Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Gemfibrozil Inhibits CYP2C8-Mediated Cerivastatin Metabolism in Human Liver Microsomes

Jun-Sheng Wang, Mikko Neuvonen, Xia Wen, Janne T. Backman and Pertti J. Neuvonen
Drug Metabolism and Disposition December 2002, 30 (12) 1352-1356; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.30.12.1352
Jun-Sheng Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mikko Neuvonen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xia Wen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janne T. Backman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pertti J. Neuvonen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

To explore the mechanism of the interaction between gemfibrozil and cerivastatin, the enzyme mapping of the oxidative metabolism of cerivastatin and the effect of gemfibrozil on cerivastatin metabolism were studied using human liver microsomes and expressed cytochrome P450 (P450) CYP2C8 and 3A4 isoforms. Based on studies with isoform-selective chemical inhibitors and expressed enzymes, CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 were equally important in the formation of desmethylcerivastatin (M-1), whereas the formation of the quantitatively most important hydroxy metabolite (M-23) was predominantly mediated via CYP2C8; other P450 isoforms played a negligible role. In human liver microsomes, gemfibrozil markedly inhibited M-23 formation, with aKi (IC50) value of 69 (95) μM, whereas inhibition of M-1 formation was weaker with aKi (IC50) value of 273 (>250) μM. The inhibitory effect of gemfibrozil was attributable to inhibition of CYP2C8 rather than CYP3A4, as evidenced by potent inhibition of the formation of M-23 (IC50 = 68 μM) and M-1 (IC50 = 78 μM) in recombinant CYP2C8 but not in recombinant CYP3A4. Additionally, gemfibrozil inhibited paclitaxel 6α-hydroxylation [Ki(IC50) = 75 μM (91 μM)], a CYP2C8 marker reaction, but did not inhibit testosterone 6β-hydroxylation (CYP3A4). The present in vitro findings suggest that inhibition of CYP2C8 activity by gemfibrozil at least partially explains the interaction between gemfibrozil and cerivastatin. The formation of M-23 acid from cerivastatin is mediated mainly by CYP2C8 and thus may be a suitable CYP2C8 probe reaction. Inhibition of CYP2C8-mediated metabolism by gemfibrozil warrants further in vivo exploration.

Cerivastatin, a cholesterol lowering drug, was recently withdrawn from the market due to its high risk of the life-threatening adverse effect, rhabdomyolysis (Charatan, 2001). Fatal rhabdomyolysis after cerivastatin treatment was reported most frequently when the drug was combined with the lipid lowering fibrate gemfibrozil (Pogson et al., 1999; Farmer, 2001; Staffa et al., 2002). Gemfibrozil increases the risk of myopathy associated with simvastatin and lovastatin, too. It was recently found to increase plasma concentrations of the active acid forms of simvastatin and lovastatin, suggesting a pharmacokinetic basis as a mechanism of gemfibrozil-statin interactions (Backman et al., 2000; Kyrklund et al., 2001).

Cerivastatin is administered as the pharmacologically active hydroxy acid form. It is cleared exclusively via biotransformation and subsequent biliary (70%) or renal (30%) excretion of the formed metabolites; no unchanged drug is excreted in humans (Mück, 1998a). According to the manufacturer of cerivastatin, in vitro studies in human liver microsomes have indicated that the biotransformation of cerivastatin is catalyzed by cytochrome P450 (P4501) CYP2C8 and 3A4, forming two major metabolites, desmethylcerivastatin (M-1) and the hydroxylated metabolite (M-23) (Mück, 1998a). The same P450 isoforms also mediate the biotransformation of M-1 and M-23 to a tertiary minor metabolite M-24. The in vitro study of Boberg et al. (1997) suggested that CYP3A4 plays a major role in the metabolism of cerivastatin. However, in vivo investigations have revealed that potent CYP3A4-inhibitors, such as erythromycin and itraconazole, increase only slightly plasma concentrations of cerivastatin (Mück et al., 1998b; Kantola et al., 1999). In contrast, gemfibrozil markedly increases the plasma concentrations of cerivastatin and M-1 acid and reduces the concentrations of M-23 acid (Backman et al., 2002).

In a recent in vitro study, gemfibrozil strongly inhibited CYP2C9 activity (Ki = 5.8 μM) and moderately inhibited CYP2C19 (Ki = 24 μM) and CYP1A2 (Ki = 82 μM) activity, with no appreciable effect on CYP2A6, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4 activities (Wen et al., 2002). However, there seem to be no published studies on the effect of gemfibrozil on CYP2C8 activity in vitro. Therefore, we have studied the effects of gemfibrozil on the oxidative metabolism of cerivastatin in vitro, to clarify the mechanism of the gemfibrozil-cerivastatin interaction.

Experimental Procedures

Materials.

Ketoconazole was obtained from Orion Pharma (Espoo, Finland). Sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, tranylcypromine, sulfaphenazole, quinidine, pyridine, paclitaxel, testosterone, and NADPH were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). S-mephenytoin, 6β-hydroxytestosterone, and 6α-hydroxypaclitaxel were purchased from Ultrafine Chemicals Ltd. (Manchester, UK). Erythromycin and cerivastatin were obtained from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany) and Bayer AG (Leverkusen, Germany), respectively. Pooled human liver microsomes (prepared from five male, and five female human liver microsomal samples) were obtained from BD Gentest (Woburn, MA). Microsomes from baculovirus-infected cells engineered to express the cDNA encoding human CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 were also purchased from BD Gentest. Other chemicals and reagents were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

Assays for the Oxidative Metabolism of Cerivastatin.

The incubation mixture, in a final volume of 200 μl, contained 1 mg/ml microsomal protein, 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 1.0 mM NADPH, 5 mM MgCl2, and various concentrations of cerivastatin (substrate stock solution dissolved in water and subsequently diluted using the 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer) in the presence or absence of one of the putative inhibitors. After incubation in a shaking water bath (37°C) for 5 to 30 min, the reactions were terminated by adding 200 μl ice-cold acetonitrile, and the samples were cooled on ice for 15 min. The samples were then removed to glass tubes containing 1 ml sodium acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.5). Lovastatin acid (50 μl of 1 μg/ml) was subsequently added as an internal standard (ISTD). The samples were then extracted with 6 ml of methyl-tert-butyl ether for 20 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was evaporated to dryness. The residue was then reconstituted with 75 μl of a solution (50:50, v/v) containing acetonitrile and 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH = 5). Thereafter 5 to 20 μl of the sample was subjected to LC-MS-MS analysis. The formation rates of M-1 and M-23 were confirmed to be linear with respect to the microsomal protein concentration (up to 1 mg/ml) and incubation time (up to 30 min) used. All human liver microsomal incubations were performed in duplicate.

Incubations with the recombinant P450 isoforms were performed using the same conditions as described for human liver microsomes, except that the mixture contained 5 pmol of P450 (CYP2C8 or CYP3A4) and was incubated for 15 min (CYP3A4) or 20 min (CYP2C8). The formation rates of M-1 and M-23 were linear over this period of time. The incubations in the expressed enzymes were performed in duplicate.

Inhibition Studies.

The effects of 11 isoform-selective P450 inhibitors as well as gemfibrozil (1–250 μM) on the P450-mediated oxidative metabolism of cerivastatin were studied. Furafylline (20 μM) was used as a selective inhibitor of CYP1A2, tranylcypromine (1 μM) for CYP2A6, trimethoprim (100 μM) for CYP2C8, sulfaphenazole (10 μM), and sulfamethoxazole (500 μM) for CYP2C9, S-mephenytoin (300 μM) for CYP2C19, quinidine (10 μM) for CYP2D6, pyridine (100 μM) for CYP2E1, ketoconazole (1 μM), troleandomycin (100 μM), and erythromycin (100 μM) for CYP3A4 (Hargreaves et al., 1994; Newton et al., 1995; Eagling et al., 1998; Hickman et al., 1998; Taavitsainen et al., 2001; Wen et al., 2002). The stock solutions of the inhibitors were prepared in the 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) with, in some cases, minimal use of methanol (final concentration less than 1%). Gemfibrozil was dissolved in acetonitrile. After evaporation of acetonitrile to dryness, gemfibrozil was reconstituted in the incubation medium. All the inhibitors and their matched controls (containing an equal volume of methanol in the case that it was used) were preincubated with the incubation medium at 37°C for 15 min, either in the presence or absence of 1.0 mM NADPH. After the preincubation, cerivastatin (final concentration 0.01–1 μM) was added either with or without 1.0 mM NADPH.

