Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

Application of Static Models to Predict Midazolam Clinical Interactions in the Presence of Single or Multiple Hepatitis C Virus Drugs

Yaofeng Cheng, Li Ma, Shu-Ying Chang, W. Griffith Humphreys and Wenying Li
Drug Metabolism and Disposition August 2016, 44 (8) 1372-1380; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.116.070409
Yaofeng Cheng
Pharmaceutical Candidate Optimization, Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Ma
Pharmaceutical Candidate Optimization, Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shu-Ying Chang
Pharmaceutical Candidate Optimization, Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Griffith Humphreys
Pharmaceutical Candidate Optimization, Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wenying Li
Pharmaceutical Candidate Optimization, Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Chemical structures of ASV (BMS-650032), DCV (BMS-790052), BCV (BMS-791325), and BCV-M1 (major metabolite of BCV).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Curve fitting of CYP3A4 mRNA induction data from two individual donor hepatocytes treated with BCV using the simple Emax model (A: donor 1; C: donor 2) and the four parameter logic model. (B: donor 1; D: donor 2)

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Strategies to evaluate P450 DDI risk for single and multiple perpetrators using static models.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    CYP3A4 mRNA change relative to dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (0.1%) treatment in hepatocytes from three human donors following incubation with ASV, DCV, BCV, or BCV-M1

    DrugTreatmentCYP3A4 mRNAa
    Donor 1Donor 2Donor 3
    ASVDonorHC3-15HC1-18HC5-10
    DMSO (0.1%)111
    0.049 µg/ml3.73bND0.802
    0.15 µg/ml1.531.861.13
    0.49 µg/ml4.723.581.77
    1 µg/ml7.795.52.92
    2 µg/ml8.6ND3.66
    4.9 µg/ml12.16.74.3
    10 µg/ml8.7c4.73c3.7
    20 µg/ml4.95c2.39c1.74c
    Rifampin (10 µM)2618.18.15
    DCVDonorHC3-15HC1-18HC5-10
    DMSO (0.1%)111
    0.16 µg/ml1.381.451.21
    0.32 µg/ml1.441.661.34
    0.75 µg/ml2.52.271.47
    1.6 µg/ml5.595.74.91
    2.5 µg/ml7.489.223.7
    4 µg/ml12.812.16.35
    6 µg/ml20.313.26.68
    9.6 µg/ml27.3138.76
    Rifampin (10 µM)2618.18.15
    BCVDonorHC3-15HC3-17HC5-10
    DMSO (0.1%)1.001.001.00
    0.15 µg/ml1.961.451.90
    0.35 µg/ml3.271.991.67
    0.8 µg/ml5.642.592.67
    1.5 µg/ml6.362.612.43
    3.5 µg/ml5.772.182.64
    8 µg/ml3.88c2.092.45
    15 µg/ml2.70c1.38c1.43c
    30 µg/ml0.29c0.08c0.26c
    Rifampin (10 µM)29.803.707.93
    BCV-M1DonorHC3-15HC3-17HC5-10
    DMSO (0.1%)1.001.001.00
    0.028 µg/ml1.041.150.97
    0.08 µg/ml1.631.261.05
    0.28 µg/ml3.571.991.61
    0.8 µg/ml7.172.492.22
    2.8 µg/ml8.232.262.41
    8 µg/ml5.24c2.141.89c
    15 µg/ml3.78c1.87c3.08
    30 µg/ml0.32c0.15c0.14c
    Rifampin (10 µM)29.803.707.93
    • ND, not determined due to sample analysis error.

    • ↵a Values are relative to vehicle control, normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and are the average of triplicate determinations.

    • ↵b Anomalous data, possibly due to sample analysis error. Data were excluded from the curve fitting.

    • ↵c Data were excluded from the curve fitting because fold increase was <80% of the observed Emaxvalue.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Induction kinetic parameters (Emax and EC50) of ASV, DCV, BCV, and BCV-M1 following incubation with hepatocytes from three individual donors

    DrugParameterFold InductionFold Increase
    HC3-15HC1-18/HC3-17aHC5-10HC3-15HC1-18/HC3-17aHC5-10
    ASVEmax14.216.743.9414.106.683.00
    EC50 (µg/ml)1.000.610.581.380.680.78
    DCVEmax28.2413.058.2745.3011.9012.80
    EC50 (µg/ml)4.321.832.387.641.966.54
    BCVEmax6.542.362.446.172.231.64
    EC50 (µg/ml)0.200.030.020.460.450.19
    BCV-M1Emax9.682.302.749.131.551.62
    EC50 (µg/ml)0.390.020.210.580.190.47
    • ↵a Induction of ASV and DCV was evaluated using lot HC1-18 hepatocytes; induction of BCV and BCV-M1 was evaluated using lot HC3-17 hepatocytes.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    In vitro kinetic parameters of ASV, DCV, BCV, and BCV-M1 interaction with human CYP3A4

    DrugReverse inhibition, Ki,uTDIInduction
    KinactKI,uEmaxEC50
    µg/ml1/minµg/mlµg/ml
    ASV2.720.0321.0357.930.95
    DCV1.91NDND23.335.38
    BCV2.62NDND3.350.37
    BCV-M11.95NDND4.100.41
    • ND, not determined

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Summary of clinical studies and pharmacokinetic parameters

    Perpetrator DrugMidazolam Oral DoseReference
    DrugOral DoseCmaxfukaFa
    mgµg/mlmin−1mg
    ASV (twice a day)2000.3510.0020.0063a1b5Eley et al. (2011)
    ASV (twice a day)6000.6320.0020.0053a1b5Unpublished datac
    DCV (every day)601.2880.0060.013a0.715Bifano et al. (2013)
    BCV (twice a day)1501.835d/0.434e0.012d,e0.0067a,d0.72d5AbuTarif et al. (2014)
    BCV (twice a day)3003.875d/0.944e0.012d,e0.0067a,d0.72d5AbuTarif et al. (2014)
    Triple I
     ASV (twice a day)2000.4920.0020.0063f15Tao et al. (2016)g
     DCV (twice a day)300.9750.0060.013f0.71
     BCV (twice a day)751.675d/0.350e0.012d,e0.0067d,f0.72d
    Triple II
     ASV (twice a day)2000.4730.0020.0063f15Tao et al. (2016)g
     DCV (twice a day)300.9740.0060.013f0.71
     BCV (twice a day)1503.141d/0.664e0.012d,e0.0067d,f0.72d
    • ↵a Determined based on plasma concentration profile from the same study.

    • ↵b The Fh value of ASV is calculated to be 7%, which is lower than the oral bioavailability of ASV (9.3%), suggesting ASV oral absorption is high in humans. Thus, the Fa value of ASV is set as 1.

    • ↵c Data from an open-label, single-sequence study (AI447007), in which 18 healthy subjects (17 male and one female) received: 1) a single oral dose of 5 mg midazolam on day 1; 2) an oral dose of 600 mg ASV twice daily from day 2 to day 8; and 3) a single dose of 5 mg midazolam on day 8 (morning). The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the investigational site (MDS Pharma Services (US) Inc., Lincoln, NE). All subjects were closely monitored for adverse events throughout the study.

    • ↵d Values for BCV.

    • ↵e Values for BCV-M1.

    • ↵f Determined based on plasma concentration profile from the single agent studies.

    • ↵g Data from an open-label, single-sequence study (AI443021), in which 20 healthy subjects (19 male and one female) received the following: 1) a cocktail of P450 and transporter probe substrates (including 5 mg midazolam) administered orally as a single dose on day 1; 2) a combination of 200 mg ASV, 20 mg DCV, and 75 mg BCV administered orally twice daily from day 6 to 20 and a cocktail of P450 and P-glycoprotein substrates (including 5 mg midazolam) administered orally as a single dose on day 16; and 3) a combination of 200 mg ASV, 20 mg DCV, and 150 mg BCV administered orally twice daily from day 21 to 35 and a cocktail of P450 and transporter probe substrates (including 5 mg midazolam) administered orally as a single dose on day 31. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the investigational site (IntegReview, LTD, Austin, TX). All subjects were closely monitored for adverse events throughout the study.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Predictions for clinical DDI studies using basic and mechanistic static models

    Perpetrator DrugObserved AUCR (90% CI)Predicted AUCR
    R3 Averagea (Individualb)AUCR Averagea (Individualb)AUCR′c Averagea (Individualb)
    ASV (200 mg twice a day)0.71 (0.67–0.75)0.32 (0.26; 0.31; 0.52)2.36 (2.29; 2.37; 2.46)0.50 (0.35; 0.54; 0.83)
    ASV (600 mg twice a day)0.56 (0.50–0.64)0.24 (0.18; 0.24; 0.43)3.02 (2.94; 3.01; 3.16)0.70 (0.51; 0.75; 1.09)
    DCV (60 mg every day)0.87 (0.83–0.92)0.18 (0.13; 0.17; 0.32)0.43 (0.33; 0.44; 0.68)—g
    BCV (150 mg twice a day)0.50 (0.45–0.57)0.17 (0.10; 0.26; 0.31)0.53 (0.34; 0.70; 0.72)—g
    BCV (300 mg twice a day)0.44 (0.40–0.48)0.14 (0.08; 0.23; 0.27)0.55 (0.34; 0.75; 0.77)—g
    Triple Combination Id0.53 (0.47–0.60)0.084 (0.06; 0.17)1.94 (1.70; 2.12)0.33 (0.21; 0.59)
    Triple Combination IIe0.42 (0.37–0.48)0.078 (0.05; 0.16)1.73 (1.45; 1.94)0.32 (0.19; 0.58)
    • CI, confidence interval.

    • ↵a Model prediction using the average values of EC50 and Emax from Table 3.

    • ↵b Model prediction using the EC50 and Emax of individual donors from Table 2.

    • ↵c Mechanistic static model approach not including the TDI effect of ASV.

    • ↵d ASV (200 mg twice a day); DCV (30 mg twice a day); and BCV (75 mg twice a day).

    • ↵e ASV (200 mg twice a day); DCV (30 mg twice a day); and BCV (150 mg twice a day).

    • ↵g Study did not involve ASV, thus AUCR' value is not applicable.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Data Supplement

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data -

      Methods

      Supplement Figure 1 - Inhibition of CYP3A4 catalyzed midazolam 1'-hydroxylation by HCV compounds

      Supplement Figure 2 - Time dependent inhibition of CYP3A4 catalyzed midazolam 1'-hydroxylation by ASV (each point represents mean of triplicate, error bar represents standard deviation)

      Supplement Table 1 - Kinetic parameters of CYP3A4 inhibition and TDI by ASV, DCV, BCV and BCV-M1 in human liver microsomes

      Supplement Table 2 - Fitting outcomes for the CYP3A4 induction data

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 44 (8)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 44, Issue 8
1 Aug 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Application of Static Models to Predict Midazolam Clinical Interactions in the Presence of Single or Multiple Hepatitis C Virus Drugs
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Predicting DDI Risk for Hepatitis C Virus Drug Combination

Yaofeng Cheng, Li Ma, Shu-Ying Chang, W. Griffith Humphreys and Wenying Li
Drug Metabolism and Disposition August 1, 2016, 44 (8) 1372-1380; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.116.070409

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Research ArticleArticle

Predicting DDI Risk for Hepatitis C Virus Drug Combination

Yaofeng Cheng, Li Ma, Shu-Ying Chang, W. Griffith Humphreys and Wenying Li
Drug Metabolism and Disposition August 1, 2016, 44 (8) 1372-1380; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.116.070409
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • BSEP Function in Suspension Hepatocytes
  • Candesartan glucuronide serves as a CYP2C8 inhibitor
  • Role of AADAC on eslicarbazepine acetate hydrolysis
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics