Abstract

Atorvastatin is eliminated by CYP3A4 which follows carrier-mediated uptake into hepatocytes by OATP1B1, OATP1B3, and OATP2B1. Multiple clinical studies demonstrated that OATP inhibition by rifampin had a greater impact on atorvastatin systemic concentration than itraconazole-mediated CYP3A4 inhibition. If it is assumed that the blood and hepatocyte compartments are differentiated by the concentration gradient that is established by OATPs, and if the rate of uptake into the hepatocyte is rate-determining to the elimination of atorvastatin from the body, then it is hypothesized that blood concentrations may not necessarily reflect liver concentrations. In wild-type mice, rifampin had a greater effect on systemic exposure of atorvastatin than ketoconazole, as the blood area under the blood concentration-time curve increased 7- and 2-fold, respectively. In contrast, liver concentrations were affected more by ketoconazole than by rifampin, as liver levels increased 21- and 4-fold, respectively. Similarly, in Cyp3a knockout animals, 39-fold increases in liver concentrations were observed despite insignificant changes in the blood area under the blood concentration-time curve. Interestingly, blood and liver levels in Oatp1a/b knockout animals were similar to wild types, suggesting that Oatp1a/b knockout may be necessary but not sufficient to completely describe atorvastatin uptake in mice. Data presented in this work indicate that there is a substantial drug interaction when blocking atorvastatin metabolism, but the effects of this interaction are predominantly manifested in the liver and may not be captured when monitoring changes in the systemic circulation. Consequently, there may be a disconnect when trying to relate blood exposure to instances of hepatotoxicity because a pharmacokinetic-toxicity relationship may not be obvious from blood concentrations.