Effects of Gemfibrozil on P450 Activities.

Activities of CYP3A4 (testosterone 6β-hydroxylation) and CYP2C8 (paclitaxel 6α-hydroxylation) were determined as described elsewhere (Wen et al., 2002). The marker substrate concentrations used, 25 μM testosterone and 1 to 5 μM paclitaxel, were comparable with or around the Km values of the reactions. Gemfibrozil was either coincubated at 37°C for 15 min with the marker substrate and NADPH (1 mM) before the reaction was initiated with human liver microsomes (0.1 mg/ml) or preincubated with human liver microsomes and NADPH for 15 min before adding the marker substrate.

Analytical Procedures.

The concentrations of cerivastatin and its major metabolites in incubations were measured by use of liquid chromatography-ionspray tandem mass spectrometry with use of the PE SCIEX API 3000 LC-MS-MS system (MDS Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada) as described previously, with minor modifications (Jemal et al., 1999). The ion transitions monitored were m/z 460 to 356 for cerivastatin (acid), m/z 442 to 354 for cerivastatin lactone,m/z 446 to 342 for M-1 acid, a sum ofm/z 476 to 280 and m/z 476 to 278 for M-23 acid, m/z 462 to 340 for M-24 acid, and m/z 423 to 285 for lovastatin acid. The limit of quantification for cerivastatin was 0.001 μM, and the day-to-day coefficient of variation was below 15% at relevant concentrations (n = 5). The cerivastatin metabolites were produced by incubating a high concentration of cerivastatin with human liver microsomes in standard incubation conditions, and the metabolites formed were used for optimization of the assay. A signal/noise ratio of 10:1 was used as the limit of detection for cerivastatin metabolites. Assays for gemfibrozil, 6α-paclitaxel, and 6β-testosterone were carried out using high-performance liquid chromatography as described previously (Hsu et al., 1991; Wen et al., 2002). The day-to-day coefficients of variation (CV) were <7% at relevant concentrations (n = 6).

Binding Studies.

Various concentrations of cerivastatin (six concentrations, 0.01–10 μM) and gemfibrozil (six concentrations, 10–250 μM) in incubation buffers containing microsomal protein (1 mg/ml) were prepared in duplicate. Unbound fractions of cerivastatin and gemfibrozil were separated by ultrafiltration (Sallustio et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2002). The unbound concentrations of gemfibrozil in the filtrates were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (Hsu et al., 1991), and those of cerivastatin by LC-MS-MS as described above.

Data Analysis.

In the determination of the IC50 (concentration of inhibitor to cause 50% inhibition of original enzyme activity) values, the analyte/ISTD peak area ratios were converted to percentage of control, using the control peak area ratio value as 100%. The apparent inhibitory constant (Ki) values of gemfibrozil for M-1 and M-23 were calculated using secondary plots of slopes taken from double-reciprocal plots of cerivastatin concentrations versus the analyte/ISTD peak area ratios.

Results

Studies with Human Liver Microsomes.

Two major metabolites, M-23 acid and M-1 acid, were found after incubation of clinically relevant concentrations of cerivastatin (0.01–0.04 μM) in human liver microsomes. The metabolite M-24 acid was also detectable, but its formation was much lower compared with the formation of M-1 and M-23, and its concentrations were around the detection limit of the LC-MS-MS assay. The formation of lactones of parent cerivastatin, M-1, M-23, and M-24 acid was negligible.

Trimethoprim and gemfibrozil considerably inhibited both M-23 and M-1 formation, whereas ketoconazole, troleandomycin, and erythromycin inhibited only the formation of M-1 (Fig.1). Gemfibrozil competitively inhibited the formation of M-23 and M-1, with Ki(IC50) values of 69 μM (95 μM) and 273 μM (>250 μM), respectively (Fig. 2). Preincubation of gemfibrozil with NADPH for 15 min did not enhance the inhibitory effects of gemfibrozil (data not shown).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Percent of inhibition of the formation of M-23 (left panel) and M-1 (right panel) at 0.04 μM cerivastatin by selective inhibitors of eight P450 isoforms in human liver microsomes (data represent the mean of duplicate incubations).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Inhibitory effects of gemfibrozil (0–250 μM) on the metabolism of cerivastatin in human liver microsomes.

A, effects of gemfibrozil on the formation of M-1 (open circles) and M-23 (solid circles) from cerivastatin (0.01 μM) in human liver microsomes. B and C, representative secondary plots for the inhibition of the formation of M-1 (B) and M-23 (C) by gemfibrozil in human liver microsomes. Data represent the mean of duplicate determinations.

Studies with Recombinant CYP2C8 and CYP3A4.

Both recombinant CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 catalyzed the formation of M-23 and M-1. However, when 0.01 μM cerivastatin was used, the formation rates of M-23 were about 14-fold lower in recombinant CYP3A4 than in recombinant CYP2C8, whereas recombinant CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 catalyzed equally the formation of M-1. Gemfibrozil dose dependently inhibited the formation of M-23 (IC50 = 68 μM) and M-1 (IC50 = 78 μM) in recombinant CYP2C8 but did not show appreciable effect on the formation of these metabolites in recombinant CYP3A4 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

The effect of gemfibrozil on the metabolism of cerivastatin (0.01 μM) to M-23 (left panel) and M-1 (right panel) in recombinant CYP2C8 (open circles) and CYP3A4 (solid circles).

Data represent the mean of duplicate determinations.

Effects of Gemfibrozil on CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 Activities.

With concentrations up to 250 μM, gemfibrozil showed practically no inhibitory effect on the formation of 6β-hydroxytestosterone in human liver microsomes (data not shown). However, gemfibrozil competitively inhibited the biotransformation of paclitaxel to 6α-hydroxypaclitaxel, with an estimatedKi (IC50) value of 75 μM (91 μM) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Inhibitory effects of gemfibrozil (0–250 μM) on paclitaxel 6α-hydroxylation in human liver microsomes.

A, dose-dependent inhibitory effects of gemfibrozil on the formation of 6α-hydroxypaclitaxel from paclitaxel (1 μM) in human liver microsomes. B, a double-reciprocal plot obtained from a 20-min incubation of human liver microsomes with NADPH and paclitaxel (a CYP2C8 marker, 1–5 μM) in the absence (○) or presence of 25 μM (●), 50 μM (■), 100 μM (▪) or 250 μM (▵) gemfibrozil. C, a Dixon plot obtained from a 20-min incubation of human liver microsomes with 1 μM (○), 2 μM (●), and 5 μM (■) of paclitaxel in the absence or presence of gemfibrozil (25–250 μM). D, a secondary plot of slopes taken from double-reciprocal plots versus gemfibrozil concentration. Each data point represents the average of duplicate determinations.

Binding Studies.

At spiked concentrations of 0.01 to 10 μM cerivastatin, and 10 to 250 μM of gemfibrozil, both compounds showed essentially no binding with the incubation medium containing 1 mg/ml microsomal protein (data not shown).

Discussion

The present in vitro studies showed that the formation of the major metabolite of cerivastatin, M-23, was markedly inhibited by gemfibrozil at clinically relevant concentrations (150 μM approximates the peak plasma concentrations of gemfibrozil after normal therapeutic doses; Backman et al., 2000). The formation of metabolite M-1 was also inhibited by gemfibrozil but to a much smaller extent. The formation of M-23 was predominantly mediated by CYP2C8, whereas both CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 catalyzed the formation of M-1. The inhibition of both metabolites formation by gemfibrozil was due to inhibition of CYP2C8 activity rather than CYP3A4.

Gemfibrozil is a nonselective inhibitor of several P450 isoforms (Ki values for CYP2C9, 2C19, 2C8, and 1A2 are 5.8, 24, 69, and 82 μM, respectively) (Wen et al., 2001) and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (Prueksaritanont et al., 2002b). The formation of M-23 was susceptible to inhibition by trimethoprim, which is a selective inhibitor of CYP2C8 (Wen et al., 2002), and the formation rate of M-23 was 14-fold higher in CYP2C8 than in CYP3A4. Moreover, the extent of inhibition of the formation of M-23 by gemfibrozil (Ki = 69 μM) was comparable with that of the formation of 6α-hydroxypaclitaxel (a known probe reaction for CYP2C8, Ki = 75 μM). Thus, the present results indicate that the formation of M-23 is mediated mainly via CYP2C8 and that the formation of M-23 may be a suitable probe for CYP2C8 activity. However, the limited availability of cerivastatin and its metabolites may limit the usefulness of this assay.

CYP2C8 is expressed at relatively high levels (6–7% of total P450 content) in human liver (Romkes et al., 1991), and its importance in drug metabolism has recently been recognized (Ong et al., 2000). It is primarily responsible for the metabolism of e.g., taxol, cerivastatin, rosiglitazone, and troglitazone and also involved in the metabolism of zopiclone, carbamazepine, verapamil, and amiodarone (Ohyama et al., 2000; Ong et al., 2000). The current results suggest that the metabolic activity of CYP2C8 in the liver can be inhibited markedly by administration of therapeutic doses of gemfibrozil. Thus, significant drug-drug interactions can be expected when gemfibrozil is coadministered with substrates of CYP2C8, in particular, if the substrates have narrow therapeutic ranges. Similarly, a significant inhibition of cerivastatin metabolism may also be expected when other CYP2C8 inhibitors [e.g., trimethoprim (Wen et al., 2002)] are coadministered with cerivastatin.

Lactonization is another important metabolic pathway of cerivastatin in humans, as evidenced by the approximate plasma levels of cerivastatin lactone and those of the M-1 and M-23 acid in vivo in humans (Kantola et al., 1999). However, lactonization of parent cerivastatin acid, M-1, and M-23 was negligible in the current in vitro conditions. Quite recently, during the final preparation of this manuscript, formation of the acyl glucuronide of cerivastatin was reported to be a significant metabolic pathway for cerivastatin in vitro (Prueksaritanont et al., 2002a,b). It was therefore assumed that cerivastatin glucuronide, and some other metabolic intermediates of cerivastatin [e.g., acyl-CoA thioester intermediates (Boberg et al., 1998)] may contribute to the formation of cerivastatin lactone in vivo (Prueksaritanont et al., 2002a). This would explain the different levels of cerivastatin lactonization observed in different in vitro conditions and in vivo.

Prueksaritanont et al. (2002b) also reported that gemfibrozil inhibited the formation of M-23 with an IC50 value of 87 μM. Although the exact mechanism of inhibition was not explored in their study, this result is in good agreement with our findings. In addition, they reported that the potency of inhibition of the formation of cerivastatin glucuronide (IC50 = 82 μM) was comparable with inhibition of the formation of M-23 (Prueksaritanont et al., 2002b). Coadministration of gemfibrozil and cerivastatin acid in vivo may inhibit not only the oxidative metabolism of cerivastatin acid but also the formation of cerivastatin glucuronide or the further metabolism of cerivastatin lactone. This may result in a more prominent inhibition of cerivastatin acid metabolism in vivo than that seen in the in vitro incubations.

To conclude, the present findings indicate that the inhibition of CYP2C8-mediated cerivastatin metabolism may contribute to the interaction between gemfibrozil and cerivastatin. Formation of M-23 acid from cerivastatin may be a useful tool for probing CYP2C8 activity both in vivo and in vitro. The in vivo interaction potential of gemfibrozil with other substrates of CYP2C8 warrants further exploration.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by grants from the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund and the National Technology Agency of Finland (Tekes).

  • Abbreviations used are::
    P450
    cytochrome P450
    ISTD
    internal standard
    LC-MS-MS
    liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
    M-1
    desmethylcerivastatin
    M-23
    hydroxylated metabolite of cerivastatin
    M-24
    hydroxylated desmethylcerivastatin
    • Received June 17, 2002.
    • Accepted August 27, 2002.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Backman JT,
    2. Kyrklund C,
    3. Kivistö KT,
    4. Wang JS,
    5. Neuvonen PJ
    (2000) Plasma concentrations of active simvastatin acid are increased by gemfibrozil. Clin Pharmacol Ther 68:122–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Backman JT, Kyrklund C, Neuvonen M, and Neuvonen PJ (2002) Gemfibrozil greatly increases plasma concentrations of cerivastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther, in press..
  3. ↵
    1. Boberg M,
    2. Angerbauer R,
    3. Fey P,
    4. Kanhai WK,
    5. Karl W,
    6. Kern A,
    7. Ploschke J,
    8. Radtke M
    (1997) Metabolism of cerivastatin by human liver microsomes in vitro. Characterization of primary metabolic pathways and of cytochrome P450 isozymes involved. Drug Metab Dispos 25:321–331.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Boberg M,
    2. Angerbauer R,
    3. Kanhai WK,
    4. Karl W,
    5. Kern A,
    6. Radtke M,
    7. Steinke W
    (1998) Biotransformation of cerivastatin in mice, rats and dogs in vivo. Drug Metab Dispos 26:640–652.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Charatan F
    (2001) Bayer decides to withdraw cholesterol lowering drug. BMJ 323:359.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Eagling VA,
    2. Tjia JF,
    3. Back DJ
    (1998) Differential selectivity of cytochrome P450 inhibitors against probe substrates in human and rat liver microsomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 45:107–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Farmer JA
    (2001) Learning from the cerivastatin experience. Lancet 358:1383–1385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hargreaves MB,
    2. Jones BC,
    3. Smith DA,
    4. Gescher A
    (1994) Inhibition of p-nitrophenol hydroxylase in rat liver microsomes by small aromatic and heterocyclic molecules. Drug Metab Dispos 22:806–810.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. ↵
    1. Hickman D,
    2. Wang JP,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Unadkat JD
    (1998) Evaluation of the selectivity of in vitro probes and suitability of organic solvents for the measurement of human cytochrome P450 monooxygenase activities. Drug Metab Dispos 26:207–215.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Hsu HC,
    2. Chen GL,
    3. Huang LC,
    4. Hsu MY
    (1991) Validation of analytical methods: gemfibrozil in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography. Chung-Hua Yao Hsueh Tsa Chih 43:117–127.
  11. ↵
    1. Jemal M,
    2. Rao S,
    3. Salahudeen I,
    4. Chen BC,
    5. Kates R
    (1999) Quantitation of cerivastatin and its seven acid and lactone biotransformation products in human serum by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 736:19–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kantola T,
    2. Kivistö KT,
    3. Neuvonen PJ
    (1999) Effect of itraconazole on cerivastatin pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 54:851–855.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kyrklund C,
    2. Backman JT,
    3. Kivistö KT,
    4. Neuvonen M,
    5. Laitila J,
    6. Neuvonen PJ
    (2001) Plasma concentrations of active lovastatin acid are markedly increased by gemfibrozil but not by bezafibrate. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:340–345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Mück W
    (1998a) Rational assessment of the interaction profile of cerivastatin supports its low propensity for drug interactions. Drugs 56 (Suppl 1) 15–23.
  15. ↵
    1. Mück W,
    2. Ochmann K,
    3. Rohde G,
    4. Unger S,
    5. Kuhlmann J
    (1998b) Influence of erythromycin pre- and co-treatment on single-dose pharmacokinetics of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor cerivastatin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 53:469–473.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Newton DJ,
    2. Wang RW,
    3. Lu AY
    (1995) Cytochrome P450 inhibitors. Evaluation of specificities in the in vitro metabolism of therapeutic agents by human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 23:154–158.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. ↵
    1. Ohyama K,
    2. Nakajima M,
    3. Nakamura S,
    4. Shimada N,
    5. Yamazaki H,
    6. Yokoi T
    (2000) A significant role of human cytochrome P450 2C8 in amiodarone N-deethylation: an approach to predict the contribution with relative activity factor. Drug Metab Dispos 28:1303–1310.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Ong CE,
    2. Coulter S,
    3. Birkett DJ,
    4. Bhasker CR,
    5. Miners JO
    (2000) The xenobiotic inhibitor profile of cytochrome P4502C8. Br J Clin Pharmacol 50:573–580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Pogson GW,
    2. Kindred LH,
    3. Carper BG
    (1999) Rhabdomyolysis and renal failure associated with cerivastatin-gemfibrozil combination therapy. Am J Cardiol 83:1146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Prueksaritanont T,
    2. Subramanian R,
    3. Fang X,
    4. Ma B,
    5. Qiu Y,
    6. Lin JH,
    7. Pearson PG,
    8. Baillie TA
    (2002a) Glucuronidation of statins in animals and humans: a novel mechanism of statin lactonization. Drug Metab Dispos 30:505–512.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Prueksaritanont T,
    2. Zhao JJ,
    3. Ma B,
    4. Roadcap BA,
    5. Tang C,
    6. Qiu Y,
    7. Liu L,
    8. Lin JH,
    9. Pearson PG,
    10. Baillie TA
    (2002b) Mechanistic studies on metabolic interactions between gemfibrozil and statins. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301:1042–1051.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Romkes M,
    2. Faletto MB,
    3. Blaisdell JA,
    4. Raucy JL,
    5. Goldstein JA
    (1991) Cloning and expression of complementary DNAs for multiple members of the human cytochrome P450IIC subfamily. Biochemistry 30:3247–3255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Sallustio BC,
    2. Fairchild BA,
    3. Pannall PR
    (1997) Interaction of human serum albumin with the electrophilic metabolite 1-O-gemfibrozil-beta-d-glucuronide. Drug Metab Dispos 25:55–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Staffa JA,
    2. Chang J,
    3. Green L
    (2002) Cerivastatin and reports of fatal rhabdomyolysis. N Engl J Med 346:539–540.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Taavitsainen P,
    2. Juvonen R,
    3. Pelkonen O
    (2001) In vitro inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes in human liver microsomes by a potent CYP2A6 inhibitor, trans-2-phenylcyclopropylamine (tranylcypromine) and its nonamine analog, cyclopropylbenzene. Drug Metab Dispos 29:217–222.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Wang JS,
    2. Wen X,
    3. Backman JT,
    4. Neuvonen PJ
    (2002) Effect of albumin and cytosol on enzyme kinetics of tolbutamide hydroxylation and on inhibition of CYP2C9 by gemfibrozil in human liver microsomes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302:43–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Wen X,
    2. Wang JS,
    3. Backman JT,
    4. Kivistö KT,
    5. Neuvonen PJ
    (2001) Gemfibrozil is a potent inhibitor of human cytochrome P450 2C9. Drug Metab Dispos 29:1359–1361.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Wen X,
    2. Wang JS,
    3. Backman JT,
    4. Laitila J,
    5. Neuvonen PJ
    (2002) Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole are selective inhibitors of CYP2C8 and CYP2C9, respectively. Drug Metab Dispos 30:631–635.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 30 (12)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 30, Issue 12
1 Dec 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gemfibrozil Inhibits CYP2C8-Mediated Cerivastatin Metabolism in Human Liver Microsomes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Gemfibrozil Inhibits CYP2C8-Mediated Cerivastatin Metabolism in Human Liver Microsomes

Jun-Sheng Wang, Mikko Neuvonen, Xia Wen, Janne T. Backman and Pertti J. Neuvonen
Drug Metabolism and Disposition December 1, 2002, 30 (12) 1352-1356; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.30.12.1352

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Gemfibrozil Inhibits CYP2C8-Mediated Cerivastatin Metabolism in Human Liver Microsomes

Jun-Sheng Wang, Mikko Neuvonen, Xia Wen, Janne T. Backman and Pertti J. Neuvonen
Drug Metabolism and Disposition December 1, 2002, 30 (12) 1352-1356; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.30.12.1352
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Experimental Procedures
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Metabolic enzymes in nintedanib metabolism
  • Mechanism of AO Inactivation by Hydralazine
  • Warfarin PBPK modeling with target binding
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics