Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Rapid CommunicationShort Communication

Inhibition of Morphine Metabolism by Ketamine

Xiaoxin Qi, Allan M. Evans, Jiping Wang, John O. Miners, Richard N. Upton and Robert W. Milne
Drug Metabolism and Disposition May 2010, 38 (5) 728-731; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.109.030957
Xiaoxin Qi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allan M. Evans
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiping Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John O. Miners
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard N. Upton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert W. Milne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Clinical observation of a synergistic effect of ketamine on morphine analgesia remains controversial. Although a pharmacodynamic basis for an interaction has been explored in animal and clinical studies, the possibility of a pharmacokinetic mechanism has not been investigated. Whereas both morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide are effective analgesics, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) lacks activity. Thus, changes in the metabolism and disposition of morphine may result in an altered response. First, we investigated the interaction between morphine and ketamine in the isolated perfused rat liver preparation. The clearance of morphine was decreased from 16.8 ± 4.6 ml/min in the control period to 7.7 ± 2.8 ml/min in the ketamine-treatment period, with the formation clearance of M3G decreasing from 8.0 ± 4.1 ml/min to 2.1 ± 1.1 ml/min. Fractional conversion of morphine to M3G was significantly decreased from 0.46 ± 0.17 in the control period to 0.28 ± 0.14 upon the addition of ketamine. The possible mechanism of the interaction was further investigated in vitro with rat liver microsomes as the enzyme source. The formation of M3G followed single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten kinetics, with a mean apparent Km of 2.18 ± 0.45 mM and Vmax of 8.67 ± 0.59 nmol/min/mg. Ketamine inhibited morphine 3-glucuronidation noncompetitively, with a mean Ki value of 33.3 ± 7.9 μM. The results demonstrate that ketamine inhibits the glucuronidation of morphine in a rat model.

Ketamine [2-(O-chlorohenyl)-2-(methylamino)cyclohexanone] is a noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist that is used as both an anesthetic and analgesic agent (Fratta et al., 1980). In recent years, there have been conflicting clinical reports on whether ketamine enhances the analgesic effects of morphine. Several researchers indicated that concurrent use of morphine and ketamine prolonged the duration of morphine-induced analgesia and reduced the consumption and adverse effects of morphine in patients (Bell, 1999; Kannan et al., 2002; Galinski et al., 2007), whereas others reported no additional value when the two were combined for postoperative analgesia (Sakata et al., 2007; Jensen et al., 2008).

The μ-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (10 mg/kg) reversed ketamine-induced analgesia in rodents (Ryder et al., 1978), similar to its effect on morphine analgesia. However, Fratta et al. (1980) indicated that ketamine did not interact with opioid receptors. Animal studies that were used to investigate the interaction between morphine and ketamine suggested that a part of the analgesic action of ketamine was achieved through a mechanism similar to that of morphine (Smith et al., 1987). Discussions regarding the mechanism of the morphine-ketamine interaction have focused on either pharmacodynamic effects or clinical observations. However, a potential pharmacokinetic mechanism for the interaction has not been explored.

Morphine undergoes extensive hepatic extraction and metabolism. More than 50% of an oral dose given to humans and rodents is excreted in urine as morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G). Approximately 10% is excreted as morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) in man and in several other species, but not in rats (Milne et al., 1996). M6G is a potent μ-receptor agonist, whereas M3G may antagonize the antinociceptive action of morphine and M6G (Milne et al., 1996). Thus, it is possible that altered morphine clearance and formation of morphine glucuronides may influence the pharmacological effect of morphine.

Pharmacokinetic interactions may be examined in vivo and in vitro, the latter using isolated organs and microsomal or cellular preparations. Isolated perfused livers (IPL) allow evaluation of dispositional and metabolic interactions, whereas rat liver microsomal preparations can be used to test for the latter based on interactions at the enzymatic level. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of ketamine on the metabolism and disposition of morphine by using the isolated perfused rat liver and rat hepatic microsomes.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals.

Morphine (morphine HCl · 3H2O; McFarlane Smith, Edinburgh, UK), ketamine (Parnell Laboratories Pty Ltd., Alexandria, NSW, Australia), bovine serum albumin (ICN Biomedicals Inc., Aurora, OH), and uridine 5′-diphosphoglucuronic acid (UDPGA), alamethicin, sodium taurocholate, and M3G (all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were used as supplied. Other chemicals were of analytical grade and were purchased commercially.

Isolated Perfused Liver Preparation.

The study was approved by the Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science (IMVS) Animal Ethics Committee (Adelaide, Australia). Five male Sprague-Dawley rat (310–360 g; IMVS, Adelaide, Australia) livers were isolated and perfused in a single-pass mode (Milne et al., 1997). Anesthesia was induced with 60 mg/kg sodium pentobarbitone. Drug-free Krebs-bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.4) that contained 16.5 mM glucose and 8.33 μM sodium taurocholate was pumped (30 ml/min) into the liver via the portal vein. After equilibration for 20 min, medium that contained 6.7 μM morphine was perfused (0–30 min), and the perfusate (1 ml) was collected from the cannulated vena cava at 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min. The medium was then changed to one that contained both 6.7 μM morphine and 21 μM ketamine (30–70 min). Perfusate was collected at 31, 32, and 35 min and every 5 min thereafter up to 70 min. All bile was collected at 5-min intervals. In addition, two rat livers were perfused with medium containing 6.7 μM morphine for 70 min after a 20-min period of equilibration. Liver viability was monitored by assessing its gross appearance (uniformly perfused), bile flow (>5 μl/min), and the recovery of venous perfusate (>98% of the volume of inflowing perfusing medium).

The perfusate and bile (diluted 1 in 1000 with water) samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with fluorescence detection (excitation at 280 nm, emission at 335 nm). Samples were directly injected onto a C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm; Alltech Associates, Inc., Deerfield, IL), with a C18 guard column (7.5 × 3.2 mm; Grace, Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia), in an oven set at 45°C. A mobile phase consisting of 2.5% acetonitrile and 97.5% phosphate buffer (20 mM) was used at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Under these conditions, the retention times for M3G and morphine were 5.9 and 17.3 min, respectively. Calibration curves were linear (r2 > 0.999) for morphine (0.27–6.67 μM) and M3G (0.11–4.88 μM) in perfusate and bile. Accuracy and precision for measuring quality controls that spanned the range for the calibration standards were within 20%.

Measurement of Microsomal M3G Formation.

Microsomes were prepared as described by Lear et al. (1991) and stored at −70°C until use. They were preincubated with alamethicin (50 μg/mg protein) on ice for 30 min. Duplicate incubations consisting of microsomes (1 mg protein/ml), 5 mM MgCl2 morphine, 0.1 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and 5 mM UDPGA in a total volume of 0.2 ml were performed at 37°C for 45 min. The reaction rate was linear with incubation time up to 60 min and protein concentration up to 2 mg/ml. The reaction was terminated by adding 0.2 ml of ice-cold HClO4 (0.1 M) and cooling on ice. Samples were centrifuged at 10,000g for 10 min. Formed M3G was quantified by using the same high-performance liquid chromatography system with a UV detector set at 210 nm. Supernatant was injected onto the same column and precolumn as described for the IPL but at ambient temperature. A mobile phase consisting 3% of acetonitrile and 97% of phosphate buffer (20 mM) was used at 1 ml/min. The retention time of M3G was 6.8 min. Calibration curves were linear (r2 > 0.996) for M3G (0.005–2.6 μM). The accuracy and precision of quality controls were less than 25%. The intraday coefficient of variation at the lower limit of quantitation (0.005 μM) was within 8%.

To determine the Km and Vmax values for M3G formation, duplicate incubations were performed with concentrations of morphine in the range of 0.05 to 10 mM. The effect of ketamine on M3G formation was assessed at four concentrations of morphine (0.25, 0.5, 1, or 1.5 mM), in the absence (control) or presence of ketamine (20, 50, and 100 μM).

Calculations and Statistical Analysis.

Experiments with the IPL.

Data from the control period (20–30 min) and from the ketamine-treatment period (60–70 min) were used for calculation of the following pharmacokinetic parameters:

  • Availability of morphine (F):

    • F=Cout/Cin

    where Cin and Cout are the concentrations of morphine in inflowing perfusing medium and outflowing perfusate, respectively.

  • Hepatic clearance of morphine (CLH,M):

    • CLH,M = CLH,M=(Cin−Cout)×QCin

    where Q is the flow rate of perfusing medium.

  • Formation clearance of M3G (CLf):

    • CLf = CLf=(Rperf+Rbil)Cin

    where Rperf and Rbil are the rates of recovery of M3G in perfusate and bile, respectively.

  • The biliary extraction ratio of hepatically formed M3G (Eb,M3G):

    • Eb,M3G = Eb,M3G=Rbil(Rbil+Rperf)

  • Fractional conversion of morphine to M3G (FCM→M3G):

    • FCM→M3 = CLf/CLH,M

Pharmacokinetic parameters are presented as mean ± S.D. Comparisons between periods were made by paired Student's t test, and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Measurement of M3G Formation.

In vitro kinetic constants are expressed as mean ± S.D. Initial estimates of apparent Km and Vmax for M3G formation were obtained from graphical analysis of Eadie-Hofstee plots. The single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten equation was fitted to untransformed data by using Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). Ki values were similarly obtained by fitting with the expression for noncompetitive inhibition.

Results and Discussion

The studies presented here provide compelling evidence that ketamine inhibits the conversion of morphine to M3G in rat liver. Morphine and M3G appeared rapidly in the outflowing perfusate and attained steady-state within 10 min of commencing perfusion with morphine alone. Upon addition of ketamine, the concentrations of M3G in the outflowing perfusate decreased markedly, whereas those for morphine increased (Fig. 1), and an additional 10 to 15 min was required before a new steady-state for M3G and morphine was reached in the outflowing perfusate. In contrast, the concentrations of morphine and M3G in the outflowing perfusate remained constant beyond the 20 min during perfusion of the two livers with morphine alone for the entire 70 min (Fig. 1). M3G was excreted extensively in bile. The rate of M3G excretion was constant after 15 min, but it decreased by approximately 75% after the addition of ketamine. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters during the control and ketamine-treatment periods are summarized in Table 1. Ketamine decreased the clearance of morphine by 54% (p < 0.05). Hepatic cellular uptake of morphine is partly achieved by an active carrier-mediated system, but with passive diffusion playing an important role after the saturation of transporters beyond 200 μM morphine (Iwamoto et al., 1978). Liver was perfused here with 6.7 μM morphine. Thus, the reduction in hepatic clearance of morphine may result from inhibition by ketamine of the active uptake of morphine or from a reduction in the biotransformation of morphine.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Concentrations (mean ± S.D.) of morphine and M3G in outflowing perfusate during perfusion with 6.7 μM morphine (0–30 min) and 6.7 μM morphine plus 21 μM ketamine (30–70 min). Dotted lines show the mean concentrations of morphine and M3G in the two additional rats perfused with morphine throughout 70 min. Solid horizontal line shows the concentration of morphine in the inflow perfusate (6.7 μM).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± S.D.) for morphine and M3G in the isolated perfused rat liver during perfusion with morphine alone or morphine plus ketamine

The permeability of M3G through the lipophilic environment of cellular membrane is apparently limited by its polarity. The uptake of M3G from sinusoids to the hepatocytes is negligible compared with the flux of hepatically formed M3G in the opposite direction. The greater efflux is driven by its accumulation within liver cells after formation from morphine (Evans et al., 1999). Efflux of M3G across the sinusoidal membrane is mediated by multidrug resistance protein (Mrp) 3, whereas efflux across the canalicular membrane is mediated by Mrp2 (van de Wetering et al., 2007). M3G was excreted extensively into bile, but no morphine was detected. The unchanged biliary extraction ratio of M3G suggests that ketamine does not affect M3G efflux, or Mrp2 and Mrp3 are both inhibited to a similar extent.

The fractional conversion of morphine to M3G was significantly impaired in the presence of ketamine (0.46 versus 0.28, p < 0.05) (Table 1). If ketamine simply blocked hepatic uptake of morphine, the fractional conversion of morphine should remain unchanged. Therefore, it would seem that inhibition of uptake is unlikely to be the only mechanism for the interaction between morphine and ketamine. In addition, the reduced fractional conversion of morphine to M3G suggests that biotransformation of morphine to M3G may be reduced to a greater extent than other metabolic pathways, such as the formation of normorphine (Blanck et al., 1990). To investigate the interaction between morphine and ketamine further, additional experiments examined the impact of ketamine on the formation of M3G by rat liver microsomes.

Glucuronidation, catalyzed by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT), is the most important conjugation reaction in drug biotransformation (Miners and Mackenzie, 1991). Morphine is extensively metabolized in the liver to one or more glucuronides, depending on the species (Milne et al., 1996), but M3G is the only glucuronide formed from natural (−)-morphine by rat microsomal UGTs (Rane et al., 1985). At least two forms of rat liver UGT are involved in the formation of M3G (Ishii et al., 1997). UGT2B7 is the major human UGT that catalyzes the formation of morphine glucuronides (Stone et al., 2003), but recombinant human UGT1A1 and 1A8 are also known to form M3G (Ohno et al., 2008). However, their activities are low compared with UGT2B7, and UGT1A8 is not expressed in the liver. Figure 2a shows a representative Eadie-Hofstee plot for the formation of M3G by activated rat liver microsomes. M3G formation was well described by the single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten equation, with a mean apparent Km of 2.18 ± 0.45 mM and Vmax of 8.67 ± 0.59 nmol/min/mg.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

a, representative Eadie-Hofstee plot for M3G formation by rat liver microsomes. b, representative Dixon plot showing the inhibitory effect of ketamine on the rate of formation of M3G from morphine. The number beside each line shows the concentration of morphine (mM).

Figure 2b shows that ketamine inhibited the formation of M3G in a noncompetitive manner, with a mean apparent Ki of 33.3 ± 7.9 μM. This result was an unexpected finding given that there was no previous evidence that ketamine was capable of inhibiting drug glucuronidation. Ketamine is metabolized primarily via N-demethylation to norketamine by cytochrome P450 (White and Ryan, 1996). The data suggest that ketamine may occupy a site on the UGT(s), which causes a reduction in the formation of M3G. Overall, it can be concluded that the inhibitory effect of ketamine on the formation of M3G by UGT accounted for the interaction observed between these two compounds in the IPL.

Projean et al. (2003) examined the pharmacokinetics of morphine in rats after intravenous administration of 10 μmol/kg and found that the concentrations of morphine were maintained above 2 μM for up to 1 h. Another study investigated the analgesic effect of morphine in rats and showed that 3.3 μmol/kg morphine (s.c.) provided a delay in the tail-flick reaction time for approximately 2.5 h (Stain et al., 1995). In the IPL, the inflow concentration of morphine in the perfusion medium was 6.7 μM in the control period, which is of the same magnitude as the concentration providing analgesia in rats. A biodisposition study of ketamine in rats showed that the concentration of ketamine was approximately 105 and 16.8 μM in liver and plasma 20 min after an intravenous dose of 12.6 μmol/kg. With this dosage, the analgesia from ketamine can be maintained for up to 30 min (Marietta et al., 1976). The concentration of ketamine perfusing the liver in our study was similar to the concentration required to achieve analgesia in rats.

Ketamine in perfusate at a concentration of approximately three times that of morphine caused a 50% reduction in its hepatic clearance. In contrast, the concentration of ketamine used in the microsomal study was approximately 4% of the concentration of morphine. The differences in inhibitory capacity in these two experimental systems might be due to hepatic distributional barriers for ketamine and its extensive metabolism and removal in perfused liver, nonspecific binding of ketamine in microsomes, and/or the inhibitory effects of endogenous inhibitors of glucuronidation present in microsomal incubations (Miners et al., 2010).

In conclusion, this study has shown that ketamine reduces the hepatic clearance of morphine, most likely due to inhibition of the hepatic UGT(s) that catalyze M3G formation. Because M3G and M6G have different pharmacological activities, it is possible that the controversial observation in patients could be partly explained by the change in ratio of M3G and/or M6G to morphine in the body. However, other inhibitory mechanisms of ketamine that cause the interaction with morphine cannot be ruled out. Whether ketamine is capable of inhibiting the glucuronidation of other drugs when the two drugs are coadministered in vivo warrants investigation.

Footnotes

  • Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org.

    doi:10.1124/dmd.109.030957.

  • ABBREVIATIONS:

    M3G
    morphine-3-glucuronide
    M6G
    morphine-6-glucuronide
    IPL
    isolated perfused liver
    UDPGA
    uridine 5′-diphosphoglucuronic acid
    Mrp
    multidrug resistance protein
    UGT
    UDP-glucuronosyltransferase.

    • Received October 28, 2009.
    • Accepted February 2, 2010.
  • Copyright © 2010 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bell RF
    (1999) Low-dose subcutaneous ketamine infusion and morphine tolerance. Pain 83:101–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Blanck A,
    2. Hansson T,
    3. Näslund B,
    4. Rane A
    (1990) Sex differences and endocrine regulation of morphine oxidation in rat liver. Biochem Pharmacol 39:1820–1822.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Evans AM,
    2. O'Brien J,
    3. Nation RL
    (1999) Application of a loading wash-out method for investigating the hepatocellular efflux of a hepatically-generated metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide. J Pharm Pharmacol 51:1289–1297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Fratta W,
    2. Casu M,
    3. Balestrieri A,
    4. Loviselli A,
    5. Biggio G,
    6. Gessa GL
    (1980) Failure of ketamine to interact with opiate receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 61:389–391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Galinski M,
    2. Dolveck F,
    3. Combes X,
    4. Limoges V,
    5. Smail N,
    6. Pommier V,
    7. Templier F,
    8. Catineau J,
    9. Lapostolle F,
    10. Adnet F
    (2007) Management of severe acute pain in emergency settings: ketamine reduces morphine consumption. Am J Emergen Med 25:385–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Ishii Y,
    2. Takami A,
    3. Tsuruda K,
    4. Kurogi A,
    5. Yamada H,
    6. Oguri K
    (1997) Induction of two UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms sensitive to phenobarbital that are involved in morphine glucuronidation: production of isoform-selective antipeptide antibodies toward UGT1.1r and UGT2B1. Drug Metab Dispos 25:163–167.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Iwamoto K,
    2. Eaton DL,
    3. Klaassen CD
    (1978) Uptake of morphine and nalorphine by isolated rat hepatocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 206:181–189.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Jensen LL,
    2. Handberg G,
    3. Helbo-Hansen HS,
    4. Skaarup I,
    5. Lohse T,
    6. Munk T,
    7. Lund N
    (2008) No morphine sparing effect of ketamine added to morphine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after uterine artery embolization. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 52:479–486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Kannan TR,
    2. Saxena A,
    3. Bhatnagar S,
    4. Barry A
    (2002) Oral ketamine as an adjuvant to oral morphine for neuropathic pain in cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 23:60–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Lear L,
    2. Nation RL,
    3. Stupans I
    (1991) Influence of morphine concentration on detergent activation of rat liver morphine-UDP-glucuronosyltransferase. Biochem Pharmacol 42:S55–S60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Marietta MP,
    2. White PF,
    3. Pudwill CR,
    4. Way WL,
    5. Trevor AJ
    (1976) Biodisposition of ketamine in the rat: self-induction of metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 196:536–544.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Milne RW,
    2. Jensen RH,
    3. Larsen C,
    4. Evans AM,
    5. Nation RL
    (1997) Comparison of the disposition of hepatically-generated morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide in isolated perfused liver from the guinea pig. Pharm Res 14:1014–1018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Milne RW,
    2. Nation RL,
    3. Somogyi AA
    (1996) The disposition of morphine and its 3- and 6-glucuronide metabolites in humans and animals, and the importance of the metabolites to the pharmacological effects of morphine. Drug Metab Revs 28:345–472.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Miners JO,
    2. Mackenzie PI
    (1991) Drug glucuronidation in humans. Pharmacol Ther 51:347–369.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Miners JO,
    2. Mackenzie PI,
    3. Knights KM
    (2010) The prediction of drug glucuronidation parameters in humans: UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzyme selective substrate and inhibitor probes for reaction phenotyping and in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of drug clearance and drug-drug interaction potential. Drug Metab Rev 42:189–201.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Ohno S,
    2. Kawana K,
    3. Nakajin S
    (2008) Contribution of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 and 1A8 to morphine-6-glucuronidation and its kinetic properties. Drug Metab Dispos 36:688–694.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Projean D,
    2. Tu TM,
    3. Ducharme J
    (2003) Rapid and simple method to determine morphine and its metabolites in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 787:243–253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Rane A,
    2. Gawronska-Szklarz B,
    3. Svensson JO
    (1985) Natural (−)- and unnatural (+)-enantiomers of morphine: comparative metabolism and effect of morphine and phenobarbital treatment. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 234:761–765.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Ryder S,
    2. Way WL,
    3. Trevor AJ
    (1978) Comparative pharmacology of the optical isomers of ketamine in mice. Eur J Pharmacol 49:15–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Sakata RK,
    2. Issy AM,
    3. Garcia JBS,
    4. Martins DC,
    5. Memoria EV
    (2007) No effect of 10 mg of oral S(+)-ketamine combined with morphine on postoperative analgesia. Acute Pain 9:153–158.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Smith DJ,
    2. Bouchal RL,
    3. deSanctis CA,
    4. Monroe PJ,
    5. Amedro JB,
    6. Perrotti JM,
    7. Crisp T
    (1987) Properties of the interaction between ketamine and opiate binding sites in vivo and in vitro. Neuropharmacology 26:1253–1260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Stain F,
    2. Barjavel MJ,
    3. Sandouk P,
    4. Plotkine M,
    5. Scherrmann JM,
    6. Bhargava HN
    (1995) Analgesic response and plasma and brain extracellular fluid pharmacokinetics of morphine and morphine-6-beta-d-glucuronide in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274:852–857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Stone AN,
    2. Mackenzie PI,
    3. Galetin A,
    4. Houston JB,
    5. Miners JO
    (2003) Isoform selectivity and kinetics of morphine 3- and 6-glucuronidation by human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: evidence for atypical glucuronidation kinetics by UGT2B7. Drug Metab Dispos 31:1086–1089.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. van de Wetering K,
    2. Zelcer N,
    3. Kuil A,
    4. Feddema W,
    5. Hillebrand M,
    6. Vlaming ML,
    7. Schinkel AH,
    8. Beijnen JH,
    9. Borst P
    (2007) Multidrug resistance proteins 2 and 3 provide alternative routes for hepatic excretion of morphine-glucuronides. Mol Pharmacol 72:387–394.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. White JM,
    2. Ryan CF
    (1996) Pharmacological properties of ketamine. Drug Alcohol Rev 15:145–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 38 (5)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 38, Issue 5
1 May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhibition of Morphine Metabolism by Ketamine
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rapid CommunicationShort Communication

Inhibition of Morphine Metabolism by Ketamine

Xiaoxin Qi, Allan M. Evans, Jiping Wang, John O. Miners, Richard N. Upton and Robert W. Milne
Drug Metabolism and Disposition May 1, 2010, 38 (5) 728-731; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.109.030957

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Rapid CommunicationShort Communication

Inhibition of Morphine Metabolism by Ketamine

Xiaoxin Qi, Allan M. Evans, Jiping Wang, John O. Miners, Richard N. Upton and Robert W. Milne
Drug Metabolism and Disposition May 1, 2010, 38 (5) 728-731; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.109.030957
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Preincubation Effects on Inhibition of OCT1 by CsA
  • Carbamazepine Metabolite and Hypersensitivity Reactions
  • SULT4A1 Preserves Mitochondrial Function
Show more Short Communications

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics