Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

UDP Glucuronosyltransferase mRNA Levels in Human Liver Disease

Mario Congiu, Maurice L. Mashford, John L. Slavin and Paul V. Desmond
Drug Metabolism and Disposition February 2002, 30 (2) 129-134; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.30.2.129
Mario Congiu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurice L. Mashford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John L. Slavin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul V. Desmond
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The UDP glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) are a family of enzymes in which substrates include drugs, xenobiotics, and products of endogenous catabolism. The main source of most UGT enzymes is the liver, a major organ in the detoxification and inactivation of compounds. Previous studies have indicated that glucuronidation, as measured by pharmacokinetic studies, is relatively spared in liver disease. Because UGT activity toward most substrates is the result of metabolism by different isoforms with overlapping specificities, these studies may not indicate the effect of disease on the levels of individual isoforms. We sought to extend these studies to the measurement of mRNA for individual isoforms in the liver of patients with various forms of liver disease. RNA was extracted from liver tissue samples of patients undergoing clinically necessary percutaneous liver biopsies. UGT mRNA levels for isoforms 1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, 2B4, 2B7, 2B10, 2B11, 2B15, and 2B17 were determined by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Biopsies were graded using the Metavir system. Results from patients with low fibrosis or inflammatory scores were compared with those with high scores. We found large interindividual variation in the levels of the various isoforms. This was greatest for UGT2B17. A consistent downward trend, reaching statistical significance for UGT1A4, UGT2B4, and UGT2B7, was observed in samples from patients with high inflammation scores. There was no such correlation with the degree of fibrosis. Our results indicate that hepatic UGT mRNA levels are reduced while the tissue is inflamed, but they are not affected in the noninflamed, chronically diseased liver.

It is well established that liver disease is associated with decreased elimination of many drugs. This is particularly so for those metabolized by enzymes of the cytochrome P450 family (Adedoyin et al., 1998; Rodighiero, 1999). Based mainly on pharmacokinetic studies, however, glucuronidation is usually comparatively well preserved in liver disease.

The interpretation of pharmacokinetic studies in liver disease is complicated by the expression of UGT1 in extrahepatic tissues (McGurk et al., 1998; Radominska-Pandya et al., 1998; Strassburg et al., 1998, 1999; Jedlitschky et al., 1999; Tchernof et al., 1999; Barbier et al., 2000). A further limitation of this approach is that human UGT comprises a superfamily of at least 15 isoforms bound to the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. There is considerable structural similarity between them, and they have overlapping substrate specificities.

Based on sequence homology, they can be divided into two subfamilies. The seven isoforms of family 2B are each encoded in a separate gene locus on chromosome 4. The eight isoforms of family 1A are coded for in an unusual arrangement on chromosome 2. Each of these proteins has an identical C terminus coded by 4 exons. The N termini differ and are each encoded by a specific exon, the final mRNA depending on which exon I product is spliced to the four constant regions (for recent review see Tukey and Strassburg, 2000).

The mechanism by which cytochrome P450 and UGT enzymes are altered in liver disease is poorly understood. Pathological components present to varying degrees in liver diseases include inflammation, cell loss, regeneration, and fibrosis. These in turn are due to a large number of changes in cellular function influenced by substances released from resident and inflammatory cells. At a gross level, it is possible to categorize a biopsy sample of diseased liver in terms of the degree of inflammation and fibrosis present. This categorization, although crude, permits correlation of each of these processes with the expression of a particular mRNA.

Although there is a number of studies on the expression of UGT mRNA in animal tissues (Debinski et al., 1996; Pellizzer et al., 1996; Strasser et al., 1998; Choo et al., 1999), there is little data on the expression of individual isoforms of UGT mRNA levels in the diseased human liver. The recent advent of real-time PCR greatly simplifies the process of detection and semiquantitation of mRNA from small biopsy tissue samples. The aim of this study was to use these methods to investigate the contribution of inflammation and fibrosis to the mRNA levels of individual UGT isoforms in patients with liver disease.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection.

Surplus tissue (5–10 mg) available from patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70°C until processing. Informed written consent was obtained from each patient, and the study protocol was approved by the St. Vincent's Hospital Human Ethics Committee.

Extraction of RNA.

RNA was extracted from the tissue by homogenization with a Polytron homogenizer in Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The extracted RNA was dissolved in 200 μl of water treated with 1% diethyl pyrocarbonate, and contaminating genomic DNA was digested with 1.5 units of DNase I (Promega, Madison, WI). The solution was extracted with Tris-equilibrated phenol, and the RNA precipitated with 2.5 volumes of ethanol. Finally, the RNA was dissolved in 100 μl of water, and aliquots removed for spectroscopic quantitation and agarose gel electrophoresis to assess RNA integrity. Approximately 5 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed in a reaction containing 10 U avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase, 1 mM dNTPs, 40 U RNasin (Promega), and 0.5 μg of random 10-mer oligonucleotides (GenSet Pacific, Lismore, Australia) for 10 min at room temperature and then for 60 min at 42°C. The resultant cDNA was diluted 10- to 20-fold and stored at −70°C until use.

PCR Primers.

Sequences of the PCR primers used for the detection of UGT isoforms were selected from UGT sequences aligned using DNAMAN software (Lynnon corporation, Quebec, Canada). Primers were made for the detection of UGT isoforms 1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, 2B4, 2B7, 2B10, 2B11, 2B15, and 2B17. In addition, for the detection of all family 1 isoforms, primers were made to regions spanning exons 3 and 4 and, for the detection of all known family 2 isoforms, to regions spanning exons 1 to 3. Primers were also made for the detection of CYP1A2, IL-1β, and TGF-β. Sequences of all primers used in the PCR are shown in Table1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Nucleotide sequences of primers used in the PCR reactions

Real-Time PCR.

PCR was performed on 5 μl of cDNA using 10 pmol of forward and reverse primers (Table 1; Sigma Genosys, Castle Hill, Australia) on a GenAmp model 5700 cycler using SYBR Green detection in a total volume of 20 μl with 10 μl of SYBR Green PCR Master-Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Cycling conditions were 1 cycle for 2 min at 60°C, 1 cycle at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of a 15-s denaturation at 95°C, and a 1-min annealing/extension at 60°C. The threshold value of detection (Ct) is the cycle at which PCR product rises above an arbitrary number and was set at the exponential phase of amplification. Values were determined from standard curves generated for each gene from serial dilution of genomic or cDNA and normalized to the value of 18S ribosomal RNA measured for each sample. PCR products were of the correct size, as determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. Statistical significance was determined with StatView software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) using Fisher's protected least significant difference. Experimental values are the means ± S.E.

Grading of Samples.

Samples were graded (by J.L.S. and P.V.D.) for inflammation or fibrosis according to the Metavir scoring system (Bedossa, 1994), and the mean mRNA levels was determined for each group. To determine the effect of inflammation, samples were graded into three groups according to the inflammation component of their Metavir score (Table2). Groups consisted of samples with low (score 0), medium (score 1), and high inflammation scores (score 2 or 3). To determine the effect of fibrosis, samples were separated into four groups consisting of samples with no fibrosis (score 0), mild fibrosis (score 1), medium fibrosis (score 2), and high fibrosis or established cirrhosis (score 3 or 4; Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Demographics of sample groups

Because insufficient cirrhotic (score 4) or inflammation (score 3) samples were available, samples with a fibrosis score of 3 or 4 or an inflammation score of 2 or 3 were grouped together for statistical purposes. The mean value for samples with a fibrosis or inflammation score of 0 was set at 100%, and means in other groups are expressed relative to this number. Graphs show the mean mRNA levels ± S.E. for each group.

Results

Interindividual Variation.

Most UGT isoforms, with the exception of UGT2B17, were readily detectable. Ct values were between 20 and 30 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Distribution of Ct values.

Distribution Ct values at which measurement of the PCR product was made.

Interindividual variability was estimated by analyzing results from samples that had minor or no inflammatory activity or fibrosis (inflammation and fibrosis scores of 1 or 0). We found a large interindividual variation in enzyme mRNA levels, ranging from 5- to 15-fold for most isoforms. Of the UGT enzymes, isoform 2B17 had the greatest interindividual variability (Fig. 1; Table3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Descriptive statistics for UGT family and CYP1A2 genes showing interindividual variability

Effect of Fibrosis.

We found no difference in UGT mRNA levels between the low-score (fibrosis 0) and high-score (fibrosis 3–4) groups using primers designed to amplify all (Fig. 2A) or individual isoforms (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Effect of fibrosis on mRNA levels.

Samples were separated into four groups according to their fibrosis score. Values are arbitrary units determined by reference to a standard curve generated for each isoform and normalized to the level of 18S ribosomal RNA determined for each sample. The fibrosis samples with a score of 0 are set to 100%. Data show means ± S.E. ∗, indicates p < 0.05. A, levels of UGT, CYP1A2, TGF-β, and IL-1β mRNA. UGT family 1 and family 2 genes were measured using primers designed to amplify all known isoforms. B, levels of individual UGT isoforms.

Levels of mRNA for CYP1A2, an enzyme representative of the cytochrome P450 family, tended to be elevated in fibrosis groups with a score of 1 and 2, and these were significantly higher than levels in the fibrosis groups with a high score (3 to 4). However, levels of the mRNA for TGF-β, a cytokine known to promote matrix deposition (Border and Noble, 1994), tended to be higher in the high-score fibrosis group (Fig. 2A). Levels of the mRNA for the cytokine IL-1β, frequently associated with reduced cytochrome P450 expression (Abdel-Razzak et al., 1995; Calleja et al., 1998; Kudo and Kawano, 1999) showed no apparent trend.

Effect of Inflammation.

UGT family 1A and family 2B mRNA levels as measured by primers designed to amplify all isoforms within each family tended to be lower in high-inflammation score samples (Fig.3A). Measurement of individual isoforms using specific primers showed a consistent downward trend in the levels of most UGT isoforms in high-inflammation score samples, reaching statistical significance for isoforms 1A4, 2B4, and 2B7 (Fig. 3B), which were reduced to 43.0 ± 12.3, 39.6 ± 19.5, and 38.4 ± 20.3% of control levels, respectively.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Effect of inflammation on mRNA levels.

Samples were separated into three groups according to their inflammation score. Values are arbitrary units determined by reference to a standard curve generated for each isoform and normalized to the level of 18S ribosomal RNA determined for each sample. The inflammation samples with a score of 0 are set to 100%. Data show means ± S.E. ∗, indicates p < 0.05. A, levels of UGT, CYP1A2, TGF-β, and IL-1β mRNA. UGT family 1 and family 2 genes were measured using primers designed to amplify all known isoforms. B, levels of individual UGT isoforms.

High-score inflammation samples had lower CYP1A2 and higher IL-1β mRNA levels than samples with a score of 1 (Fig. 3A). TGF-β mRNA levels in the group with score from 2 to 3 were similar to those with a score of 0.

Discussion

Although it is commonly accepted that liver disease results in a decreased activity of the cytochrome P450 system, the effect on glucuronidation is controversial (Hoyumpa and Schenker, 1991). Glucuronidation has commonly been determined from either pharmacokinetic studies in humans or experimental models of liver disease in animals. UGT isoforms have overlapping specificities, and a metabolite may be the product of several isoforms. Furthermore, extra hepatic metabolism may be significant (McGurk et al., 1998; Nowell et al., 1999), hepatic blood flow may be impaired, or the binding of drug to plasma proteins may be affected (Davies and Skjodt, 2000). The direct measurement of UGT mRNA in hepatocytes overcomes limitations and assumptions of the pharmacokinetic approach. A number of studies in animals and hepatic cell lines (Vargas et al., 1998; Kardon et al., 2000; Walle et al., 2000; Luquita et al., 2001) and in humans (Ritter et al., 1999) indicate that hepatic UGT protein and/or activity, for at least some isoforms, in general follow the mRNA levels.

In these studies, we used real-time PCR to examine the effect of inflammation and fibrosis on the levels of individual isoforms of the UGT family in patients with liver disease. We found that a reduction in the expression of UGT mRNA in our samples was associated with the degree of inflammation. There was no correlation with the level of fibrosis. In addition our data indicates that the large interindividual variability in drug metabolism, which is often observed across patients, may at least partly be a result of differential mRNA levels of these enzymes. This may be a result of genetic factors or even induction by dietary components.

In a number of studies in human liver (Debinsky et al., 1995) or animal models of cirrhosis (Debinsky et al., 1996), results have indicated that levels of the glucuronidating enzymes as measured by immuno or hybridization histochemistry are maintained or elevated when compared with control tissue. Our results support findings that glucuronidation is unaffected in the fibrotic liver and that hepatic UGT mRNA levels are not reduced.

The mechanism by which the inflammatory process may repress these enzymes is complex and poorly understood (Morgan et al., 1998). The reduction in UGT mRNA in our high-score inflammation samples may be the result of substances released by resident or infiltrating inflammatory cells, as evidenced by the increase in interleukin-1β mRNA in the high-score inflammation group. A number of studies have found that cytokines can affect the expression of UGT (Monshouwer et al., 1996;Levesque et al., 1998; Strasser et al., 1998) or cytochrome P450 enzymes (Ferrari et al., 1993; Abdel-Razzak et al., 1995; Monshouwer et al., 1996; Sindhu et al., 1996; Guillen et al., 1998; Levesque et al., 1998; Kudo and Kawano, 1999; Monshouwer and Witkamp, 2000). There is evidence for the involvement of nuclear factor-κB in the repression of the rat CYP2C11 gene in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide or interleukin-1β, but interleukin-6 induced repression occurs by an alternative mechanism (Iber et al., 2000). In addition, because our data are standardized to 18S ribosomal RNA, some reduction in hepatic UGT mRNA is expected as a result of an increase in nonhepatic 18S RNA by infiltrating inflammatory cells.

Because of the consistent downward trend observed across most isoforms, the relatively small number of samples with severe liver disease, and the large variation, more comprehensive studies will need to be done to establish the precise relationship between inflammatory liver disease and the expression of individual UGT isoforms. However, the reduction in mRNA levels reached statistical significance for three of the isoforms that we measured, indicating that inflammatory liver disease may have differential effects on the various UGT isoforms.

Our data indicate that there is the potential for decreased drug glucuronidation in the liver of patients with an active inflammatory condition and some hepatic fibrosis, but glucuronidation may recover once the inflammation subsides. This may help explain the uncertainty surrounding drug glucuronidation in liver disease using pharmacokinetic approaches in which experimental results may be from pools of patients with mixed inflammatory/cirrhotic conditions.

Footnotes

  • Abbreviations used are::
    UGT
    uridine 5′-diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase
    PCR
    polymerase chain reaction
    IL-1β
    interleukin-1β
    TGF-β
    transforming growth factor-β
    Ct
    the threshold cycle
    • Received August 9, 2001.
    • Accepted October 29, 2001.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abdel-Razzak Z,
    2. Corcos L,
    3. Fautrel A,
    4. Guillouzo A
    (1995) Interleukin-1β antagonizes phenobarbital induction of several major cytochromes P450 in adult rat hepatocytes in primary culture. FEBS Lett 366:159–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Adedoyin A,
    2. Arns PA,
    3. Richards WO,
    4. Wilkinson GR,
    5. Branch RA
    (1998) Selective effect of liver disease on the activities of specific metabolizing enzymes: investigation of cytochromes P450 2C19 and 2D6. Clin Pharmacol Ther 64:8–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Barbier O,
    2. Lapointe H,
    3. El Alfy M,
    4. Hum DW,
    5. Belanger A
    (2000) Cellular localization of uridine diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase 2B enzymes in the human prostate by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4819–4826.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bedossa P
    (1994) Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C (1994). The French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology 20:15–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Border WA,
    2. Noble NA
    (1994) Mechanisms of Disease: transforming growth factor-β in tissue fibrosis. N Engl J Med 331:1286–1292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Calleja C,
    2. Eeckhoutte C,
    3. Dacasto M,
    4. Larrieu G,
    5. Dupuy J,
    6. Pineau T,
    7. Galtier P
    (1998) Comparative effects of cytokines on constitutive and inducible expression of the gene encoding for the cytochrome P450 3A6 isoenzyme in cultured rabbit hepatocytes: consequences on progesterone 6β-hydroxylation. Biochem Pharmacol 56:1279–1285.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Choo EF,
    2. Angus PW,
    3. Morgan DJ
    (1999) Effect of cirrhosis on sulfation by the isolated perfused rat liver. J Hepatol 30:498–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Davies NM,
    2. Skjodt NM
    (2000) Choosing the right nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for the right patient: a pharmacokinetic approach. Clin Pharmacokinet 38:377–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Debinski HS,
    2. Lee CS,
    3. Danks JA,
    4. Mackenzie PI,
    5. Desmond PV
    (1995) Localization of uridine 5′-diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase in human liver injury. Gastroenterology 108:1464–1469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Debinski HS,
    2. Mackenzie PI,
    3. Lee CS,
    4. Mashford ML,
    5. Danks JA,
    6. Tephly TR,
    7. Green M,
    8. Desmond PV
    (1996) UDP glucuronosyltransferase in the cirrhotic rat liver. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:373–379.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ferrari L,
    2. Herber R,
    3. Batt AM,
    4. Siest G
    (1993) Differential effects of human recombinant interleukin-1β and dexamethasone on hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes in male and female rats. Biochem Pharmacol 45:2269–2277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Guillen MI,
    2. Donato MT,
    3. Jover R,
    4. Castell JV,
    5. Fabra R,
    6. Trullenque R,
    7. Gomez-Lechon MJ
    (1998) Oncostatin M down-regulates basal and induced cytochromes P450 in human hepatocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 285:127–134.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Hoyumpa AM,
    2. Schenker S
    (1991) Is glucuronidation truly preserved in patients with liver disease? Hepatology 13:786–795.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Iber H,
    2. Chen Q,
    3. Cheng PY,
    4. Morgan ET
    (2000) Suppression of CYP2C11 gene transcription by interleukin-1 mediated by NF-κB binding at the transcription start site. Arch Biochem Biophys 377:187–194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Jedlitschky G,
    2. Cassidy AJ,
    3. Sales M,
    4. Pratt N,
    5. Burchell B
    (1999) Cloning and characterization of a novel human olfactory UDP-glucuronosyltransferase. Biochem J 340:837–843.
  16. ↵
    1. Kardon T,
    2. Coffey MJ,
    3. Banhegyi G,
    4. Conley AA,
    5. Burchell B,
    6. Mandl J,
    7. Braun L
    (2000) Transcriptional induction of bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase by ethanol in rat liver. Alcohol 21:251–257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kudo S,
    2. Kawano K
    (1999) Role of interleukin-1β in the modulations of cytochrome P450 and heme metabolism in rat liver. J Interferon Cytokine Res 19:601–607.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Levesque E,
    2. Beaulieu M,
    3. Guillemette C,
    4. Hum DW,
    5. Belanger A
    (1998) Effect of interleukins on UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 steroid uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase expression and activity in the LNCaP cell line. Endocrinology 139:2375–2381.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Luquita MG,
    2. Catania VA,
    3. Pozzi EJ,
    4. Veggi LM,
    5. Hoffman T,
    6. Pellegrino JM,
    7. Ikushiro Si,
    8. Emi Y,
    9. Iyanagi T,
    10. Vore M,
    11. Mottino AD
    (2001) Molecular basis of perinatal changes in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity in maternal rat liver. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298:49–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. McGurk KA,
    2. Brierley CH,
    3. Burchell B
    (1998) Drug glucuronidation by human renal UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Biochem Pharmacol 55:1005–1012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Monshouwer M,
    2. McLellan RA,
    3. Delaporte E,
    4. Witkamp RF,
    5. van Miert AS,
    6. Renton KW
    (1996) Differential effect of pentoxifylline on lipopolysaccharide-induced down-regulation of cytochrome P450. Biochem Pharmacol 52:1195–1200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Monshouwer M,
    2. Witkamp RF
    (2000) Cytochromes and cytokines: changes in drug disposition in animals during an acute phase response: a mini-review. Vet Q 22:17–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Morgan ET,
    2. Sewer MB,
    3. Iber H,
    4. Gonzalez FJ,
    5. Lee YH,
    6. Tukey RH,
    7. Okino S,
    8. Vu T,
    9. Chen YH,
    10. Sidhu JS,
    11. Omiecinski CJ
    (1998) Physiological and pathophysiological regulation of cytochrome P450. Drug Metab Dispos 26:1232–1240.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Nowell SA,
    2. Massengill JS,
    3. Williams S,
    4. Radominska-Pandya A,
    5. Tephly TR,
    6. Cheng Z,
    7. Strassburg CP,
    8. Tukey RH,
    9. MacLeod SL,
    10. et al.
    (1999) Glucuronidation of 2-hydroxyamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4, 5-b]pyridine by human microsomal UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: identification of specific UGT1A family isoforms involved. Carcinogenesis 20:1107–1114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Pellizzer AM,
    2. Smid SA,
    3. Strasser SI,
    4. Lee CS,
    5. Mashford ML,
    6. Desmond PV
    (1996) UDP-glucuronosyltransferase in the regenerating rat liver. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:1130–1136.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Radominska-Pandya A,
    2. Little JM,
    3. Pandya JT,
    4. Tephly TR,
    5. King CD,
    6. Barone GW,
    7. Raufman JP
    (1998) UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in human intestinal mucosa. Biochim Biophys Acta 1394:199–208.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Ritter JK,
    2. Kessler FK,
    3. Thompson MT,
    4. Grove AD,
    5. Auyeung DJ,
    6. Fisher RA
    (1999) Expression and inducibility of the human bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1 in liver and cultured primary hepatocytes: evidence for both genetic and environmental influences. Hepatology 30:476–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Rodighiero V
    (1999) Effects of liver disease on pharmacokinetics. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet 37:399–431.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Sindhu RK,
    2. Sakai H,
    3. Okamoto T,
    4. Kikkawa Y
    (1996) Differential effect of interleukin-1α on rat hepatic cytochrome P450 monooxygenases. Toxicology 114:37–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Strassburg CP,
    2. Manns MP,
    3. Tukey RH
    (1998) Expression of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A locus in human colon. Identification and characterization of the novel extrahepatic UGT1A8. J Biol Chem 273:8719–8726.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Strassburg CP,
    2. Strassburg A,
    3. Nguyen N,
    4. Li Q,
    5. Manns MP,
    6. Tukey RH
    (1999) Regulation and function of family 1 and family 2 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase genes (UGT1A, UGT2B) in human esophagus. Biochem J 338:489–498.
  32. ↵
    1. Strasser SI,
    2. Mashford ML,
    3. Desmond PV
    (1998) Regulation of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase during the acute-phase response. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:88–94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Tchernof A,
    2. Levesque E,
    3. Beaulieu M,
    4. Couture P,
    5. Despres JP,
    6. Hum DW,
    7. Belanger A
    (1999) Expression of the androgen metabolizing enzyme UGT2B15 in adipose tissue and relative expression measurement using a competitive RT-PCR method. Clin Endocrinol 50:637–642.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Tukey RH,
    2. Strassburg CP
    (2000) Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases metabolism, expression, and disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40:581–616.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Vargas M,
    2. Lamb JG,
    3. Franklin MR
    (1998) Phase II-selective induction of hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes by oltipraz-5-(2-pyrazinyl)-4-methyl-1,2-dithiol-3-thione-, 1,7-phenanthroline, and 2,2′-dipyridyl in rats is not accompanied by induction of intestinal enzymes. Drug Metab Dispos 26:91–97.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Walle T,
    2. Otake Y,
    3. Galijatovic A,
    4. Ritter JK,
    5. Walle UK
    (2000) Induction of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1 by the flavonoid chrysin in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 Drug Metab Dispos 28:1077–1082.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 30 (2)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 30, Issue 2
1 Feb 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
UDP Glucuronosyltransferase mRNA Levels in Human Liver Disease
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

UDP Glucuronosyltransferase mRNA Levels in Human Liver Disease

Mario Congiu, Maurice L. Mashford, John L. Slavin and Paul V. Desmond
Drug Metabolism and Disposition February 1, 2002, 30 (2) 129-134; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.30.2.129

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Research ArticleArticle

UDP Glucuronosyltransferase mRNA Levels in Human Liver Disease

Mario Congiu, Maurice L. Mashford, John L. Slavin and Paul V. Desmond
Drug Metabolism and Disposition February 1, 2002, 30 (2) 129-134; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.30.2.129
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • In Vivo Functional Effects of CYP2C9 M1L
  • Clearance pathways: fevipiprant with probenecid perpetrator
  • Predicting Volume of Distribution from In Vitro Parameters
Show more Article

Similar Articles

  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics