Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticle

A Comparison of Total and Plasma Membrane Abundance of Transporters in Suspended, Plated, Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes Versus Human Liver Tissue Using Quantitative Targeted Proteomics and Cell Surface Biotinylation

Vineet Kumar, Laurent Salphati, Cornelis E. C. A. Hop, Guangqing Xiao, Yurong Lai, Anita Mathias, Xiaoyan Chu, W. Griffith Humphreys, Mingxiang Liao, Scott Heyward and Jashvant D. Unadkat
Drug Metabolism and Disposition April 2019, 47 (4) 350-357; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.118.084988
Vineet Kumar
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vineet Kumar
Laurent Salphati
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cornelis E. C. A. Hop
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guangqing Xiao
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yurong Lai
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita Mathias
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoyan Chu
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Griffith Humphreys
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mingxiang Liao
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Heyward
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jashvant D. Unadkat
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (V.K., J.D.U.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California (L.S., C.E.C.A.H.); Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts (G.X.); Departments of Clinical Research, Clinical Pharmacology, and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L., A.M.); Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (X.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey (W.G.H.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.L.); and BioIVT, Baltimore, Maryland (S.H.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Suspended (SH), plated (PH), and sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (SCH) are commonly used models to predict in vivo transporter-mediated hepatic uptake (SH or PH) or biliary (SCH) clearance of drugs. When doing so, the total and the plasma membrane abundance (PMA) of transporter are assumed not to differ between hepatocytes and liver tissue (LT). This assumption has never been tested. In this study, we tested this assumption by measuring the total and PMA of the transporters in human hepatocyte models versus LT (total only) from which they were isolated. Total abundance of OATP1B1/2B1/1B3, OCT1, and OAT2 was not significantly different between the hepatocytes and LT. The same was true for the PMA of these transporters across the hepatocyte models. In contrast, total abundance of the sinusoidal efflux transporter, MRP3, and the canalicular efflux transporters, MRP2 and P-gp, was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in SCH versus LT. Of the transporters tested, only the percentage of PMA of OATP1B1, P-gp, and MRP3, in SCH (82.8% ± 7.3%, 57.5% ± 10.9%, 69.3% ± 5.7%) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than in SH (73.3% ± 6.4%, 27.4% ± 6.4%, 53.6% ± 4.1%). If the transporters measured in the plasma membrane are functional and the PMA in SH is representative of that in LT, these data suggest that SH, PH, and SCH will result in equal prediction of hepatic uptake clearance of drugs mediated by the transporters tested above. However, SCH will predict higher sinusoidal efflux and biliary clearance of drugs if the change in PMA of these transporters is not taken into consideration.

Introduction

The liver, by either hepatic uptake/efflux transport or metabolism or both, predominately clears the majority of small-molecule drugs on the market or in development. Predicting in vivo hepatobiliary clearances of new molecular entities is important to predict their first in human dose, potential drug–drug interactions and the impact of genetic polymorphism of transporters/enzymes on their disposition. If the liver is the target organ for drug therapy, such predictions could also help estimate the hepatic exposure of a drug at a given dosage regimen.

Several hepatocyte models are commonly used to predict in vivo hepatobiliary clearance of drugs. Suspended (SH) or plated hepatocytes (PH) are used to predict in vivo hepatic uptake clearance of drugs, whereas sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (SCH) are used to predict both in vivo uptake and biliary clearance (CLb) of drugs. Although these hepatocyte models have been successfully used to predict in vivo metabolic clearance (CL) of drugs (Naritomi et al., 2003; Soars et al., 2007), they have been shown to severely underpredict the in vivo transporter-mediated CL of drugs (Abe et al., 2008; Jones et al., 2012; Zou et al., 2013). One possible reason for this underprediction could be a difference in hepatic transporter abundance (total and/or plasma membrane) between hepatocyte models and liver tissue (LT). Indeed, we have previously shown this to be the case in the rat SCH versus LT (Ishida et al., 2018). Taking into consideration such difference in the total transporter abundance (SCH vs. LT) enabled us to successfully predict rosuvastatin hepatic uptake CL in rats determined by positron emission tomography imaging (Ishida et al., 2018). Therefore, to investigate whether the same was true for human hepatocytes, we determined the total and the plasma membrane transporter abundance in the hepatocyte models versus human LT (total only) using targeted quantitative proteomics. To do so, we included the following unique design features not hitherto implemented by others: 1) the abundance of hepatic transporters in the hepatocyte models was compared with the LT from which the hepatocytes were isolated; 2) the percentage of plasma membrane abundance (PMA) of hepatic transporters was quantified in the hepatocyte models using a cell surface biotinylation method optimized in our laboratory; 3) to avoid interindividual variability in the total membrane isolation (a method routinely used by us and others), the total abundance of transporters was quantified in the homogenate (not total membrane) of human liver tissues and hepatocytes. In this work, we present data from these studies, which can guide selection of the appropriate hepatocyte model to predict in vivo hepatic uptake and biliary efflux CL of drugs.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Reagents

Synthetic signature peptides for OATP1B1, OATP2B1, OATP1B3, NTCP, OCT1, OAT2, MRP3, MRP2, P-gp, and BSEP were obtained from New England Peptides (Boston, MA). The corresponding stable isotope-labeled peptides for above transporters and Na+-K+ ATPase, dithiothreitol (DTT), iodoacetamide, mass spectrometry grade trypsin, William’s E medium (no glutamine), cryopreserved hepatocyte recovery medium, total protein quantification bicinchoninic acid assay kit, Hanks’ balanced salt solution with calcium and magnesium, and Pierce cell surface protein isolation kit were obtained from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL). Pierce cell surface protein isolation kit contains sulfosuccinimidyl-2-(biotinamido) ethyl-1, 3-dithiopropionate, quenching solution (100 mm glycine), lysis buffer, neutravidin agarose gel, wash buffer, column accessory pack, DTT, phosphate buffer, and Tris buffer. High-pressure liquid chromatography–grade acetonitrile and SDS were purchased from Fischer Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ). Formic acid was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). All reagents were analytical grade. Twenty-four–well collagen-coated plates and matrigel were purchased from Corning (Kennebunk, ME). Human hepatocyte thaw medium, INVITROGRO CP medium, INVITROGRO HI medium, and TORPEDO antibiotic mix were obtained from BioIVT (Westbury, NY).

Procurement of Human Liver Tissues and Hepatocytes

Human liver frozen tissues (about 150–250 mg, n = 4) and cryopreserved human hepatocytes isolated from the respective human liver tissues were obtained from BioIVT. The demographics of the human liver donors are shown in Supplemental Table 1.

Homogenate Preparation of Human Liver Tissue and Hepatocytes (SH, PH, and SCH) To Quantify Total Transporter Abundance

LT.

About 50–100 mg human liver tissue from each donor was homogenized in extraction buffer II (Pierce cell surface protein isolation kit) in Omni Bead Ruptor at 4°C. The homogenized liver tissue was dissolved in extraction buffer II and 2% SDS (1:1) for protein quantification by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analyses.

SH.

Cryopreserved human hepatocytes were partially thawed at 37°C and then quickly transferred to a 15-ml tube containing 5 ml cryopreserved hepatocyte recovery medium (4°C). After centrifugation at 1000g for 5 minutes at 4°C, the cryopreserved hepatocyte recovery medium was aspirated, and 5 ml William’s E medium (37°C) was added to the hepatocytes. The live hepatocytes were counted using the trypan blue exclusion method. About 8.4 × 106 viable hepatocytes were transferred to a 15-ml tube containing Hanks’ balanced salt solution buffer and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Then the hepatocytes were pelleted by centrifuging the tube at 1000g for 5 minutes at 4°C. The pellet was dissolved in extraction buffer II and 2% SDS (1:1) for protein quantification by LC-MS/MS analyses.

PH.

About 0.35 × 106 hepatocytes were plated per well in a 24-well collagen-coated plate for 5 hours with 0.5 ml/well TORPEDO containing INVITROGRO CP medium (1:9 (v/v). Then the cells were scraped and centrifuged at 1000g for 5 minutes at 4°C to collect the hepatocytes pellet. The pellet was dissolved in extraction buffer II and 2% SDS (1:1) for protein quantification by LC-MS/MS analyses.

SCH.

About 0.35 × 106 hepatocytes/well were plated in a 24-well collagen-coated plate for 24 hours with 0.5 ml/well TORPEDO containing INVITROGRO CP medium (1:9 (v/v). Then the medium was replaced with TORPEDO containing INVITROGRO HI medium with 0.25 mg/ml matrigel. Medium was replaced daily with 0.5 ml/well fresh TORPEDO containing INVITROGRO HI. On day 4 of the sandwich culture, the cells were scraped and centrifuged at 1000g for 5 minutes at 4°C to collect the hepatocytes pellet. The pellet was dissolved in 2 ml extraction buffer II and 2% SDS (1:1) for protein quantification by LC-MS/MS analyses.

Plasma Membrane Isolation from Suspended, Plated, and Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes by Cell Surface Biotinylation

Plasma membrane from SH, PH, and SCH was isolated, using a cell surface biotinylation methodology optimized in our laboratory (Kumar et al., 2017, 2018). The cell surface biotinylation method nonspecifically biotinylates plasma membrane proteins, including many proteins other than the transporters of interest. This nonspecific biotinylation allows one to isolate pure plasma membrane fractions from cells and hepatocytes. Briefly, SH (∼8.4 × 106 hepatocytes) or PH/SCH (0.35 × 106 hepatocytes/well, 24-well plate) were incubated with 10 ml or 0.5 ml/well sulfosuccinimidyl-2-(biotinamido) ethyl-1, 3-dithiopropionate (0.78 mg/ml), respectively, at 37°C for 30 minutes. Then hepatocytes were washed twice with 10 ml phosphate-buffered saline buffer, scraped, and centrifuged at 500g for 3 minutes at 4°C to collect the hepatocytes pellet and lysed in 750 μl lysis buffer. After cell lysis, the biotinylated plasma membrane was isolated using neutravidin resin columns. Fractions representing biotinylated (plasma membrane fraction) and nonbiotinylated (intracellular fraction) were collected for protein quantification by LC-MS/MS analyses. As a quality control check, only samples that fell within the range of 100% ± 30% recovery of cellular proteins (relative to the homogenate) were deemed acceptable.

Applying the cell surface biotinylation method (Kumar et al., 2017) to SCH posed an interesting question. Should this method be applied to SCH in the presence or absence of calcium (Ca2+)? In the presence of Ca2+, the hepatocytes form tight junctions (Pfeifer et al., 2013). These tight junctions, which may hinder accessibility of the biotinylation reagent to the canalicular membrane, are disrupted in the absence of Ca2+. Therefore, to investigate whether there was any difference in the efficiency of cell surface biotinylation, we conducted a pilot study of cell surface biotinylation of SCH in the presence and absence of Ca2+. The abundance of plasma membrane hepatic transporters as a percentage of total (homogenate), in presence or absence of Ca2+, was statistically not different (Wilcoxon signed rank test; Supplemental Fig. 1). Therefore, all subsequent cell surface biotinylation experiments in hepatocytes were conducted in the presence of Ca2+.

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Total and Plasma Membrane Transporter Abundance

Total protein content (wt/wt) in human liver and hepatocytes homogenate was quantified by the bicinchoninic acid assay. Transporter abundance was quantified using validated and optimized proteomics protocols implemented in our laboratory (Prasad and Unadkat, 2014a,b; Wang et al., 2015). Briefly, liver tissue/hepatocyte homogenates (equivalent to 0.2 mg total protein) were treated with 45 μl ammonium bicarbonate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.8), 25 μl 3% sodium deoxycholate (w/v), 12.5 μl DTT (250 mM), and 5 μl human albumin (10 mg/ml). Proteins present in the sample were denatured, and disulfide bond between cysteine residues was reduced by incubation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by the addition of 25 μl iodoacetamide (200 mM; an alkylating agent) and treatment with ice-cold methanol (0.5 ml), chloroform (0.2 ml), and water (0.45 ml) and centrifugation (12,000g). Lastly, the protein sample was digested with 20 μl trypsin (equivalent to 3.2 µg trypsin), mixed with 20 μl labeled internal standards, and followed by centrifugation at 5000g for 5 minutes at 4°C, and 5 μl supernatant was introduced into the LC-MS/MS system. The calibration standards were prepared by spiking peptide standards into the extraction buffer II of the membrane protein extraction kit. As an internal biologic control, total membrane isolated from 39 human livers was pooled (PHL) (Wang et al., 2016), aliquoted, and stored at −80°C. This PHL sample was processed and analyzed in each LC-MS/MS run to ensure that the data from PHL were consistent (within 100% ± 20%) with the liver transporter abundance data published by us (Wang et al., 2016). We note in this work that the surrogate peptide of interest for each transporter protein was localized intracellularly (except NTCP; Supplemental Table 3). Thus, it will not be modified by the biotinylation reagent (because this reagent does not permeate the cell membrane) (Supplemental Fig. 3).

Samples were analyzed, as described before (Kumar et al., 2018). Briefly, AB Sciex 6500 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Sciex, Framingham, MA) coupled to the Water Acquity Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) system (Waters, Milford, MA) was operated in electrospray positive ionization mode for LC-MS/MS analysis of the signature peptides (Supplemental Table 2). The NTCP peptide was quantified on a Waters Xevo TQS tandem mass spectrometer (Supplemental Table 2) due to the greater sensitivity of detection of this peptide afforded by this instrument. The transitions from doubly charged parent ion to singly charged product ions for the analyte peptides and their respective stable isotope-labeled peptides were monitored (Supplemental Table 2). The chromatographic separation and resolution were obtained on an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (1.8 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm) with a 0.2-µm inlet frits (Waters). Mobile phases (0.3 ml/min) consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B). The gradient program for UPLC method for determination of transporters in hepatocytes and LT was as follows: 0–3 minutes, 3% B; 3–10 minutes, 3%–13% B; 10–20 minutes, 13%–25% B; 20–22 minutes, 25%–33.3% B; 22–24 minutes, 33.3%–80% B; 24–25 minutes, 80% B; 25–26 minutes, 80%–3% B; 26–30 minutes, 3% B, including washing and re-equilibration for 4 minutes.

In all of the above analyses, Na+-K+ ATPase and calreticulin were used as positive controls of plasma membrane and intracellular (endoplasmic reticulum) marker proteins, respectively. For calreticulin, the stable labeled internal standard was not procured; therefore, the stable labeled internal standard of Na+-K+-ATPase was used to estimate the calreticulin peak area ratio, as reported previously (Kumar et al., 2017, 2018). The unlabeled peptide of Na+-K+ ATPase was not procured. Thus, Na+-K+ ATPase area ratio was used to determine the correlation with hepatic transporter abundance in LT and hepatocyte models (Supplemental Fig. 2).

Data and Statistical Analyses

Determination of Total Transporter Abundance in LT and Hepatocyte Models.

For each donor, the total transporter abundance in the homogenates of LT and hepatocyte models was determined as a mean ± S.D. of three to five independent experiments (only single experiment for NTCP).

Determination of Percentage of PMA of Transporters in Hepatocyte Models.

The percentage of PMA of hepatic transporters, calreticulin, and Na+-K+ ATPase in hepatocyte models (using cell surface biotinylation) was calculated, as reported previously (Kumar et al., 2017). The PMA of transporters in hepatocyte models was obtained by multiplying the percentage of PMA with the total transporter abundance in homogenate, and the data are reported as mean ± S.D. of four lots of hepatocytes from three independent experiments (only single experiment for NTCP).

Statistical Analysis.

Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparison nonparametric statistical method (using Prism 7, version 7.03) was used to compare (pairwise comparison for each donor) the percentage of PMA, PMA or total abundance of the hepatic transporters in hepatocyte models, and LT. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the percentage of PMA of hepatic transporters in SCH in the presence or absence of calcium.

Results

A Comparison of Total Transporter Abundance in Suspended, Plated, Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes and Human Liver Tissue.

In general, the total transporter abundance was most variable between the donors and between SCH and other hepatocyte models or LT. For each donor, the total abundance of sinusoidal uptake transporter proteins (OATP1B1/2B1/1B3, OCT1, and OAT2) was relatively consistent between different hepatocyte models and LT (Fig. 1). However, the total protein abundance of the sinusoidal efflux transporter, MRP3, and the canalicular efflux transporters, MRP2 and P-gp, was significantly increased in SCH compared with their respective LT (Fig. 1). NTCP and BSEP abundance in PH was significantly, but modestly, higher than LT, but similar to SH and SCH.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Total hepatic transporter abundance in LT, SH, PH, and SCH. There was no significant difference in the total abundance of uptake transporters OATP1B1/2B1/1B3, OCT1, and OAT2 between LT, SH, PH, and SCH. In contrast, total abundance of the efflux transporters MRP2, MRP3, and P-gp was significantly greater in SCH vs. LT. NTCP and BSEP abundance was significantly higher in PH vs. LT. Data for each donor are mean ± S.D. of three to five independent experiments (only single experiment for NTCP). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

A Comparison of Plasma Membrane Abundance of Transporters in Suspended, Plated, and Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes.

As expected, the localization of the intracellular (endoplasmic reticulum) marker, calreticulin, and the plasma membrane marker, Na+-K+ ATPase, was predominantly intracellular and in the plasma membrane, respectively (Fig. 2). For each donor, the percentage of PMA of hepatic transporters in the hepatocyte models was highly reproducible with % CV of <30%. The majority (i.e., >50%) of the sinusoidal uptake transporters were localized in the plasma membrane of the SH, PH, and SCH (Fig. 2). There was no significant difference in the percentage of PMA of sinusoidal uptake transporters in SH, PH, and SCH (except OATP1B1) (Fig. 2). Comparison of the PMA of NTCP in SCH versus other models could not be performed for YTW because NTCP could not be quantified in SCH for this donor (Fig. 3). The majority of the efflux transporters, P-gp (except in SCH) and BSEP, were intracellular, whereas the majority of MRP2 and MRP3 transporters were in the plasma membrane. The percentage of PMA of the efflux transporters, MRP2 and BSEP, was found to be similar in SH, PH, and SCH (Fig. 2). In contrast, the percentage of PMA of MRP3 and P-gp was significantly higher in SCH (69.3% and 57.5%) compared with SH (57.6% and 27.4%) (Fig. 2). The cell surface biotinylation method can be applied only to intact cells and not to tissues. Therefore, PMA of transporters was compared among only in the hepatocyte models. The abundance of sinusoidal uptake transporters in the plasma membrane in the different hepatocyte models was not significantly different (Fig. 3). In contrast, among the efflux transporters, only the PMA of MRP3, MRP2, and P-gp in SCH was found to be significantly greater than that in SH (Fig. 3). This difference was variable among the donors studied. For donor ADR, the change in PMA of MRP3, P-gp, and MRP2 between SCH versus SH was large, about 600%–2000%, whereas for JEL there was minimal or no change between SCH versus SH (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Percentage of plasma membrane abundance of hepatic transporters in SH, PH, and SCH. Hepatic uptake transporters (OATP1B1/2B1/1B3, NTCP, OCT1, OAT2) were mostly (>50%) localized in the plasma membrane of SH, PH, or SCH. P-gp and BSEP were mostly localized intracellularly in SH and PH, but in SCH, the localization in the plasma membrane of P-gp, but not BSEP, increased significantly to >50%. Na+-K+ ATPase and calreticulin were used as a positive control for plasma membrane and intracellular (endoplasmic reticulum) marker, respectively. Cell surface biotinylation experiment was conducted in presence of calcium-containing Hanks’ balanced salt solution buffer. Data are reported as mean ± S.D. of four hepatocyte donors (except SCH-NTCP: three donors), with data for each donor as the mean of three independent experiments (only single experiment for NTCP). *P < 0.05.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Plasma membrane abundance of hepatic transporters in SH, PH, and SCH. Values are expressed as percentage of abundance relative to the respective SH (derived from Figs. 1 and 2). Of the transporters studied, the PMA of MRP2, MRP3, and P-gp was significantly higher in SCH vs. SH. Data for each donor are reported as mean of three to five independent experiments (only single experiment for NTCP). *P < 0.05.

Correlation of Total Transporter Abundance in Suspended, Plated, Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes, and Human Liver Tissue.

The total abundance of the sinusoidal efflux, MRP3, and the canalicular efflux transporters, MRP2 and P-gp (but not BSEP), was highly correlated (R2 ≥ 0.88) with each other (Fig. 4, A–C). The total abundance of OATP1B1 and OATP2B1 showed good correlation with that of OAT2 and OCT1 (Fig. 4, D and E, R2 ≥ 0.67), respectively. The abundance of other transporters showed poor correlation (R2 ≤ 0.5) with each other (Fig. 4F; see Supplemental Table 3).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Correlation of total transporter abundance across LT, SH, PH, and SCH. The total abundance of MRP2, MRP3, and P-gp was highly correlated with each other [(A–C), R2 ≥ 0.88]. OAT2 and OCT1 abundance showed good correlation with OATP1B1 and OATP2B1 [(D and E), R2 ≥ 0.67], respectively, but the abundance of OAT2 was poorly correlated (R2 ≤ 0.5) with OATP1B3 [(F); representative of those showing poor correlation—see Supplemental Table 3]. Each datum is mean of three to five independent experiments.

Correlation of Abundance of Total and Plasma Membrane Transporter with the Abundance of Na+-K+ ATPase in Suspended, Plated, and Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes.

Total transporter abundance of sinusoidal and canalicular transporters showed poor correlation (R2 ≤ 0.28) with total abundance of Na+-K+ ATPase in the hepatocyte models (Supplemental Fig. 2A). Except for MRP2, MRP3, and P-gp, the same was true for PMA of these transporters. The PMA of MRP2, MRP3, and P-gp was highly correlated (R2 ≥ 0.7) with that of Na+-K+ ATPase (Supplemental Fig. 2B).

Discussion

To address the aims of our study, we deliberately incorporated, in our experiments, three distinct and unique design features, not hitherto implemented by others (Li et al., 2010; Jones et al., 2012; Schaefer et al., 2012; Vildhede et al., 2018). First, we systematically compared the changes in transporter abundance in SH, PH, and SCH relative to that in the liver tissue from which they were isolated. This design increased our power to discern the change in abundance of transporters in the hepatocyte models versus that in the corresponding liver tissue. Second, to avoid interbatch variability in total membrane yield, we determined the transporter abundance in the homogenate rather than in the total membrane isolated from the various samples (Billington et al., 2018; Vildhede et al., 2018). However, the disadvantage of this design (Wegler et al., 2017) was that it did not allow us to quantify the low abundance transporters MATE1, MRP4, and BCRP. Third, because it is the transporter abundance in the plasma membrane that is functionally important for the uptake or efflux of drugs, we determined this abundance in the hepatocyte models used. The plasma membrane transporter abundance data also answered the question whether the change (if any) in plasma membrane transporter abundance in the hepatocyte models was due to the change in total abundance or the change in the percentage of PMA or both.

There was significant interindividual variability in total transporter abundance between hepatocyte donors. This interindividual variability in OATP1B1 abundance was not due to genetic polymorphisms (Supplemental Table 1), which are known to affect the transporter abundance/activity (Prasad et al., 2014; Li and Barton, 2018). We have shown that the hepatic abundance of OATP1B1 is haplotype-dependent and follows the order *1b (e.g., FEA and JEL) > *1a (e.g., YTW) > *5 (e.g., ADR) (Prasad et al., 2014). Despite having the same OATP1B1 haplotype as FEA, one donor, JEL (African American), demonstrated higher total abundance of OATP1B1 and behaved differently from the other donors with respect to total and PMA in SCH versus other hepatocyte models (Figs. 1 and 3).

The lack of difference in the total abundance of the sinusoidal uptake transporters (except NTCP; Fig. 1) in the various hepatocyte models versus LT is contrary to our observation and those of others with rat hepatocytes. In the rat, a significant decrease in the total abundance of the sinusoidal Oatp transporters was observed in SCH versus LT (De Bruyn et al., 2013; Ishida et al., 2018). As was the case in this study for the suspended hepatocytes, we and others have previously shown that the total membrane abundance of MRP2, MRP3, P-gp, and BSEP (in total membrane) is similar between freshly isolated or cryopreserved hepatocytes versus human LT (Li et al., 2009b; Lundquist et al., 2014). The significantly higher total abundance of MRP2, MRP3, and P-gp in SCH versus LT (Fig. 1) is consistent with previously published data (although sparse) (Hoffmaster et al., 2004; Li et al., 2009a) obtained with Western blotting after cell lysis or quantitative proteomic analysis of total membrane (not homogenate) isolated from hepatocytes and LT. Similarly, rat Mrp2 abundance in cell lysate is stable in SCH over 4 days in culture (Zhang et al., 2005), but the abundance of rat P-gp, human P-gp, and MRP2 in cell lysate or total membrane isolated from SCH increases over 6 days in culture (Hoffmaster et al., 2004; Li et al., 2009a). Kimoto et al. (2012) have reported that OATP transporter abundance in human liver tissue is about twice that in cryopreserved human hepatocytes or SCH (Kimoto et al., 2012), but similar between cryopreserved human hepatocytes and SCH. Others have reported that all measured transporter abundance in total membrane was lower (except OCT1 and OAT2) in freshly isolated human hepatocytes compared with human liver tissue (Vildhede et al., 2015). However, the difference in transporter abundance between liver tissue and hepatocytes observed by others (Kimoto et al., 2012; Vildhede et al., 2015) could be due to differential loss in membrane as none of these studies was conducted with the homogenate of liver tissue or hepatocytes.

Because it is the PMA of the transporter that is important for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) of transporter-mediated clearances, we determined the percentage of PMA in hepatocyte models. As indicated earlier, the cell surface biotinylation methodology used in this study to isolate plasma membrane cannot be applied to tissues; therefore, the percentage of PMA of transporters in LT could not be determined. Although most (>50%) of the uptake transporters were localized in the plasma membrane of the hepatocytes, so were some of the efflux transporters, namely MRP2 and MRP3. However, most of P-gp (except in SCH) and BSEP were localized in the intracellular compartment. When the hepatocytes were sandwich-cultured, the percentage of PMA of both MRP3 and P-gp increased significantly (P < 0.05) compared with that in the SH. This change was most remarkable for P-gp, in which the percentage of PMA of P-gp was ∼twofold higher in SCH (∼58%) than in SH or PH (∼30%).

When the above data were combined, a clear picture emerged of the PMA of the transporters in the hepatocyte models. Although there was significant interindividual variability in the PMA of the transporters in SCH versus SH, the PMA in the other hepatocyte models (SH and PH) remained consistent with each other. Remarkably, PMA of MRP3, MRP2, and P-gp significantly increased in SCH versus SH with the greatest change occurring for P-gp (e.g., ∼2000% in ADR). The increase in PMA of P-gp and MRP3 in SCH versus SH was due to an increase in total abundance (Fig. 1) as well as an increase in the percentage of PMA (Fig. 2). In contrast, the increased PMA of MRP2 in SCH versus SH was due to an increase in the total transporter abundance (Fig. 1) but not in the percentage of PMA (Fig. 2). This could be an alternate explanation for the widely reported internalization of MRP2 in SCH (see below).

There are contradictory reports about internalization or intracellular localization of canalicular efflux transporters, resulting in decreased abundance in the plasma membrane of hepatocyte models (SH and PH). In freshly isolated hepatocytes, rat Mrp2 and Mdr1a/b are predominately localized intracellularly (Bow et al., 2008). However, when sandwich-cultured (days 5 and 6), Mdr1a/b and MDR1 are predominantly expressed in the plasma membrane of rat and human hepatocytes, respectively (Hoffmaster et al., 2004). In contrast, immunolocalization studies of Lundquist et al. (2014) have shown that the majority of the ABC transporters (P-gp, MRP2, and BCRP) are localized in the plasma membrane of the cryopreserved human hepatocytes and human livers. They also demonstrated transport activity of BCRP and P-gp in plated human and rat hepatocytes, suggesting that some (or perhaps all) of these transporters are localized to the plasma membrane (Lundquist et al., 2014). Unfortunately, all of the localization studies cited above are immunolocalization studies. Thus, the percentage of transporters in the plasma membrane versus that in the intracellular compartments was not quantified. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to quantify PMA of hepatic transporters in SH, PH, and SCH. Nevertheless, our data, along with others (Hoffmaster et al., 2004; Lam and Benet, 2004; Lam et al., 2006; Bow et al., 2008; Lundquist et al., 2014), indicate that canalicular transporters in human suspended and plated hepatocytes are not all internalized, but are also present in the plasma membrane.

If the percentage of PMA of sinusoidal uptake transporters in SH is representative of the LT and all transporters expressed in the plasma membrane are functional, our data (Figs. 1–3) suggest that any of human hepatocyte models (SH or PH or SCH) can be used to predict the in vivo hepatic uptake clearance of drugs mediated by OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT2, and OCT1 (Kumar et al., 2015) without the need to measure the plasma membrane or total abundance of the transporters. Likewise, SH or PH could be used to predict sinusoidal (or perhaps even biliary efflux) clearance of drugs without quantifying the total or PMA of these transporters. Whether SH or PH can be used to predict efflux clearance of drugs remains to be explored. In contrast, SCH, the most commonly used hepatocyte model to estimate in vivo CLb, will overpredict CLb and sinusoidal efflux clearance mediated by the transporters, MRP2/P-gp and MRP3, respectively, unless changes in the PMA of these transporters are quantified. It is worth noting that there are a few limitations to this conclusion. First, the PMA of the transporters in LT and the hepatocyte model is assumed to be proportional to their activity. Second, because there is considerable interindividual variability in the abundance of transporters, this conclusion is made based on a limited data set of four lots of hepatocytes. If the percentage of PMA of the transporter in LT is higher than in SH, PH, or SCH, then these hepatocyte models will underpredict the hepatic uptake clearances of drugs, but SCH will most likely overpredict efflux clearance (MRP2 or MRP3 or P-gp–mediated). Take, for example, MRP3, which shows the lowest increase (threefold) in total abundance in SCH versus LT. Thus, even if the percentage of PMA of MRP3 in LT is 100%, the SCH will overpredict the biliary clearance of drugs. If the percentage of PMA of MRP3 in LT is much less than in SH, this overprediction will be even greater.

The high correlation (R2 > 0.67) of total transporter abundance of MRP2 versus MRP3, MRP2 versus P-gp, MRP3 versus P-gp, OAT2 versus OATP1B1, and OCT1 versus OATP2B1 (Fig. 4) suggests a common regulatory mechanism of these transporters (Chen et al., 2012). The good correlation of plasma membrane canalicular efflux transporter (MRP2, MRP3, and P-gp) abundance with Na+-K+ ATPase (Supplemental Fig. 2B) could be the result of simultaneous targeting of these proteins to the newly formed canalicular membrane in SCH.

In summary, we have conducted a systematic study to quantify the total and PMA of hepatic transporters in commonly used human hepatocyte models and compared it with total abundance of the transporters in LT from which they were derived. Based on the total abundance data, all three hepatocyte models, suspended, plated, and sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes, can be used for IVIVE sinusoidal uptake clearance of drugs in humans. However, for IVIVE of efflux clearance, although all three models could potentially be used, the increase in PMA of MRP3, MPR2, and P-gp in SCH needs to be considered. Of course, for both approaches, the complementary in vitro clearance of the drug by the respective transporter needs to be obtained. As to whether such data can be reliably obtained for the efflux transporters (in SH and PH) needs to be explored. Importantly, these data do not support the hypothesis that lower abundance of transporters (total or plasma membrane) in the hepatocyte models versus LT is the reason for lack of success in IVIVE of transporter-mediated hepatobiliary clearance of drugs in humans. Thus, other factors to explain this failure (if any) need to be sought. Such factors include correct identification of the rate-determining step in the clearance of the drug, considering the difference between in vitro and in vivo in the mechanism of transport of the drug (Kumar et al., 2018), and refining in vitro methods to accurately determine both the active and passive clearance of the drug. We have recently shown that when these factors are carefully considered, the in vivo hepatic and renal uptake clearance of rosuvastatin and metformin can be accurately predicted by proteomics-informed scaling of the in vitro uptake clearance of these drugs in transporter-expressing cells (Ishida et al., 2018; Kumar et al., 2018). Such studies with additional drugs, including prediction(s) and verification (e.g., by positron emission tomography imaging) of in vivo efflux clearance using this proteomics-informed approach, are needed.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tot Bui Nguyen for support in cell surface biotinylation experiments and LC-MS/MS proteomics.

Authorship Contributions

Participated in research design: Kumar, Salphati, Hop, Xiao, Lai, Mathias, Chu, Humphreys, Liao, Heyward, Unadkat.

Conducted experiments: Kumar.

Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: Heyward.

Performed data analysis: Kumar, Unadkat.

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Kumar, Salphati, Hop, Xiao, Lai, Mathias, Chu, Humphreys, Liao, Heyward, Unadkat.

Footnotes

    • Received October 18, 2018.
    • Accepted January 7, 2019.
  • ↵1 Current affiliation: Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • ↵2 Current affiliation: Aranmore Pharma Consultant, Trenton, New Jersey.

  • ↵3 Current affiliation: Clovis Oncology, San Francisco, California.

  • V.K. was supported in part by the Simcyp Grant and Partnership Scheme and University of Washington Research Affiliate Program on Transporters funded by Genentech, Biogen, Gilead, Merck, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Pfizer, and Takeda. This work will constitute part of the thesis of VK.

  • https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.118.084988.

  • ↵Embedded ImageThis article has supplemental material available at dmd.aspetjournals.org.

Abbreviations

CLb
biliary clearance
DTT
dithiothreitol
IVIVE
in vitro to in vivo extrapolation
LC-MS/MS
liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
LT
liver tissue
PH
plated hepatocytes
PHL
pooled human liver
PMA
plasma membrane abundance
SCH
sandwich-cultured hepatocytes
SH
suspended hepatocytes
  • Copyright © 2019 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abe K,
    2. Bridges AS,
    3. Yue W, and
    4. Brouwer KL
    (2008) In vitro biliary clearance of angiotensin II receptor blockers and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes: comparison with in vivo biliary clearance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326:983–990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Billington S,
    2. Ray AS,
    3. Salphati L,
    4. Xiao G,
    5. Chu X,
    6. Humphreys WG,
    7. Liao M,
    8. Lee CA,
    9. Mathias A,
    10. Hop CECA, et al.
    (2018) Transporter expression in noncancerous and cancerous liver tissue from donors with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic hepatitis C infection quantified by LC-MS/MS proteomics. Drug Metab Dispos 46:189–196.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bow DA,
    2. Perry JL,
    3. Miller DS,
    4. Pritchard JB, and
    5. Brouwer KL
    (2008) Localization of P-gp (Abcb1) and Mrp2 (Abcc2) in freshly isolated rat hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 36:198–202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Tang Y,
    3. Guo C,
    4. Wang J,
    5. Boral D, and
    6. Nie D
    (2012) Nuclear receptors in the multidrug resistance through the regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. Biochem Pharmacol 83:1112–1126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. De Bruyn T,
    2. Chatterjee S,
    3. Fattah S,
    4. Keemink J,
    5. Nicolaï J,
    6. Augustijns P, and
    7. Annaert P
    (2013) Sandwich-cultured hepatocytes: utility for in vitro exploration of hepatobiliary drug disposition and drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 9:589–616.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hoffmaster KA,
    2. Turncliff RZ,
    3. LeCluyse EL,
    4. Kim RB,
    5. Meier PJ, and
    6. Brouwer KL
    (2004) P-glycoprotein expression, localization, and function in sandwich-cultured primary rat and human hepatocytes: relevance to the hepatobiliary disposition of a model opioid peptide. Pharm Res 21:1294–1302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ishida K,
    2. Ullah M,
    3. Tóth B,
    4. Juhasz V, and
    5. Unadkat JD
    (2018) Successful prediction of in vivo hepatobiliary clearances and hepatic concentrations of rosuvastatin using sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes, transporter-expressing cell lines, and quantitative proteomics. Drug Metab Dispos 46:66–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Jones HM,
    2. Barton HA,
    3. Lai Y,
    4. Bi YA,
    5. Kimoto E,
    6. Kempshall S,
    7. Tate SC,
    8. El-Kattan A,
    9. Houston JB,
    10. Galetin A, et al.
    (2012) Mechanistic pharmacokinetic modeling for the prediction of transporter-mediated disposition in humans from sandwich culture human hepatocyte data. Drug Metab Dispos 40:1007–1017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kimoto E,
    2. Yoshida K,
    3. Balogh LM,
    4. Bi YA,
    5. Maeda K,
    6. El-Kattan A,
    7. Sugiyama Y, and
    8. Lai Y
    (2012) Characterization of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) expression and its functional contribution to the uptake of substrates in human hepatocytes. Mol Pharm 9:3535–3542.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Kumar V,
    2. Nguyen TB,
    3. Tóth B,
    4. Juhasz V, and
    5. Unadkat JD
    (2017) Optimization and application of a biotinylation method for quantification of plasma membrane expression of transporters in cells. AAPS J 19:1377–1386.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Kumar V,
    2. Prasad B,
    3. Patilea G,
    4. Gupta A,
    5. Salphati L,
    6. Evers R,
    7. Hop CE, and
    8. Unadkat JD
    (2015) Quantitative transporter proteomics by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry: addressing methodologic issues of plasma membrane isolation and expression-activity relationship. Drug Metab Dispos 43:284–288.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Kumar V,
    2. Yin J,
    3. Billington S,
    4. Prasad B,
    5. Brown CDA,
    6. Wang J, and
    7. Unadkat JD
    (2018) The importance of incorporating OCT2 plasma membrane expression and membrane potential in IVIVE of metformin renal secretory clearance. Drug Metab Dispos 46:1441–1445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Lam JL and
    2. Benet LZ
    (2004) Hepatic microsome studies are insufficient to characterize in vivo hepatic metabolic clearance and metabolic drug-drug interactions: studies of digoxin metabolism in primary rat hepatocytes versus microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 32:1311–1316.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Lam JL,
    2. Okochi H,
    3. Huang Y, and
    4. Benet LZ
    (2006) In vitro and in vivo correlation of hepatic transporter effects on erythromycin metabolism: characterizing the importance of transporter-enzyme interplay. Drug Metab Dispos 34:1336–1344.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Li N,
    2. Bi YA,
    3. Duignan DB, and
    4. Lai Y
    (2009a) Quantitative expression profile of hepatobiliary transporters in sandwich cultured rat and human hepatocytes. Mol Pharm 6:1180–1189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Li N,
    2. Singh P,
    3. Mandrell KM, and
    4. Lai Y
    (2010) Improved extrapolation of hepatobiliary clearance from in vitro sandwich cultured rat hepatocytes through absolute quantification of hepatobiliary transporters. Mol Pharm 7:630–641.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Li N,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Hua F, and
    4. Lai Y
    (2009b) Absolute difference of hepatobiliary transporter multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP2/Mrp2) in liver tissues and isolated hepatocytes from rat, dog, monkey, and human. Drug Metab Dispos 37:66–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Li R and
    2. Barton HA
    (2018) Explaining ethnic variability of transporter substrate pharmacokinetics in healthy Asian and Caucasian subjects with allele frequencies of OATP1B1 and BCRP: a mechanistic modeling analysis. Clin Pharmacokinet 57:491–503.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Lundquist P,
    2. Englund G,
    3. Skogastierna C,
    4. Lööf J,
    5. Johansson J,
    6. Hoogstraate J,
    7. Afzelius L, and
    8. Andersson TB
    (2014) Functional ATP-binding cassette drug efflux transporters in isolated human and rat hepatocytes significantly affect assessment of drug disposition. Drug Metab Dispos 42:448–458.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Naritomi Y,
    2. Terashita S,
    3. Kagayama A, and
    4. Sugiyama Y
    (2003) Utility of hepatocytes in predicting drug metabolism: comparison of hepatic intrinsic clearance in rats and humans in vivo and in vitro. Drug Metab Dispos 31:580–588.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Pfeifer ND,
    2. Yang K, and
    3. Brouwer KL
    (2013) Hepatic basolateral efflux contributes significantly to rosuvastatin disposition I: characterization of basolateral versus biliary clearance using a novel protocol in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 347:727–736.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Prasad B,
    2. Evers R,
    3. Gupta A,
    4. Hop CE,
    5. Salphati L,
    6. Shukla S,
    7. Ambudkar SV, and
    8. Unadkat JD
    (2014) Interindividual variability in hepatic organic anion-transporting polypeptides and P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) protein expression: quantification by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy and influence of genotype, age, and sex. Drug Metab Dispos 42:78–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Prasad B and
    2. Unadkat JD
    (2014a) Comparison of heavy labeled (SIL) peptide versus SILAC protein internal standards for LC-MS/MS quantification of hepatic drug transporters. Int J Proteomics 2014:451510.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Prasad B and
    2. Unadkat JD
    (2014b) Optimized approaches for quantification of drug transporters in tissues and cells by MRM proteomics. AAPS J 16:634–648.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Schaefer O,
    2. Ohtsuki S,
    3. Kawakami H,
    4. Inoue T,
    5. Liehner S,
    6. Saito A,
    7. Sakamoto A,
    8. Ishiguro N,
    9. Matsumaru T,
    10. Terasaki T, et al.
    (2012) Absolute quantification and differential expression of drug transporters, cytochrome P450 enzymes, and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in cultured primary human hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 40:93–103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Soars MG,
    2. McGinnity DF,
    3. Grime K, and
    4. Riley RJ
    (2007) The pivotal role of hepatocytes in drug discovery. Chem Biol Interact 168:2–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Vildhede A,
    2. Kimoto E,
    3. Rodrigues AD, and
    4. Varma MVS
    (2018) Quantification of hepatic organic anion transport proteins OAT2 and OAT7 in human liver tissue and primary hepatocytes. Mol Pharm 15:3227–3235.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Vildhede A,
    2. Wiśniewski JR,
    3. Norén A,
    4. Karlgren M, and
    5. Artursson P
    (2015) Comparative proteomic analysis of human liver tissue and isolated hepatocytes with a focus on proteins determining drug exposure. J Proteome Res 14:3305–3314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Collins C,
    3. Kelly EJ,
    4. Chu X,
    5. Ray AS,
    6. Salphati L,
    7. Xiao G,
    8. Lee C,
    9. Lai Y,
    10. Liao M, et al.
    (2016) Transporter expression in liver tissue from subjects with alcoholic or hepatitis C cirrhosis quantified by targeted quantitative proteomics. Drug Metab Dispos 44:1752–1758.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Prasad B,
    3. Salphati L,
    4. Chu X,
    5. Gupta A,
    6. Hop CE,
    7. Evers R, and
    8. Unadkat JD
    (2015) Interspecies variability in expression of hepatobiliary transporters across human, dog, monkey, and rat as determined by quantitative proteomics. Drug Metab Dispos 43:367–374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Wegler C,
    2. Gaugaz FZ,
    3. Andersson TB,
    4. Wiśniewski JR,
    5. Busch D,
    6. Gröer C,
    7. Oswald S,
    8. Norén A,
    9. Weiss F,
    10. Hammer HS, et al.
    (2017) Variability in mass spectrometry-based quantification of clinically relevant drug transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes. Mol Pharm 14:3142–3151.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Zhang P,
    2. Tian X,
    3. Chandra P, and
    4. Brouwer KL
    (2005) Role of glycosylation in trafficking of Mrp2 in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes. Mol Pharmacol 67:1334–1341.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Zou P,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Wong S,
    4. Feng MR, and
    5. Liederer BM
    (2013) Comparison of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of biliary clearance using an empirical scaling factor versus transport-based scaling factors in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes. J Pharm Sci 102:2837–2850.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 47 (4)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 47, Issue 4
1 Apr 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comparison of Total and Plasma Membrane Abundance of Transporters in Suspended, Plated, Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes Versus Human Liver Tissue Using Quantitative Targeted Proteomics and Cell Surface Biotinylation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleArticle

Transporter Abundance in Human Hepatocyte Models

Vineet Kumar, Laurent Salphati, Cornelis E. C. A. Hop, Guangqing Xiao, Yurong Lai, Anita Mathias, Xiaoyan Chu, W. Griffith Humphreys, Mingxiang Liao, Scott Heyward and Jashvant D. Unadkat
Drug Metabolism and Disposition April 1, 2019, 47 (4) 350-357; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.118.084988

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleArticle

Transporter Abundance in Human Hepatocyte Models

Vineet Kumar, Laurent Salphati, Cornelis E. C. A. Hop, Guangqing Xiao, Yurong Lai, Anita Mathias, Xiaoyan Chu, W. Griffith Humphreys, Mingxiang Liao, Scott Heyward and Jashvant D. Unadkat
Drug Metabolism and Disposition April 1, 2019, 47 (4) 350-357; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.118.084988
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Olanzapine Glucuronidation in Humanized Mice
  • rs2242480 Regulates the Expression of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5
  • Absorption, Metabolism, and Excretion of Taselisib
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics