Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Cytochrome P450 2C11 5′-Flanking Region and Promoter Mediate in Vivo Suppression by 3-Methylcholanthrene

Rana M. Sawaya and David S. Riddick
Drug Metabolism and Disposition September 2008, 36 (9) 1803-1811; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.108.020966
Rana M. Sawaya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David S. Riddick
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aromatic hydrocarbons such as 3-methylcholanthrene (MC) elicit toxic and adaptive responses through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). Aromatic hydrocarbons act via an unknown mechanism to suppress the transcription of CYP2C11, a growth hormone-regulated gene encoding the male-specific rat hepatic cytochrome P450 2C11. We hypothesize that suppression of CYP2C11 by aromatic hydrocarbons is mediated by the gene's promoter and 5′-flank. Using hydrodynamics-based injections to deliver plasmid DNA to the liver of live rats, we studied the MC responsiveness of luciferase constructs containing 10.1, 5.6, and 2.4 kilobases (kb) of the CYP2C11 5′-flank. MC suppressed CYP2C11-luciferase activity of the 10.1- and 5.6-kb constructs to less than 50% of vehicle levels by 24 and 72 h. Luciferase activity of the 2.4-kb CYP2C11 construct was decreased to 63% of vehicle levels 24 h after MC treatment, but no suppression was detected by 72 h. Negative regulatory element(s) responsible for CYP2C11 reporter suppression by MC exist in the proximal 2.4 kb of the 5′-flank; however, additional cis-acting elements located between –5.6 and –2.4 kb mediate persistent reporter suppression. As a positive control for AHR activation, MC dramatically induced the luciferase activity of a Cyp1a1-driven luciferase plasmid under AHR control. Modulation of reporter gene activity by MC was accompanied by induction of endogenous CYP1A1 and suppression of endogenous CYP2C11 mRNA/protein. This is the first demonstration of aromatic hydrocarbon-mediated suppression of a CYP2C11-luciferase construct, and this finding suggests that the 5′-flanking region and promoter mediate down-regulation of this gene in the intact rat.

Aromatic hydrocarbons are environmental contaminants that are present in almost every aspect of the global ecosystem. Nonhalogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), represented by the laboratory chemical 3-methylcholanthrene (MC), are formed during incomplete combustion of organic materials and are found in automobile exhaust, furnace gas, cigarette smoke, and grilled meat. PAHs are bioactivated and the resulting metabolites covalently bind DNA to initiate carcinogenesis. PAH exposure can pose a serious threat to human health and has been linked to the development of human lung and stomach cancers (Lee and Shim, 2007). Scientific interest in aromatic hydrocarbons stems from the toxicity and endocrine-disrupting potential of this important class of chemicals. It is therefore important to understand the mechanisms of aromatic hydrocarbon-mediated toxicity, particularly pathways implicated in the modulation of genes encoding cytochromes P450 (P450) that are involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics and endogenous substrates.

MC and related aromatic hydrocarbons are ligands for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), which is a ligand-activated transcription factor (TF) belonging to the basic-helix-loop-helix/Per-AHR nuclear translocator (ARNT)-Sim superfamily. The AHR resides in the cytoplasm in complex with two molecules of the 90-kDa heat shock protein, p23, and the AHR-interacting protein. Upon ligand binding, the AHR migrates into the nucleus and forms a heterodimer with ARNT. The resulting complex can recognize and bind dioxin-responsive elements (DREs) located in the 5′-flanking region of various target genes; modulation of the expression of these genes can elicit toxic and adaptive responses in mammals (Okey et al., 1994).

Aromatic hydrocarbons can up-regulate and down-regulate P450 gene expression. Mechanisms of AHR-mediated induction of P450s are partly understood as they have been studied extensively; however, our understanding of P450 suppression is less clear (Riddick et al., 2004). Data from our laboratory (Jones and Riddick, 1996), in agreement with earlier studies (reviewed in Riddick et al., 2003) as well as recent studies (Caron et al., 2005; Shaban et al., 2005), show that exposure of male rats to aromatic hydrocarbons results in the suppression of hepatic CYP2C11 catalytic activity, protein, and mRNA levels via an unknown pretranslational mechanism.

CYP2C11 is the major male-specific constitutive P450 present in the rat liver. The male-characteristic pulsatile pattern of growth hormone (GH) secretion is the main physiological signal regulating the expression of this gene. This regulation occurs at the transcriptional level by a combination of direct and indirect actions involving the Janus kinase 2-signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b (STAT5b) pathway as well as hepatic nuclear factors (HNFs) (Holloway et al., 2006; Waxman and O'Connor, 2006).

In vivo suppression of CYP2C11 by MC is at least partially regulated at the level of gene transcription as shown by nuclear run-on analysis (Lee and Riddick, 2000). We showed previously that MC and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) do not down-regulate expression of CYP2C11-luciferase reporter constructs containing up to 10.1 kb of the CYP2C11 5′-flank in transient transfection assays in cell culture (Bhathena et al., 2002; Sawaya and Riddick, 2008). Lack of suppression of CYP2C11-luciferase constructs by aromatic hydrocarbons in these previous cell culture studies suggests that this gene should be studied in vivo where the full complement of TFs, coactivators, corepressors, and endocrine factors necessary for physiological CYP2C11 regulation are present. To overcome the limitation of cell culture transfection studies, we implemented the hydrodynamics-based approach to study reporter plasmids in the living rat (Liu et al., 1999). In rats this technique results in high levels of plasmid DNA expression in hepatocytes upon rapid injection of a large volume (equivalent to 8–12% of the rat's body weight) of DNA-containing solution into the tail vein (Maruyama et al., 2002).

We hypothesize that the in vivo suppression of CYP2C11 by aromatic hydrocarbons is mediated by the gene's promoter and 5′-flank. To identify regulatory sequences involved in mediating transcriptional down-regulation of this gene, we have studied the MC responsiveness of luciferase constructs under the control of various lengths of the CYP2C11 5′-flank in living rats using the hydrodynamics-based approach.

Materials and Methods

Reporter Gene Constructs. The following plasmids from Promega (Madison, WI) were used as controls: the promoterless pGL3-Basic and pRL-TK (Renilla luciferase). pGudluc1.1 contains the luciferase gene under regulation of a 480-base pair fragment from the mouse Cyp1a1 5′-flank containing four DREs driven by the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter (Garrison et al., 1996).

Luciferase plasmids (–10.1-2C11) and (–5.6-2C11) containing extended regions of the CYP2C11 5′-flank amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and cloned into the promoterless pGL3-Basic vector were generated and characterized as described previously (Sawaya and Riddick, 2008). Generation of the (–2.4-2C11) plasmid, which was originally named (–2390-2C11)-pGL3, was described previously (Bhathena et al., 2002). The following stretches of the CYP2C11 5′-flank sequence are contained in these reporter plasmids: (–10.1-2C11), –10,061 to +20; (–5.6-2C11), –5616 to + 17; and (–2.4-2C11), –2390 to + 21. All numbering of nucleotide positions is according to version 3.4 of the November 2004 rat genomic assembly found on the UCSC Genome Browser Web site (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway) relative to the start site of transcription.

Large-Scale Plasmid Preparation. The Endo-Free plasmid purification Maxi and Giga kits (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) were used for large-scale plasmid preparation of pGL3-Basic, (–5.6-2C11), (–2.4-2C11), and pRL-TK. The pGudluc1.1 and (–10.1-2C11) endotoxin-free plasmids were prepared and purified at large scale by Aldevron (Fargo, ND). All plasmids were resuspended in buffer TE (pH 8) and stored at –20°C until use.

Animals and Treatment. Male Fischer 344 rats (7–9 weeks of age; 150–200 g) were purchased from Charles River Canada (St.-Constant, QC, Canada). Rats were fed Harlan Teklad rodent laboratory chow and water ad libitum. All animal experimentation was approved by the University of Toronto Animal Care Committee, and rats were cared for in accordance with guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Rats were housed two animals per cage, and exposed to a 12-h light cycle followed by a 12-h dark cycle. Animals were acclimatized to living conditions in the Division of Comparative Medicine at the University of Toronto for 7 days before experimental procedures were begun.

Before hydrodynamics-based injections, rats were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation (5% isoflurane in oxygen for induction; 2% isoflurane in oxygen for maintenance). Rats received a single i.p. injection of either MC (80 mg/kg, 98% purity; Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI) or an equivalent volume of vehicle (sterile Mazola corn oil). Rats were then injected via the tail vein with a firefly luciferase plasmid and the pRL-TK Renilla luciferase plasmid dissolved in sterile lactated Ringer's solution (130 mM Na, 4 mM K, 1.4 mM Ca, 109 mM Cl, and 28 mM lactate; Baxter Co., Mississauga, ON, Canada) at a volume equivalent to 8% of the rat's body weight. Injection time never exceeded 10 s. The Renilla construct was used to normalize for DNA transfection efficiency into the liver. Tail vein injections were performed using a 22-gauge, 1-inch-long catheter connected to a 25-ml capacity syringe. Each rat received 20 μg of firefly luciferase plasmid and 1.75 μgof Renilla plasmid DNA/ml of Ringer's solution injected, with the following exceptions. Rats euthanized at 24 and 72 h after injection with the (–5.6--2C11) plasmid and rats euthanized at 6 h after injection with the (–10.1-2C11) plasmid received 5 μg of firefly luciferase plasmid and 0.5 μgof Renilla plasmid DNA/ml of Ringer's solution. These plasmid amounts fall within optimal ranges required for high-level reporter gene expression in the liver (Liu et al., 1999; Maruyama et al., 2002).

Rats were euthanized by decapitation at 24 or 72 h after high-volume injections. Rats receiving the (–10.1-2C11) plasmid were also studied at an earlier time point of 6 h after injection. The liver of each rat was perfused in situ with ice-cold 1.15% KCl. Livers were excised and weighed. Small pieces of individual livers (∼0.1 g) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –70°C until RNA isolation was performed. Fresh liver (1.5 g) isolated from the left lobe of each rat was homogenized in 1 ml of 1× passive lysis buffer (Promega). Homogenates were centrifuged at 4°C for 25 min at 15 000g. The supernatant was stored at –70°C until dual luciferase assays were performed. Thawed supernatant (20 μl) was mixed with 100 μl of luciferase assay reagent II (Promega). Firefly luciferase activity was measured using a TD-20/20 luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). Stop and glow buffer (100 μl) was then added, and Renilla luciferase activity was measured. The firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity.

The remaining liver (∼8 g) was homogenized in 4 volumes of cold phosphate-buffered KCl (1.15% KCl and 10 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.4), and microsomes were isolated by differential centrifugation (McCluskey et al., 1986). Microsomal pellets were suspended in storage buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 20% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –70°C. Microsomal protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (1976).

Analysis of CYP1A1 and β-Actin mRNA Levels by RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated from liver tissue by the acid guanidinium thiocyanatephenol-chloroform extraction method using TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). To remove genomic DNA contamination, all RNA samples were treated with 20 U of DNase I (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Baie d'Urfé, QC, Canada) for 25 min at 37°C. The yield and purity of RNA was assessed by determining the A260/A280 ratio, and the RNA integrity was determined by comparing the 28S and 18S rRNA bands as visualized on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. RT was performed by incubating 1 μg of RNA with oligo(dT)15 (2 μg; Roche Diagnostics, Laval, QC, Canada) at 60°C for 5 min. Samples were then incubated in a final volume of 40 μl with Moloney murine leukemia virus-reverse transcriptase (400 U; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), RNA Guard (60 U; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences), a 1 mM concentration of each 2′-deoxynucleoside 5′-triphosphate (Invitrogen), 10 mM dithiothreitol, and 1× RT buffer containing 50 mM Tris, 75 mM KCl, and 3 mM MgCl2. Reactions proceeded for 60 min at 37°C, followed by incubation at 70°C for 10 min.

All PCR primers were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. (Coralville, IA). PCR primer sequences and cycling conditions are shown in Table 1. Each 50-μl PCR reaction contained input cDNA derived from 50 ng of RNA, Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 U; Invitrogen), 0.2 μM concentrations of each primer, a 0.2 mM concentration of each 2′-deoxynucleoside 5′-triphosphate (Invitrogen), and 1× PCR buffer containing 20 mM Tris, 50 mM KCl, and 3 mM MgCl2. PCR products were separated on a 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel, stained with Vistra Green (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) and imaged using the STORM Phosphorimager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). The presence of CYP1A1 mRNA was used as a qualitative positive control for MC treatment and not subjected to quantitative analysis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Primer sequences and thermal cycling conditions used for analysis of steady-state mRNA levels in rat liver by RT-PCR

Analysis of CYP2C11 mRNA Levels by Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR. Primers and probes used for real-time analyses were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. Table 2 contains all primer and probe sequences. Molecular probes were labeled at the 5′-end with the reporter fluorescent dye 6-carboxyfluorescein and the quencher fluorescent dye Iowa Black at the 3′-end. RNA was reverse-transcribed as described above. The MX4000 real-time PCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used for real-time PCR reactions. Each 25-μl reaction contained a final concentration of 0.3 μM (CYP2C11) or 0.4 μM (β-actin) primers, 0.2 μM (CYP2C11) or 0.3 μM (β-actin) probe, input cDNA (derived from 50 ng of RNA), and the 2X Brilliant QPCR Master Mix (Stratagene). A standard curve consisting of a 10-fold dilution series derived from pooling cDNA from several rats was run with each real-time PCR reaction to determine the reaction efficiency. Each dilution used in the standard curve was performed in triplicate. Cycling conditions consisted of an initial 10-min denaturation at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 30 s. Normalized expression (NE) was determined for each sample using the calculation Math, where E is the efficiency of the PCR amplification for each gene product and Ct is the threshold cycle at which fluorescence was detected (Simon, 2003).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Primer and probe sequences used for measurements of steady-state mRNA levels in rat liver by real-time quantitative RT-PCR

Immunoblot Analysis. Microsomal protein (5 μg for CYP1A1 and 3.5 μg for CYP2C11 analysis) from each liver was resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-ECL; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences). For CYP1A1 detection, mouse monoclonal antibody 1-31-2 (from Dr. H. V. Gelboin, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) was used at a dilution of 1:5000 in TNT (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20) containing 5% skim milk powder. Blots were then incubated with sheep anti-mouse Ig-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) at a dilution of 1:5000. For CYP2C11 protein detection, a rabbit anti-CYP2C11 polyclonal antibody [from Dr. E. T. Morgan, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (Morgan et al., 1985)] was used at a dilution of 1:5000 in TNT containing 5% skim milk powder, followed by a donkey anti-rabbit Ig-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) at a 1:5000 dilution. An enhanced chemiluminescence system (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) was used for protein detection, and films were scanned on an HP Scanjet 3970 scanner (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA). Relative quantitation was performed using IPLab Gel software (Signal Analytics, Vienna, VA). CYP1A1 immunoblots were used as a qualitative positive control for MC treatment and were not subjected to quantitative analysis. CYP2C11 quantitative analyses were performed under conditions that yielded a linear relationship between the amount of microsomal protein and immunoreactive signal intensity.

Statistical Analysis. Data are presented as a percentage of the mean for the vehicle-treated controls, and each bar represents the mean ± S.D. of determinations from three or four rats. All statistical analyses were performed on the raw data rather than on the percent control data presented in the figures. Student's t tests were performed to determine whether the mean value for MC-treated rats differed from the mean value for the corresponding vehicle control rats at each time point. Statistical significance of linear correlation data was determined by the Pearson correlation test. In all cases, a result was considered to be statistically significant if p ≤ 0.05.

Results

We have studied how MC affects luciferase plasmids driven by various lengths of the CYP2C11 5′-flank in living rats. Based on previous bioinformatic analyses (Sawaya and Riddick, 2008), we have focused on the proximal 10.1-kb region of the 5′-flank. This region is particularly enriched for DRE-like motifs (also known as AHRE-I elements) and also contains one perfect match to the AHRE-II consensus sequence, a novel site first identified in the CYP1A2 gene that binds an unknown factor that recruits the AHR · ARNT complex as a coactivator (Boutros et al., 2004; Sogawa et al., 2004). This region also contains putative sites for TFs involved in GH regulation of this gene (STAT5 and HNF-3) (Park and Waxman, 2001; Timsit and Riddick, 2002) and NF-κB response elements that can mediate suppression of this gene by inflammatory cytokines (Iber et al., 2000).

Using the hydrodynamics-based technique, rats received a tail vein injection consisting of one of five firefly luciferase plasmids [pGudluc1.1, pGL3-Basic, (–10.1-2C11), (–5.6-2C11), or (–2.4-2C11)] and the Renilla luciferase plasmid (pRL-TK) to normalize for in vivo transfection efficiency. MC or the corn oil vehicle was administered to rats via i.p. injection immediately before the high-volume tail vein injection, and rats were euthanized at 24 or 72 h after treatment; however, rats receiving the (–10.1-2C11) plasmid were also euthanized at an earlier time-point of 6 h after treatment.

Hepatic luciferase activity of our positive control plasmid pGudluc1.1 was increased approximately 2000-fold by 24 h and 3000-fold by 72 h after MC administration (Fig. 1A). This result confirmed that the administered dose of MC (80 mg/kg) increased transcription of a reporter gene delivered to the liver by the hydrodynamics-based approach. No observable signs of toxicity were associated with this dose of MC.

Under in vivo conditions in which MC activates the AHR to induce pGudluc1.1 reporter gene transcriptional activity, we examined the MC responsiveness of the four other firefly luciferase reporter plasmids: pGL3-Basic and three CYP2C11 constructs containing 10.1, 5.6, and 2.4 kb of 5′-flanking region (Fig. 1B). pGL3-Basic is a luciferase reporter plasmid devoid of an eukaryotic promoter, thus serving as a negative control for aromatic hydrocarbon responsiveness. MC induced pGL3-Basic luciferase activity slightly at both time points studied, but this response was not statistically significant. At 24 h after treatment, all CYP2C11 constructs were down-regulated by MC compared with vehicle-treated rats. The most pronounced down-regulation was observed with (–5.6-2C11), which was suppressed to 36% of vehicle levels. (–2.4-2C11) showed the smallest magnitude of suppression 24 h after treatment, being decreased to 63% of vehicle levels. At 72 h, luciferase activities of (–10.1-2C11) and (–5.6-2C11) plasmids were strikingly down-regulated by 69 and 76%, respectively, in response to MC treatment. Suppression of (–5.6-2C11) did not achieve statistical significance at 72 h because vehicle-treated rats displayed large variations in basal luciferase activity, whereas the variation at 24 h was minimal (Table 3). MC up-regulated (–2.4-2C11) luciferase activity by 53% at 72 h; however, this result was not statistically significant. Because all plasmids displayed a decline in luciferase activity with MC at 24 h, we examined an earlier time point of 6 h after injection in rats receiving the (–10.1-2C11) plasmid, to gain a clearer understanding of the time course involved in CYP2C11 reporter suppression. Regardless of chemical treatment, large variations in normalized luciferase activity were observed at this early time point (Table 3). There was a 43% decline in luciferase activity 6 h after MC administration, an effect that was not statistically significant (Fig. 1B).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Hepatic luciferase activity in rats receiving hydrodynamics-based injections

All data are expressed in arbitrary light units (normalized for Renilla activity) as mean ± S.D. of determinations from hepatic lysates prepared from three or four rats. Statistically significant effects of MC are summarized in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Effect of MC on hepatic reporter gene activity in rats receiving hydrodynamics-based injections. Rats received one of five firefly luciferase plasmids: (A) pGudluc1.1 or (B) pGL3-Basic, (–10.1-2C11), (–5.6-2C11), or (–2.4-2C11), as well as the pRL-TK Renilla construct and were given i.p. injections of vehicle corn oil (CO) or 80 mg/kg MC. Rats were euthanized 6, 24, or 72 h later as indicated. Hepatic lysates were prepared from each rat, and firefly luciferase activity was measured and normalized to Renilla luciferase activity. Results for MC-treated rats are expressed as a percentage of the mean for the vehicle-treated controls at each time point. Each bar represents the mean ± S.D. of determinations from three or four rats. Significant differences from vehicle-treated rats at a given time point, based on a two-tailed Student's t test for pGL3-Basic luciferase data, and a one-tailed Student's t test for all CYP2C11 constructs and pGudluc1.1 luciferase data: *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001.

For CYP2C11 constructs that were suppressed by MC at both 24 and 72 h, basal luciferase activity in vehicle-treated rats was always higher at 72 h after injection (Table 3). The opposite trend was observed for pGudluc1.1 and pGL3-Basic luciferase activity, which displayed high levels of activity at 24 h, tapering off by 72 h after treatment. All Renilla luciferase levels were relatively similar within a single plasmid group at the same time point, indicating consistent transfection efficiencies among rats. Renilla luciferase values were higher when examined at 24 h after treatment and were considerably lower by 72 h for all rats.

The effectiveness of the MC treatment was further confirmed by monitoring induction of endogenous CYP1A1 protein in rats receiving high-volume tail vein injections as a qualitative positive control response. MC markedly induced CYP1A1 protein (Fig. 2A) at all time points regardless of the plasmid administered, although the extent of induction varied between individual rats. The effects of MC administration on endogenous hepatic CYP2C11 expression in rats receiving hydrodynamics-based injections were examined at the protein level (Fig. 2, B and C). Suppression of CYP2C11 protein levels by MC was detected at 24 h (62–77% of vehicle levels); however, statistical significance was achieved only in rats receiving pGudluc1.1, (–10.1-2C11), and (–2.4-2C11). Dramatic down-regulation of CYP2C11 protein was observed at 72 h in MC-treated rats receiving pGL3-Basic, pGudluc1.1, and (–5.6-2C11) with levels falling to 24 to 54% of vehicle levels. Rats receiving (–2.4-2C11) showed no overall changes in CYP2C11 protein levels between vehicle and MC treatment at 72 h. These rats displayed high levels of variation in CYP2C11 protein with standard deviations ranging from 45 to 54% of the mean. No differences in CYP2C11 protein levels were detected between MC- and vehicle-treated rats at 6 h.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Immunoblot analysis of endogenous hepatic CYP1A1 and CYP2C11 protein levels after vehicle or MC treatment in rats receiving hydrodynamics-based injections. Rats received one of five firefly luciferase plasmids: pGL3-Basic, pGudluc1.1, (–10.1-2C11), (–5.6-2C11), or (–2.4-2C11) as well as the pRL-TK Renilla construct and were given i.p. injections of vehicle (V) or MC (M). Rats were euthanized 6, 24, or 72 h later as indicated. A, immunoblot analysis of hepatic microsomal protein (5 μg) using a CYP1A1 monoclonal antibody. B, immunoblot analysis of hepatic microsomal protein (3.5 μg) using a CYP2C11 polyclonal antibody. Representative immunoblots are shown for one rat sample selected from the three or four rats within each treatment group. C, relative quantitation of CYP2C11 apoprotein levels. Results for MC-treated rats are presented as a percentage of the mean for the vehicle-treated control rats at each time point. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. of determinations from microsomal samples isolated from three or four rats. Similar results were obtained in two or three independent immunoblot analyses. Significant differences from vehicle-treated rats at a given time point based on a one-tailed Student's t test: *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01.

As an additional qualitative positive control, MC markedly induced CYP1A1 mRNA (Fig. 3, A and B) at all time points regardless of the plasmid administered, although the extent of induction varied among individual rats. We used real-time quantitative RT-PCR to determine whether endogenous hepatic CYP2C11 mRNA expression was down-regulated by MC in rats receiving hydrodynamics-based injections (Fig. 3C). At 24 h, modest trends for CYP2C11 mRNA suppression were observed in MC-treated rats receiving high-volume injections (67–76% of vehicle levels), but statistical significance was only achieved in rats receiving (–5.6-2C11). Suppression of endogenous CYP2C11 mRNA levels was detected at 72 h in all rats (52–69% of vehicle control) except rats receiving pGL3-Basic. Statistical significance at 72 h was achieved in rats receiving pGudluc1.1 and (–10.1-2C11), because a large variation in CYP2C11 mRNA expression was observed in vehicle-treated rats receiving (–5.6-2C11) and (–2.4-2C11) (data not shown). At 6 h after treatment, no suppression of CYP2C11 mRNA levels by MC treatment was observed.

In general, CYP2C11 protein levels paralleled CYP2C11 mRNA levels (Fig. 4). A significant positive correlation was observed between endogenous CYP2C11 mRNA and protein levels in rats receiving all plasmids by high-volume tail vein injection except for rats in the (–2.4-2C11) plasmid group. For CYP2C11 constructs strongly suppressed by MC [(–10.1-2C11) and (–5.6-2C11)], luciferase activity was positively correlated with endogenous CYP2C11 mRNA levels (Fig. 5, A and B). Luciferase activity of (–2.4-2C11) was down-regulated at 24 h after MC treatment but showed a trend for an increase at 72 h, resulting in a significant negative correlation between luciferase activity and CYP2C11 mRNA expression (Fig. 5C). pGudluc1.1 luciferase activity displayed a slight trend for a negative correlation with endogenous CYP2C11 mRNA levels; however, this was not statistically significant (Fig. 5D). There was no significant relationship between pGL3-Basic luciferase activity and endogenous CYP2C11 mRNA (data not shown).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Effect of MC administration on endogenous hepatic CYP1A1 and CYP2C11 mRNA levels in rats receiving hydrodynamics-based injections. Rats received one of five firefly luciferase plasmids: pGL3-Basic, pGudluc1.1, (–10.1-2C11), (–5.6-2C11), or (–2.4-2C11) as well as the pRL-TK Renilla construct and were given i.p. injections of vehicle (V) or MC (M). Rats were euthanized 6, 24, or 72 h later as indicated. RT-PCR analysis of CYP1A1 (A) and β-actin (B) mRNA as visualized on Vistra Green-stained polyacrylamide gels. Representative results are shown for one rat sample selected from the three or four rats within each treatment group. C, relative quantitation of CYP2C11 mRNA levels as determined by real-time RT-PCR using molecular beacons. CYP2C11 signal was normalized to β-actin. Results for MC-treated rats are presented as a percentage of the mean for the vehicle-treated control rats at each time point. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. of determinations from hepatic RNA samples isolated from three or four rats. Significant differences from vehicle-treated rats at a given time point based on a one-tailed Student's t test: *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01.

Discussion

CYP2C11-luciferase constructs containing extended stretches of the 5′-flank were hydrodynamically introduced into rat hepatocytes in vivo. Our findings indicate that negative regulatory element(s) responsible for CYP2C11 reporter suppression by MC exist in the proximal 2.4-kb of the 5′-flank and that additional cis-acting elements located between –5.6 and –2.4 kb mediate persistent reporter suppression.

Endogenous CYP2C11 protein and mRNA levels are quite variable in both vehicle- and MC-treated rats receiving high-volume injections, a finding that coincides with variability in our qualitative assessment of CYP1A1 induction (Figs. 2A and 3A). This variability, together with the small numbers of animals used in this study, results in some data trends that do not achieve statistical significance. Overall there was a positive correlation between CYP2C11 mRNA and protein levels in individual rats that reached significance in all but one of the five plasmid treatment groups. This result further supports a pretranslational mechanism for the down-regulation of CYP2C11 protein by MC. The half-life of CYP2C11 mRNA in primary rat hepatocytes has been reported to be 9.8 h (Iber et al., 2000) and 16 h (Bhathena et al., 2002). Because MC is able to cause partial suppression of the rate of gene transcription within 6 h (Lee and Riddick, 2000) and blockage of transcription is not complete because of ongoing MC metabolism, we included time points that would give us a realistic window for detecting suppression of endogenous CYP2C11 and reporter plasmids: 24 and 72 h in all rats, and 6 h in rats receiving (–10.1-2C11). A prior study in our laboratory showed that maximal suppression of endogenous CYP2C11 protein and mRNA occurs between 72 and 120 h after in vivo MC treatment (Jones and Riddick, 1996). In the present study, there was an overall trend for down-regulation of endogenous CYP2C11 expression at 24 and 72 h, but not at 6 h (Figs. 2C and 3C).

Endogenous CYP2C11 levels in rats receiving high-volume injections were not uniform in their response to MC among the five plasmid groups. This difference may result if the high-volume injection itself elicits an inflammatory response in rats, stimulating the release of proinflammatory cytokines that are implicated in decreasing CYP2C11 transcription (Iber et al., 2000). Although we used procedures to generate endotoxin-free plasmids, injection of plasmids containing variable endotoxin concentrations may down-regulate endogenous CYP2C11 levels (Cheng et al., 2003) in both vehicle- and MC-treated rats. Mechanistic insight into variations in endogenous CYP2C11 levels after hydrodynamics-based injections could be gained by measuring proinflammatory cytokine and endotoxin levels in future studies. Transient hepatotoxicity is also a consequence of high-volume tail vein injection that may affect expression of endogenous CYP2C11. Serum liver enzyme levels increase transiently after high-volume tail vein injections, returning to baseline within 2 to 3 days (Liu et al., 1999; Budker et al., 2006), coinciding with normal liver morphology at 24 h after injection (Budker et al., 2006). Other biochemical markers of hepatic toxicity are unchanged after hydrodynamics-based injections (Liu et al., 1999). Although we did not measure serum liver enzymes in this study, veterinary staff observed no clinical signs of hepatotoxicity and histological analysis performed on selected animals showed good hepatocyte morphology with some small isolated foci of hepatic necrosis at 2 to 3 days after injection.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Correlation between endogenous hepatic CYP2C11 protein levels and CYP2C11 mRNA levels in rats receiving the following luciferase plasmids by hydrodynamics-based injection: (A) (–10.1-2C11), (B) (–5-6-2C11), (C) (–2.4-2C11), (D) pGL3-Basic, or (E) pGudluc1. The equations of the lines of best fit were generated by least-squares linear regression analysis. Statistical significance was determined using the two-tailed Pearson correlation test with a significance level set at p ≤ 0.05.

Interestingly, CYP2C11-luciferase plasmids strongly suppressed by MC [(–5.6-2C11) and (–10.1-2C11)] displayed a positive correlation between luciferase activity and endogenous CYP2C11 mRNA levels, indicating that luciferase activity paralleled the response of the endogenous gene. Luciferase activity of (–2.4-2C11), which was weakly suppressed by MC at 24 h, was negatively correlated with CYP2C11 mRNA expression. This correlation may be skewed by the unexpected trend for induction of this plasmid at 72 h, whereas endogenous CYP2C11 mRNA showed trends for suppression.

All of our CYP2C11-luciferase constructs were suppressed at 24 h after treatment, suggesting that TF binding sites located in the proximal 2.4 kb of the 5′-flank are required for transient suppression by MC. By 72 h after treatment, luciferase activity from the (–10.1-2C11) and (–5.6-2C11) plasmids remains down-regulated. This result suggests that negative regulatory elements located between –5.6 and –2.4 kb mediate persistent suppression by MC. Although the precise mechanism of CYP2C11 suppression remains to be elucidated, possible mechanisms can be postulated based on the presence of putative DRE-like, AHRE-II, NF-κB, STAT5, and HNF-3 sequences located in the proximal 5.6 kb of the 5′-flank (Sawaya and Riddick, 2008). We envision three possible mechanisms by which MC suppresses CYP2C11 expression: direct AHR-mediated suppression via DREs and/or AHRE-II, interference with GH signaling needed to maintain CYP2C11 transcription, and/or suppression involving inflammatory cytokines activated by MC.

The notion that CYP2C11 suppression coincided with the stimulation of AHR-mediated responses was first introduced in structure-activity relationship studies (reviewed in Riddick et al., 2003). Our laboratory demonstrated that the transformed AHR binds with high affinity to a DRE-like sequence at positions –1546 to –1533 of the CYP2C11 5′-flank (Bhathena et al., 2002). A functional role for this DRE in the paradoxical induction of CYP2C11-luciferase activity by TCDD and MC in HepG2 cells was determined by site-directed mutagenesis (Sawaya and Riddick, 2008). Multiple DRE-like elements and/or the AHRE-II motif located in the proximal 5.6-kb of the CYP2C11 5′-flank may function as inhibitory DREs, which confer AHR-mediated suppression of other genes after TCDD treatment (reviewed in Riddick et al., 2003). To verify the involvement of the AHR in suppression of our CYP2C11-luciferase constructs we attempted, but did not succeed, to antagonize the receptor in vivo using the AHR antagonist/partial agonist α-naphthoflavone (data not shown).

The second mechanistic possibility involves interference by MC with hormonal signaling pathways involved in CYP2C11 expression. The mechanisms behind suppression of numerous P450s after aromatic hydrocarbon treatment are unknown (Kurose et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2006; Ovando et al., 2006; Ning et al., 2008), but several components of the GH receptor/Janus kinase 2/STAT5b pathway have been shown to be targets for disruption by MC in mice (Nukaya et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2006). In hypophysectomized male rats, MC interferes with the ability of exogenous GH to stimulate hepatic CYP2C11 expression (Timsit and Riddick, 2000). Ethylbenzene, a simple aromatic hydrocarbon, can decrease CYP2C11 protein only in intact but not in hypophysectomized rats (Serron et al., 2001). Such findings suggest that CYP2C11 down-regulation by aromatic hydrocarbons may occur by a mechanism that disrupts the ability of GH to maintain constitutive CYP2C11 expression.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Correlation between hepatic luciferase activity and endogenous CYP2C11 mRNA levels in rats receiving the following luciferase plasmids by hydrodynamics-based injection: (A) (–10.1-2C11), (B) (–5.6-2C11), (C) (–2.4-2C11), or (D) pGudluc1. The equations of the lines of best fit were generated by least-squares linear regression analysis. Statistical significance was determined using the two-tailed Pearson correlation test with a significance level set at p ≤ 0.05.

A third possible mechanism of MC-mediated CYP2C11 suppression involves inflammatory cytokines. Increased NF-κB binding activity and protein levels have been reported after exposure to the PAH benzo[a]pyrene (Weng et al., 2004). Inflammatory cytokines activated by MC could act to suppress our constructs by directly binding to NF-κB-responsive elements on the CYP2C11 5′-flank (Iber et al., 2000) or by interfering with GH signaling (Ahmed et al., 2007).

Previous studies of our CYP2C11-luciferase constructs in HepG2 cells revealed paradoxical induction of the reporter gene that is AHR-dependent and DRE-mediated (Sawaya and Riddick, 2008). Conversely, we found that these same reporter plasmids were suppressed by MC treatment when studied in the living rat, a response that is analogous to the behavior of the endogenous CYP2C11 gene. Similarly, Sasaki et al. (1999) found that studying GH regulation of rat CYP2C12 reporter constructs in living rats was more mechanistically accurate than studying these constructs in HepG2 cells. Reporter gene results obtained in cell lines may not reliably predict in vivo responses of the endogenous gene to xenobiotic treatment.

Studying mechanisms of CYP2C11 suppression has useful implications from both a clinical and molecular viewpoint. P450 suppression is of clinical significance as shown by altered drug toxicity in patients during inflammatory conditions (Morgan et al., 2008). Although the sex difference in hepatic P450 expression is not as obvious in humans as in rats, it does exist and appears to be under hormonal control (Dhir et al., 2006). Recently, human CYP2C8 was shown to be down-regulated in primary human hepatocytes treated with MC (Ning et al., 2008). Consequently, studies of molecular mechanisms involved in control of rat P450s have the potential to reveal fundamental mechanistic pathways that could be conserved in other mammals. We plan to use CYP2C11 as a model system to understand how PAHs decrease the transcription of other hormonally regulated genes.

This is the first demonstration of aromatic hydrocarbon-mediated suppression of a CYP2C11-luciferase construct in any biological system. Sequences responsible for CYP2C11 reporter suppression by MC exist in the proximal 2.4 kb of the 5′-flank and additional cis-acting elements located between –5.6 and –2.4 kb mediate persistent reporter suppression. Additional deletion constructs and site-directed mutants introduced to living rats by the hydrodynamics approach will more precisely define the sequences mediating suppression, whereas in vivo chromatin immunoprecipitation assays will allow us to study protein-DNA interactions in the CYP2C11 gene in its native chromosomal context. To determine whether pituitary factors are required to mediate suppression by MC, CYP2C11-luciferase constructs should be studied in hypophysectomized rats with or without GH replacement. The involvement of the AHR in reporter suppression may be verified with the use of an effective in vivo AHR antagonist in the rat.

Acknowledgments

We thank the following individuals for contribution to this work: Chunja Lee and Frank Giuliano for skilled technical assistance; Paul Boutros for bioinformatics support; Dr. Rachel Tyndale, Dr. Patricia Harper, Dr. Peter Wells, Anne Mullen Grey, and Dr. Ivy Moffat for valuable discussions; Dr. Philip Seeman for use of the MX4000 real-time PCR machine; Dr. Michael Denison (University of California, Davis, CA) for providing the pGudluc1.1 plasmid; Dr. Anahita Bhathena for use of the (–2.4-2C11) plasmid; Dr. Edward Morgan (Emory University, Atlanta, GA) and Dr. Harry Gelboin (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) for the generous gift of antibodies.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant MOP-42399 (to D.S.R.).

  • Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org.

  • doi:10.1124/dmd.108.020966.

  • ABBREVIATIONS: PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; MC, 3-methylcholanthrene; P450, cytochrome P450; AHR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; ARNT, aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator; TF, transcription factor; DRE, dioxin-responsive element; GH, growth hormone; STAT5, signal transducer and activator of transcription 5; HNF, hepatocyte nuclear factor; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; kb, kilobase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, reverse transcription; NF, nuclear factor.

    • Received February 12, 2008.
    • Accepted June 3, 2008.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    Ahmed TA, Buzzelli MD, Lang CH, Capen JB, Shumate ML, Navaratnarajah M, Nagarajan M, and Cooney RN (2007) Interleukin-6 inhibits growth hormone-mediated gene expression in hepatocytes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292: G1793–G1803.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Bhathena A, Lee C, and Riddick DS (2002) Suppression of cytochrome P450 2C11 by aromatic hydrocarbons: mechanistic insights from studies of the 5′-flanking region of the CYP2C11 gene. Drug Metab Dispos 30: 1385–1392.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Boutros PC, Moffat ID, Franc MA, Tijet N, Tuomisto J, Pohjanvirta R, and Okey AB (2004) Dioxin-responsive AHRE-II gene battery: identification by phylogenetic footprinting. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 321: 707–715.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Budker VG, Subbotin VM, Budker T, Sebestyén MG, Zhang G, and Wolff JA (2006) Mechanism of plasmid delivery by hydrodynamic tail vein injection. II. Morphological studies. J Gene Med 8: 874–888.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Caron E, Rioux N, Nicolas O, Lebel-Talbot H, and Hamelin BA (2005) Quantification of the expression and inducibility of 12 rat cytochrome P450 isoforms by quantitative RT-PCR. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 19: 368–378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Cheng PY, Wang M, and Morgan ET (2003) Rapid transcriptional suppression of rat cytochrome P450 genes by endotoxin treatment and its inhibition by curcumin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 307: 1205–1212.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Dhir RN, Dworakowski W, Thangavel C, and Shapiro BH (2006) Sexually dimorphic regulation of hepatic isoforms of human cytochrome P450 by growth hormone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 316: 87–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Franc MA, Pohjanvirta R, Tuomisto J, and Okey AB (2001) In vivo up-regulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor expression by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in a dioxin-resistant rat model. Biochem Pharmacol 62: 1565–1578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Garrison PM, Tullis K, Aarts JMMJG, Brouwer A, Giesy JP, and Denison MS (1996) Species-specific recombinant cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-like chemicals. Fundam Appl Toxicol 30: 194-203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Holloway MG, Laz EV, and Waxman DJ (2006) Codependence of growth hormone-responsive, sexually dimorphic hepatic gene expression on signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b and hepatic nuclear factor-4α. Mol Endocrinol 20: 647–660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Iber H, Chen Q, Cheng PY, and Morgan ET (2000) Suppression of CYP2C11 gene transcription by interleukin-1 mediated by NF-κB binding at the transcription start site. Arch Biochem Biophys 377: 187–194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Jones EJ and Riddick DS (1996) Regulation of constitutive rat hepatic cytochromes P450 by 3-methylcholanthrene. Xenobiotica 26: 995–1012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    Kurose K, Tohkin M, Ushio F, and Fukuhara M (1998) Cloning and characterization of Syrian hamster testosterone 7α-hydroxylase, CYP2A9. Arch Biochem Biophys 351: 60–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Lee BM and Shim GA (2007) Dietary exposure estimation of benzo[a]pyrene and cancer risk assessment. J Toxicol Environ Health A 70: 1391–1394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Lee C, Hutson JR, Tzau VK-F, and Riddick DS (2006) Regulation of constitutive mouse hepatic cytochromes P450 and growth hormone signaling components by 3-methylcholanthrene. Drug Metab Dispos 34: 1530–1538.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Lee C and Riddick DS (2000) Transcriptional suppression of cytochrome P4502C11 gene expression by 3-methylcholanthrene. Biochem Pharmacol 59: 1417–1423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Liu F, Song Y, and Liu D (1999) Hydrodynamics-based transfection in animals by systemic administration of plasmid DNA. Gene Ther 6: 1258–1266.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Maruyama H, Higuchi N, Nishikawa Y, Kameda S, Iino N, Kazama JJ, Takahashi N, Sugawa M, Hanawa H, Tada N, et al. (2002) High-level expression of naked DNA delivered to rat liver via tail vein injection. J Gene Med 4: 333–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    McCluskey SA, Racz WJ, and Marks GS (1986) Properties of 17- to 19-day old chick embryo liver microsomes: induction of cytochrome P-450, effect of storage at low temperature, and resistance to lipid peroxidation. J Pharmacol Methods 16: 111–123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Morgan ET, Goralski KB, Piquette-Miller M, Renton KW, Robertson GR, Chaluvadi MR, Charles KA, Clarke SJ, Kacevska M, Liddle C, et al. (2008) Regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters in infection, inflammation, and cancer. Drug Metab Dispos 36: 205–216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Morgan ET, MacGeoch C, and Gustafsson J-A (1985) Sexual differentiation of cytochrome P450 in rat liver: evidence for a constitutive isozyme as the male-specific 16α-hydroxylase. Mol Pharmacol 27: 471–479.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  23. ↵
    Ning B, Dial S, Sun Y, Wang J, Yang J, and Guo L (2008) Systematic and simultaneous gene profiling of 84 drug-metabolizing genes in primary human hepatocytes. J Biomol Screen 13: 194-201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Nukaya M, Takahashi Y, Gonzalez FJ, and Kamataki T (2004) Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated suppression of GH receptor and Janus kinase 2 expression in mice. FEBS Lett 558: 96–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Okey AB, Riddick DS, and Harper PA (1994) The Ah receptor: mediator of the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds. Toxicol Lett 70: 1-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Ovando BJ, Vezina CM, McGarrigle BP, and Olson JR (2006) Hepatic gene down-regulation following acute and subchronic exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol Sci 94: 428–438.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Park SH and Waxman DJ (2001) Inhibitory cross-talk between STAT5b and liver nuclear factor HNF3β: impact on the regulation of growth hormone pulse-stimulated, male-specific liver cytochrome P-450 gene expression. J Biol Chem 276: 43031–43039.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Riddick DS, Lee C, Bhathena A, and Timsit YE (2003) The 2001 Veylien Henderson Award of the Society of Toxicology of Canada: positive and negative transcriptional regulation of cytochromes P450 by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 81: 59–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Riddick DS, Lee C, Bhathena A, Timsit YE, Cheng PY, Morgan ET, Prough RA, Ripp SL, Michael Miller KK, Jahan A, et al. (2004) Transcriptional suppression of cytochrome P450 genes by endogenous and exogenous chemicals. Drug Metab Dispos 32: 367–375.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Sasaki Y, Takahashi Y, Nakayama K, and Kamataki T (1999) Cooperative regulation of CYP2C12 gene expression by STAT5 and liver-specific factors in female rats. J Biol Chem 274: 37117–37124.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Sawaya RM and Riddick DS (2008) Cytochrome P450 2C11 5′-flanking region and promoter: regulation by aromatic hydrocarbons in vitro. Toxicology 248: 104–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Serron SC, Zhang S, Bergeron RM, and Backes WL (2001) Effect of hypophysectomy and growth hormone replacement on the modulation of P450 expression after treatment with the aromatic hydrocarbon ethylbenzene. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 172: 163–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Shaban Z, Soliman M, El-Shazly S, El-Bohi K, Abdelazeez A, Kehelo K, Kim HS, Muzandu K, Ishizuka M, Kazusaka A, et al. (2005) AhR and PPARα: antagonistic effects on CYP2B and CYP3A, and additive inhibitory effects on CYP2C11. Xenobiotica 35: 51–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Simon P (2003) Q-Gene: processing quantitative real-time RT-PCR data. Bioinformatics 19: 1439–1440.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Sogawa K, Numayama-Tsuruta K, Takahashi T, Matsushita N, Miura C, Nikawa J, Gotoh O, Kikuchi Y, and Fujii-Kuriyama Y (2004) A novel induction mechanism of the rat CYP1A2 gene mediated by Ah receptor·Arnt heterodimer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 318: 746–755.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Tijet N, Boutros PC, Moffat ID, Okey AB, Tuomisto J, and Pohjanvirta R (2006) Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates distinct dioxin-dependent and dioxin-independent gene batteries. Mol Pharmacol 69: 140–153.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Timsit YE and Riddick DS (2000) Interference with growth hormone stimulation of hepatic cytochrome P450 2C11 expression in hypophysectomized male rats by 3-methylcholanthrene. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 163: 105–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Timsit YE and Riddick DS (2002) Stimulation of hepatic signal transducer and activator of transcription 5b by GH is not altered by 3-methylcholanthrene. Endocrinology 143: 3284–3294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Waxman DJ and O'Connor C (2006) Growth hormone regulation of sex-dependent liver gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 20: 2613–2629.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Weng MW, Hsiao YM, Chen CJ, Wang JP, Chen WC, and Ko JL (2004) Benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide up-regulates COX-2 expression through NF-κB in rat astrocytes. Toxicol Lett 151: 345–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 36 (9)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 36, Issue 9
1 Sep 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cytochrome P450 2C11 5′-Flanking Region and Promoter Mediate in Vivo Suppression by 3-Methylcholanthrene
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Cytochrome P450 2C11 5′-Flanking Region and Promoter Mediate in Vivo Suppression by 3-Methylcholanthrene

Rana M. Sawaya and David S. Riddick
Drug Metabolism and Disposition September 1, 2008, 36 (9) 1803-1811; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.108.020966

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Cytochrome P450 2C11 5′-Flanking Region and Promoter Mediate in Vivo Suppression by 3-Methylcholanthrene

Rana M. Sawaya and David S. Riddick
Drug Metabolism and Disposition September 1, 2008, 36 (9) 1803-1811; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.108.020966
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Role of Human MSRA on Sulindac Activation
  • Determination of Acyl-, O-, and N-Glucuronide
  • TMDD Affects PK of IL-10 Fc-fusion Proteins
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics