Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Escitalopram (S-Citalopram) and Its Metabolites in Vitro: Cytochromes Mediating Biotransformation, Inhibitory Effects, and Comparison to R-Citalopram

Lisa L. von Moltke, David J. Greenblatt, Gina M. Giancarlo, Brian W. Granda, Jerold S. Harmatz and Richard I. Shader
Drug Metabolism and Disposition August 2001, 29 (8) 1102-1109;
Lisa L. von Moltke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Greenblatt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gina M. Giancarlo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian W. Granda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerold S. Harmatz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard I. Shader
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Transformation of escitalopram (S-CT), the pharmacologically active S-enantiometer of citalopram, to S-desmethyl-CT (S-DCT), and ofS-DCT to S-didesmethyl-CT (S-DDCT), was studied in human liver microsomes and in expressed cytochromes (CYPs). Biotransformation of theR-enantiomer (R-CT) was studied in parallel. S-CT was transformed to S-DCT by CYP2C19 (Km = 69 μM), CYP2D6 (Km = 29 μM), and CYP3A4 (Km = 588 μM). After normalization for hepatic abundance, relative contributions to net intrinsic clearance were 37% for CYP2C19, 28% for CYP2D6, and 35% for CYP3A4. At 10 μM S-CT in liver microsomes,S-DCT formation was reduced to 60% of control by 1 μM ketoconazole, and to 80 to 85% of control by 5 μM quinidine or 25 μM omeprazole. S-DDCT was formed fromS-DCT only by CYP2D6; incomplete inhibition by quinidine in liver microsomes indicated participation of a non-CYP pathway. Based on established index reactions, S-CT andS-DCT were negligible inhibitors (IC50> 100 μM) of CYP1A2, -2C9, -2C19, -2E1, and -3A, and weakly inhibited CYP2D6 (IC50 = 70–80 μM).R-CT and its metabolites, studied using the same procedures, had properties very similar to those of the correspondingS-enantiomers. Thus S-CT, biotransformed by three CYP isoforms in parallel, is unlikely to be affected by drug interactions or genetic polymorphisms. S-CT andS-DCT are also unlikely to cause clinically important drug interactions via CYP inhibition.

Previous studies have evaluated the properties of biotransformation of racemic citalopram (CT) to monodesmethylcitalopram (DCT) in vitro by human liver microsomes and by heterologously expressed individual human cytochromes (Kobayashi et al., 1997; Rochat et al., 1997; von Moltke et al., 1999b). These studies indicate that CYP3A4, -2C19, and -2D6 all contribute to this reaction, with approximate relative contributions at low concentrations of CT estimated at 34% for CYP3A, 36% for CYP2C19, and 30% for CYP2D6. Stereoselective clearance has also been suggested, in that intrinsic clearance of S-citalopram (approved generic name of Escitalopram) may exceed that ofR-citalopram (R-CT; Olesen and Linnet, 1999). Clinical studies indicate that steady-state concentrations ofR-CT may exceed those of S-CT during chronic administration of racemic CT to humans, and that the elimination half-life of R-citalopram exceeds that ofS-citalopram (Bondolfi et al., 1996; Foglia et al., 1997;Voirol et al., 1999). These differences are of potential clinical importance, since the S-isomers of CT and DCT have greater intrinsic antidepressant activity than their respectiveR-isomers (Hyttel et al., 1992). S-Citalopram itself is currently under investigation as an antidepressant agent.

The present study evaluated the biotransformation of the individualR- and S-isomers of CT to DCT, and ofR- and S-DCT to didesmethylcitalopram (DDCT), by human liver microsomes, and by microsomes containing pure human cytochromes expressed by cDNA-transfected human lymphoblastoid cells. The inhibitory actions of R- and S-CT, -DCT, and -DDCT versus index reactions representing activity of specific human cytochromes were also evaluated.

Materials and Methods

In Vitro Procedures.

Liver samples from individual human donors with no known liver disease were provided by the International Institute for the Advancement of Medicine, Exton, PA, the Liver Tissue Procurement and Distribution System, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, and the National Disease Research Interchange, Philadelphia, PA. All samples were of the CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 normal metabolizer phenotype based on prior in vitro phenotyping studies.

Microsomes were prepared by ultracentrifugation; microsomal pellets were suspended in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer containing 20% glycerol and stored at −80°C until use. Microsomes containing individual human cytochromes expressed by cDNA-transfected human lymphoblastoid cells (Gentest, Woburn, MA) were similarly stored at −80°C until use. Pure samples of R- and S-CT, -DCT, and -DDCT were provided by H. Lundbeck A/S (Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark) through Forest Laboratories (New York, NY). Other chemical reagents and drug entities were purchased from commercial sources or kindly provided by their pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Incubation mixtures contained 50 mM phosphate buffer, 5 mM Mg2+, 0.5 mM NADP+, and an isocitrate/isocitric dehydrogenase regenerating system. Appropriate substrates, with and without inhibitor in methanol solution, were added to a series of incubation tubes. The solvent was evaporated to dryness at 40°C under conditions of mild vacuum. Reactions were initiated by addition of microsomal protein (0.25 mg/ml for liver microsomes, 1.0 mg/ml for expressed CYPs). After an appropriate incubation duration at 37°C, reactions were stopped by cooling on ice and addition of 100 μl of acetonitrile. Internal standard was added, the incubation mixture was centrifuged, and the supernatant was transferred to an autosampling vial for high performance liquid chromatography analysis. The mobile phase consisted of a combination of acetonitrile and 50 mM phosphate buffer as appropriate for each assay. The analytical column was stainless steel, 30 cm × 3.9 mm, containing reverse-phase C-18 μBondapak, or 15 cm × 3.9 mm, containing reverse-phase C-18 Novapak (Waters Associates, Milford, MA). Column effluent was monitored by ultraviolet absorbance at the appropriate wavelength. All biotransformation reactions were verified to be in the linear range with respect to incubation duration and protein concentration.

Inhibition Studies.

The potential inhibitory effect of the stereoisomers of CT, DCT, and DDCT on the activity of six human cytochromes was evaluated using index reactions and methods as follows (Table1): CYP1A2, phenacetin (100 μM) to acetaminophen (von Moltke et al., 1996a; Venkatakrishnan et al., 1998b); CYP2C9, tolbutamide (100 μM) to hydroxytolbutamide (Venkatakrishnan et al., 1998c); CYP2C19, S-mephenytoin (25 μM) to 4′-OH-mephenytoin (Venkatakrishnan et al., 1998c); CYP2D6, dextromethorphan (25 μM) to dextrorphan (Schmider et al., 1997; von Moltke et al., 1998c); CYP2E1, chlorzoxazone (50 μM) to 6-OH-chlorzoxazone (Court et al., 1997); CYP3A, triazolam (250 μM) to α-OH-triazolam (von Moltke et al., 1996b, 1998a, 2001; Perloff et al., 2000). Substrate specificity in the potency of CYP3A inhibitors has been suggested (Kenworthy et al., 1999); triazolam is an index CYP3A substrate reported to be representative of the most common substrate category.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

In vitro systems for evaluating CYP inhibitory activity of citalopram stereoisomers and metabolites

Varying concentrations of R- and S-CT,R- and S-DCT, and R- andS-DDCT (0–250 μM) were coincubated with fixed concentrations of the index substrate. Also studied in each system were “positive control” index inhibitors, as well as SSRIs previously established as inhibitory for that specific reaction (Table 1).

Reaction velocities with coaddition of inhibitor were expressed as a percentage ratio (Rv) of the control velocity with no inhibitor present. The relation of Rv to inhibitor concentration was analyzed by nonlinear regression to determine the inhibitor concentration producing a 50% decrement in reaction velocity (IC50) (von Moltke et al., 1998b).

Enzyme Kinetic Studies.

Varying concentrations of R-CT, S-CT,R-DCT, and S-DCT (0–1000 μM) were added to incubation tubes, and the solvent evaporated to dryness. Incubations with human liver microsomes or with heterologously expressed human cytochromes (Crespi, 1995; Crespi and Penman, 1997; Crespi and Miller, 1999) were performed as described above and as reported previously (von Moltke et al., 1999b). Reactions were stopped by addition of acetonitrile and by cooling on ice. Internal standard (phenacetin) was added, the mixtures were centrifuged, and supernatants were transferred to high performance liquid chromatography autosampling vials. The mobile phase was 70% 50 mM KH2PO4 and 30% acetonitrile at 2 ml/min. Column effluent was monitored by ultraviolet absorbance at 230 nm. Concentrations of DCT (following incubation withR- or S-CT) or of DDCT (following incubation withR- or S-DCT) were determined using calibration curves containing known amounts of DCT or DDCT. Reaction velocities were calculated in units of picomoles per minute per milligram of microsomal protein for liver microsomal studies, or picomoles per minute per picomole of CYP in expressed cytochrome studies.

Liver Microsomes.

Biotransformation of R- or S-CT to DCT was consistent with Michaelis-Menten kinetics in four of eight instances. The following equation was fitted to data points using nonlinear regression:V=Vmax·CTCT+Km Equation 1In the other four instances, data points were best described by a Michaelis-Menten equation modified by an exponent (A), ranging in value from 1.01 to 1.23. This equation is consistent with substrate activation or binding cooperativity (Schmider et al., 1996;von Moltke et al., 1996b; Ueng et al., 1997; Harlow and Halpert, 1998;Witherow and Houston, 1999).V=Vmax·CTACTA+KmA Equation 2In both equations, V is reaction velocity and CT is the concentration of citalopram (either R-CT orS-CT). The choice between eqs. 1 and 2 as a function of best fit was based on visual comparison of the data points with the fitted function, as well as standard statistical criteria (Schmider et al., 1996).

Biotransformation of R- and S-DCT to DDCT was consistent with a two-enzyme process, with the high-affinity (lowKm) component consistent with a Michaelis-Menten process. The low-affinity process required approximation by a linear function. The following equation was fitted to data points.V=Vmax·DCTDCT+Km+Z·DCT Equation 3DCT is the concentration of desmethylcitalopram and Zis a constant used for approximation of the low-affinity enzyme process.

Heterologously Expressed Cytochromes.

Initial screening studies were performed to evaluate the possible formation of DCT from R- and S-CT, and of DDCT from R- and S-DCT, using expressed CYP1A2, -1A6, -2B6, -2C9, -2C19, -2D6, -2E1, and -3A4. Formation of DCT from the enantiomers of CT was mediated by CYP2C19, -2D6, and -3A4; other CYPs did not yield detectable metabolite formation. Transformation of the enantiomers of DCT to DDCT was mediated only by CYP2D6, with no detectable metabolic activity from other cytochromes.

Accordingly, transformation of R- and S-CT to DCT was characterized as described above using varying concentrations ofR- and S-CT incubated with heterologously expressed CYP2C19, -2D6, and -3A4 in separate experiments. Transformation of R- and S-DCT to DDCT was characterized using heterologously expressed CYP2D6.

The relative activity factor approach was used to estimate relative contributions of CYP2C19, -2D6, and -3A4 to net clearance ofR-CT and S-CT. Average relative in vivo abundances, equivalent to the relative activity factors, were estimated using methods described in detail previously (Crespi, 1995;Venkatakrishnan et al., 1998a,c, 1999, 2000, 2001; von Moltke et al., 1999a,b; Störmer et al., 2000). These were 13.1% for CYP2C19, 3.8% for -2D6, and 83.1% for -3A4. Vmaxand intrinsic clearance values for the individual cytochromes were multiplied by the average relative abundances and the values were normalized to 100%. The resulting values were used to estimate the contribution of each cytochrome to net reaction velocity in relation to concentration of R-CT or S-CT.

Chemical Inhibition of R-CT, S-CT,R-DCT, and S-DCT Biotransformation in Microsomes.

Human liver microsomes were incubated with fixed concentrations (10 μM or 100 μM) of R-CT or S-CT. These were performed in the control condition (without inhibitors), or with coaddition of index inhibitors corresponding to the three CYP isoforms participating in CT biotransformation (Table 1). These were omeprazole (25 μM) versus CYP2C19, quinidine (5 μM) versus CYP2D6, and ketoconazole (1 μM) versus CYP3A. We recognize that 25 μM omeprazole may not be fully specific as a CYP2C19 inhibitor (Ko et al., 1997; Giancarlo et al., 2001). The effect of quinidine on biotransformation of R-CT and S-CT to DDCT was studied using similar methods. Reaction velocities with coaddition of inhibitor were expressed as a percentage ratio of the control velocity with no inhibitor present.

Results

Inhibition Studies.

In all systems the positive control inhibitors produced the expected degree of inhibition of their respective index reactions (Table 1).

CYP1A2.

R- and S-CT and metabolites all were negligible inhibitors of phenacetin O-deethylation, the index reaction for CYP1A2. None of these compounds produced 50% inhibition. The mean IC50 for α-naphthoflavone was 0.2 μM, and the mean IC50 for fluvoxamine was 0.3 μM.

CYP2C9.

R-CT, S-CT, R-DCT, andS-DCT were weak inhibitors of CYP2C9, represented by tolbutamide hydroxylation, with less than 50% inhibition produced even at 250 μM. R-DDCT and S-DDCT produced a moderate degree of inhibition, with IC50 values of 30.7 (±6.3) μM and 25.7 (±8.0) μM, respectively. Sulfaphenazole was a strong inhibitor (IC50 = 1.3 μM), and the SSRI fluvoxamine also was a moderately strong inhibitor (IC50 = 9.4 μM).

CYP2C19.

R- and S-CT were very weak inhibitors, with less than 50% inhibition of S-mephenytoin hydroxylation even at 100 μM. R- and S-DCT also were weak inhibitors.R- and S-DDCT were moderate inhibitors, with mean IC50 values of 18.7 and 12.1 μM, respectively. Omeprazole was a strong inhibitor of CYP2C19, as was the SSRI fluvoxamine (see Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

IC50 values versus S-mephenytoin hydroxylation (CYP2C19) or dextromethorphan O-demethylation (CYP2D6)

CYP2D6.

Only R-DCT had potentially important inhibiting potency versus CYP2D6, represented by dextromethorphanO-demethylation. The mean IC50 was 25.5 (± 2.1) μM. This is very close to the inhibitory potency of sertraline and is consistent with clinical data suggesting that racemic citalopram and sertraline have comparably weak CYP2D6 inhibitory potency. The SSRI paroxetine was at least an order of magnitude more potent (IC50 = 2.6 μM) than R-DCT as a CYP2D6 inhibitor (see Table 2). Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine (mean IC50 = 2.0 and 2.7 μM, respectively) also were strong CYP2D6 inhibitors.

CYP3A.

CT and metabolites all were very weak or negligible inhibitors of CYP3A, as indicated by triazolam hydroxylation. None of the compounds (at 100 μM) produced more than 50% inhibition. Fluvoxamine and nefazodone were moderately strong inhibitors (von Moltke et al., 1996b,1999c).

CYP2E1.

CT and metabolites were weak or negligible inhibitors of chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation, producing less than 20% inhibition at 250 μM.

Enzyme Kinetic Studies: Liver Microsomes.

The mean Km for biotransformation ofR-CT to R-DCT was higher than for S-CT (256 versus 165 μM) (Fig. 1). Using theVmax/Km ratio (intrinsic clearance) as an approximation of metabolic activity at low substrate concentrations, the mean ratio for S-CT exceeded that for R-CT (6.1 versus 4.9 μl/min/mg protein), but the difference was not statistically significant based on Student's pairedt test.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Formation of DCT from R- and S-CT by liver microsomes from a representative human liver sample.

Actual data points and functions of best fit are shown.

The mean Km for biotransformation ofR-DCT to R-DDCT was higher than forS-DCT (108 versus 72 μM) (Fig.2). Based on theVmax/Km ratio, intrinsic clearance for S-DCT was slightly higher than forR-DCT (1.32 versus 1.17 μl/min/mg protein). Furthermore, intrinsic clearances for DCT formation from R- orS-CT both were higher than clearances for transformation ofR- or S-DCT to DDCT.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Formation of DDCT from R- and S-DCT by human liver microsomes from the same human liver sample as in Fig. 1.

Actual data points and functions of best fit are shown.

Enzyme Kinetic Studies: Individual Human Cytochromes.

Table 3 shows enzyme kinetic values for formation of DCT from R- and S-CT by heterologously expressed human CYP2C19, -2D6, and -3A4 (Fig.3). Consistent with prior studies of racemic CT (von Moltke et al., 1999b), CYP2D6 had the highest affinity (lowest Km), CYP3A4 had the lowest affinity, and CYP2C19 fell in between. This was true for bothR-CT and S-CT.Vmax/Km ratios corresponding to each of the isoforms were higher for S-CT than for R-CT.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Kinetic analysis of biotransformation of citalopram and desmethycitalopram enantiomers by heterologously expressed human cytochromes

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Formation of DCT from R- or S-CT by heterologously expressed CYP2D6, -2C19, and -3A4.

See Table 3 for kinetic parameters. Contributions have not been normalized for relative abundance of the three CYP isoforms. Left,R-CT as substrate (open square is an outlying data point for CYP2C19; this was not used in analysis); right, S-CT as substrate.

After normalization for estimated relative abundance of the three individual CYP isoforms, CYP3A accounted for 46% of net intrinsic clearance of R-CT, CYP2C19 for 33%, and CYP2D6 for 21%. For S-CT, CYP3A accounted for 35% of net clearance, CYP2C19 for 37%, and CYP2D6 for 28% (Fig. 4) (Table 3).

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Predicted relative contributions of CYP2D6, -2C19, and -3A4 to net rate of formation of DCT from R- or S-CT.

Contributions have been normalized for relative abundance of the three CYP isoforms. Left, R-CT as substrate; right,S-CT as substrate.

Figure 5 shows the biotransformation ofR-DCT and S-DCT to DDCT by heterologously expressed CYP2D6. Km values (12.4 and 16.8 μM, respectively; Table 3) were lower than the high-affinity components of the reaction in liver microsomes.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

Formation of DDCT from R- or S-DCT by heterologously expressed CYP2D6.

Left, R-DCT as substrate; right, S-DCT as substrate.

Chemical Inhibition of CT and DCT Biotransformation in Microsomes.

At 10 μM R- or S-CT, ketoconazole reduced reaction velocity to 55 to 60% of control, quinidine to 80% of control, and omeprazole to 80 to 85% of control (Fig.6). When the R- andS-CT concentration was increased to 100 μM, the degree of inhibition by ketoconazole increased, while inhibition by quinidine decreased (Fig. 6). These findings are consistent with the data from heterologously expressed CYP isoforms.

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6

Inhibition of formation of DCT from R- or S-CT by ketoconazole, quinidine, or omeprazole.

Reaction velocities are expressed as a percentage of the control velocity without inhibitor. Each bar represents the mean (± S.E.) value for four separate human liver samples. Left, R- orS-CT concentration, 10 μM; right, R- orS-CT concentration, 100 μM.

Quinidine (5 μM) reduced formation of DDCT from R- orS-DCT to only 70 to 80% of control (Fig.7), whereas the same concentration of quinidine reduced formation of R- and S-DCT to less than 10% of control values in heterologously expressed CYP2D6.

Figure 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7

Inhibition of formation of DDCT from R-DCT or S-DCT by quinidine at substrate concentrations of 10 μM (n = 3, left) or 100 μM (n = 7, right).

Reaction velocities are expressed as a percentage of the control value without inhibitor. Each point represents the mean (± S.E.) value for a series of human liver samples.

Discussion

R-CT, S-CT, R-DCT, andS-DCT are weak or negligible inhibitors of human CYP1A2, -2C9, -2C19, -2E1, and -3A in human liver microsomes. R- andS-CT also are weak or negligible inhibitors of CYP2D6. TheR-isomer of DCT is a weak to moderate inhibitor of CYP2D6, comparable in potency to sertraline. R- andS-DDCT are moderate inhibitors of CYP2C9 and -2C19. However, this is unlikely to be of clinical importance due to the low plasma levels (less than 0.05 μM) of DDCT achieved clinically (Baumann and Larsen, 1995).

Transformation clearance of S-CT to DCT in liver microsomes is higher than that of R-CT, accounting for the trend to higher plasma levels of R-CT during clinical use of racemic citalopram and the shorter elimination half-life of S-CT (Bondolfi et al., 1996; Foglia et al., 1997; Voirol et al., 1999). Formation clearance of DCT from CT exceeds elimination clearance of DCT to DDCT. Since plasma levels of DCT do not exceed those of CT during clinical use of racemic citalopram, the findings suggest that another metabolic pathway (in addition to formation of DDCT) or another mechanism of elimination may contribute to DCT clearance (Rochat et al., 1998; Dalgaard and Larsen, 1999).

Studies with heterologously expressed human CYP isoforms indicate that CYP2D6, -2C19, and -3A all contribute to formation of DCT fromR- or S-CT, with CYP3A accounting for 35 to 46% of net intrinsic clearance. The contribution of CYP3A is predicted to increase at higher concentrations of CT, while the contribution of CYP2D6 is predicted to decrease. This was verified by studies of chemical inhibition of this reaction in liver microsomes by index inhibitors. As in the case of liver microsomes, intrinsic clearance ofS-CT by the three CYP isoforms was higher than that ofR-CT.

CYP2D6 was the only identified CYP isoform mediating formation of DDCT from R- or S-DCT. However, these were high-affinity (low Km) reactions in expressed CYP2D6, with Km values lower than the high-affinity component in liver microsomes. Furthermore, the reaction was incompletely inhibited by quinidine (5 μM) in liver microsomes but was extensively inhibited by quinidine in expressed CYP2D6. This again suggests participation of some other process mediating net biotransformation of DCT in liver microsomes and in vivo.

Thus S-CT is biotransformed to its principal demethylated metabolite by three distinct human CYP isoforms in parallel. As such, impaired activity of any one of these isoforms due to a drug interaction or a genetic “poor metabolizer” polymorphism is unlikely to have a large effect on net metabolic clearance. As examples, clearance of racemic CT among individuals identified as phenotypic poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 was only modestly lower than in normal metabolizer controls (Sindrup et al., 1993). Coadministration of ketoconazole with racemic CT produced a reduction in CT clearance of approximately 10%, which was not statistically significant (Gutierrez and Abramowitz, 2001). Cimetidine, an inhibitor of multiple CYP isoforms, reduced clearance of racemic CT by 30% (Priskorn et al., 1997a). S-CT and its metabolites themselves are weak or negligible inhibitors of human CYP isoforms, indicating a low likelihood of clinically important drug interactions due to impaired CYP activity (Gram et al., 1993; Priskorn et al., 1997b; Avenoso et al., 1998; Taylor et al., 1998; Nolting and Abramowitz; 2000; von Bahr et al., 2000).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the collaboration and assistance of Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Ph.D.

Footnotes

  •  This work was supported by Grants MH-01237, MH-58435, MH-34223, DA-13209, DK/AI-58496, and DA-05258 from the Department of Health and Human Services, and by a grant from Forest Laboratories, New York, NY.

  • Abbreviations used are::
    CT
    citalopram
    DCT
    desmethylcitalopram
    DDCT
    didesmethylcitalopram
    CYP
    cytochrome P450
    SSRI
    selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
    • Received January 2, 2001.
    • Accepted April 16, 2001.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Avenoso A,
    2. Facciolà G,
    3. Scorda MG,
    4. Gitto C,
    5. Ferrante GD,
    6. Madia AG,
    7. Spina E
    (1998) No effect of citalopram on plasma levels of clozapine, risperidone and their active metabolites in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Clin Drug Investig 16:393–398.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Baumann P,
    2. Larsen F
    (1995) The pharmacokinetics of citalopram. Rev Contemp Pharmacother 6:287–295.
  3. ↵
    1. Bondolfi G,
    2. Chautems C,
    3. Rochat B,
    4. Bertschy G,
    5. Baumann P
    (1996) Non-response to citalopram in depressive patients: pharmacokinetic and clinical consequences of a fluvoxamine augmentation. Psychopharmacol 128:421–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Court MH,
    2. von Moltke LL,
    3. Shader RI,
    4. Greenblatt DJ
    (1997) Biotransformation of chlorzoxazone by hepatic microsomes from humans and ten other mammalian species. Biopharm Drug Dispos 18:213–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Crespi CL
    (1995) Xenobiotic-metabolizing human cells as tools for pharmacological and toxicological research. Adv Drug Res 26:179–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Crespi CL,
    2. Miller VP
    (1999) The use of heterologously expressed drug metabolizing enzymes—state of the art and prospects for the future. Pharmacol Ther 84:121–131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Crespi CL,
    2. Penman BW
    (1997) Use of cDNA-expressed human cytochrome P450 enzymes to study potential drug-drug interactions. Adv Pharmacol 43:171–188.
  8. ↵
    1. Dalgaard L,
    2. Larsen C
    (1999) Metabolism and excretion of citalopram in man: identification of O-acyl- and N-glucuronides. Xenobiotica 29:1033–1041.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Foglia JP,
    2. Pollock BG,
    3. Kirshner MA,
    4. Rosen J,
    5. Sweet R,
    6. Mulsant B
    (1997) Plasma levels of citalopram enantiomers and metabolites in elderly patients. Psychopharmacol Bull 33:109–112.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Giancarlo GM,
    2. Venkatakrishnan K,
    3. Granda BW,
    4. von Moltke LL,
    5. Greenblatt DJ
    (2001) Relative contributions of CYP2C9 and 2C19 to phenytoin 4-hydroxylation in vitro: inhibition by sulfaphenazole, omeprazole and ticlopidine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 57:31–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Gram LF,
    2. Hansen MGJ,
    3. Sindrup SH,
    4. Brøsen K,
    5. Poulsen JH,
    6. Aaes-Jørgensen T,
    7. Overø KF
    (1993) Citalopram: interaction studies with levomepromazine, imipramine, and lithium. Ther Drug Monit 15:18–24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Gutierrez M,
    2. Abramowitz W
    (2001) Lack of effect of a single dose of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of citalopram. Pharmacotherapy 21:163–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Harlow GR,
    2. Halpert JR
    (1998) Analysis of human cytochrome P450 3A4 cooperativity: construction and characterization of a site-directed mutant that displays hyperbolic steroid hydroxylation kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6636–6641.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Hyttel J,
    2. Bøgesø KP,
    3. Perregarrd J,
    4. Sànchez C
    (1992) The pharmacological effect of citalopram resides in the (S)-(+) enantiomer. J Neural Transm Gen Sect 88:157–160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kenworthy KE,
    2. Bloomer JC,
    3. Clarke SE,
    4. Houston JB
    (1999) CYP3A4 drug interactions: correlation of 10 in vitro probe substrates. Br J Clin Pharmacol 48:716–727.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Ko J-W,
    2. Sukhova N,
    3. Thacker D,
    4. Chen P,
    5. Flockhart DA
    (1997) Evaluation of omeprazole and lansoprazole as inhibitors of cytochrome P450 isoforms. Drug Metab Disp 25:853–862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Kobayashi K,
    2. Chiba K,
    3. Yagi T,
    4. et al.
    (1997) Identification of cytochrome P450 isoforms involved in citalopram N-demethylation by human liver microsomes. J Pharm Exp Ther 280:927–933.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Nolting A,
    2. Abramowitz W
    (2000) Lack of interaction between citalopram and the CYP3A4 substrate triazolam. Pharmacotherapy 20:750–755.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Olesen OV,
    2. Linnet K
    (1999) Studies on the stereoselective metabolism of citalopram by human liver microsomes and cDNA-expressed cytochrome P450 enzymes. Pharmacology 59:298–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Perloff MD,
    2. von Moltke LL,
    3. Court MH,
    4. Kotegawa T,
    5. Shader RI,
    6. Greenblatt DJ
    (2000) Midazolam and triazolam biotransformation in mouse and human liver microsomes: relative contribution of CYP3A and CYP2C9 isoforms. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 292:618–628.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Priskorn M,
    2. Larsen F,
    3. Segonzac A,
    4. Moulin M
    (1997a) Pharmacokinetic interaction study of citalopram and cimetidine in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 52:241–242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Priskorn M,
    2. Sidhu JS,
    3. Larsen F,
    4. Davis JD,
    5. Khan AZ,
    6. Rolan PE
    (1997b) Investigation of multiple dose citalopram on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic warfarin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 44:199–202.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Rochat B,
    2. Amey M,
    3. Gillet M,
    4. Meyer UA,
    5. Baumann P
    (1997) Identification of three cytochrome P450 isozymes involved in N-demethylation of citalopram enantiomers in human liver microsomes. Pharmacogenetics 7:1–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Rochat B,
    2. Kosel M,
    3. Boss G,
    4. Testa B,
    5. Gillet M,
    6. Baumann P
    (1998) Stereoselective biotransformation of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram and its demethylated metabolites by monoamine oxidases in human liver. Biochem Pharmacol 56:15–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Schmider J,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Fogelman SM,
    4. von Moltke LL,
    5. Shader RI
    (1997) Metabolism of dextromethorphan in vitro: involvement of cytochromes P450 2D6, 3A3/4, with a possible role of 2E1. Biopharm Drug Dispos 18:227–240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Schmider J,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Harmatz JS,
    4. Shader RI
    (1996) Enzyme kinetic modeling as a tool to analyse the behaviour of cytochrome P450 catalysed reactions: application to amitriptyline N-demethylation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 41:593–604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Sindrup SH,
    2. Brøsen K,
    3. Hansen MGJ,
    4. Aaes-Jørgensen T,
    5. Overø KF,
    6. Gram LF
    (1993) Pharmacokinetics of citalopram in relation to the sparteine and the mephenytoin oxidation polymorphisms. Ther Drug Monit 15:11–17.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Störmer E,
    2. von Moltke LL,
    3. Greenblatt DJ
    (2000) Scaling drug biotransformation data from cDNA-expressed cytochrome P-450 to human liver: a comparison of relative activity factors and human liver abundance in studies of mirtazapine metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295:793–801.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Taylor D,
    2. Ellison Z,
    3. Ementon Shaw L,
    4. Wickham H,
    5. Murray R
    (1998) Co-administration of citalopram and clozapine: effect on plasma clozapine levels. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 13:19–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Ueng Y-F,
    2. Kuwabara T,
    3. Chun Y-J,
    4. Guengerich F
    (1997) Cooperativity in oxidations catalyzed by cytochrome P450–3A4. Biochemistry 36:370–381.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Venkatakrishnan K,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. von Moltke LL,
    4. Schmider J,
    5. Harmatz JS,
    6. Shader RI
    (1998a) Five distinct human cytochromes mediate amitriptyline N-demethylation in vitro: dominance of CYP 2C19 and 3A4. J Clin Pharmacol 38:112–121.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Venkatakrishnan K,
    2. von Moltke LL,
    3. Greenblatt DJ
    (1998b) Human cytochromes P450 mediating phenacetin O-deethylation in vitro: validation of the high affinity component as an index of CYP1A2 activity. J Pharm Sci 87:1502–1507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Venkatakrishnan K,
    2. von Moltke LL,
    3. Greenblatt DJ
    (1999) Nortriptyline E-10-hydroxylation in vitro is mediated by human CYP2D6 (high affinity) and CYP3A4 (low affinity): implications for interactions with enzyme-inducing drugs. J Clin Pharmacol 39:567–577.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Venkatakrishnan K,
    2. von Moltke LL,
    3. Greenblatt DJ
    (1998c) Relative quantities of catalytically active CYP 2C9 and 2C19 in human liver microsomes: application of the relative activity factor approach. J of Pharm Sci 87:845–853.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Venkatakrishnan K,
    2. von Moltke LL,
    3. Court MH,
    4. Harmatz JS,
    5. Crespi CL,
    6. Greenblatt DJ
    (2000) Comparison between cytochrome P450 (CYP) content and relative activity approaches to scaling from cDNA-expressed CYPs to human liver microsomes: ratios of accessory proteins as sources of discrepancies between the approaches. Drug Metab Dispos 28:1493–1504.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Venkatakrishnan K,
    2. von Moltke LL,
    3. Greenblatt DJ
    (2001) Application of the relative activity factor approach in scaling from heterologously expressed cytochromes P450 to human liver microsomes: studies on amitriptyline as a model substrate. J Pharmacol and Exp Ther 297:326–337.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Voirol P,
    2. Rubin C,
    3. Bryois C,
    4. Kosel M,
    5. Buclin T,
    6. Baumann P
    (1999) Pharmacokinetic consequences of a citalopram treatment discontinuation. Ther Drug Monit 21:263–266.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. von Bahr C,
    2. Ursing C,
    3. Yasui N,
    4. Tybring G,
    5. Bertilsson L,
    6. Röjdmark S
    (2000) Fluvoxamine but not citalopram increases serum melatonin in healthy subjects—an indication that cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 hydroxylate melatonin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 56:123–127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Duan SX,
    4. Harmatz JS,
    5. Shader RI
    (1998a) Inhibition of triazolam hydroxylation by ketoconazole, itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole and fluconazole in vitro. Pharm Pharmacol Commun 4:443–445.
  40. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Duan SX,
    4. Schmider J,
    5. Kudchadker L,
    6. Fogelman SM,
    7. Harmatz JS,
    8. Shader RI
    (1996a) Phenacetin O-deethylation by human liver microsomes in vitro: inhibition by chemical probes, SSRI antidepressants, nefazodone, and venlafaxine. Psychopharmacology 128:398–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Granda BW,
    4. Duan SX,
    5. Grassi JM,
    6. Venkatakrishnan K,
    7. Harmatz JS,
    8. Shader RI
    (1999a) Zolpidem metabolism in vitro: responsible cytochromes, chemical inhibitors, and in vivo correlations. Br J Clin Pharmacol 48:89–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Granda BW,
    4. Giancarlo GM,
    5. Duan SX,
    6. Daily JP,
    7. Harmatz JS,
    8. Shader RI
    (2001) Inhibition of human cytochrome P450 isoforms by nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. J Clin Pharmacol 41:85–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Granda BW,
    4. Grassi JM,
    5. Schmider J,
    6. Harmatz JS,
    7. Shader RI
    (1999c) Nefazodone, meta-chlorophenylpiperazine, and their metabolites in vitro: cytochromes mediating transformation, and P450–3A4 inhibitory actions. Psychopharmacology 145:113–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Grassi JM,
    4. Granda BW,
    5. Duan SX,
    6. Fogelman SM,
    7. Daily JP,
    8. Harmatz JS,
    9. Shader RI
    (1998b) Protease inhibitors as inhibitors of human cytochromes P450: high risk associated with ritonavir. J Clin Pharmacol 38:106–111.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Grassi JM,
    4. Granda BW,
    5. Venkatakrishnan K,
    6. Duan SX,
    7. Fogelman SM,
    8. Harmatz JS,
    9. Shader RI
    (1999b) Citalopram and desmethylcitalopram in vitro: human cytochromes mediating transformation, and cytochrome inhibitory effects. Biol Psychiatry 46:839–849.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Grassi JM,
    4. Granda BW,
    5. Venkatakrishnan K,
    6. Schmider J,
    7. Harmatz JS,
    8. Shader RI
    (1998c) Multiple human cytochromes contribute to biotransformation of dextromethorphan in vitro: role of CYP-2C9, -2C19, -2D6, and -3A. J Pharm Pharmacol 50:997–1004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. von Moltke LL,
    2. Greenblatt DJ,
    3. Harmatz JS,
    4. Duan SX,
    5. Harrel LM,
    6. Cotreau-Bibbo MM,
    7. Pritchard GA,
    8. Wright CE,
    9. Shader RI
    (1996b) Triazolam biotransformation by human liver microsomes in vitro: effects of metabolic inhibitors, and clinical confirmation of a predicted interaction with ketoconazole. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 76:370–379.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Witherow LE,
    2. Houston JB
    (1999) Sigmoidal kinetics of CYP3A substrates: An approach for scaling dextromethorphan metabolism in hepatic microsomes and isolated hepatocytes to predict in vivo clearance in rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 290:58–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 29 (8)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 29, Issue 8
1 Aug 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Escitalopram (S-Citalopram) and Its Metabolites in Vitro: Cytochromes Mediating Biotransformation, Inhibitory Effects, and Comparison to R-Citalopram
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Escitalopram (S-Citalopram) and Its Metabolites in Vitro: Cytochromes Mediating Biotransformation, Inhibitory Effects, and Comparison to R-Citalopram

Lisa L. von Moltke, David J. Greenblatt, Gina M. Giancarlo, Brian W. Granda, Jerold S. Harmatz and Richard I. Shader
Drug Metabolism and Disposition August 1, 2001, 29 (8) 1102-1109;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Escitalopram (S-Citalopram) and Its Metabolites in Vitro: Cytochromes Mediating Biotransformation, Inhibitory Effects, and Comparison to R-Citalopram

Lisa L. von Moltke, David J. Greenblatt, Gina M. Giancarlo, Brian W. Granda, Jerold S. Harmatz and Richard I. Shader
Drug Metabolism and Disposition August 1, 2001, 29 (8) 1102-1109;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Human ADME Properties of Abrocitinib
  • MSCs Pharmacokinetics under liver diseases
  • In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation Using Empirical Scaling
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics