Abstract
There is considerable evidence that pregnancy changes the disposition of drugs in an enzyme- and gestational stage–specific manner. On the basis of probe drug studies, the activity of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 increases and CYP1A2 decreases during human pregnancy. However, no studies of CYP2B6 activity during human pregnancy have been conducted. In rodent models and in HepG2 cells, CYP2B enzymes have been shown to be regulated by estradiol. Because estradiol concentrations increase by ∼50-fold during human pregnancy, it was hypothesized that the increasing estradiol concentrations during human pregnancy would result in induction of CYP2B6 activity. Hepatocytes from three female donors were treated with estradiol, and the EC50 and Emax were measured for CYP2B6 mRNA and bupropion hydroxylation activity. The measured values were used to predict the magnitude of CYP2B6 induction during human pregnancy. At 100 nM total estradiol, a concentration achievable during the third trimester of pregnancy, CYP2B6 activity was predicted to increase by 1.5–3-fold, based on increased CYP2B6 activity and mRNA. When the Emax and EC50 values were compared with those for carbamazepine and rifampin, estradiol was found to be as potent an inducer of CYP2B6 as rifampin and carbamazepine. These data suggest that, during human pregnancy, the increasing estradiol concentrations will result in increased clearance of drugs that have CYP2B6-mediated clearance pathways. This could in part explain the observed increase in methadone clearance during pregnancy.
Introduction
CYP2B6 contributes to the clearance of 3–12% of common drugs, including 25–30% of known CYP3A4 substrates (Xie and Evans, 2001; Walsky et al., 2006). CYP2B6 is one of the primary enzymes responsible for the clearance of bupropion and methadone, (Totah et al., 2007; Wang and Tompkins, 2008), and in an uninduced state, it contributes to the clearance of sertraline, diazepam, ketamine, propofol, selegiline, and various designer drugs (Kreth et al., 2000; Yanagihara et al., 2001; Wang and DeVane, 2003; Maurer et al., 2004; Obach et al., 2005; Walsky et al., 2006; Wang and Tompkins, 2008) and to the clearance of efavirenz and nevirapine (Erickson et al., 1999; Ward et al., 2003), two drugs used to treat HIV infection. Because of its importance as one of the clearance pathways of many drugs taken by pregnant women, increased CYP2B6 activity during human pregnancy may have a large impact in the therapy of pregnant women. Despite CYP2B6’s importance in clearance of drugs given to pregnant women, the CYP2B6 activity during human pregnancy has not been studied. Two studies have evaluated the clearance of methadone during human pregnancy in women receiving methadone maintenance, and lower plasma methadone concentrations and increased clearance of methadone were reported (Pond et al., 1985; Wolff et al., 2005). This could be explained by either CYP3A4 or CYP2B6 induction or increased renal clearance during pregnancy. In a small study of sertraline pharmacokinetics during pregnancy, three subjects were studied both after and during pregnancy (Freeman et al., 2008). In all three subjects, sertraline concentrations were higher postpartum than during second trimester, and in two subjects, the third trimester sertraline concentrations were lower than those during postpartum. The magnitude of change in sertraline concentrations varied from 29% decrease to 90% decrease (Freeman et al., 2008). In contrast to these observations, the oral clearance of nevirapine was not different during the third trimester of pregnancy and postpartum when evaluated in a population of unknown CYP2B6 genotypes (Capparelli et al., 2008). Because all of these drugs are eliminated by multiple cytochrome P450 enzymes, the effect of pregnancy on CYP2B6 activity cannot be conclusively evaluated from these studies.
There is considerable evidence from rodent studies that estradiol induces the expression of Cyp2b genes. In female and male mouse hepatocytes, Cyp2b9 and Cyp2b10 were induced in an estradiol and estrone concentration–dependent manner (Nemoto and Sakurai, 1995), and in vivo in male mice, treatment with 0.5 mg/kg/day estradiol resulted in a significant increase of Cyp2b9 mRNA (Nemoto and Sakurai, 1995). In aromatase−/− mice, which are deficient in estrogen biosynthesis, Cyp2b9 expression was eliminated, suggesting a role of estradiol in constitutive Cyp2b9 regulation (Yamada et al., 2002). In primary mouse hepatocytes, the Cyp2b10 promoter was activated by estradiol, and an estradiol responsive DNA element was identified (Yamamoto et al., 2001). In HepG2 cells, reporter assays showed that estradiol activates constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and enhances CYP2B6 promoter activity (Koh et al., 2012). In addition, in rat hepatocytes, estradiol was shown to cause nuclear translocation of CAR (Koh et al., 2012). Together, these studies demonstrate an important role of estrogens in CYP2B regulation, but the potential magnitude of CYP2B6 induction resulting from the increasing circulating estrogen concentrations during pregnancy has not been previously predicted. The aim of this study was to determine, in human hepatocytes, whether CYP2B6 mRNA and activity is increased by estradiol and to predict the magnitude of CYP2B6 induction during human pregnancy from the hepatocyte data. This is, to our knowledge, the first report of mechanistic quantitative predictions of magnitude of change of drug clearance during pregnancy.
Materials and Methods
Reagents and Chemicals.
William’s E Medium, Dubelcco’s modified Eagle’s medium, dexamethasone, rifampicin, estradiol, carbamazepine, and bupropion were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Cryopreserved Recovery Medium and media supplements were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Matrigel and hydroxybupropion was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA), and Kreb-Henseleit buffer (KHB) from Celsis/In Vitro Technologies (Chicago, IL). Nuclease-free water, RNA later, MagMax 96 RNA isolation kit, High Capacity cDNA Transcription Kit, TaqMan assays, and all TaqMan reagents and consumables were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA).
Cell Culture.
Cryopreserved human hepatocytes (Supplemental Table 1) were purchased from Invitrogen. Hepatocytes were plated and cultured according to previously described methods (Dickmann et al., 2011). Cells were treated the day after plating, and media with an appropriate concentration of drug was replaced daily for cytochrome P450 induction studies. Estradiol, carbamazepine, and rifampin were dissolved in ethanol, and cells were treated with 10 different concentrations (0.39–200 µM for carbamazepine and 0.025–25 µM for rifampicin and estradiol) of the inducer or vehicle control for 48 hours. All treatments at each concentration were conducted in triplicate in all three donors. The concentration of ethanol in treatments and vehicle controls was 0.1%.
Cytochrome P450 Activity Assays in Hepatocyte Culture.
After a 48-hour incubation with either rifampicin, carbamazepine, or estradiol, cells were washed with 100 μl of KHB. Cells were then incubated with KHB containing 250 μM bupropion for 30 minutes. KHB containing parent and metabolite was removed and frozen at −70°C until analysis. Hydroxybupropion formation from bupropion was measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with an API4000 Q-trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems), two LC-20AD pumps with an in-line CBM-20A controller and DGU-20A5 solvent degasser (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD), and a Leap CTC HTS PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Carrboro, NC). The injection volume was 20 μl. LC separation was achieved using a Gemini C18 2.0 * 30 mm 5-μm column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA). Gradient elution (flow rate 500 μl/min) was performed using a mobile phase system consisting of (A) 5 mM ammonium formate with 0.1% formic acid and (B) acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid with the following gradient: 0–0.5 minutes, 5% solution B; 0.5–1.75 minutes, 100% solution B; and 1.75–2 minutes, 5% solution B. Source and gas parameters were as follows: curtain gas, 10; collision gas, medium; ionspray voltage, 4500 V; and temperature, 450°C. Analyte was detected using positive ion multiple reaction monitoring with the following conditions: Q1, 256.2 m/z; Q3, 139 m/z; DP, 60; CE, 30; CXP, 13. Tolbutamide was used as an internal standard. The lower limit of detection of the assay was 2.5 nM, and the day to day variability was less than 10%.
mRNA Analysis.
Immediately after activity assay, cells were lysed and RNA was stabilized with lysis buffer from the MagMax96 RNA isolation kit. Total RNA was isolated using this kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and RNA quantity was assessed by determining the ratio of absorbance at 280 and 260 nm with use of a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Wilmington, DE). All RNA samples were then adjusted to 10 ng/µl with nuclease-free water. cDNA was synthesized using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit with a final volume of 40 µl and 132 ng total RNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After synthesis, the cDNA reactions were diluted to 160 µl total volume with nuclease-free water. TaqMan reactions were run on a 7900HT Real-time polymerase chain reaction system (Applied Biosystems) in a 384-well optical reaction plate. Each reaction contained 10 µl 2× Gene Expression Master Mix, 5 µl nuclease-free water, 1 µl 20× primer and probe mix, and 4 µl of cDNA. All reactions were run in duplicate using default cycling parameters. The TaqMan assay used for CYP2B6 measurement was Hs03044634_m1 and for the housekeeping gene (18s) was Hs03928985_g1.
Data Analysis and Prediction of Increased CYP2B6 Activity During Pregnancy.
Data were fit to both a 3- (fixed slope) and 4-parameter (variable slope) dose response model using GraphPad Prism 5, version 5.04 (La Jolla, CA). The 4-parameter model resulted in ambiguous fits for induction by carbamazepine. Therefore, for consistency between donors and inducers, only 3-parameter fits (CYP2B6 mRNA/activity = + Emin + (Emax – Emin)/(1 + 10(Log[EC50] – Log[Drug]))) are shown for all donors and compounds tested. The goodness of fit was determined from the R2 values generated in GraphPad Prism. R2 values were equal to or greater than 0.89 for mRNA and activity fits in all donors tested. Significance of the magnitude of induction in individual treatments was tested using analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s test as a posthoc test using GraphPad Prism. A P value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Significance of differences between the Emax and EC50 values among estradiol, carbamazepine, and rifampicin treatments was tested using paired (each donor considered as a paired set) t test, and a P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
To predict the effect of rifampicin and carbamazepine on CYP2B6 activity, in vivo mean plasma concentrations of 8 μM for rifampicin and 34 μM for carbamazepine were used (Thummel et al., 2011). Because estradiol concentrations vary considerably among women during pregnancy and among gestational stages, estradiol concentrations of 10–1000 nM were used for predictions. The fold induction was predicted as described previously (Ripp et al., 2006; Sinz et al., 2008) according to the following equation:in which [I] is the inducer concentration, Emax is the maximum fold induction observed in vitro, and EC50 is the inducer concentration at which 50% of maximum fold induction is reached. The increase in CYP2B6 expression and activity was predicted separately for each hepatocyte donor with use of mRNA and activity data.
Results and Discussion
Estradiol, carbamazepine, and rifampicin resulted in significant (P < 0.05), concentration-dependent induction of CYP2B6 mRNA and activity in human hepatocyte donors (Table 1 and Fig. 1). In all donors, the increase in CYP2B6 activity was significant (P < 0.05) after treatment with ≥12.5μM carbamazepine, ≥0.78 μM estradiol, and ≥0.78 μM rifampicin. The increase in CYP2B6 mRNA was significant (P < 0.05) in all donors after treatment with ≥6.5μM carbamazepine, ≥2 μM estradiol, and ≥2 μM rifampicin. In each individual donor, the Emax of CYP2B6 mRNA induction by estradiol was greater than that observed after carbamazepine and rifampicin treatment. but the difference in Emax values for all donors combined was not significant (P > 0.05). On the basis of CYP2B6 activity, the maximum effect of estradiol on CYP2B6 activity was similar to that of rifampicin. Although the mean EC50 value of CYP2B6 induction by estradiol is above the circulating concentrations of estradiol (Table 1), the potency of estradiol was similar to that of rifampicin and carbamazepine (P > 0.05 for EC50 values) as CYP2B6 inducer.
Characterization of the potency and magnitude of increase in CYP2B6 mRNA and activity by rifampicin, carbamazepine, and estradiol treatment in three cultured human hepatocyte donors
EC50 and Emax values for rifampicin, carbamazepine, and estradiol were determined as described in Materials and Methods.
Representative CYP2B6 mRNA and activity dose-response curves for primary human hepatocytes from two donors treated with rifampicin, carbamazepine, and estradiol. Cells were treated in triplicate with rifampicin, carbamazepine, and estradiol for 48 hours, and CYP2B6 mRNA and activity was assessed as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data were fit to a 3-parameter (fixed slope) dose-response model, as described in the Materials and Methods section. (A) Donor Hu8127, CYP2B6 mRNA. (B) Donor Hu8127, CYP2B6 activity. (C) Donor Hu4069, CYP2B6 mRNA. (D) Donor Hu4069, CYP2B6 activity. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of triplicate treatments.
To test whether the CYP2B6 induction observed in these hepatocytes could be used to predict the magnitude of CYP2B6 induction in vivo, the magnitude of increase in CYP2B6-mediated clearance caused by rifampicin and carbamazepine was predicted. On the basis of the CYP2B6 mRNA data, carbamazepine and rifampicin were predicted to increase CYP2B6 mRNA by 9–11-fold (mean, 10-fold) and 7–20-fold (mean, 15-fold), respectively. On the basis of the CYP2B6 activity data, the fold increase in CYP2B6 activity was predicted to be 2.3–5.8-fold (mean, 3.9-fold) and 4–24-fold (mean, 14-fold) by carbamazepine and rifampicin, respectively. These predictions are in agreement with the observed increase in bupropion clearance after carbamazepine and rifampicin administration. Carbamazepine decreases bupropion area under the curve (AUC) by 87% and increases OH-bupropion to bupropion AUC ratio by 11.5-fold (Ketter et al., 1995), suggesting an 11-fold increase in hydroxybupropion formation clearance, assuming that the clearance of hydroxybupropion is unaffected by carbamazepine. Rifampicin decreases bupropion AUC by 46–67% (Loboz et al., 2006) and increases hydroxybupropion formation clearance by 4-fold (2.3–6.8-fold) (Kirby et al., 2011), an effect slightly less than that predicted from the hepatocyte data.
On the basis of the good predictions with carbamazepine and rifampicin, the effect of increasing estradiol concentrations on CYP2B6 activity during pregnancy was predicted without using an additional scaling factor (Fig. 2). At 50 nM and 100 nM estradiol, predicted CYP2B6 mRNA induction was 1.9 ± 0.72–fold and 2.8 ± 1.4–fold, respectively, and CYP2B6 activity induction was 1.2 ± 0.15–fold and 1.4 ± 0.30–fold, respectively. Because circulating estradiol concentrations reach up to 50 nM during pregnancy (Soldin et al., 2005), on the basis of these mRNA data, a 2-fold increase in CYP2B6 expression is predicted during pregnancy. Because estradiol concentrations increase gradually during pregnancy (O'Leary et al., 1991), on the basis of these data, it is expected that CYP2B6 activity also increases gradually throughout pregnancy, reaching the maximum induction during the third trimester. Of note, estradiol concentrations vary considerably among individuals during pregnancy (O'Leary et al., 1991), and thus, the magnitude of CYP2B6 induction is expected to vary largely among women during pregnancy. Although these predictions based on methods used for xenobiotics suggest that CYP2B6 activity is increased by only 2-fold during pregnancy, it is possible that a greater effect would be observed in vivo, because estradiol concentrations are high consistently and do not fluctuate like commonly administered xenobiotic inducers. The effect of inducer concentration fluctuations is not well characterized and depends on whether fluctuation is sufficient to cause inducer concentrations to drop below receptor saturation.
Prediction of in vivo increase of CYP2B6 mRNA and activity with increasing concentrations of estradiol. Predictions were done as described in the Materials and Methods section for each donor using Emax and EC50 values in Table 1.
It is well established that CYP2B6 is inducible via CAR activation, although pregnane X receptor also appears to play a role in CYP2B6 regulation (Faucette et al., 2007; Mo et al., 2009). It has also been shown that estradiol activates CAR directly (Kawamoto et al., 2000) and that activation of CAR by estradiol results in CYP2B6 induction (Koh et al., 2012). Although it is possible that activation of pregnane X receptor or estrogen receptor by estradiol also contributes to increased CYP2B6 mRNA and activity, it is expected that a similar in vitro to in vivo prediction is applicable for induction of CYP2B6 by estradiol, as is shown for rifampicin and carbamazepine. However, it is not clear whether circulating concentrations of estradiol accurately reflect the concentrations inside the hepatocytes. The 100 nM concentration of estradiol appears to be appropriate and physiologically relevant for evaluating effects of estradiol in human hepatocytes, because the same concentration was shown to down-regulate CYP2C19 in human hepatocytes via activation of estrogen receptors (Mwinyi et al., 2010). This down-regulation provides a potential explanation for the mechanisms by which CYP2C19 activity is decreased during pregnancy. The agreement between the down-regulation of CYP2C19 by 100 nM estradiol in human hepatocytes and decreased clearance during pregnancy suggests that this concentration reflects the exposure in the liver during human pregnancy.
The predicted magnitude of increase in CYP2B6 activity (by 2-fold) during pregnancy is in excellent agreement with the observed 2-fold increase in methadone clearance during pregnancy (Pond et al., 1985; Wolff et al., 2005). Although in vivo drug-drug interaction studies and in vitro experiments have shown that methadone is cleared predominantly by CYP2B6 (Totah et al., 2008), CYP3A4 and renal clearance also contribute to methadone clearance. On the basis of the data presented here, it is likely that the increased methadone clearance is attributable to increased CYP2B6 activity together with increased CYP3A4 and renal clearance during pregnancy. On the basis of studies on midazolam oral clearance during pregnancy, CYP3A4 activity increases by ∼2-fold during the third trimester of pregnancy (Hebert et al., 2008). Because CYP3A4 is only a minor elimination pathway of methadone, a 2-fold increase in CYP3A4 activity alone is not sufficient to explain the magnitude of increase in methadone clearance during pregnancy. Unfortunately, no other studies of disposition of CYP2B6 substrates/probes, such as bupropion, have been reported to further evaluate the magnitude of CYP2B6 induction during pregnancy. CYP2B6 is a minor elimination pathway for a number of drugs, and hence induction of CYP2B6 during human pregnancy may have important clinical implications, especially when it is combined with increased CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 activity during pregnancy.
Author Contributions
Participated in research design: Dickmann, Isoherranen.
Conducted experiments: Dickmann.
Performed data analysis: Dickmann, Isoherranen.
Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Dickmann, Isoherranen.
Footnotes
↵
This article has supplemental material available at dmd.aspetjournals.org.
Abbreviations
- AUC
- area under the curve
- CAR
- constitutive androstane receptor
- fm
- fraction of total clearance of the drug to which the affected enzyme contributes
- KHB
- Kreb-Henseleit buffer
- Received June 6, 2012.
- Accepted July 19, 2012.
- Copyright © 2013 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics