-hydroxytestosterone and ketoconazole were purchased from Steraloids Inc. (Wilton, NH) and Research Diagnostics Inc. (Flanders, NJ), respectively. 3-Methylhydroxytolbutamide, 1′-hydroxymidazolam, bufuralol, and 1′-hydroxybufuralol were obtained from Ultrafine Chemicals (Manchester, England). Felodipine and amlodipine were obtained in house (Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ). Human liver microsomes pooled from 10 or 15 subjects were obtained from the International Institute for the Advancement of Medicine (Exton, PA) and In Vitro Technologies Inc. (Baltimore, MD). Human liver microsomes known to contain high levels of CYP3A activity (used in the P-450-iron (II)-metabolite complex formation experiment) were obtained from Gentest Corp. (Woburn, MA). Microsomes prepared from insect cells with cDNAs of human CYP3A4 and NADPH-dependent reductase coexpressed were prepared and characterized at Merck Research Laboratories (West Point, PA).

Assays for P-450 Activities.

Assays for CYP3A (testosterone 6β-hydroxylation and midazolam 1′-hydroxylation), CYP2D6 (bufuralol 1′-hydroxylation), and CYP2C9 (tolbutamide methyl hydroxylation) activities were described previously (Prueksaritanont et al., 1996). Testosterone, midazolam, tolbutamide, and bufuralol were used at concentrations (50, 10, 100, and 10 μM, respectively) comparable to their reportedKm values. Human liver microsomes were preincubated with CCBs for 30 min at 37°C, either in the presence or absence of 1 mM NADPH, before assaying for P-450 activities. Known selective inhibitors for P-450 CYP3A (TAO and ketoconazole), CYP2D6 (quinidine), and CYP2C9 (sulfaphenazole) were included as positive controls. Time- and concentration-dependent inhibition of testosterone 6β-hydroxylation was performed by preincubating human liver microsomes with CCBs in the presence of 1 mM NADPH for up to 45 min at 37°C. The reaction mixtures were then diluted 5-fold for the determination of testosterone 6β-hydroxylase activity, using 250 μM testosterone.

Dialysis Experiment.

Human liver microsomes (0.5 mg) were incubated with 1 mM NADPH and CCBs or known CYP3A inhibitors for 30 min at 37°C, in a final volume of 0.5 ml. Incubation mixtures were immediately transferred in to “slide-a-lyzer” dialysis cassettes (10,000 molecular weight cutoff; Pierce, Rockford, IL) and dialyzed against 1.5 liters of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer containing 5 mM sodium EDTA, pH 7.4, for ∼16 h. The dialysis buffer was changed once after 4 to 6 h. Undialyzed and dialyzed samples were diluted 5-fold and determined for their testosterone 6β-hydroxylase activities using 250 μM testosterone. Protein contents of dialyzed samples were subsequently measured using Lowry's method (Lowry et al., 1951).

Formation of P-450-Iron (II)-Metabolite Complexes.

Spectral differences (400 to 500 nm) between the reference and sample cuvettes were obtained using Perkin Elmer UV 20 double-beam UV-visible spectrophotometer. Incubation mixtures containing 1 mg/ml (P-450 content = 0.53 nmol/mg protein) human liver microsomes or 0.25 μM insect cell expressed recombinant CYP3A4, 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 10 mM magnesium chloride, and 1 mM NADPH were placed in both cuvettes. CCBs were added at a final concentration of 0.1 mM to the sample cuvette and incubated at room temperature. Spectral differences were monitored every 4 min for up to 28 min. To prevent carbon monoxide complex formation (Franklin, 1991), the incubation mixture in the sample cuvette was bubbled with air briefly every 10 min. The extent of P-450-iron (II)-metabolite complex formed was quantified based on a previously reported extinction coefficient (455–490 nm) value of 64,000 M−1/cm−1 (Pershing and Franklin, 1982; Franklin, 1991). In the experiment with CYP3A4, spectral differences also were monitored after the addition of potassium ferricyanide (50–200 μM).

Data Analysis.

The concentration of CCBs producing a 50% decrease in the activities of P-450 (IC50) values were estimated using nonlinear regression analysis (PCNONLIN; Scientific Consulting, Cary, NC), based on the following relationship:E=Emax×[1−(C/C+IC50)] where E and Emax are the effects measured in the presence of CCBs (at concentrationC) and in the absence of CCBs, respectively.

Results

Inhibitory Effects of CCBs on CYP3A Activity.

Concentration-dependent inhibitory effects of the six CCBs as well as those of known inhibitors of testosterone 6β-hydroxylation in the absence and presence of NADPH during the 30-min preincubation period are shown in Fig. 2, A and B, respectively. Both ketoconazole and TAO produced inhibitory profiles consistent with their mechanisms of inhibition. The potent reversible inhibitor ketoconazole did not show an increased inhibitory effect after preincubation with NADPH (Table 1). In fact, a decreased inhibition was observed (∼3-fold, Table 1). This was consistent with the fact that ketoconazole is a substrate for CYP3A. Also as expected, the quasi-irreversible inhibitor TAO showed increased inhibitory potency when preincubated in the presence of NADPH (Fig. 2, A and B; Table 1). In addition, IC50values obtained in the present study for both ketoconazole and TAO agreed well with those reported previously (Wrighton and Ring, 1994;Eagling et al., 1998; McKillop et al., 1998).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Concentration-dependent inhibition of testosterone 6β-hydroxylation after a 30-min preincubation with various concentrations of CCBs in the absence (A) or the presence (B) of NADPH.

Activities were determined by incubating human liver microsomes with 50 μM testosterone for 10 min after the 30-min preincubation period. Control activities (mean ± S.D., n = 6) = 2.7 ± 0.3 nmol/min/mg for preincubation either with or without NADPH.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

IC50 values (μM) for inhibition of CYP3A activities in human liver microsomes

Among the six CCBs examined and after preincubation without NADPH, nicardipine was the most potent inhibitor (IC50 = 1.7 μM) of testosterone 6β-hydroxylase activity. All other CCBs showed comparable inhibitory potencies, with IC50values ranging from ∼20 to ∼80 μM (Fig. 2A, Table 1). The IC50 values of verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine for 6β-testosterone hydroxylase were comparable to those reported earlier using cyclosporin, quinine, or midazolam as a CYP3A probe (Tjia et al., 1989; Pichard et al., 1990; Wrighton and Ring, 1994; Sutton et al., 1997; Zhao and Ishizaki, 1997). With the exception of nifedipine, the inhibition effects of all CCBs were increased (from 2-fold for nicardipine to >10-fold for verapamil and diltiazem) when preincubated in the presence of NADPH, similar to the observation with mibefradil (Fig. 2B, Table 1). In the preincubation experiment with NADPH, nicardipine also was the most potent inhibitor (IC50 = ∼0.9 μM), whereas nifedipine was the least potent inhibitor (IC50 = ∼30 μM). Under similar conditions, the IC50 value for mibefradil was 0.3 μM (Prueksaritanont et al., 1999).

The inhibitory profiles of these CCBs and the known inhibitors on midazolam 1′-hydroxylase activity, another commonly used CYP3A marker, were very similar to those of testosterone 6β-hydroxylase activity (Table 1). In most cases, values for IC50obtained for the two markers were within 2-fold of each other (Table1). This similarity in the IC50 values, which were obtained at their Km values, were consistent with the fact that both markers are substrates for CYP3A. As was observed with testosterone 6β-hydroxylation, nicardipine also was more potent than the other CCBs tested, but was less potent than mibefradil in inhibiting midazolam 1′-hydroxylation.

Inhibitory Effects of CCBs on CYP2D6 Activity.

Unlike the observations on CYP3A activity, none of the CCBs examined showed increases in inhibitory potencies or decreases in IC50 values toward CYP2D6 activity (bufuralol 1′-hydroxylase) after preincubation with NADPH (Table2). Among the CCBs studied, the most and the least potent inhibitor were nicardipine (IC50= ∼3 μM) and diltiazem (IC50 > 150 μM), respectively (Table 2). The inhibitory potencies of verapamil, amlodipine, felodipine, and nifedipine were comparable, with IC50 values ranging between 40 and 70 μM. The results obtained with nicardipine were similar to those reported previously (Fonne-Pfister and Meyer, 1988). Under the present conditions, the IC50 value (0.06 μM) of quinidine, a known CYP2D6-selective inhibitor, on CYP2D6 activity also was comparable to that reported earlier (Halliday et al., 1995).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

IC50 values (μM) for inhibition of 2D6 activities in human liver microsomes

Inhibitory Effects of CCBs on CYP2C9 Activity.

Similar to the above findings on CYP2D6 activity, inhibitory effects of the CCBs on CYP2C9 activity (tolbutamide methyl hydroxylase) were not increased by preincubation in the presence of NADPH (Table3). In either experiment, nicardipine was the most potent inhibitor (IC50 = 7–9 μM), whereas verapamil and diltiazem were much less potent inhibitors than any CCBs tested as indicated by their IC50 values of >140 μM (Table 3). In agreement with previous reports (Eagling et al., 1998; von Moltke et al., 1998), the known CYP2C9-selective inhibitor sulfaphenazole yielded an IC50 value of 0.5 μM.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

IC50 values (μM) for inhibition of 2C9 activities in human liver microsomes

Characterization of CYP3A Inhibition.

To characterize the apparent NADPH-dependent inhibition observed on CYP3A activity, nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem were chosen for additional studies. As shown in Fig. 3, the inhibition of testosterone 6β-hydroxylation by nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem was both time- and concentration-dependent. Nicardipine was a fast-acting inhibitor, whereas diltiazem was a much slower inhibitor. Values for the maximal inhibition rate constant and apparent KI of nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem were estimated, based on reciprocal plots of the initial inhibition rate constant and CCB concentration, to be 2, 0.03, and 0.01 min−1 and 0.6, 0.5, and 0.5 μM, respectively.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Time- and concentration-dependent inhibition of testosterone 6β-hydroxylase activity by the CCBs nicardipine (A), verapamil (B), and diltiazem (C) obtained in the presence of NADPH during preincubation.

Activities were determined using 250 μM testosterone and after a 5-fold dilution of the incubation mixture. Control activities (mean ± S.D., n = 3) = 3.4 ± 0.1 nmol/min/mg.

Reversibility of CYP3A Inhibition.

Reversibility of the inhibition of CYP3A activity by nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem was examined by dialysis. As expected, the activity of CYP3A that was inhibited by all of the inhibitors examined after preincubation without NADPH was virtually restored by dialysis (Table 4). In the experiment with NADPH present during preincubation, CYP3A activity inhibited by nicardipine and verapamil also was fully recovered after dialysis (Table 4). However, dialysis only partially (∼80%) restored the inhibited CYP3A activity by diltiazem (Table 4). In a parallel experiment with mibefradil and ethynylestradiol, both potent irreversible inhibitors of CYP3A (Guengerich, 1988; Prueksaritanont et al., 1999), only 14 to 31% of the control activity was recovered after dialysis (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Inhibitory effects of CCBs on testosterone 6β-hydroxylase activity in human liver microsomes before and after dialysis

Formation of P-450-Metabolite Complex.

In vitro studies were further conducted to investigate whether the NADPH-dependent inhibition of CYP3A activity by nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem was via the formation of MI complex. The three CCBs all contain an amine functional group, formed P-450-iron (II)-metabolite complex, as evident by a Soret peak at around 455 nm (Buening and Franklin, 1976; Pershing and Franklin, 1982; Bensoussan et al., 1995) when incubated with human liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH (Fig. 4, A–C). Under the conditions used (which yielded ∼40% complex formation for TAO, data not shown), the extent of complex formation was estimated to be ∼30, 20, and ∼6% for nicardipine, diltiazem, and verapamil, respectively. Similar results also were observed with recombinant CYP3A4 (Fig. 4, A–C), but not CYP2D6 or CYP2C9 (data not shown). Addition of ferricyanide reduced absorbance at the maxima, consistent with dissociation of the complex and regeneration of P-450-iron (III) (Fig. 4, A–C). These results are in agreement with the aforementioned NADPH-dependent inhibition of nicardipine, diltiazem, and verapamil on CYP3A, and not CYP2D6 or CYP2C9 activity, and supported that this inhibition was due, in part, to the complex formation between their metabolites and CYP3A.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Metabolite-P-450 complex spectra for nicardipine (A), verapamil (B), and diltiazem (C) in human liver microsomes (HLM) and CYP3A4.

Spectra were recorded after a 28-min incubation of HLM or CYP3A4 with 100 μM nicardipine, diltiazem, or verapamil in the absence or presence of 1 mM NADPH, and in the presence of NADPH and 200 μM potassium ferricyanide.

Discussion

Mechanisms of CYP inhibition of a compound can be divided into three categories: reversible, quasi-irreversible, and irreversible (Lin and Lu, 1998). Quasi-irreversible and irreversible inhibitors require at least one cycle of the CYP catalytic process, and are thus signified by both NADPH- and time-dependent inhibition. Experimentally, mechanisms of inhibition of inhibitors could be assessed initially by comparing their inhibitory effects obtained in the presence and absence of NADPH during a preincubation period. In the present study, the IC50 values obtained for all CCBs tested on CYP2D6 or CYP2C9 activity in the presence of NADPH were not lower than those observed in the absence of NADPH during preincubation. This NADPH-independent inhibition suggests that all six CCBs are not quasi-irreversible or irreversible, but rather reversible inhibitors for these isozymes. In contrast, except for nifedipine, all CCBs tested showed increased inhibitory potencies (up to 16-fold) toward CYP3A activities when preincubated in the presence of NADPH. The results suggest that these CCBs may be converted, at least in part, to reactive intermediates or products that contribute to the overall inhibition, either reversible, quasi-irreversible, or irreversible, of CYP3A activities.

To characterize this apparent NADPH-dependent CYP3A inhibition, nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem, representatives of dihydropyridines, phenylalkylamines, and benzothiazepines, respectively, were selected for additional studies. Based on the finding that NADPH-dependent inhibition was completely reversible on dialysis (Table 4), both nicardipine and verapamil are not irreversible inactivators for human CYP3A. The finding of ∼20% irreversible inhibition on dialysis after preincubation of diltiazem with NADPH (Table 4) suggests that diltiazem might act in part as an irreversible inhibitor of CYP3A. A possibility also exists that highly potent metabolite(s) of diltiazem, such as N-desmethyl diltiazem and N, N-didesmethyl diltiazem (Sutton et al., 1997), due possibly to tight binding, could remain in the incubation mixture after the 16-h dialysis period.

Subsequent studies showed that nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem were able to form P-450-iron (II)-metabolite complex in human liver microsomes and in recombinant human CYP3A4, indicating that they are quasi-irreversible inhibitors of CYP3A4. These results were not unexpected considering that N-demethylated metabolites, all shown to be mediated by CYP3A (Kroemer et al., 1993; Sutton et al., 1997; Fukunaga et al., 1998), have been observed after administration of the three CCBs, and that N-dealkylation of a secondary or tertiary amine has been suggested as the first step leading to formation of P-450-iron (II)-metabolite complex. The smaller extent of the complex formation observed with verapamil (∼6%) as compared with that obtained with nicardipine (30%) or diltiazem (20%) suggests that the MI complex formation contributed relatively less to the overall NADPH-dependent inhibition for verapamil than for nicardipine or diltiazem. Considering that verapamil exhibited lower IC50 values (Table 1) and higher maximal inhibition rate constant/KI ratio than diltiazem, the relatively low level of MI complex observed for verapamil suggests that metabolite(s) of verapamil might also be potent, but reversible inhibitor(s). It is also interesting to point out that the metabolite complexes observed with these CCBs were relatively unstable on dialysis because virtually complete restoration of testosterone 6β-hydroxylase activity was observed after dialysis in the case of nicardipine and verapamil (Table 4). A similar observation was also obtained in our laboratory with TAO, a known P-450-metabolite complex-forming agent (Table 4). It is presently unclear whether the P-450-iron (II)-metabolite complex formed by diltiazem was more stable than that those complexes formed by nicardipine, verapamil, or TAO.

Based on the above observations and considering typical plasma concentrations of ∼0.1 to 0.4 μM for nicardipine, verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine, and of ∼5 to 50 nM for amlodipine and felodipine (Kelly and O'Malley, 1992), all CCBs tested, with the exception of nicardipine, could be considered as weak reversible inhibitors for CYP2D6 and CYP2C9. Significant degree of metabolic inhibition on CYP2D6 and CYP2C9 activities may not be expected after a therapeutic dose of verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine, amlodipine, or felodipine. However, the present study suggested, based on their IC50 values (0.9–5 μM) obtained in the presence of NADPH preincubation relative to their therapeutic concentrations (0.1–0.4 μM), that nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem are relatively potent inhibitors of CYP3A in humans. Inhibition of CYP3A activities likely contributed, at least in part, to the previously observed decreased clearances or increased plasma concentrations of CYP3A substrates after concomitant administration with nicardipine, diltiazem, and verapamil (Kirch et al., 1990; Schlanz et al., 1991; Rosenthal and Ezra, 1995; Azie et al., 1998; Kantola et al., 1998; Lamberg et al., 1998). The above conclusion is additionally supported by the present finding that the three CCBs are quasi-irreversible inhibitors of CYP3A, eliciting inhibitory effects, in part, via MI complex. In vivo, such a complex is known to be so stable that the CYP involved in the complex formation would be unavailable for drug metabolism. As a result, the inhibitory effects of quasi-irreversible inhibitors are more prominent after multiple dosing and last longer than those of reversible inhibitors (Murray and Reidy, 1990; Lin and Lu, 1998). Consistent with these, there have been several cases of significant interactions noted after repeated doses of nicardipine, verapamil, or diltiazem with CYP3A substrates as compared with after other CCBs (Kirch et al., 1990; Schlanz et al., 1991;Rosenthal and Ezra, 1995; Azie et al., 1998; Kantola et al., 1998;Lamberg et al., 1998). The relatively fewer cases of pharmacokinetic interactions reported for felodipine and amlodipine also appeared to be consistent with the present finding that their IC50 values obtained in the presence of NADPH were >200-fold higher than reported plasma concentrations after a therapeutic dose. Noteworthy, the potent and irreversible CYP3A inhibitor mibefradil, which was recently withdrawn from the market due to drug-interaction potential, exhibited lower IC50 value (0.3 μM) relative to its therapeutic concentrations (0.5–1 μM) than all six CCBs studied (Prueksaritanont et al., 1999).

To conclude, the present results revealed that among six CCBs tested, only nifedipine was a reversible inhibitor of CYP3A, CYP2D6, and CYP2C9. All other CCBs reversibly inhibited CYP2D6 and CYP2C9, but not CYP3A activities. Based on ratios between IC50values obtained in the presence of NADPH during preincubation and the respective therapeutic concentrations, nicardipine, verapamil, and diltiazem are relatively potent inhibitors of CYP3A. In addition, the three CCBs inhibited CYP3A activities, at least in part, through the formation of MI complex, and thus are classified as quasi-irreversible inhibitors. The results provide a rational basis for significant pharmacokinetic interactions reported between these CCBs and P-450 substrates, and support the notion that an understanding of the underlying mechanism of inhibition is important to provide valuable insights into drug-drug interactions observed in vivo (Lin and Lu, 1998).

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Anthony Y. H. Lu of Rutgers University for a critical review of the manuscript and Dr. Magang Shou for providing insect microsomes expressed with human CYP3A4 and NADPH-dependent reductase.

Footnotes

  • Send reprint requests to: Thomayant Prueksaritanont, Ph.D., Department of Drug Metabolism, WP 75–100, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA 19486. E-mail:thomayant-prueksaritanont{at}merck.com

  • Abbreviations used are::
    CCBs
    calcium channel blockers
    P-450
    cytochrome P-450
    MI
    metabolic intermediate
    TAO
    troleandomycin
    • Received August 24, 1999.
    • Accepted October 13, 1999.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Azie NE,
    2. Brater DC,
    3. Becker PA,
    4. Jones DR,
    5. Hall SD
    (1998) The interaction of diltiazem with lovastatin and pravastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 64:369–377.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bensoussan C,
    2. Delaforge M,
    3. Mansuy D
    (1995) Particular ability of cytochromes P450 3A to form inhibitory P450-iron-metabolite complexes upon metabolic oxidation of aminodrugs. Biochem Pharmacol 49:591–602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Buening MK,
    2. Franklin MR
    (1976) SKF 525-A inhibition, induction, and 452-nm complex formation. Drug Metab Dispos 4:244–255.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. ↵
    1. Eagling VA,
    2. Tjia JF,
    3. Back DJ
    (1998) Differential selectivity of cytochrome P450 inhibitors against probe substrates in human and rat liver microsomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 45:107–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Fonne-Pfister R,
    2. Meyer UA
    (1988) Xenobiotic and endobiotic inhibitors of cytochrome P-450db1 function, the target of the debrisoquine/sparteine type polymorphism. Biochem Pharmacol 37:3829–3835.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Franklin MR
    (1991) Cytochrome P450 metabolic intermediate complexes from macrolide antibiotics and related compounds. Methods Enzymol 206:559–573.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Fukunaga Y,
    2. Miyashita A,
    3. Iwatsubo T,
    4. Noguchi K,
    5. Watanabe T,
    6. Higuchi S
    (1998) Identification of the human liver cytochrome P-450 isozymes involved in nicardipine metabolism. ISSX Proc 13:124.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Guengerich FP
    (1988) Oxidation of 17α-ethynylestradiol by human liver cytochrome P-450. Mol Pharmacol 33:500–508.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. ↵
    1. Halliday RC,
    2. Jones BC,
    3. Smith DA,
    4. Kitteringham NR,
    5. Park BK
    (1995) An investigation of the interaction between halofantrine, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4: Studies with human liver microsomes and heterologous enzyme expression systems. Br J Clin Pharmacol 40:369–378.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hunt BA,
    2. Self TH,
    3. Lalonde RL,
    4. Bottorff MB
    (1989) Calcium channel blockers as inhibitors of drug metabolism. Chest 96:393–399.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kantola T,
    2. Kivistö KT,
    3. Neuvonen PJ
    (1998) Erythromycin and verapamil considerably increase serum simvastatin and simvastatin acid concentrations. Clin Pharmacol Ther 64:177–182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kelly JG,
    2. O'Malley K
    (1992) Clinical pharmacokinetics of calcium antagonists: An update. Clin Pharmacokinet 22:416–433.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kirch W,
    2. Kleinbloesem CH,
    3. Belz GG
    (1990) Drug interactions with calcium antagonists. Pharmacol Ther 45:109–136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kroemer HK,
    2. Gautier J-C,
    3. Beaune P,
    4. Henderson C,
    5. Wolf CR,
    6. Eichelbaum M
    (1993) Identification of P450 enzymes involved in metabolism of verapamil in humans. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 348:332–337.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Lamberg TS,
    2. Kivistö KT,
    3. Neuvonen PJ
    (1998) Effects of verapamil and diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of buspirone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 63:640–645.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Lin JH,
    2. Lu AYH
    (1998) Inhibition and induction of cytochrome P450 and the clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet 35:361–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Lowry OH,
    2. Rosebrough NJ,
    3. Farr AL,
    4. Randall RJ
    (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. McKillop D,
    2. Wild MJ,
    3. Butters CJ,
    4. Simcock C
    (1998) Effects of propofol on human hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 activities. Xenobiotica 28:845–853.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Murray M,
    2. Reidy GF
    (1990) Selectivity in the inhibition of mammalian cytochromes P-450 by chemical agents. Pharmacol Rev 42:85–101.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Pershing LK,
    2. Franklin MR
    (1982) Cytochrome P-450 metabolic-intermediate complex formation and induction by macrolide antibiotics: A new class of agents. Xenobiotica 12:687–699.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Pichard L,
    2. Fabre I,
    3. Fabre G,
    4. Domergue J,
    5. Saint Aubert B,
    6. Mourad G,
    7. Maurel P
    (1990) Screening for inducers and inhibitors of cytochrome P-450 (cyclosporin A oxidase) in primary cultures of human hepatocytes and in liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 18:595–606.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  22. ↵
    1. Prueksaritanont T,
    2. Gorham LM,
    3. Hochman J,
    4. Tran L,
    5. Vyas KP
    (1996) Comparative studies of drug-metabolizing enzymes in dog, monkey and human small intestines, and in Caco-2 cells. Drug Metab Dispos 24:634–642.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  23. ↵
    1. Prueksaritanont T,
    2. Ma B,
    3. Tang C,
    4. Meng Y,
    5. Assang C,
    6. Lu P,
    7. Reider PJ,
    8. Lin JH,
    9. Baillie TA
    (1999) Metabolic interactions between mibefradil and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: An in vitro investigation with human liver preparations. Br J Clin Pharmacol 47:291–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Rosenthal T,
    2. Ezra D
    (1995) Calcium antagonists: Drug interactions of clinical significance. Drug Saf 13:157–187.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Schlanz KD,
    2. Myre SA,
    3. Bottorff MB
    (1991) Pharmacokinetic interactions with calcium channel antagonists. Clin Pharmacokinet 21:344–356.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Sutton D,
    2. Butler AM,
    3. Nadin L,
    4. Murray M
    (1997) Role of CYP3A4 in human hepatic diltiazem N-demethylation: Inhibition of CYP3A4 activity by oxidized diltiazem metabolites. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282:294–300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Tjia JF,
    2. Back DJ,
    3. Breckenridge AM
    (1989) Calcium channel antagonists and cyclosporine metabolism: In vitro studies with human liver microsomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 28:362–365.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Grassi JM,
    4. Granda BW,
    5. Duan SX,
    6. Fogelman SM,
    7. Daily JP,
    8. Harmatz JS,
    9. Shader RI
    (1998) Protease inhibitors as inhibitors of human cytochromes P450: High risk associated with ritonavir. J Clin Pharmacol 38:106–111.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Welker HA,
    2. Wiltshire H,
    3. Bullingham R
    (1998) Clinical pharmacokinetics of mibefradil. Clin Pharmacokinet 35:405–423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Wrighton SA,
    2. Ring BJ
    (1994) Inhibition of human CYP3A catalyzed 1′-hydroxy midazolam formation by ketoconazole, nifedipine, erythromycin, cimetidine and nizatidine. Pharm Res 11:921–924.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Zhao X-J,
    2. Ishizaki T
    (1997) Metabolic interactions of selected antimalarial and non-antimalarial drugs with the major pathway (3-hydroxylation) of quinine in human liver microsomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 44:505–511.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 28 (2)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 28, Issue 2
1 Feb 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Drug Interactions with Calcium Channel Blockers: Possible Involvement of Metabolite-Intermediate Complexation with CYP3A
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Drug Interactions with Calcium Channel Blockers: Possible Involvement of Metabolite-Intermediate Complexation with CYP3A

Bennett Ma, Thomayant Prueksaritanont and Jiunn H. Lin
Drug Metabolism and Disposition February 1, 2000, 28 (2) 125-130;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Drug Interactions with Calcium Channel Blockers: Possible Involvement of Metabolite-Intermediate Complexation with CYP3A

Bennett Ma, Thomayant Prueksaritanont and Jiunn H. Lin
Drug Metabolism and Disposition February 1, 2000, 28 (2) 125-130;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Olanzapine Glucuronidation in Humanized Mice
  • rs2242480 Regulates the Expression of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5
  • Absorption, Metabolism, and Excretion of Taselisib
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics