Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
LetterLetter to the Editor

Misuse of the Well-Stirred Model of Hepatic Drug Clearance

Jiansong Yang, Masoud Jamei, Karen R. Yeo, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan and Geoffrey T. Tucker
Drug Metabolism and Disposition March 2007, 35 (3) 501-502; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.106.013359
Jiansong Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masoud Jamei
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen R. Yeo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey T. Tucker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The “well-stirred” model of hepatic drug clearance was first proposed by Gillette (1971) and established by Rowland et al. (1973) and Wilkinson and Shand (1975). In the form that it is commonly used, net hepatic drug clearance based on whole-blood drug concentration (CLH,B) is derived as a function of hepatic blood flow (QH,B), the free fraction of drug in blood (fuB), and the intrinsic metabolic clearance in the liver based on unbound drug concentration (CLuint,H): Math

This assumes that the drug is distributed instantly and homogenously throughout liver water and that the unbound concentrations in plasma and liver water are identical. Effectively, this means that drug distribution into the liver is perfusion-limited with no diffusion delay and that no active transport systems are involved. The latter possibilities have generally been disregarded in most applications.

A key feature of this model is that it equates whole-blood drug clearance, rather than plasma drug clearance, to liver blood flow, because the organ is potentially capable of extracting the drug from both plasma and blood cells. Most reported clearance values are referenced to plasma rather than blood, since it is more common to measure drug concentration in plasma. If plasma drug clearance (CLH) is to be estimated, then eq. 1 must be modified to take into account the free fraction in plasma (fu) and the total blood to total plasma drug concentration ratio (CB/CP): Math

As expected conceptually, eq. 1 indicates that hepatic blood clearance cannot exceed liver blood flow. However, from eq. 2, it is possible that hepatic plasma clearance may exceed hepatic blood flow (and hepatic plasma flow) when fuCLuint,H ≫ QH,B and CB/CP > 1 (Hinderling, 1997). Some confusion over the definition of fuB and a failure to appreciate the conversion between blood and plasma clearance are evident in some of the recent literature, confounding the ability to extrapolate between in vitro and in vivo drug clearance.

The Definition of fuB

The free fraction of drug in blood is given by eq. 3: Math where AuB is the amount of unbound drug in whole blood and AB is the total amount of drug in blood. Thus: Math where CuRBC is the unbound drug concentration in cells (essentially red blood cells; RBC); VRBC is the volume of RBC per milliliter of blood; Cu is unbound drug concentration in plasma water; VP is the volume of plasma per milliliter of blood; and Hc is the hematocrit.

In the original development of the well-stirred model, the assumption was made that the unbound concentration of drug in blood cells equates to the unbound concentration in plasma (CuRBC = Cu). Hence, eq. 4 becomes: Math

In contrast, Masimirembwa et al. (2003) defined the free fraction in blood as: Math

However, this only applies where no drug associates with the cells (CuRBC = 0 in eq. 4) when, to provide a correct value of hepatic blood clearance, eq. 1 would need to be modified to eq. 7: Math

In the special case of the drug not associating with blood cells at all, it is preferable to report plasma, rather than blood, clearance, using fu and hepatic plasma flow (QH,B(1 – Hc)).

Estimation of in Vivo Hepatic Clearance from in Vitro Data

Values of CLuint,H derived using human liver microsomes, hepatocytes, or recombinant enzymes are often scaled to in vivo hepatic clearance using the well-stirred model. However, in deriving hepatic plasma clearance, several recent studies have used eq. 8 instead of the correct form (eq. 2) (Blanchard et al., 2004; Foti and Fisher, 2004; Blanchard et al., 2005; de Graaf et al., 2006; Mohutsky et al., 2006; Strelevitz et al., 2006): Math

This would only be valid if CB/CP were equal to unity. For drugs with low values of fuCLuint,H, estimates of CLH would be similar using eqs. 2 and 8. Thus, when fuCLuint,H ≪ QH,B (eq. 2 and 8), CLH approaches fuCLuint,H, and the factor CB/CP is not important. However, major discrepancies would result for higher clearance drugs when CB/CP does not equal unity.

Estimation of Intrinsic Hepatic Clearance from in Vivo Data

To assess predictions of intrinsic hepatic drug clearance from in vitro data, estimates are often compared with values back-calculated from in vivo values of hepatic drug clearance using the well-stirred model. In this context, studies (e.g., Takanaga et al., 2000) have employed eq. 9 by rearranging eq. 8, instead of the correct form (eq. 10 from a rearrangement of eq. 2): MathMath

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Comparison of FH values determined using eqs. 11 through 13 [QH,B = 97 l/h; Hc = 0.48 (Valentin, 2002)] and different values of CB/C (0.7 and 2). When CB/CP = 1, eqs. 11 and 13 give the same result; when CB/CP = 1 – Hc, eqs. 12 and 13 give the same result.

Estimation of Hepatic Availability from in Vivo Data

Another common application of the well-stirred model is to estimate the fraction avoiding “first-pass” metabolism (hepatic availability; FH) after oral drug administration from systemic clearance after intravenous administration. Assuming negligible extrahepatic clearance, several reports have used plasma drug clearance after intravenous administration (CLiv) and eq. 11 (Lau et al., 2006; Strelevitz et al., 2006) or eq. 12 (Kharasch et al., 2004a,b) to estimate FH: MathMath

Eq. 11 is only valid if CB/CP is unity, and eq. 12 is not valid unless CB/CP is equal to (1 – Hc) (i.e., no drug associates with the cells). A more appropriate equation, based on the original assumptions of the well-stirred model, is given by eq. 13: Math

The different implications of eqs. 11 through 13 for the estimation of FH are explored in Fig. 1.

Errors in the estimation of FH may be further propagated into estimates of the fraction avoiding first-pass loss across the gut wall (FG) from the relationship F/(faFH), where F is net oral bioavailability and fa is the fraction of the dose entering the intestinal wall (Takanaga et al., 2000; Kharasch et al., 2004a,b).

In summary, we emphasize that the mixing of plasma free fraction and hepatic blood flow is inadvisable and illogical when using the well stirred liver, or indeed any model of hepatic drug clearance, for in vitro/in vivo extrapolation.

Footnotes

  • Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org.

  • doi:10.1124/dmd.106.013359.

  • ABBREVIATION: RBC, red blood cells.

    • Received October 17, 2006.
    • Accepted December 15, 2006.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    Blanchard N, Alexandre E, Abadie C, Lave T, Heyd B, Mantion G, Jaeck D, Richert L, and Coassolo P (2005) Comparison of clearance predictions using primary cultures and suspensions of human hepatocytes. Xenobiotica 35: 1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Blanchard N, Richert L, Notter B, Delobel F, David P, Coassolo P, and Lave T (2004) Impact of serum on clearance predictions obtained from suspensions and primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. Eur J Pharm Sci 23: 189–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    de Graaf IA, de Kanter R, de Jager MH, Camacho R, Langenkamp E, van de Kerkhof EG, and Groothuis GM (2006) Empirical validation of a rat in vitro organ slice model as a tool for in vivo clearance prediction. Drug Metab Dispos 34: 591–599.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Foti RS and Fisher MB (2004) Impact of incubation conditions on bufuralol human clearance predictions: enzyme lability and nonspecific binding. Drug Metab Dispos 32: 295–304.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Gillette JR (1971) Factors affecting drug metabolism. Ann NY Acad Sci 179: 43–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Hinderling PH (1997) Red blood cells: a neglected compartment in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacol Rev 49: 279–295.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Kharasch ED, Hoffer C, Whittington D, and Sheffels P (2004a) Role of hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P450 3A and 2B6 in the metabolism, disposition, and miotic effects of methadone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 76: 250–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Kharasch ED, Walker A, Hoffer C, and Sheffels P (2004b) Intravenous and oral alfentanil as in vivo probes for hepatic and first-pass cytochrome P450 3A activity: noninvasive assessment by use of pupillary miosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 76: 452–466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Lau YY, Okochi H, Huang Y, and Benet LZ (2006) Pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin and its hydroxy metabolites in rats and the effects of concomitant rifampicin single doses: relevance of first-pass effect from hepatic uptake transporters, and intestinal and hepatic metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos 34: 1175–1181.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Mohutsky MA, Chien JY, Ring BJ, and Wrighton SA (2006) Predictions of the in vivo clearance of drugs from rate of loss using human liver microsomes for phase I and phase II biotransformations. Pharm Res (NY) 23: 654–662.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Rowland M, Benet LZ, and Graham GG (1973) Clearance concepts in pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1: 123–136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Strelevitz TJ, Foti RS, and Fisher MB (2006) In vivo use of the P450 inactivator 1-aminobenzotriazole in the rat: varied dosing route to elucidate gut and liver contributions to first-pass and systemic clearance. J Pharm Sci 95: 1334–1341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Takanaga H, Ohnishi A, Matsuo H, Murakami H, Sata H, Kuroda K, Urae A, Higuchi S, and Sawada Y (2000) Pharmacokinetic analysis of felodipine-grapefruit juice interaction based on an irreversible enzyme inhibition model. Br J Clin Pharmacol 49: 49–58.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    Valentin J (2002) Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection: Reference Values. Pergamon, Oxford, UK.
  15. ↵
    Wilkinson GR and Shand DG (1975) A physiological approach to hepatic drug clearance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 18: 377–390.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 35 (3)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 35, Issue 3
1 Mar 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Misuse of the Well-Stirred Model of Hepatic Drug Clearance
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
LetterLetter to the Editor

Misuse of the Well-Stirred Model of Hepatic Drug Clearance

Jiansong Yang, Masoud Jamei, Karen R. Yeo, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan and Geoffrey T. Tucker
Drug Metabolism and Disposition March 1, 2007, 35 (3) 501-502; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.106.013359

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
LetterLetter to the Editor

Misuse of the Well-Stirred Model of Hepatic Drug Clearance

Jiansong Yang, Masoud Jamei, Karen R. Yeo, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan and Geoffrey T. Tucker
Drug Metabolism and Disposition March 1, 2007, 35 (3) 501-502; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.106.013359
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • The Definition of fuB
    • Estimation of in Vivo Hepatic Clearance from in Vitro Data
    • Estimation of Intrinsic Hepatic Clearance from in Vivo Data
    • Estimation of Hepatic Availability from in Vivo Data
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Unbound Maximum Hepatic Inlet Concentration
  • Misidentification of Bupropion Glucuronide Metabolites
  • Response to Letter to the Editor
Show more Letter to the Editor

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics