Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Cytochrome P450 3A4 and CYP3A5-Catalyzed Bioactivation of Lapatinib

Joanna K. Towles, Rebecca N. Clark, Michelle D. Wahlin, Vinita Uttamsingh, Allan E. Rettie and Klarissa D. Jackson
Drug Metabolism and Disposition October 2016, 44 (10) 1584-1597; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.116.070839
Joanna K. Towles
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. Nashville, Tennessee (J.K.T., R.N.C., K.D.J.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington (M.D.W., A.E.R); and CoNCERT Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts (V.U.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca N. Clark
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. Nashville, Tennessee (J.K.T., R.N.C., K.D.J.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington (M.D.W., A.E.R); and CoNCERT Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts (V.U.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle D. Wahlin
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. Nashville, Tennessee (J.K.T., R.N.C., K.D.J.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington (M.D.W., A.E.R); and CoNCERT Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts (V.U.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vinita Uttamsingh
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. Nashville, Tennessee (J.K.T., R.N.C., K.D.J.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington (M.D.W., A.E.R); and CoNCERT Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts (V.U.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allan E. Rettie
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. Nashville, Tennessee (J.K.T., R.N.C., K.D.J.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington (M.D.W., A.E.R); and CoNCERT Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts (V.U.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klarissa D. Jackson
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. Nashville, Tennessee (J.K.T., R.N.C., K.D.J.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington (M.D.W., A.E.R); and CoNCERT Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts (V.U.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Metabolic activation of the dual-tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib by cytochromes CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 has been implicated in lapatinib-induced idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity; however, the relative enzyme contributions have not been established. The objective of this study was to examine the roles of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in lapatinib bioactivation leading to a reactive, potentially toxic quinoneimine. Reaction phenotyping experiments were performed using individual human recombinant P450 enzymes and P450-selective chemical inhibitors. Lapatinib metabolites and quinoneimine-glutathione (GSH) adducts were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A screen of cDNA-expressed P450s confirmed that CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 are the primary enzymes responsible for quinoneimine-GSH adduct formation using lapatinib or O-dealkylated lapatinib as the substrate. The mean kinetic parameters (Km and kcat) of lapatinib O-dealkylation revealed that CYP3A4 was 5.2-fold more efficient than CYP3A5 at lapatinib O-dealkylation (CYP3A4 kcat/Km = 6.8 μM−1 min−1 versus CYP3A5 kcat/Km = 1.3 μM−1 min−1). Kinetic analysis of GSH adduct formation indicated that CYP3A4 was also 4-fold more efficient at quinoneimine-GSH adduct formation as measured by kcat (maximum relative GSH adduct levels)/Km (CYP3A4 = 0.0082 vs. CYP3A5 = 0.0021). In human liver microsomal (HLM) incubations, CYP3A4-selective inhibitors SR-9186 and CYP3cide reduced formation of GSH adducts by 78% and 72%, respectively, compared with >90% inhibition by the pan-CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole. The 16%–22% difference between CYP3A- and CYP3A4-selective inhibition indicates the involvement of remaining CYP3A5 activity in generating reactive metabolites from lapatinib in pooled HLMs. Collectively, these findings support the conclusion that both CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 are quantitatively important contributors to lapatinib bioactivation.

Footnotes

    • Received April 4, 2016.
    • Accepted July 21, 2016.
  • This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute [Grant K01CA190711]. Research reported in this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

  • dx.doi.org/10.1124/dmd.116.070839.

  • Copyright © 2016 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
View Full Text

 

DMD articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years. 

Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page. 

 

  • Click here for information on institutional subscriptions.
  • Click here for information on individual ASPET membership.

 

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 44 (10)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 44, Issue 10
1 Oct 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cytochrome P450 3A4 and CYP3A5-Catalyzed Bioactivation of Lapatinib
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Contribution of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 to Lapatinib Bioactivation

Joanna K. Towles, Rebecca N. Clark, Michelle D. Wahlin, Vinita Uttamsingh, Allan E. Rettie and Klarissa D. Jackson
Drug Metabolism and Disposition October 1, 2016, 44 (10) 1584-1597; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.116.070839

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Contribution of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 to Lapatinib Bioactivation

Joanna K. Towles, Rebecca N. Clark, Michelle D. Wahlin, Vinita Uttamsingh, Allan E. Rettie and Klarissa D. Jackson
Drug Metabolism and Disposition October 1, 2016, 44 (10) 1584-1597; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.116.070839
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Metabolic enzymes in nintedanib metabolism
  • Mechanism of AO Inactivation by Hydralazine
  • Warfarin PBPK modeling with target binding
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics