Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Sorafenib Hepatobiliary Disposition: Mechanisms of Hepatic Uptake and Disposition of Generated Metabolites

Brandon Swift, Noelia Nebot, Jin Kyung Lee, Tianxiang Han, William R. Proctor, Dhiren R. Thakker, Dieter Lang, Martin Radtke, Mark J. Gnoth and Kim L. R. Brouwer
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 2013, 41 (6) 1179-1186; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.048181
Brandon Swift
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noelia Nebot
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jin Kyung Lee
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tianxiang Han
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William R. Proctor
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dhiren R. Thakker
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dieter Lang
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Radtke
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark J. Gnoth
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim L. R. Brouwer
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (B.S., N.N., J.K.L., D.R.T., K.L.R.B.), Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics (T.H., W.R.P.), UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany (D.L., M.R., M.J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sorafenib is an orally active tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of renal and hepatocellular carcinoma. This study was designed to establish whether transport proteins are involved in the hepatic uptake of sorafenib and to determine the extent of biliary excretion of sorafenib and its metabolites in human hepatocytes. Initial uptake was assessed in freshly isolated, suspended human hepatocytes in the presence of inhibitors and modulators. [14C]Sorafenib (1 µM) uptake at 4°C was reduced by about 61–63% of the uptake at 37°C, suggesting a high degree of passive diffusion. Hepatocyte uptake of [14C]sorafenib was not Na+ dependent or influenced by the organic anion transporter 2 inhibitor ketoprofen. However, initial [14C]sorafenib hepatocyte uptake was reduced by 46 and 30% compared with control values in the presence of the organic anion transporting polypeptide inhibitor rifamycin SV and the organic cation transporter (OCT) inhibitor decynium 22, respectively. [14C]Sorafenib (0.5–5 µM) uptake was significantly higher in hOCT1-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells compared with mock cells, and inhibited by the general OCT inhibitor, 1-methyl-4-phenylpryidinium. OCT1-mediated uptake was saturable with a Michaelis-Menten constant of 3.80 ± 2.53 µM and a Vmax of 116 ± 42 pmol/mg/min. The biliary excretion index and in vitro biliary clearance of sorafenib (1 µM) in sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes were low (∼11% and 11 ml/min/kg, respectively). Results suggest that sorafenib uptake in human hepatocytes occurs via passive diffusion, by OCT1, and by organic anion transporting polypeptide(s). Sorafenib undergoes modest biliary excretion, predominantly as a glucuronide conjugate(s).

Introduction

Sorafenib (Fig. 1), an orally active multikinase inhibitor, blocks tumor cell proliferation by targeting Raf/mitogen activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase and exerts an antiangiogenic effect by targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1/-2/-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β tyrosine kinases (Wilhelm et al., 2004). Sorafenib is approved for the treatment of renal and hepatocellular carcinomas and has demonstrated activity toward other malignancies (Ratain et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Chemical structure of sorafenib and metabolic pathways.

After oral administration of [14C]sorafenib to healthy volunteers, approximately 77% of a 100-mg oral dose was excreted in feces (51% as parent), and 19% of the dose was excreted in urine as glucuronidated metabolites; approximately 17% of circulating radioactivity in plasma was in the form of sorafenib N-oxide (Lathia et al., 2006). Sorafenib oxidative metabolism is mediated by CYP3A4 yielding the N-oxide sorafenib metabolite. Sorafenib also undergoes glucuronidation by the uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyl-transferase (UGT1A9) pathway (Fig. 1) (Lathia et al., 2006). Peak plasma concentrations of sorafenib occur within 2 to 3 hours after a single oral dose (Strumberg et al., 2005); secondary peaks in the plasma concentration-time profile have been attributed to enterohepatic recirculation of sorafenib after cleavage of the glucuronide conjugate or reduction of the N-oxide in the gastrointestinal tract (Lathia et al., 2006). High interpatient variability in the Cmax and the area under the concentration-time profile (AUC) in human plasma of sorafenib and the primary metabolite, sorafenib N-oxide have been reported after multiple oral doses of sorafenib (Strumberg et al., 2007; Miller et al., 2009). Variability in pharmacokinetics can be caused by interindividual differences in the metabolizing enzymes or the transport proteins, which also are subject to polymorphisms. Understanding the mechanisms of hepatic uptake and the extent of biliary excretion of sorafenib is particularly important in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, where the target site of sorafenib is the liver.

Transport proteins can play an important role in the clearance of drugs from hepatic sinusoidal blood and the excretion of the parent drug and/or metabolite(s) across the apical membrane into the bile canaliculus. The basolateral proteins that mediate the uptake of endogenous and exogenous compounds into hepatocytes include members of the solute carrier superfamily: Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP), organic anion transporters (OATs), organic cation transporters (OCTs), and organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs). NTCP, which is expressed exclusively in the liver, is Na+ dependent and predominately accounts for the uptake of bile acids (Ho et al., 2004). Recently, a few drugs, such as rosuvastatin, have been reported to be NTCP substrates (Ho et al., 2006). The OATPs exhibit broad and overlapping substrate specificity and display an affinity for organic anions as well as some bulky cations and neutral steroids (Mikkaichi et al., 2004). In contrast to NTCP, the OATPs operate in an Na+-independent manner and function as bidirectional carriers (Li et al., 2000; Briz et al., 2006; Mahagita et al., 2007). Three human isoforms— OATP1B1, 1B3, and 2B1—play a substantial role in the hepatic uptake of many endogenous and exogenous compounds, including bilirubin (Konig et al., 2000; Cui et al., 2001), fexofenadine (Cvetkovic et al., 1999), and many statins (Shitara and Sugiyama, 2006). OCTs are electrogenic uniporters that mediate primarily the transport of small cations, although the transport of anions and uncharged compounds has been reported (Koepsell et al., 2003). The OATs constitute a family of proteins that mediate transport of negatively charged endogenous and exogenous compounds in exchange for dicarboxylate ions. OATs are expressed predominantly in the kidney, although OAT2 has higher expression on the sinusoidal membrane of hepatocytes compared with the basolateral membrane of proximal kidney tubules (Sun et al., 2001). Transporters located in the apical membrane involved in the removal of drug and metabolite(s) into the bile canaliculus include P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance–associated protein (MRP2), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and the bile salt export pump. Sorafenib is a weak substrate for P-gp, but the overall effect of this transporter on plasma concentrations is low based on in vivo results using mdr1a/1b(-/-) knockout mice (Gnoth et al., 2010).

The objective of the present study was to determine whether transport proteins are involved in the hepatic uptake of sorafenib and to determine the extent of biliary excretion of sorafenib and its metabolites in human hepatocytes. Initial uptake was assessed in freshly isolated human hepatocytes and in OCT1-transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes were used to determine the hepatobiliary disposition of sorafenib and metabolites.

Materials and Methods

Materials.

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), F-12 Nutrient Mixture, minimum essential medium nonessential amino acids solution (100×), l-glutamine, penicillin G-streptomycin solution (100×), gentamicin, and penicillin G-streptomycin-amphotericin B solution (100×) were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Rifamycin SV, ketoprofen, dexamethasone, TEA, 1,1-dimethyl-biguanide hydrochloride (metformin), fetal bovine serum, Triton X-100, HEPES, d-glucose, dexamethasone, trypsin-EDTA solution (1×), and Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS) modified with (H-1387) or without (H-4891) calcium chloride were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Sorafenib tosylate (purity 99.7%), [14C]sorafenib (3.09 MBq/mg radiochemical purity 99.2%), the internal standard [2H3, 15N] sorafenib tosylate, and decynium 22 were provided by Bayer HealthCare AG (Wuppertal, Germany). [14C]TEA (55 mCi/mmol) was purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO). [14C]Biguanide (metformin, 110 mCi/mmol) was purchased from Moraveck Biochemicals (Brea, CA). ITS+ (insulin/transferrin/selenium) culture supplement was purchased from BD Biosciences Discovery Labware (Bedford, MA). Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagents and bovine serum albumin for the protein assay standard were purchased from Pierce Chemical Co. (Rockford, IL). Ultima Gold XR scintillation cocktail was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and available from commercial sources.

Suspended Hepatocyte Isolation and Uptake Studies.

CellzDirect, Life Technologies (Research Triangle Park, NC), kindly provided freshly isolated human hepatocytes in suspension. Hepatocyte donors were a 60-year-old Caucasian woman and a 63-year-old Caucasian man with no recent history of smoking or alcohol use. Hepatocyte viability, as determined by trypan blue exclusion, was 89 and 90%. Cells were suspended in cold modified Hank’s buffer with 10 mM Tris/5 mM glucose (pH 7.4) or Na+-free choline buffer (10 mM Tris, 5 mM glucose, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.8mM CaCl2, 0.9 mM MgSO4, 10 mM HEPES, and 137 mM choline; pH 7.4) and stored on ice before uptake studies were performed (Leslie et al., 2007). Isolated hepatocytes were suspended in the same buffer (1 × 106 cells/ml), placed on ice, and used immediately in experiments. Hepatocyte suspensions (1 ml; n = 2 livers, in triplicate) were preincubated in 16 × 100-mm glass test tubes at 37°C for 3 minutes; 0.1% dimethysulfoxide or chemical inhibitor was added 1 minute before [14C]sorafenib (0.9 µM; 3.86 nCi; 0.9% methanol). The following concentrations of inhibitors were selected based on reported affinities for the given active transport processes: 20 µM rifamycin SV (OATP1B1, OATP1B3, and OATP2B1 inhibitor), 5 µM decynium 22 (OCT inhibitor), and 10 µM ketoprofen (OAT2 inhibitor). Aliquots (100 µl) of the suspension were removed at timed intervals (up to 2.5 minutes), placed in 0.4-ml polyethylene tubes, and centrifuged immediately through a top layer of silicone oil:mineral oil (82:18, v/v; 100 µl) into a bottom layer of 3 M KOH (50 µl). [14C]Sorafenib in the cell pellet and supernatant were analyzed by liquid scintillation counting. Adherent fluid volume was estimated with [14C]inulin as described previously (Baur et al., 1975). Protein concentrations for individual hepatocyte suspensions were determined with the BCA protein assay reagent kit (Pierce) as instructed by the manufacturer. Bovine serum albumin, as supplied by the manufacturer, was used as a standard (0.2–1 mg/ml).

Transport Studies in hOCT1-Expressing CHO Cells.

Transport studies were carried out 5 days postseeding, as previously described (Ming et al., 2009). Briefly, stably transfected CHO cells were grown as monolayers in 24-well plates, and the medium was changed every other day. Cells were preincubated for 30 minutes at 37°C in transport buffer (HBSS with calcium chloride, 25 mM d-glucose, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4). Experiments were initiated by replacement of the transport buffer with 0.4 ml of varying amounts of radiolabeled dose solutions in transport buffer. Initially, time-dependent experiments were conducted for up to 30 minutes to determine the linear uptake range (unpublished data). For concentration-dependent experiments, uptake was determined in the mock cells or CHO-OCT1 cells over a 10-minute period. Inhibition of OCT1-mediated uptake was performed in mock or CHO-OCT1 cells by concomitantly incubating 500 µM MPP+ (1-methyl-4-phenylpryidinium) with the substrate [14C]sorafenib. After incubation, dose solutions were aspirated and cells were washed four times with 4°C transport buffer. Cells were lysed with 500 µl of 0.1 N NaOH/0.1% SDS for 4 hours on an orbital shaker, and samples were analyzed by liquid scintillation counting. Data were normalized to protein concentration in each well, determined in duplicate aliquots using BCA protein assay reagent kit, as detailed above.

For estimation of Michaelis-Menten (Km) parameters, OCT1-mediated uptake was determined as the difference in cell associated radioactivity in the hOCT1-transfected and mock cells at each substrate concentration. The Km and Vmax values were obtained by fitting the Michaelis-Menten equation V = Vmax • [S]/(Km + [S]) to the data using WinNonlin v.5.2.1 (Pharsight, Mountain View, CA), where V represents the velocity of substrate transport, [S] refers to the concentration of substrate, and Km is defined as the concentration of substrate at the half-maximal transport rate (Vmax).

Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocyte Studies.

B-CLEAR-Human kits were purchased from Qualyst, Inc. (Research Triangle Park, NC). Human hepatocytes isolated from two different subjects (Table 1) were seeded at approximately 1.75 × 106 cells/well on six-well BioCoat plates in DMEM without phenol red supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 1% (v/v) minimum essential medium nonessential amino acids, 100 units penicillin G sodium, 100 µg streptomycin sulfate, 1 µM dexamethasone, 5% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, and 10 µM insulin (day 0 of culture) and allowed to attach for 2–6 hours in a humidified incubator (95% O2, 5% CO2) at 37°C. After cell attachment, culture plates were swirled gently, and the culture medium was replaced with the same medium. Cells were overlaid 16–24 hours (day 1 of culture) after seeding with ice-cold Matrigel basement membrane matrix (0.25 mg/ml) in 2 ml/well cold serum-free DMEM containing 2 mM l-glutamine, 1% (v/v) minimum Eagle’s medium nonessential amino acids, 100 units penicillin G sodium, 100 µg streptomycin sulfate, 1 µM dexamethasone, and 1% (v/v) ITS+ (insulin/transferrin/selenium). The culture medium was changed every 24 hours until experiments were performed on day 7 of culture.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Demographics, BEI, and Clbiliary of [3H]taurocholate in sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes

Donors had no history of tobacco or alcohol use or comedications; body mass index (BMI); sandwich-cultured hepatocytes were incubated with 1 μM [3H]taurocholate (10 minutes). Results are presented as representative data from triplicate determinations in two livers.

Accumulation Studies.

The method to determine substrate accumulation in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes has been described previously (Leslie et al., 2007; Wolf et al., 2008). Cells were incubated for 20 minutes at 37°C with 1.5 ml of sorafenib solution (1 and 10 µM). Medium samples were collected immediately, and hepatocytes were rinsed vigorously three times with 2 ml of ice-cold standard buffer after the incubation. Substrate uptake was corrected for nonspecific binding by subtracting uptake on blank six-well Biocoat plates overlaid with Matrigel. Data were normalized to protein concentration in each well, determined in duplicate with the BCA protein assay reagent kit. Because of incompatability of the protein assay with organic solvent, the average protein concentration for standard HBSS or Ca2+-free HBSS incubations in the same liver preparation was used to normalize sorafenib content. Sorafenib-treated hepatocytes were stored immediately at −80°C until analysis. The cells were lysed with 1 ml of mobile phase containing internal standard, scraped off the plates and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 minutes before analysis by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

Sample Analysis.

Sorafenib and sorafenib N-oxide concentrations were determined by a liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry assay using a LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) coupled to an Agilent 1200 system (Agilent Technology, Waldbronn, Germany). Sorafenib and its metabolites were eluted from a Synergi Hydro RP 2.5-µm column (20 × 2 mm internal diameter; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) using a mobile phase gradient at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min (A: 0.05% formic acid in water; B: 0.05% formic acid in acetonitrile); 0 minutes 30% B, 5 minutes 60% B, 5.3 minutes 30% B. The column effluent was monitored using a LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Scientific) by quantification of the exact mass of sorafenib, internal standard, sorafenib N-oxide, and sorafenib glucuronide. The calibration ranged from 1 ng/ml to 1000 ng/ml. The lower limit of quantification for sorafenib was 2 ng/ml and 1 ng/ml for sorafenib N-oxide.

Data Analysis.

For accumulation studies in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes, the biliary excretion index (BEI, %) and in vitro biliary clearance (in vitro Clbiliary) were calculated using B-CLEAR technology [Qualyst, Inc.; (Liu et al., 1999)]:Embedded Imagewhere substrate accumulation in the cells+bile compartments was determined in hepatocytes preincubated in standard buffer; cellular accumulation of substrate was determined in hepatocytes preincubated in Ca2+-free HBSS.Embedded Imagewhere AUC0-T was calculated using the log trapezoidal method; the theoretical dosing concentration was used for t = 0 and the final medium concentration for t = incubation time. In vitro Clbiliary values were scaled per kilogram of body weight using 0.948 (liver 1) and 1.35 (liver 2) mg of protein per well, assuming the following: 1 mg protein/1.75 × 106 cells, 107 × 106 hepatocytes per gram of human liver tissue, and 25.7 g of liver tissue per kg of body weight, as previously described (Davies and Morris, 1993).

Statistically significant differences in sorafenib uptake in transfected CHO cells were determined by a two-way analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. The criterion for significance in all cases was P < 0.05.

Results

Uptake of Sorafenib in Suspended Human Hepatocytes.

Initial uptake of [14C]sorafenib into suspended human hepatocytes was linear up to about 1.5 minutes (Fig. 2, A and B). Uptake at 4°C was reduced by about 61–63% of the uptake at 37°C (Fig. 2, A–D). [14C]Sorafenib uptake at all the time points sampled (Fig. 2, C and D) did not exhibit sodium dependence (average [14C]sorafenib uptake was about 4, 13, and 14% greater than control values when sodium was replaced with choline in the uptake buffer at 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 minutes, respectively), and it was not influenced significantly by ketoprofen (uptake was decreased by only 4% compared with control uptake). Initial [14C]sorafenib uptake was reduced by 26, 46, and 42% of control values in the presence of the OATP inhibitor rifamycin SV at 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 minutes, respectively, and reduced by 25, 30, and 39% of control values in the presence of the OCT inhibitor decynium 22 at 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 minutes, respectively (Fig. 2, C and D; 2.5-minute data not shown).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Uptake of [14C]sorafenib (0.9 µM) in suspended human hepatocytes from two separate donors (A and B) over 2.5 minutes. Hepatocytes were incubated at 37°C (●) or 4°C (○) in standard buffer (mean ± S.D.; n = 2 livers in triplicate). Initial uptake of [14C]sorafenib (0.9 µM) at 0.5 minutes (C) and 1.5 minutes (D) in suspended human hepatocytes incubated at 37°C in standard buffer, unless otherwise specified, and in the presence of transport protein modulators, including choline buffer, inhibitors (rifamycin SV, decynium 22, and ketoprofen) and lower incubation temperature (n = 2 livers; mean percentage ± range).

Transport of Sorafenib in OCT1-Transfected CHO Cells.

As expected, uptake of 10 µM [14C]metformin (unpublished data) and 5 µM [14C]TEA in OCT1-transfected CHO cells was increased around 7-fold compared with mock cells, confirming OCT1 function in these cells (Fig. 3A). The uptake of 5 µM [14C]TEA was completely abated in the presence of 500 µM MPP+ (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Uptake of the positive control (A) [14C]TEA (5 µM) was assessed in CHO-OCT1 cells in the absence (white bar) and presence (hatched bar) of 500 µM MPP+ and mock cells (black bar). Uptake of (B) [14C]sorafenib (0.5–5 µM) in CHO-hOCT1 cells. CHO-hOCT1 cells were incubated in the absence (▴) and presence (Δ) of 500 µM MPP+, and mock cells in the absence (●) and presence (○) of 500 µM MPP+ at 10 minutes. Inset: OCT1-mediated [14C]sorafenib transport determined as the difference in uptake in CHO-hOCT1 and mock cells at each substrate concentration. The curve represents the best fit of the Michaelis-Menten equation to the OCT1-mediated uptake data. Data represent mean ± S.D. (n = 3); *P < 0.001 OCT1 versus mock; †P < 0.001 OCT1 versus OCT1+MPP+; ††P < 0.001 mock versus mock+MPP+; when error bars are not visible, they are smaller than the symbol.

[14C]Sorafenib uptake was significantly higher in OCT1-transfected CHO cells compared with mock cells over the concentration range examined (0.5–5 µM). OCT1-mediated uptake was saturable with a Km of 3.80 ± 2.53 µM and Vmax of 116 ± 42 pmol/mg/min. The OCT inhibitor, MPP+, decreased [14C]sorafenib uptake in OCT1-transfected and mock CHO cells, suggesting that other MPP+ sensitive transport processes are involved in sorafenib uptake (Fig. 3B). MPP+ reduced [14C]sorafenib uptake in mock cells by ∼49–63%, suggesting that passive diffusion plays a role in sorafenib uptake, consistent with data generated in suspended human hepatocytes at 4°C.

Hepatobiliary Dispostion of Sorafenib in Human Sandwich-Cultured Hepatocytes.

The hepatobiliary disposition of [3H]taurocholate and sorafenib was measured in human sandwich-cultured hepatocytes. After a 10-minute incubation with 1 µM [3H]taurocholate, the BEI and in vitro Clbiliary for both livers (Table 1) were consistent with previous data generated in this model system. The cellular accumulation of sorafenib appeared to be dose dependent (Table 2). Sorafenib cellular accumulation was approximately 2 orders of magnitude greater than the primary metabolite sorafenib N-oxide after a 20-minute incubation at the 1 µM sorafenib dose, and greater than 1 order of magnitude at the 10 µM sorafenib dose (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Accumulation, BEI, and Clbiliary of sorafenib or sorafenib N-oxide in sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes

Sandwich-cultured hepatocytes were incubated with 1 and 10 μM sorafenib for 20 minutes. Results are presented as mean ± S.D. from triplicate experiments from two livers.

The BEI of sorafenib in sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes was low (∼11%). The sorafenib in vitro Clbiliary was moderately low at 1 and 10 µM sorafenib (∼11 ml/min/kg), ranging from approximately one-third to one-fifth of the taurocholate in vitro Clbiliary values in each of the liver donors (Tables 1 and 2). After a 20-minute incubation with either 1 or 10 µM sorafenib, sorafenib N-oxide concentrations were below the detection limit (<1 ng/ml) in medium, except for the 10 µM dose in hepatocytes prepared from the second liver; however, longer incubation times of 60 and 120 minutes resulted in slightly higher medium concentrations of sorafenib N-oxide (Fig. 4). The BEI of sorafenib glucuronide at the 1 µM dose was negligible for both liver donors at 20 minutes; sorafenib glucuronide was detected in medium at all the time points and increased with the longer incubation time. The biliary excretion of sorafenib glucuronide increased with incubation time (BEI = 0, 42, and 40% at 20, 60, and 120 minutes, respectively) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Ratio of amount of sorafenib and formed metabolites in (cells + bile)/(cells + bile + medium) in day 7 sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes from liver 2 incubated with 1 µM sorafenib for 20 (solid bars), 60 (open bars), and 120 (hatched bars) minutes. The BEI was calculated after triplicate determination of substrate accumulation in cells and cells + bile. A standard was unavailable for sorafenib glucuronide, so the peak area under the curve divided by the internal standard area under the curve was used.

Discussion

Hepatic transport proteins are recognized increasingly as important determinants of the pharmacokinetics of many drugs, as well as key sites of drug-drug interactions (Soars et al., 2009). Genetic polymorphisms of uptake transport proteins also have been implicated in interindividual differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clinically relevant drugs such as the statins (Ieiri et al., 2009). In the present study, the transport proteins involved in the hepatic uptake of sorafenib were investigated, and the hepatobiliary disposition of sorafenib and metabolites was assessed.

Sorafenib is a very lipophilic compound (log D7 = 5.16; predicted properties SciFinder Scholar, version 2007, CAS, Columbus, OH). The initial uptake of sorafenib in human hepatocytes was examined at 37°C versus 4°C to assess the contribution of passive diffusion to overall uptake. The initial uptake of [14C]sorafenib at 4°C was reduced by 61 and 63% at 0.5 and 1.5 minutes, respectively, compared with 37°C, which suggests a high degree of passive diffusion (Fig. 2, A–D). The contribution of passive diffusion versus carrier mediated uptake remains unclear as a result of the effect of temperature on both processes. There was also a high degree of passive diffusion in CHO cells (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, greater than 54% of the sorafenib dose partitioned into human sandwich-cultured hepatocytes after a 20-minute incubation with 1 µM sorafenib based on the mass of drug remaining in the media at the end of the incubation period in relation to the initial dose (Table 2). These findings are in agreement with the reported high Papp in the absorptive direction of 16.4 ± 12.3 and 33.5 ± 16.1 × 10−6 cm/s for 0.1 and 1 µM sorafenib, respectively, determined in Caco-2 cells (Gnoth et al., 2010).

The active uptake of [14C]sorafenib (0.9 µM) was investigated with transport protein modulators. Rifamycin SV (20 µM) was selected as an inhibitor of all the relevant human isoforms of OATP expressed in the liver: OATP1A2, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, and OATP2B1 (Vavricka et al., 2002). Decynium 22 (5 µM) was used as an OCT inhibitor (Zhang et al., 1997; Hayer-Zillgen et al., 2002), and OAT2 function was inhibited with ketoprofen (10 µM) (Morita et al., 2001; Ohtsuki et al., 2002). To assess Na+-dependent transport by NTCP, choline-based buffer was substituted for Na+-based buffer in suspended hepatocytes. The sensitivity of the transport proteins and specificity to the inhibitors rifamycin SV and decynium 22 were confirmed in the presence and absence of the model probe substrates [3H]estradiol-17-β-D-glucuronide (OATP substrate) and [14C]TEA (OCT substrate), as published previously (Swift et al., 2010). Sorafenib uptake at all time points sampled was sensitive to rifamycin SV and decynium 22, suggesting that the OATPs and OCTs are involved in the hepatic uptake this tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Fig. 2, C and D). The contribution of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 to the hepatic uptake of sorafenib has been confirmed in vitro (Zimmerman et al., 2013). The involvement of OCT1 in sorafenib uptake was investigated further using a hOCT1-expressing CHO cell line. This finding contradicts work by Hu et al., who reported no appreciable uptake of sorafenib by Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing OCT1, OATP1A2, OATP1B1, or OATP1B3 (Hu et al., 2009). This apparent discrepancy could be explained by experimental differences. For example, in the present studies, sorafenib uptake into CHO cells was saturable after 10 minutes; Hu et al., incubated sorafenib with X. laevis oocytes for 1 hour, possibly masking the active uptake component. Furthermore, different in vitro model systems may yield conflicting data. For example, Agarwal et al. (2011) conclusively demonstrated the transport of sorafenib by Bcrp both in vitro and in vivo, in contrast to the data generated in LLC-PK1 cells transfected with BCRP (Hu et al., 2009; Agarwal et al., 2011). Imatinib, another tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is an OCT1 substrate in the human T-lymphoblastoid cell line CCRF-CEM (Thomas et al., 2004). Some substrate overlap exists between OCTs and OATPs, which have an affinity for numerous type II (bulky) cations such as N-methylquinine (van Montfoort et al., 1999). Furthermore, the class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been shown to inhibit metformin uptake in OCT-transfected cell lines (Minematsu and Giacomini, 2011).

Decynium 22 inhibition of sorafenib uptake in suspended human hepatocytes was likely due to OCT1 based on further studies demonstrating that OCT1-mediated uptake of sorafenib was significantly higher in OCT1-transfected CHO cells compared with mock cells over the concentration range examined (0.5–5 µM) (Fig. 3B). These results are the first to demonstrate that sorafenib is a substrate of OCT1 with a Km of 3.8 µM. Interestingly, sorafenib uptake in nontransfected mock cells was inhibited partially by MPP+, suggesting that other MPP+-sensitive endogenous transport proteins in the CHO cell line are involved in sorafenib uptake. The unknown transport protein(s) that is/are sensitive to MPP+ in mock CHO cells may be present in human hepatocytes. We cannot rule out the possibility that rifamycin SV inhibited the uptake of sorafenib by this unknown transport protein(s) in the suspended hepatocyte experiments.

To investigate the hepatobiliary disposition of sorafenib, studies were performed in human sandwich-cultured hepatocytes. The dosing concentrations (1 and 10 µM) used in these studies were in the range of the reported total maximum plasma concentration (5 to 21 µM) after multiple oral doses of sorafenib (100–600 mg twice daily) (Strumberg et al., 2005), but higher than the expected unbound plasma concentration of sorafenib based on reported binding to plasma proteins (99.5% bound; package insert). Sorafenib, a P-gp and Bcrp substrate (Hu et al., 2009; Gnoth et al., 2010; Agarwal et al., 2011), exhibited a relatively low BEI (up to 11%; Table 2) and in vitro Clbiliary (up to 11.5 ml/min/kg), which is not surprising because of the extent of CYP3A4- and UGT1A9-mediated metabolism observed in vivo (Lathia et al., 2006). The model bile acid [3H]taurocholate, which is generally considered to have a high hepatic clearance, was included as a system control in the two liver donors, but it also serves as a good reference point for compounds with high BEI (64.8 and 62.6%) and high in vitro Clbiliary (59.9 and 32.4 ml/min/kg) (Table 1).

Biotransformation of sorafenib to the N-oxide is mediated primarily by CYP3A4 (Lathia et al., 2006; Ghassabian et al., 2012). The low formation of sorafenib N-oxide in day 7 human sandwich-cultured hepatocytes may be due to lower cytochrome P450 enzyme activity after isolation and culture (Hoen et al., 2000; Boess et al., 2003). Dexamethasone is a prototypical cytochrome P450 inducer that is added to cell culture medium. In the present studies, dexamethasone concentrations in the culture medium were only 1 µM, which is much lower than the 10 µM or higher concentrations used in some human and rat sandwich-cultured hepatocyte studies to induce CYP3A4 and Cyp3A1/2 protein expression and increase activity of CYP3A4 and Cyp3A1/2, as measured by testosterone 6β-hydroxylation (LeCluyse et al., 1996). Sorafenib N-oxide is the primary circulating metabolite in human plasma (Lathia et al., 2006); concentrations of sorafenib N-oxide in medium, a surrogate for blood, increased with the longer incubation times. Although no glucuronide was detected in the bile of sandwich-cultured hepatocytes after a 20-minute incubation, sorafenib glucuronide was excreted into bile after incubation of hepatocytes with sorafenib for 60 and 120 minutes, as demonstrated with the higher BEI (40–42%) (Fig. 4). The increased formation and biliary excretion of sorafenib glucuronide after longer incubation times may partially explain the significant amount of parent drug recovered in feces after oral dosing [∼77% of a 100 mg oral dose was excreted in feces, of which 51% was the parent drug (according to the package insert)]. Based on our results, we hypothesize that sorafenib glucuronide undergoes biliary excretion; a portion of the glucuronide conjugate is cleaved in the gastrointestinal tract; subsequently, generated sorafenib is reabsorbed. This hypothesis is supported by the clinical observation of secondary peaks in the sorafenib plasma concentration-time profile (Lathia et al., 2006). Sorafenib glucuronide also was detected in the medium of sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (Fig. 4), in agreement with the findings that glucuronidated metabolites of sorafenib are recovered in human urine after oral administration.

Sorafenib metabolites, specifically the glucuronide conjugates, require transport proteins for biliary excretion and basolateral efflux. As mentioned, sorafenib is a P-gp and BCRP substrate and may also be an MRP2 substrate (Shibayama et al., 2011), suggesting that these transport proteins may play a role in the biliary excretion of sorafenib and its metabolites. MRP2 is responsible for the biliary excretion of many glucuronide conjugates of drugs, as well as bilirubin conjugates (Kamisako et al., 1999), and may transport sorafenib glucuronide into bile. Clinically relevant drug interactions associated with impaired biliary clearance have been reported for digoxin with coadministration of the P-gp inhibitors quinidine, verapamil, and ritonavir (Fenner et al., 2009). Furthermore, it is well recognized that patients with liver disease develop adaptive changes in transport protein expression; these adaptations protect the hepatocyte from the intracellular accumulation of toxic compounds such as bile acids. In fact, many patients with hepatocellular carcinoma develop cirrhosis, which results in the downregulation of basolateral uptake transport proteins often coupled with the upregulation of canalicular and basolateral efflux proteins (Zollner et al., 2003, 2007). This highlights the importance of understanding the mechanisms of sorafenib hepatobiliary disposition.

In conclusion, sorafenib uptake in suspended human hepatocytes, CHO cells and sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes was extensive. Uptake into human hepatocytes was temperature dependent and decreased approximately 61–63% at 4°C, suggesting a high degree of passive diffusion. The active portion of hepatic uptake was sensitive to rifamycin SV and decynium 22, suggesting the involvement of OATPs and OCT, respectively. OCT1-mediated uptake of sorafenib was confirmed in OCT1 overexpressing CHO cells. Sorafenib undergoes modest biliary excretion as the parent compound; biliary excretion of the major metabolites, N-oxide and glucuronide conjugate(s), is increased with incubation time in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes.

Authorship Contributions

Participated in research design: Swift, Proctor, Thakker, Gnoth, Radtke, Brouwer.

Conducted experiments: Swift, Lee, Han, Proctor.

Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: Swift, Thakker, Gnoth, Lang.

Performed data analysis: Swift, Nebot, Brouwer.

Wrote or contributed to the writing off the manuscript: Swift, Nebot, Gnoth, Brouwer.

Footnotes

    • Received August 2, 2012.
    • Accepted March 12, 2013.
  • This research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health [Grant R01GM41935]. B.S. was supported by an Eli Lilly and Company predoctoral fellowship.

  • This work was previously presented in part: Swift B, Nebot N, Lee JK, Proctor WR, Thakker DR, Lang D, Radtke M, Gnoth MJ, and Brouwer KLR (2010) Hepatic uptake and excretion of sorafenib and its metabolites. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Annual Meeting; 2010 Nov 14–18; New Orleans, LA.

  • dx.doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.048181.

Abbreviations

AUC
area under the concentration-time profile
BCA
bicinchoninic acid
BCRP
breast cancer resistance protein
BEI
biliary excretion index
CHO
Chinese hamster ovary cells
Clbiliary
in vitro biliary clearance
DMEM
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
HBSS
Hanks’ balanced salt solution
Km
Michaelis-Menten constant
MPP+
1-methyl-4-phenylpryidinium
MRP2
multidrug resistance-associated protein 2
NTCP
Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide
OAT
organic anion transporter
OATP
organic anion transporting polypeptide
OCT
organic cation transporter
P-gp
P-glycoprotein
TEA
tetraethylammonium
  • Copyright © 2013 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Agarwal S,
    2. Sane R,
    3. Ohlfest JR,
    4. Elmquist WF
    (2011) The role of the breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) in the distribution of sorafenib to the brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 336:223–233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Baur H,
    2. Kasperek S,
    3. Pfaff E
    (1975) Criteria of viability of isolated liver cells. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem 356:827–838.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Boess F,
    2. Kamber M,
    3. Romer S,
    4. Gasser R,
    5. Muller D,
    6. Albertini S,
    7. Suter L
    (2003) Gene expression in two hepatic cell lines, cultured primary hepatocytes, and liver slices compared to the in vivo liver gene expression in rats: possible implications for toxicogenomics use of in vitro systems. Toxicol Sci 73:386–402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Briz O,
    2. Romero MR,
    3. Martinez-Becerra P,
    4. Macias RI,
    5. Perez MJ,
    6. Jimenez F,
    7. San Martin FG,
    8. Marin JJ
    (2006) OATP8/1B3-mediated cotransport of bile acids and glutathione: an export pathway for organic anions from hepatocytes? J Biol Chem 281:30326–30335.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Cui Y,
    2. König J,
    3. Leier I,
    4. Buchholz U,
    5. Keppler D
    (2001) Hepatic uptake of bilirubin and its conjugates by the human organic anion transporter SLC21A6. J Biol Chem 276:9626–9630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Cvetkovic M,
    2. Leake B,
    3. Fromm MF,
    4. Wilkinson GR,
    5. Kim RB
    (1999) OATP and P-glycoprotein transporters mediate the cellular uptake and excretion of fexofenadine. Drug Metab Dispos 27:866–871.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Davies B,
    2. Morris T
    (1993) Physiological parameters in laboratory animals and humans. Pharm Res 10:1093–1095.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Fenner KS,
    2. Troutman MD,
    3. Kempshall S,
    4. Cook JA,
    5. Ware JA,
    6. Smith DA,
    7. Lee CA
    (2009) Drug-drug interactions mediated through P-glycoprotein: clinical relevance and in vitro-in vivo correlation using digoxin as a probe drug. Clin Pharmacol Ther 85:173–181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ghassabian S,
    2. Rawling T,
    3. Zhou F,
    4. Doddareddy MR,
    5. Tattam BN,
    6. Hibbs DE,
    7. Edwards RJ,
    8. Cui PH,
    9. Murray M
    (2012) Role of human CYP3A4 in the biotransformation of sorafenib to its major oxidized metabolites. Biochem Pharmacol 84:215–223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gnoth MJ,
    2. Sandmann S,
    3. Engel K,
    4. Radtke M
    (2010) In vitro to in vivo comparison of the substrate characteristics of sorafenib tosylate toward P-glycoprotein. Drug Metab Dispos 38:1341–1346.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Hayer-Zillgen M,
    2. Brüss M,
    3. Bönisch H
    (2002) Expression and pharmacological profile of the human organic cation transporters hOCT1, hOCT2 and hOCT3. Br J Pharmacol 136:829–836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Ho RH,
    2. Leake BF,
    3. Roberts RL,
    4. Lee W,
    5. Kim RB
    (2004) Ethnicity-dependent polymorphism in Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (SLC10A1) reveals a domain critical for bile acid substrate recognition. J Biol Chem 279:7213–7222.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Ho RH,
    2. Tirona RG,
    3. Leake BF,
    4. Glaeser H,
    5. Lee W,
    6. Lemke CJ,
    7. Wang Y,
    8. Kim RB
    (2006) Drug and bile acid transporters in rosuvastatin hepatic uptake: function, expression, and pharmacogenetics. Gastroenterology 130:1793–1806.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hoen PA,
    2. Commandeur JN,
    3. Vermeulen NP,
    4. Van Berkel TJ,
    5. Bijsterbosch MK
    (2000) Selective induction of cytochrome P450 3A1 by dexamethasone in cultured rat hepatocytes: analysis with a novel reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay section sign. Biochem Pharmacol 60:1509–1518.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Hu S,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Franke R,
    4. Orwick S,
    5. Zhao M,
    6. Rudek MA,
    7. Sparreboom A,
    8. Baker SD
    (2009) Interaction of the multikinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib with solute carriers and ATP-binding cassette transporters. Clin Cancer Res 15:6062–6069.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Ieiri I,
    2. Higuchi S,
    3. Sugiyama Y
    (2009) Genetic polymorphisms of uptake (OATP1B1, 1B3) and efflux (MRP2, BCRP) transporters: implications for inter-individual differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of statins and other clinically relevant drugs. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 5:703–729.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kamisako T,
    2. Leier I,
    3. Cui Y,
    4. König J,
    5. Buchholz U,
    6. Hummel-Eisenbeiss J,
    7. Keppler D
    (1999) Transport of monoglucuronosyl and bisglucuronosyl bilirubin by recombinant human and rat multidrug resistance protein 2. Hepatology 30:485–490.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Koepsell H,
    2. Schmitt BM,
    3. Gorboulev V
    (2003) Organic cation transporters. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 150:36–90.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. König J,
    2. Cui Y,
    3. Nies AT,
    4. Keppler D
    (2000) A novel human organic anion transporting polypeptide localized to the basolateral hepatocyte membrane. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 278:G156–G164.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Lathia C,
    2. Lettieri J,
    3. Cihon F,
    4. Gallentine M,
    5. Radtke M,
    6. Sundaresan P
    (2006) Lack of effect of ketoconazole-mediated CYP3A inhibition on sorafenib clinical pharmacokinetics. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57:685–692.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. LeCluyse EL,
    2. Bullock PL,
    3. Parkinson A,
    4. Hochman JH
    (1996) Cultured rat hepatocytes. Pharm Biotechnol 8:121–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Leslie EM,
    2. Watkins PB,
    3. Kim RB,
    4. Brouwer KLR
    (2007) Differential inhibition of rat and human Na+-dependent taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP/SLC10A1) by bosentan: a mechanism for species differences in hepatotoxicity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 321:1170–1178.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Meier PJ,
    3. Ballatori N
    (2000) Oatp2 mediates bidirectional organic solute transport: a role for intracellular glutathione. Mol Pharmacol 58:335–340.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. LeCluyse EL,
    3. Brouwer KR,
    4. Gan LS,
    5. Lemasters JJ,
    6. Stieger B,
    7. Meier PJ,
    8. Brouwer KLR
    (1999) Biliary excretion in primary rat hepatocytes cultured in a collagen-sandwich configuration. Am J Physiol 277:G12–G21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Mahagita C,
    2. Grassl SM,
    3. Piyachaturawat P,
    4. Ballatori N
    (2007) Human organic anion transporter 1B1 and 1B3 function as bidirectional carriers and do not mediate GSH-bile acid cotransport. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 293:G271–G278.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Mikkaichi T,
    2. Suzuki T,
    3. Tanemoto M,
    4. Ito S,
    5. Abe T
    (2004) The organic anion transporter (OATP) family. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 19:171–179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Miller AA,
    2. Murry DJ,
    3. Owzar K,
    4. Hollis DR,
    5. Kennedy EB,
    6. Abou-Alfa G,
    7. Desai A,
    8. Hwang J,
    9. Villalona-Calero MA,
    10. Dees EC,
    11. et al.
    (2009) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction: CALGB 60301. J Clin Oncol 27:1800–1805.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Minematsu T,
    2. Giacomini KM
    (2011) Interactions of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with organic cation transporters and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion proteins. Mol Cancer Ther 10:531–539.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Ming X,
    2. Ju W,
    3. Wu H,
    4. Tidwell RR,
    5. Hall JE,
    6. Thakker DR
    (2009) Transport of dicationic drugs pentamidine and furamidine by human organic cation transporters. Drug Metab Dispos 37:424–430.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Morita N,
    2. Kusuhara H,
    3. Sekine T,
    4. Endou H,
    5. Sugiyama Y
    (2001) Functional characterization of rat organic anion transporter 2 in LLC-PK1 cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298:1179–1184.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Ohtsuki S,
    2. Asaba H,
    3. Takanaga H,
    4. Deguchi T,
    5. Hosoya K,
    6. Otagiri M,
    7. Terasaki T
    (2002) Role of blood-brain barrier organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3) in the efflux of indoxyl sulfate, a uremic toxin: its involvement in neurotransmitter metabolite clearance from the brain. J Neurochem 83:57–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Ratain MJ,
    2. Eisen T,
    3. Stadler WM,
    4. Flaherty KT,
    5. Kaye SB,
    6. Rosner GL,
    7. Gore M,
    8. Desai AA,
    9. Patnaik A,
    10. Xiong HQ,
    11. et al.
    (2006) Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24:2505–2512.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Shibayama Y,
    2. Nakano K,
    3. Maeda H,
    4. Taguchi M,
    5. Ikeda R,
    6. Sugawara M,
    7. Iseki K,
    8. Takeda Y,
    9. Yamada K
    (2011) Multidrug resistance protein 2 implicates anticancer drug-resistance to sorafenib. Biol Pharm Bull 34:433–435.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Shitara Y,
    2. Sugiyama Y
    (2006) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors: drug-drug interactions and interindividual differences in transporter and metabolic enzyme functions. Pharmacol Ther 112:71–105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Soars MG,
    2. Webborn PJ,
    3. Riley RJ
    (2009) Impact of hepatic uptake transporters on pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions: use of assays and models for decision making in the pharmaceutical industry. Mol Pharm 6:1662–1677.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Strumberg D,
    2. Clark JW,
    3. Awada A,
    4. Moore MJ,
    5. Richly H,
    6. Hendlisz A,
    7. Hirte HW,
    8. Eder JP,
    9. Lenz HJ,
    10. Schwartz B
    (2007) Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of sorafenib: a review of four phase I trials in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. Oncologist 12:426–437.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Strumberg D,
    2. Richly H,
    3. Hilger RA,
    4. Schleucher N,
    5. Korfee S,
    6. Tewes M,
    7. Faghih M,
    8. Brendel E,
    9. Voliotis D,
    10. Haase CG,
    11. et al.
    (2005) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the Novel Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor BAY 43-9006 in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 23:965–972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Sun W,
    2. Wu RR,
    3. van Poelje PD,
    4. Erion MD
    (2001) Isolation of a family of organic anion transporters from human liver and kidney. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 283:417–422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Swift B,
    2. Yue W,
    3. Brouwer KLR
    (2010) Evaluation of (99m)technetium-mebrofenin and (99m)technetium-sestamibi as specific probes for hepatic transport protein function in rat and human hepatocytes. Pharm Res 27:1987–1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Thomas J,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Clark RE,
    4. Pirmohamed M
    (2004) Active transport of imatinib into and out of cells: implications for drug resistance. Blood 104:3739–3745.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. van Montfoort JE,
    2. Hagenbuch B,
    3. Fattinger KE,
    4. Müller M,
    5. Groothuis GM,
    6. Meijer DK,
    7. Meier PJ
    (1999) Polyspecific organic anion transporting polypeptides mediate hepatic uptake of amphipathic type II organic cations. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 291:147–152.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Vavricka SR,
    2. Van Montfoort J,
    3. Ha HR,
    4. Meier PJ,
    5. Fattinger K
    (2002) Interactions of rifamycin SV and rifampicin with organic anion uptake systems of human liver. Hepatology 36:164–172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Wilhelm SM,
    2. Carter C,
    3. Tang L,
    4. Wilkie D,
    5. McNabola A,
    6. Rong H,
    7. Chen C,
    8. Zhang X,
    9. Vincent P,
    10. McHugh M,
    11. et al.
    (2004) BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 64:7099–7109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Wolf KK,
    2. Brouwer KR,
    3. Pollack GM,
    4. Brouwer KLR
    (2008) Effect of albumin on the biliary clearance of compounds in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 36:2086–2092.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Dresser MJ,
    3. Gray AT,
    4. Yost SC,
    5. Terashita S,
    6. Giacomini KM
    (1997) Cloning and functional expression of a human liver organic cation transporter. Mol Pharmacol 51:913–921.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Zimmerman EI,
    2. Hu S,
    3. Roberts JL,
    4. Gibson AA,
    5. Orwick SJ,
    6. Li L,
    7. Sparreboom A,
    8. Baker SD
    (2013) Contribution of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 to the disposition of sorafenib and sorafenib-glucuronide. Clin Cancer Res DOI: [published ahead of print].
  47. ↵
    1. Zollner G,
    2. Fickert P,
    3. Silbert D,
    4. Fuchsbichler A,
    5. Marschall HU,
    6. Zatloukal K,
    7. Denk H,
    8. Trauner M
    (2003) Adaptive changes in hepatobiliary transporter expression in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol 38:717–727.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Zollner G,
    2. Wagner M,
    3. Fickert P,
    4. Silbert D,
    5. Gumhold J,
    6. Zatloukal K,
    7. Denk H,
    8. Trauner M
    (2007) Expression of bile acid synthesis and detoxification enzymes and the alternative bile acid efflux pump MRP4 in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Liver Int 27:920–929.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 41 (6)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 41, Issue 6
1 Jun 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sorafenib Hepatobiliary Disposition: Mechanisms of Hepatic Uptake and Disposition of Generated Metabolites
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Sorafenib Hepatobiliary Disposition

Brandon Swift, Noelia Nebot, Jin Kyung Lee, Tianxiang Han, William R. Proctor, Dhiren R. Thakker, Dieter Lang, Martin Radtke, Mark J. Gnoth and Kim L. R. Brouwer
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 1, 2013, 41 (6) 1179-1186; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.048181

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Research ArticleArticle

Sorafenib Hepatobiliary Disposition

Brandon Swift, Noelia Nebot, Jin Kyung Lee, Tianxiang Han, William R. Proctor, Dhiren R. Thakker, Dieter Lang, Martin Radtke, Mark J. Gnoth and Kim L. R. Brouwer
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 1, 2013, 41 (6) 1179-1186; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.048181
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • BSEP Function in Suspension Hepatocytes
  • Candesartan glucuronide serves as a CYP2C8 inhibitor
  • Role of AADAC on eslicarbazepine acetate hydrolysis
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics