Advertisement
OtherShort Communication

MECHANISM-BASED INACTIVATION OF CYP2D6 BY METHYLENEDIOXYMETHAMPHETAMINE

A. Heydari, K. Rowland Yeo, M. S. Lennard, S. W. Ellis, G. T. Tucker and A. Rostami-Hodjegan
Drug Metabolism and Disposition November 2004, 32 (11) 1213-1217; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.104.001180

Abstract

The potency of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) as a mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP2D6 has been defined using microsomes prepared from yeast expressing the enzyme and from three human livers. The inhibitory effect was increased by preincubation through formation of a metabolic intermediate complex. Inactivation parameters (kinact and KI), defined with respect to the O-demethylation of dextromethorphan, were 0.29 ± 0.03 (S.E.) min-1 and 12.9 ± 3.6 (S.E.) μM for yeast-expressed CYP2D6, and 0.26 ± 0.02 min-1 and 14.4 ± 2.5 μM, 0.15 ± 0.01 min-1 and 8.8 ± 2.6 μM, and 0.12 ± 0.05 min-1 and 45.3 ± 32.1 μM for the liver microsomal preparations. The rate of inactivation of CYP2D6 by MDMA decreased when quinidine, a competitive inhibitor of CYP2D6, was added to the primary incubation mixture. However, inactivation was unaffected by the addition of glutathione. The results indicate that MDMA is a potent mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP2D6, with implications for understanding its in vivo disposition and drug interaction potential.

MDMA (commonly known as “Ecstasy”) is a synthetic amphetamine derivative that has become a popular recreational drug, particularly in the “rave” culture (Cole and Sumnall, 2003). Case reports of exaggerated responses and death associated with its use suggest that some individuals are at an increased risk of toxicity (Tucker et al., 1994). Hyperthermia, tachycardia, convulsions, rhabdomyolysis, and acute liver and renal failure following MDMA use in nightclubs are well documented, and longer-term use is linked to irreversible changes in serotoninergic function (Ramamoorthy et al., 2002). Although administration of MDMA and its metabolite methylenedioxyamphetamine to rats produces serotonergic nerve terminal degeneration, these compounds are not neurotoxic when injected directly into the brain. This suggests a requirement for their peripheral metabolism to neurotoxic metabolites (Easton et al., 2003) which, presumably, are then actively transported into the brain. These metabolites are believed to be downstream products formed after the opening of the methylendioxyphenyl ring, a process which is mainly mediated by CYP2D6 as a high-affinity enzyme (Tucker et al., 1994; Kreth et al., 2000), with low-affinity contributions from CYP1A2, CYP2B6, and CYP3A4 (Kreth et al., 2000).

CYP2D6 is a polymorphic enzyme and a functional form is absent in 5 to 9% of Caucasians as a result of autosomal recessive inheritance of gene mutations (Zanger et al., 2004). Thus, it has been suggested that genetically deficient metabolism of MDMA may help to explain why some users of “Ecstasy” appear to be more sensitive to its acute effects (Tucker et al., 1994; Lin et al., 1997). However, recent studies have found no obvious link between inherited CYP2D6 deficiency and MDMA intoxication (O'Donohoe et al., 1998; Schwab et al., 1999; Gilhooly and Daly, 2002). Wu et al. (1997) reported that MDMA is a potent competitive inhibitor of CYP2D6 in human liver microsomes. In addition, they showed that the inhibitory effect of MDMA was increased following preincubation with human liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH. Later studies (Delaforge et al., 1999) confirmed that MDMA forms a metabolic intermediate complex (MIC) with human CYP2D6 expressed in yeast microsomes. However, a quantitative definition of the potency of MDMA as a mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP2D6 is lacking. Thus, the kinetics of the inhibitory effects of MDMA on CYP2D6 in human liver microsomes from extensive metabolizer (EM) subjects and microsomes prepared from yeast expressing the human enzyme were investigated in this study.

Materials and Methods

Drugs and Chemicals. Racemic MDMA was provided by Professor R. Forrest (Department of Forensic Pathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK). Dextrorphan tartrate was obtained from Sigma/RBI (Natick, MA). Quinidine, dextromethorphan hydrobromide, and glutathione were purchased from Sigma Chemical (Poole, Dorset, UK). Laudanosine was obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Poole, Dorset, UK). Glucose 6-phosphate (G6P) dehydrogenase (grade II) and the disodium salts of G6P and NADP were purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Lewes, UK). Acetonitrile and orthophosphoric acid were obtained from Fisher Scientific Co. (Loughborough, UK). Triethylamine was purchased from BDH (Poole, Dorset, UK).

Preparation of Microsomes from Human Liver and Yeast Expressing CYP2D6. Three human liver samples (HL6, HL7, and HL17), genotyped as being from EMs of CYP2D6, were used. These samples had been acquired with the approval of the South Sheffield Research Ethics Committee and the local coroner. Clinical details of the donors are described elsewhere (Crewe et al., 1997). Human liver microsomes were prepared as described previously (Otton et al., 1988) and stored at -80°C as a suspension in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 30% (v/v) glycerol. Microsomal protein was measured by the method of Lowry et al. (1951) using bovine serum albumin as the standard. The heterologous expression of human CYP2D6 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the preparation of yeast microsomes have been described previously (Ellis et al., 1992).

Time-Dependent Inhibition of CYP2D6 Activity. The effect of 5 min of preincubation with MDMA on the inhibition of dextromethorphan O-demethylation was investigated. All incubations were carried out at 37°C in a shaking water bath. The preincubation tubes contained MDMA (0, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 6.25, and 12.5 μM, final concentrations) in 50 μl of KCl (1.15%, w/v) and a NADPH-generating system (0.4 μmol of NADP, 4 μmol of G6P, 2 μmol of MgCl2, and 0.4 unit of G6P-dehydrogenase) in 100 μl of 0.2 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The reactions were started by the addition of 50 μl of yeast microsomes expressing CYP2D6 (20 pmol of P450). After 5 min, 50 μl of dextromethorphan solution was added to the preincubation mixture (final concentration 20 μM) to assess the remaining CYP2D6 activity. Incubations were carried out in duplicate for another 5 min and terminated by the addition of 25 μl of perchloric acid (60%, v/v). Coincubations in which MDMA and dextromethorphan were added together at the end of the 5-min preincubation were also carried out (MDMA was not added to the preincubation tubes in these experiments).

The extent of CYP2D6 inactivation during the coincubation period, in addition to that occurring during preincubation, was assessed by determining the Vmax of dextromethorphan in the absence and presence of MDMA. Thus, the above experiments were repeated using a range of dextromethorphan concentrations (0–200 μM) with and without MDMA (final concentration 5 μM). Incubation mixtures comprised 50 μl of yeast microsomal suspension (20 pmol of P450), MDMA and dextromethorphan, each dissolved in 50 μl of KCl (1.15, w/v), and 100 μl of the NADPH-generating system dissolved in 0.2 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). All incubations were carried out in duplicate at each substrate concentration, and each experiment was repeated twice.

The Effect of Preincubation Time on the Inactivation of CYP2D6. Incubation tubes contained MDMA at final concentrations of 0, 2, 4, 8, 20, and 40 μM in 125 μl of KCl (1.15%, w/v) and a NADPH-generating system (2 μmol of NADP, 20 μmol of G6P, 9.99 μmol of MgCl2, and 6 units of G6P-dehydrogenase) in 250 μl of 0.2 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The reactions were started by the addition of 125 μl of yeast microsomes expressing CYP2D6 (160 pmol of P450). Aliquots (62 μl) were removed at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min from the preincubation mixture and added to other incubation tubes. Each of these tubes contained 50 μl of dextromethorphan solution (final concentration 20 μM) and 69 μl of KCl. The incubation procedure (carried out in duplicate) and the assessment of remaining CYP2D6 activity were as described above.

These experiments were repeated using microsomes prepared from each of the three human livers. Preincubation times ranged from 0 to 30 min, and incubation was carried out for 10 min. The preincubation reactions were started by the addition of 125 μl of human liver microsomal suspension (1 mg of protein). All other incubation conditions were as described for the experiments involving yeast microsomes.

Spectral Complex Formation. Microsomes from yeast expressing CYP2D6 (500 pmol of P450) were mixed with NADPH (4 mM) in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to a final volume of 1 ml. The mixture was divided between two 0.5-ml cuvettes of 1 cm path length. MDMA solution was added to the sample cuvette to give a final concentration of 800 μM (lower concentrations were evaluated but did not produce measurable complex). An equivalent volume of water was added to the reference cuvette. Difference spectra were recorded at room temperature using a double-beam UV-3000 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) scanning between 500 and 380 nm at 0, 2, 5, 15, and 30 min.

Effects of Quinidine and Glutathione on the Inactivation of CYP2D6. Yeast microsomes (20 pmol of P450) were preincubated for 5 min at 37°C with the NADPH-generating system in the presence of quinidine (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, or 1 μM) or glutathione (0.1, 1, 5, or 10 μM) with or without MDMA (5 μM). The samples were then assayed for remaining CYP2D6 activity following addition of dextromethorphan (20 μM).

Nonspecific Microsomal Binding of MDMA. Nonspecific binding of MDMA to yeast microsomes was measured by ultracentrifugation using Millipore Centrifree Micropartition devices (Millipore Corporation, Stonehouse, UK).

Aliquots (500 μl) of inactive microsomes from yeast expressing CYP2D6 (final protein concentration 1.27 mg/ml) were spiked with different concentrations of MDMA (0.5–2.2 μM) and 50 μl of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), incubated in the ultrafiltration reservoir at 37°C for 10 min, and then centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min. The ultrafiltrates were assayed for MDMA by HPLC. Control experiments, without the addition of microsomal protein, were carried out to assess the binding of MDMA to different components of the ultrafiltration device. The extent of this binding was calculated using the following equation (adapted from Ballard, 1998): Math where fumic is the fraction of unbound drug in microsomes, C is the total drug concentration in the reservoir (microsomal samples), fumem is the fraction of drug not bound to the membrane (calculated using fuc and fuR and measured concentrations after centrifugation of buffer samples), fuc is the fraction of drug not bound to the receiving cup (calculated using buffer samples placed in the cup), Cuc is the concentration of drug in the cup (after centrifugation of microsomal samples), and fuR is the fraction of drug not bound to the reservoir (calculated using buffer samples placed in the reservoir).

Drug Assays. Dextrorphan was assayed using modifications of the methods described by Jacqz-Aigrain et al. (1989, 1993). Laudanosine (15 μl, 5 μg/ml) was added as the internal standard to all incubation samples, which were then vortexed and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm (10,000g) for 10 min. The supernatant (50 μl) was injected onto an HPLC system fitted with a radial compression column containing NovaPak CN reversed phase material (Waters, Milford, MA) and a CN precolumn. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile/water (10:90, v/v) containing 0.03% (v/v) triethylamine adjusted to pH 3.1 with orthophosphoric acid. A model 2080 HPLC pump (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) was used for solvent delivery at a flow rate of 3 ml min-1. The eluate was monitored with an LC240 fluorescence spectrophotometric detector (PerkinElmer UK, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, UK) set at excitation and emission wavelengths of 270 and 312 nm, respectively. The retention time of dextrorphan was 6.2 min, and the intra- and interday coefficients of variation of the assay (concentration range 0.1–0.8 μM) were 1.8% and 4.4%, respectively.

MDMA was measured using the same HPLC system and conditions (retention time 3 min). The intra- and interday coefficients of variation of the assay (concentration range 1–2 μM) were 6% and 8%, respectively.

Data Analysis. IC50, Vmax, and Km values were calculated by nonlinear least-squares regression using GraFit (Version 5.0.4; Erithacus Sofware, Horley, Surrey, UK). Inactivation constants (kinact and KI) were estimated as described by Silverman (1995). Any loss of enzyme activity unrelated to the inhibitor was accounted for by expressing the control rate of CYP2D6-mediated metabolism (O-demethylation of dextromethorphan to dextrorphan) in yeast and human liver microsomes as a percentage of that in time-matched control samples without inhibitor. The rate constant for initial inactivation (kobs) at each inhibitor concentration was estimated from a plot of the slope of the natural log of “percent remaining activity” versus preincubation time. Values of kinact and KI were obtained from a double reciprocal plot of kobs versus the corresponding inhibitor concentrations. These values were used as initial estimates in solving the following equation with GraFit: Math where [I] is the initial inhibitor concentration, kinact is the maximum rate constant for inactivation when [I] approximates infinity, and KI is the inhibitor concentration that produces half the maximal rate of inactivation. Comparisons between estimated kinetic constants were made using the Z test implemented in Excel.

Results

The inhibitory effect of MDMA on dextromethorphan O-demethylation in yeast microsomes expressing CYP2D6 was increased by preincubation. The IC50 values for inhibition were 9.4 ± 2.1 (S.E.) μM and 5.0 ± 0.7 (S.E.) μM for coincubation and preincubation, respectively. Dextromethorphan O-demethylation was inhibited in a time- and concentration-dependent manner by MDMA using microsomes prepared from yeast expressing CYP2D6 (Fig. 1) and human liver microsomes (data not shown). The percentage disappearance of MDMA (2 μM) observed at the end of the preincubation step was 56% for yeast (5 min) and 44%, 18%, and 10% (30 min) for HL6, HL7, and HL17, respectively. Inactivation parameters (kinact and KI) determined for CYP2D6 in yeast microsomes (Fig. 1) were 0.29 ± 0.03 (S.E.) min-1 and 12.9 ± 3.6 (S.E.) μM, respectively. Corresponding values for the three human liver samples were 0.26 ± 0.02 min-1 and 14.4 ± 2.5 μM (HLM6), 0.15 ± 0.01 min-1 and 8.8 ± 2.6 μM (HLM7), and 0.12 ± 0.05 min-1 and 45.3 ± 32.1 μM (HLM17).

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Inactivation of CYP2D6 by MDMA in yeast microsomes expressing CYP2D6. a, relationship between preincubation time with various concentrations of MDMA and CYP2D6 activity as measured by percentage of remaining activity of dextrorphan formation compared with control. b, plot of inactivation rate constant as a function of MDMA concentration used to determine kinact and KI values. The data points at each concentration refer to duplicate experiments and the solid line is the best fit obtained by nonlinear least-squares regression.

As shown in Fig. 2, the maximal rate of dextrorphan formation (Vmax) by yeast microsomes expressing CYP2D6 was unaffected by the presence of coincubated MDMA (5 μM). Vmax values in the absence and presence of MDMA were similar [1.05 ± 0.02 (S.E.) and 1.07 ± 0.03 (S.E.) pmol/min/pmol P450, respectively; p = 0.49; Z test]. However, corresponding Km values (4.99 ± 0.52 μM versus 9.23 ± 1.06 μM) were significantly different (p < 0.001; Z test), indicating some degree of non-mechanism-based inhibition. Assuming that the shift in Km corresponded to competitive inhibition with an extent of 1 + [I]/Ki, and knowing the MDMA concentration in the incubation mixture (5 μM), a value for the competitive inhibition constant (Ki) of 5.9 μM was estimated. Because no significant non-specific microsomal binding of MDMA was observed, no correction of this Ki value was necessary. Spectral difference scanning of yeast microsomes during incubation with MDMA in the presence of a NADPH-generating system indicated a time-dependent increase in absorbance at 456 nm (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

The effect of coincubation with MDMA on dextrorphan formation rate in yeast microsomes expressing CYP2D6. Increasing concentrations of dextromethorphan were associated with no change in the maximum rate of dextrorphan formation. The inset shows a shift of the curve to the right during coincubation of dextromethorphan with MDMA.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Difference spectrum indicating the formation of a MIC during incubation of MDMA (800 μM) with yeast microsomes expressing CYP2D6.

The rate of inactivation by MDMA decreased when quinidine, a competitive inhibitor of CYP2D6, was added to the primary incubation mixture containing yeast microsomes (Fig. 4a). Inactivation decreased with increasing concentrations of quinidine. Figure 4b shows that the addition of glutathione had little effect on the rate of inactivation of CYP2D6 by MDMA in yeast microsomes.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Effects of the competitive inhibitor quinidine (left panel) and the nucleophile glutathione (right panel) on MDMA-mediated inactivation of CYP2D6 in yeast microsomes. C signifies control experiments with quinidine or glutathione at the same concentrations as those with added MDMA.

Discussion

The findings confirm that MDMA is a mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP2D6. Preincubation of MDMA in the presence of a NADPH-generating system caused an increase in the inhibitory effect of the drug, and the rate of inactivation of CYP2D6 was time- and concentration-dependent. The inactivation was associated with a time-dependent increase in absorbance at 456 nm during the preincubation period, supporting the formation of a MIC. The decrease in inactivation observed in the presence of the competitive CYP2D6 inhibitor quinidine suggests that transformation of MDMA to the MIC occurs at the active site of CYP2D6. The lack of effect of glutathione on the inactivation of CYP2D6 suggests that, once the reactive intermediate has been generated, it does not leave the active site. These findings are consistent with criteria for a mechanism-based inhibitor (Silverman, 1995).

The presence of the methylenedioxyphenyl ring in MDMA and methylenedioxyamphetamine is the most likely reason for formation of a MIC with CYP2D6, although such complexes are also formed by amine groups. P450-mediated oxidation of the methylene carbon in both compounds would lead to formation of unstable intermediates, which are then demethylenated to catechols (3,4-dihydroxymethamphetamine and α-methyldopamine) or dehydrated to carbenes. The former compounds may be oxidized further to orthoquinones, which can react with nucleophilic groups on macromolecules or conjugate with glutathione to form neurotoxins (Easton et al., 2003). The carbene intermediates are likely to form covalent complexes with the heme iron of CYP2D6, yielding the characteristic type 3 spectrum (Ortiz de Montellano, 1995).

Values of kinact and KI were generally similar for yeast microsomes and microsomes from the three livers investigated. The differences between the livers are likely to be due to genotypic differences affecting specific activity. The liver samples used in the present study were genotyped as being *1*1, *1*4, and *1*2 for HL6, HL7, and HL17, respectively. It has been shown that livers with the CYP2D6*1/*2 genotype exhibit 20 to 40% lower intrinsic clearances with respect to MDMA and dextromethorphan than the mean value associated with wild-type livers (*1/*1) (Ramamoorthy et al., 2002). It is likely that MDMA at higher concentrations also inactivates CYP 1A2, 2B6 and 3A4, inasmuch as these enzymes contribute to low-affinity N-demethylenation of the compound (Kreth et al., 2000).

The values of kinact (0.12–0.26 min-1) and KI (8.8–45.3 μM) for MDMA are similar to those reported for paroxetine (kinact = 0.25 min-1, KI = 6.6 μM), another mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP2D6 that also has a methylendioxyphenyl ring (Bertelsen et al., 2003). Thus, the impact of mechanism-based inactivation of its own metabolism by MDMA in vivo is expected to be similar to that observed with comparable doses of paroxetine; that is, dose- and concentration-dependent kinetics, persistent inactivation of CYP2D6, phenocopying of EM individuals to apparent poor metabolizers, and higher exposure to coadministered CYP2D6 substrates (Alfaro et al., 1999; Laine et al., 2001, 2004; Belle et al., 2002; Liston et al., 2002).

The experiments involving coincubation of MDMA and dextromethorphan indicated that further loss of CYP2D6 activity did not occur during the incubation step at higher dextromethorphan concentrations. Observed Vmax (1.05 pmol/min/pmol P450) and Km (5.0 μM) values for dextrorphan formation in the absence of MDMA were consistent with previous estimates obtained using baculovirus-transformed insect cells (1.68 pmol/min-1 pmol-1 and 4.0 μM) (Ramamoorthy et al., 2002) and B-lymphoblastoid cells (10.8 pmol/min-1 pmol-1 and 5.2 μM) (Kawashiro et al., 1998). There was a small shift in activity in the presence of MDMA, which suggests that the contribution of competitive inhibition of CYP2D6 is small, since the Ki value is greater than 1 (values below 1 are commonly regarded as being associated with potent inhibition). The calculation of Ki assumed no contribution from mechanism-based inactivation to the observed shift in activity. However, inspection of the inset in Fig. 2 indicates that when dextromethorphan concentrations were low, the shift in activity was larger than that observed at higher concentrations. This indicates some contribution of mechanism-based inactivation to the decrease in CYP2D6 activity. Thus, the calculated Ki value may overestimate the potency of competitive inhibition of CYP2D6 by MDMA. Kinetic models that account for simultaneous competitive and mechanism-based inhibition are necessary to define the contribution of each type of inhibition during coincubation.

Recreational doses of MDMA are associated with maximum plasma drug concentrations of around 3 μM (de la Torre et al., 2000). Considering the range of KI values obtained in the present study (8.8–46.1 μM), it would appear that mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 by MDMA in vivo is unlikely. However, assuming an absorption rate constant of 2.2 h-1 (estimated from the data of de la Torre et al., 2000) and a liver blood flow of 90 l/h, the maximum inlet concentration of MDMA to the liver following a 100-mg oral dose could be as high as 22 μM. Accordingly, it is likely that MDMA concentrations at the active site of CYP2D6 will exceed its inactivation KI during “first pass” through the liver, leading to a marked decrease in enzyme activity in vivo. Indeed, multiple-dose studies of MDMA in humans have demonstrated both concentration- and time-dependent kinetics (de la Torre et al., 2000). The effect of mechanism-based inhibition of CYP2D6 in vivo is a function of the inactivation parameters of the drug (KI, kinact, and partition ratio) and the synthesis rate of de novo enzyme (Mayhew et al., 2000). The in vitro rate of CYP2D6 inactivation by MDMA is high relative to the observed rate of CYP2D6 loss in cultured precision-cut human liver slices (Renwick et al., 2000). Therefore, under basal conditions, it is likely that inactivation of CYP2D6 exceeds substantially the rate of synthesis of new enzyme. Rapid inactivation of CYP2D6 may result in the phenocopying of extensive metabolizers to poor metabolizers in vivo. This expectation is supported by unpublished data (R. de la Torre, personal communication) showing that, despite the importance of CYP2D6 as the major contributor to the metabolism of MDMA in vitro, there was a relatively small difference in the oral clearance of the drug between a group of EMs and a poor metabolizer subject. The decreased contribution of CYP2D6 to MDMA clearance in vivo, as a consequence of autoinhibition via mechanism-based inactivation, is also consistent with a relatively small inhibitory effect (30%) of paroxetine on MDMA clearance in vivo (Segura et al., 2004).

In conclusion, the kinetics of inactivation of CYP2D6 by MDMA has been characterized, showing that it is extremely potent in this respect. The full implications of this finding for the in vivo kinetics of the drug, the identification of risk factors for acute and chronic toxicity, and drug-drug interactions remain to be elucidated.

Footnotes

  • A.H. was in receipt of a scholarship supported by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. This work was presented, in part, at the British Association for Psychopharmacology Meeting in Cambridge, UK, 20–23 July 2003.

  • Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org.

  • doi:10.1124/dmd.104.001180.

  • ABBREVIATIONS: MDMA, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine; G6P, glucose 6-phosphate; MIC, metabolic intermediate complex; EM, extensive metabolizer with respect to CYP2D6; P450, cytochrome P450; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography.

    • Received June 25, 2004.
    • Accepted August 20, 2004.

References

  1. ↵
    Alfaro CL, Lam YW, Simpson J, and Ereshefsky L (1999) CYP2D6 status of extensive metabolizers after multiple-dose fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, or sertraline. J Clin Psychopharmacol 19: 155-163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Ballard PG (1998) Tissue distribution and metabolism studies for a series of barbiturates. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  3. ↵
    Belle DJ, Ernest CS, Sauer JM, Smith BP, Thomasson HR, and Witcher JW (2002) Effect of potent CYP2D6 inhibition by paroxetine on atomoxetine pharmacokinetics. J Clin Pharmacol 42: 1219-1227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bertelsen KM, Venkatakrishnan K, von Moltke LL, Obach RS, and Greenblatt DJ (2003) Apparent mechanism-based inhibition of human CYP2D6 in vitro by paroxetine: comparison with fluoxetine and quinidine. Drug Metab Dispos 31: 289-293.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Cole JC and Sumnall HR (2003) Altered states: the clinical effects of Ecstasy. Pharmacol Ther 98: 35-58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Crewe HK, Ellis SW, Lennard MS, and Tucker GT (1997) Variable contribution of cytochromes P450 2D6, 2C9 and 3A4 to the 4-hydroxylation of tamoxifen by human liver microsomes. Biochem Pharmacol 53: 171-178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Delaforge M, Jaouen M, and Bouille G (1999) Inhibitory metabolite complex formation of methylenedioxymethamphetamine with rat and human cytochrome P450. Particular involvement of CYP 2D. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 7: 153-158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    de la Torre R, Farre M, Ortuno J, Mas M, Brenneisen R, Roset PN, Segura J, and Cami J (2000) Non-linear pharmacokinetics of MDMA (`ecstasy') in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol 49: 104-109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Easton N, Fry J, O'Shea E, Watkins A, Kingston S, and Marsden CA (2003) Synthesis, in vitro formation and behavioural effects of glutathione regioisomers of alpha-methyldopamine with relevance to MDA and MDMA (ecstasy). Brain Res 987: 144-154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Ellis SW, Ching MS, Watson PF, Henderson CJ, Simula AP, Lennard MS, Tucker GT, and Woods HF (1992) Catalytic activities of human debrisoquine 4-hydroxylase cytochrome P450 (CYP2D6) expressed in yeast. Biochem Pharmacol 44: 617-620.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Gilhooly TC and Daly AK (2002) CYP2D6 deficiency, a factor in ecstasy related deaths? Br J Clin Pharmacol 54: 69-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Jacqz-Aigrain E, Funck-Brentano C, and Cresteil T (1993) CYP2D6- and CYP3A-dependent metabolism of dextromethorphan in humans. Pharmacogenetics 3: 197-204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Jacqz-Aigrain E, Menard Y, Popon M, and Mathieu H (1989) Dextromethorphan phenotypes determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr 495: 361-363.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    Kawashiro T, Yamashita K, Zhao XJ, Koyama E, Tani M, Chiba K, and Ishizaki T (1998) A study on the metabolism of etoposide and possible interactions with antitumor or supporting agents by human liver microsomes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286: 1294-1300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Kreth K, Kovar K, Schwab M, and Zanger UM (2000) Identification of the human cytochromes P450 involved in the oxidative metabolism of “Ecstasy”-related designer drugs. Biochem Pharmacol 59: 1563-1571.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Laine K, De Bruyn S, Bjorklund H, Rouru J, Hanninen J, Scheinin H, and Anttila M (2004) Effect of the novel anxiolytic drug deramciclane on cytochrome P(450) 2D6 activity as measured by desipramine pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 59: 893-898.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Laine K, Tybring G, Hartter S, Andersson K, Svensson JO, Widen J, and Bertilsson L (2001) Inhibition of cytochrome P4502D6 activity with paroxetine normalizes the ultrarapid metabolizer phenotype as measured by nortriptyline pharmacokinetics and the debrisoquin test. Clin Pharmacol Ther 70: 327-335.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Lin LY, Di Stefano EW, Schmitz DA, Hsu L, Ellis SW, Lennard MS, Tucker GT, and Cho AK (1997) Oxidation of methamphetamine and methylenedioxymethamphetamine by CYP2D6. Drug Metab Dispos 25: 1059-1064.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Liston HL, DeVane CL, Boulton DW, Risch SC, Markowitz JS, and Goldman J (2002) Differential time course of cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme inhibition by fluoxetine, sertraline and paroxetine in healthy volunteers. J Clin Psychopharmacol 22: 169-173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, and Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265-275.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Mayhew BS, Jones DR, and Hall SD (2000) An in vitro model for predicting in vivo inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 by metabolic intermediate complex formation. Drug Metab Dispos 28: 1031-1037.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    O'Donohoe A, O'Flynn K, Shields K, Hawi Z, and Gill M (1998) MDMA toxicity. No evidence for a major influence of metabolic genotype at CYP2D6. Addict Biol 3: 309-314.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Ortiz de Montellano PR (1995) Structure, mechanism and inhibition of cytochrome P450. Drug Metab Dispos 23: 1181-1187.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    Otton SV, Crewe HK, Lennard MS, Tucker GT, and Woods HF (1988) Use of quinidine inhibition to define the role of the sparteine/debrisoquine cytochrome P450 in metoprolol oxidation by human liver microsomes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 247: 242-247.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Ramamoorthy Y, Yu AM, Suh N, Haining RL, Tyndale RF, and Sellers EM (2002) Reduced (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (“Ecstasy”) metabolism with cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitors and pharmacogenetic variants in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol 63: 2111-2119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Renwick AB, Watts PS, Edwards RJ, Barton PT, Guyonnet I, Price RJ, Tredger JM, Pelkonen O, Boobis AR, and Lake BG (2000) Differential maintenance of cytochrome P450 enzymes in cultured precision-cut human liver slices. Drug Metab Dispos 28: 1202-1209.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Schwab M, Seyringer E, Brauer RB, Hellinger A, and Griese EU (1999) Fatal MDMA intoxication. Lancet 353: 593-594.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Segura M, Farre M, Pichini S, Peiro A, Roset PN, Ramirez A, Ortuno J, Pacific R, Zuccaro P, and Segura J (2004) Contribution of CYP2D6 to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) disposition in humans: use of paroxetine as a metabolic inhibitor probe. Clin Pharmacokinet, in press.
  29. ↵
    Silverman RB (1995) Mechanism-based enzyme inactivators, in: Enzyme Kinetics and Mechanism, Part D: Developments in Enzyme Dynamics (Purich DL ed), p 240, Academic Press, London.
  30. ↵
    Tucker GT, Lennard MS, Ellis SW, Woods HF, Cho AK, Lin LY, Hiratsuka A, Schmitz DA, and Chu TY (1994) The demethylenation of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (“ecstasy”) by debrisoquine hydroxylase (CYP2D6). Biochem Pharmacol 47: 1151-1156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Wu D, Otton SV, Inaba T, Kalow W, and Sellers EM (1997) Interactions of amphetamine analogs with human liver CYP2D6. Biochem Pharmacol 53: 1605-1612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Zanger UM, Raimundo S, and Eichelbaum M (2004) Cytochrome P450 2D6: overview and update on pharmacology, genetics, biochemistry. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 369: 23-37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

OtherShort Communication

MECHANISM-BASED INACTIVATION OF CYP2D6 BY METHYLENEDIOXYMETHAMPHETAMINE

A. Heydari, K. Rowland Yeo, M. S. Lennard, S. W. Ellis, G. T. Tucker and A. Rostami-Hodjegan
Drug Metabolism and Disposition November 1, 2004, 32 (11) 1213-1217; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.104.001180
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement