Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleMinireview
Open Access

The Nonclinical Disposition and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Properties of N-Acetylgalactosamine–Conjugated Small Interfering RNA Are Highly Predictable and Build Confidence in Translation to Human

Robin McDougall, Diane Ramsden, Sagar Agarwal, Saket Agarwal, Krishna Aluri, Michael Arciprete, Christopher Brown, Elena Castellanos-Rizaldos, Klaus Charisse, Saeho Chong, Joseph Cichocki, Kevin Fitzgerald, Varun Goel, Yongli Gu, Dale Guenther, Bahru Habtemariam, Vasant Jadhav, Maja Janas, Muthusamy Jayaraman, Jeffrey Kurz, Jing Li, Ju Liu, Xiumin Liu, Steven Liou, Chris Maclauchlin, Martin Maier, Muthiah Manoharan, Jayaprakash K. Nair, Gabriel Robbie, Karyn Schmidt, Peter Smith, Christopher Theile, Akshay Vaishnaw, Scott Waldron, Yuanxin Xu, Xuemei Zhang, Ivan Zlatev and Jing-Tao Wu
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 2022, 50 (6) 781-797; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.121.000428
Robin McDougall
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diane Ramsden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sagar Agarwal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saket Agarwal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krishna Aluri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Arciprete
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Brown
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Castellanos-Rizaldos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Charisse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saeho Chong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Cichocki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Fitzgerald
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Varun Goel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongli Gu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dale Guenther
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bahru Habtemariam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vasant Jadhav
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maja Janas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muthusamy Jayaraman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Kurz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ju Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiumin Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Liou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Maclauchlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Maier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muthiah Manoharan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayaprakash K. Nair
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel Robbie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karyn Schmidt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Theile
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akshay Vaishnaw
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Waldron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuanxin Xu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuemei Zhang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivan Zlatev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing-Tao Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Metabolic scheme of sense strand (A) and antisense strand (B). The sense strand contains three GalNAc moieties attached to a linker, which can undergo cleavage of the amide bonds at positions 1 (linker 1) through 3 (linker 3). The antisense strand (B) can undergo metabolism by exonucleases (red) that work on the end of the strand, resulting in release of mononucleotides, whereas endonucleases (blue) cleave internally and result in strands of varying lengths. The GalNAc-siRNAs evaluated in these series of studies contain consistent chemical modifications of the 2′ ribose including substitution of a fluoro (green) or O-methyl (black). The GalNAc in the ESC and above classes also contain phosphorothioate (PS) in place of phosphorodiester bonds in the six labeled positions (orange line). The earlier class of GalNAc-siRNAs that revusiran and siRNA20 are from, called STC, contain only two PS bonds at the overhang nucleotides in the antisense strand at the 3′ end.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Mean ± S.D. siRNA5 (A) or siRNA1 (B) duplex plasma concentration-time profiles based on AS and sense strand (SS) after a single subcutaneous administra tion of varying but similar dose levels in rat, monkey, and human. The data are plotted as the mean and S.D. (error bars) of n = 4, 6, or 10 data points per time point. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for assay was 10 ng/ml (dashed line). The PK parameters were described using noncompartmental methods. Statistical signifi cance was determined using a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test with unequal variance. There was no significant difference between AS and SS concentrations at any time points or in the derived PK parameters. (C) The Pearson correlation coefficient for the AUC (h*µg/ml) values derived from multiple GalNAc-siRNAs tested at increasing dose levels in rat (x-axis) and monkey (y-axis). (D) The Pearson correlation coefficient for the AUC (h*µg/ml) values derived from multiple GalNAc-siR NAs tested at increasing dose levels in monkey (x-axis) and human (y-axis). (E) The AUC (h*µg/ml) values derived for increasing subcutaneous dose levels of seven GalNAc-siRNA in human, and (F) the same data derived in monkey. In these panels, siRNA15 is depicted by the blue circle, siRNA2 by the red square, siRNA21 by the green upward triangle, siRNA5 by the purple downward triangle, siRNA6 by the orange diamond, siRNA7 by the black circle, and siRNA13 by the brown square. (G) The concentration-time profile for siRNA1 (blue circle; closed is after intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg, and open is after subcutaneous administration of 10 mg/kg), siRNA2 (red square; closed is after intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg, and open is after subcutaneous administration of 10 mg/kg), and siRNA5 (green tri angle; closed is after intravenous administration of 5 mg/kg, and open is after subcutaneous administration of 5 mg/kg). The table shows the derived PK parameters and the estimated % bioavailability (%F) from these studies.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Dose-normalized Cmax (A–D) and AUC (E–H) values in male and female livers after subcutaneous administration to rat (A and E), subcutaneous administration to monkey (B and F), intravenous administration to rat (C and G), and intravenous administration to monkey (D and H). The horizontal line represents the median data point, and the vertical lines represent the 90% confidence intervals in (A), (B), (E), and (F), where multiple dose levels were evaluated after subcutaneous administration. For intravenous dosing, only a single dose level was administered, and the data points represent the composite mean value for n = 3 rats or monkeys. In these panels, siRNA1 is represented by a blue circle, siRNA2 by a red triangle, siRNA3 by a green upward triangle, siRNA4 by a purple downward triangle, siRNA5 by an orange diamond, siRNA6 by a black square, and siRNA7 by a brown square. Statistical significance between PK parameters across GalNAc-siRNA between males and females was evaluated using a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test with unequal variance, and there were no statistically significant findings. (I and J) The AUC (h*µg/g) determined in liver following increasing subcutaneous dose levels of siRNA1 through siRNA22 (depicted with varying color circles) in rat (I) and monkey (J). The black line represents the mean linear regression for the data set, whereas the blue lines represent the slopes between 2- and 0.5-fold of the mean.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Tissue distribution profile in rats after subcutaneous administration of radiolabeled siRNA2 (3 mg/kg), siRNA5 (3 mg/kg), and siRNA20 (10 mg/kg) to rats based on the estimated dose-normalized AUC (h*µg/g) (A) from the QWBA analysis. The QWBA data represents the composite value of n = 3 animals per time point. (B and C) The microautoradiography results after 3 mg/kg administration of siRNA5 to rats. In these pictures, the annotations of 10, 11, 13, and 14 represent the central vein, the centrilobular region, the periportal region, the portal vein, and the bile duct, respectively.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Metabolite profiles for siRNA2, siRNA5, siRNA6, siRNA9, and siRNA13 in homogenate prepared from monkey livers after subcutaneous dosing. The percentage of full-length (blue) compared with 3′N-1 (orange) and other active metabolites (green) is derived from the AUC profile either as a pool or discrete time point samples. In all cases, authentic standards were used to determine the quantitative levels of full-length or metabolites, and the sum of the individual components was used to derive the percentage of total.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    After subcutaneous administration of [3H]siRNA2 in rats, a secondary peak of radioactivity was observed starting around 120 hours postdosing. (A) The primary and secondary radioactivity peaks, which already account for the release of tritiated water via deduction. Evaluation of the radiochromatogram from plasma samples taken at the maximum of this secondary peak (B) demonstrates that all of the radioactivity elutes early, where shortmer (>3 but <7 oligonucleotides), dimer (2 oligonucleotides), or monomers (single nucleotides and/or nucleosides) elute. There were no peaks observed at the elution times for siRNA2 (13.9 minutes) or the active metabolite AS(N-1)3′ (13.5 minutes).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Pharmacodynamics were measured after subcutaneous administration of 1 mg/kg siRNA11 to intact female rats (blue) or bile duct–cannulated female rats (red) using a commercially available ELISA kit toward the target protein in serum. The y-axis is the relative amount of target remaining, and the x-axis is the time point in hours. Each point represents the mean of three animals per time point, with the bars representing the S.D. A two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test with unequal variance was used to evaluate whether there were any statistical differences between the intact and BDC rats at each time point. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups observed.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    The time profile (x-axis) for concentrations of siRNA17 and two active metabolites was evaluated over 99 days after a single s.c. administration of 3 mg/kg in monkey (n = 3) in plasma (A) (y-axis), liver (B) (y-axis), and RISC (C) (y-axis). In addition, the measurement of target in serum samples was determined using a commercially available ELISA kit to measure pharmacodynamics as a ratio of baseline (predose) levels (D) (y-axis). Each point represents the composite mean per time point.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    siRNA7 was administered by a single subcutaneous injection to mouse (red), cynomologus monkey (cyno) (black), and human (blue) at 0.3 (squares) or 3 mg/kg (circle). The extent and duration of target reduction was evaluated through serum measurements over time. The relative target (y-axis) over time (x-axis) is displayed for n = 3 (mouse and monkey) and n = 6 (human).

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    (A) The concentration (y-axis) time profile (x-axis) in monkey liver after subcutaneous administration of similar single-dose levels (2.5 mg/kg for revusiran in orange and 3 mg/kg for vutrisiran in blue). (B) The liver half-life values generated from pharmacokinetic data after single-dose administration of revusiran and vutrisiran to rat and monkey. The composite profile of n = 3 animals is depicted. (C) The pharmacodynamic activity in monkey (n = 3) as relative serum TTR protein level (y-axis) over time in days (x-axis). Revusiran (orange circles) was given s.c. at 2.5 mg/kg each day for 5 days, followed by weekly dosing for 4 weeks. Vutrisiran (blue squares) was given as a single s.c. injection at 1 mg/kg. (D) The pharmacodynamic activity in human (n = 6) as relative serum TTR protein level (y-axis) over time in days (x-axis). Revusiran (orange circles) was given s.c. at 500 mg each day for 5 days, followed by weekly dosing for 5 weeks. Vutrisiran (blue squares) was given as a single s.c. injection at 50 mg/kg.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters from subcutaneous dosing of multiple siRNAs to male (M) and female (F) rats and monkeys

    siRNADosePlasma Pharmacokinetic Properties after Subcutaneous Administration to Monkeys
    CmaxAUClastTmaxt1/2Dose at Cmax
    MFMFMFMFMF
    mg/kgng/mlh*ng/mlh%
    10.340.657.6233266128.79ND0.1590.225
    363459847003310222.782.110.2480.234
    102530286015,70016,600221.965.840.2970.335
    2189.317327946511NDND0.1050.203
    58577024820426022NDND0.2010.165
    102060203011,30010,600123.36ND0.2420.238
    150.343.830.6189162112.382.840.1710.119
    196.2112695686113.243.370.1130.131
    335842521902680222.792.50.1400.166
    3172.9641128722NDND0.08540.075
    53862811930169022NDND0.09040.0658
    252560213019,70012,000213.796.130.1200.0998
    40.382.186.819820411NDND0.3210.339
    124531184394910.52.551.520.2870.364
    51140125056105850113.041.810.2680.293
    206770448044,00038,000248.49ND0.3960.263
    50.113.813.216822.541NDND0.1610.155
    118112912,200114022ND9.940.2120.151
    511609855590424022NDND0.2720.231
    101570225012,10010,700223.58ND0.1840.263
    60.342.237.61191270.526.22ND0.1650.147
    190.699.758666244NDND0.1060.117
    35492993140160042NDND0.2140.117
    307760692063,10066,100242.7ND0.3030.270
    siRNADosePlasma Pharmacokinetic Properties after Subcutaneous Administration to Rats
    CmaxAUClastTmaxt1/2Dose at Cmax
    MFMFMFMFMF
    mg/kgng/mlh*ng/mlh%
    10.334.729.139.616.811NDND0.4530.381
    190.592.417417111NDND0.3550.363
    329030149447911NDND0.3790.395
    10143010603740212011ND1.380.5610.415
    21981121411580.250.25ND2.540.3840.44
    110211325416421NDND0.4010.442
    5466386140011100.50.253.141.660.3650.303
    55684551580124021NDND0.4450.357
    109761170239029800.2523.31ND0.3830.458
    101120155041503820226.33ND0.4410.607
    32.52302853203710.50.5NDND0.360.447
    551463993476210.5NDND0.4030.502
    254450398010,3007080111.43ND0.6980.625
    40.371.493.91011110.50.5NDND0.9331.23
    13122074152620.50.50.969ND1.220.814
    5943943184020200.250.50.9310.830.7390.741
    204130499016,20010,6000.51ND1.020.8090.981
    50.121.7221514.20.50.5ND0.9870.8490.865
    12713353814980.50.51.03ND1.061.32
    51010874182020200.511.051.110.7930.687
    10220024304770462010.50.914ND0.8640.955
    • F, female; M, male; ND, not determined.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Estimated %F from traditional intravenous bolus or 1-hour infusions compared with subcutaneous administration

    siRNADN AUClast Subcutaneous/DN AUClast Intravenous
    Bolus or InfusionRatMonkey
    siRNA1Bolus15ND
    siRNA2Bolus2437
    1-h infusion225ND
    siRNA3Bolus2523
    siRNA4Bolus2331
    siRNA5Bolus3150
    siRNA6Bolus1314
    1-h infusion104ND
    siRNA 91-h infusion148115
    siRNA181-h infusion3279
    siRNA22Bolus3751
    • DN, dose normalized; ND, not determined.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Representative ratio of liver/plasma after subcutaneous administration decreases with increasing dose in rat and monkey

    siRNADoseAUClast Liver/AUClast Plasma
    RatMonkeyRatMonkey
    mg/kg
    siRNA10.30.349056110
    1ND3967ND
    3344822455
    101019554123
    siRNA21132067758
    5541253473
    101022154142
    siRNA32.51323312,558
    5516484729
    2525ND2634
    siRNA40.30.314,47612,169
    1119,81611,927
    5516,6216628
    2020ND2382
    siRNA50.10.168875749
    112776ND
    5528997337
    101018486063
    siRNA6ND0.3ND21,098
    ND1ND11,927
    ND3ND6628
    ND30ND2382
    • ND, not determined

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    In vitro GalNAc and linker metabolism for siRNA8 in cultured hepatocytes

    AnalyteTotal AUC siRNA8 Sense Strand Metabolite Profile
    RatMonkeyHuman
    %
    −3 GalNAcNot detected48.745.0
    −3 GalNAc, −1linker1Not detected20.327.5
    −3 GalNAc, −1linker1, −1linker2Not detected5.2Not detected
    −3 GalNAc, −2linker1Not detected12.214.9
    −3 GalNAc, −2linker1, −1linker2Not detected3.6Not detected
    −3 GalNAc, −3linker1,99.58.511.0
    −3 GalNAc, −3linker1, −1linker2Not detected1.6Not detected
    Full-length siRNA866.671.074.9
    AS(N-1)3′ siRNA829.721.215.9
    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Pharmacological activity assessment for siRNA2 metabolites (transfected) in plated HEP3B

    Designation (AS)Target mRNA Baseline Remaining
    %
    Parent16.4
    3′N-110.3
    3′N-211.4
    3′N-313.5
    3′N-415.9
    3′N-512.2
    3′N-647.7
    3′N-781.1
    3′N-895.7
    5′N-178.6
    5′N-220.7
    5′N-389.0
    5′N-478.5
    5′N-595.2
    5′N-6100
    5′N-7100
    5′N-8100
    • View popup
    TABLE 6

    Cross-species renal excretion profiles as a percentage of the total dose

    SpeciesLumasiranGivosiranVutrisiran
    %
    Rat9119
    Monkey15–251911–24
    Human8–253–1710–25
    • View popup
    TABLE 7

    Summary of PK/PD and urinary excretion in rats with and without 5/6 nephrectomy

    PlasmaLiver
    siRNAConditionCmaxAUClastCmaxAUClastUrine ExcretionmRNA Reduction
    μg/mlh*μg/mlμg/gh*μg/g%
    siRNA12Sham0.1610.50114.5ND42 ng/mla74
    Nephrectomy0.1310.60614.6ND13 ng/mla73
    siRNA14Sham0.0480.1988.0752570
    Nephrectomy0.0340.1395.87650.7470
    siRNA5Sham0.0800.30311.9ND3.270
    Nephrectomy0.0810.30014.7ND1.175
    • aTotal urine volume not available for normalization.

    • ND, not determined.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Data Supplement

    • Supplemental Data -

      Methods

      Supplemental Table 1 - In vitro evaluation of single and duplex stability in the presence of enzymes known to cleave RNA and DNA.

      Supplemental Table 2 - Cross species metabolite profiles from plated hepatocytes and nonclinical liver samples.

      Supplemental Figure 1 - Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) results for siRNA2 and siRNA19 following a 1:1 mixture of sense strands (SS), antisense strands (AS) and duplex strands in PBS (Panel A).

      Supplemental Figure 2 - Evaluation of sense strand metabolites in rat (Panel A) and monkey (Panel B) liver samples following SC administration of siRNA6.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 50 (6)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 50, Issue 6
1 Jun 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Nonclinical Disposition and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Properties of N-Acetylgalactosamine–Conjugated Small Interfering RNA Are Highly Predictable and Build Confidence in Translation to Human
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleMinireview

Predictable Cross-Species Translation of GalNAc-Conjugated siRNA

Robin McDougall, Diane Ramsden, Sagar Agarwal, Saket Agarwal, Krishna Aluri, Michael Arciprete, Christopher Brown, Elena Castellanos-Rizaldos, Klaus Charisse, Saeho Chong, Joseph Cichocki, Kevin Fitzgerald, Varun Goel, Yongli Gu, Dale Guenther, Bahru Habtemariam, Vasant Jadhav, Maja Janas, Muthusamy Jayaraman, Jeffrey Kurz, Jing Li, Ju Liu, Xiumin Liu, Steven Liou, Chris Maclauchlin, Martin Maier, Muthiah Manoharan, Jayaprakash K. Nair, Gabriel Robbie, Karyn Schmidt, Peter Smith, Christopher Theile, Akshay Vaishnaw, Scott Waldron, Yuanxin Xu, Xuemei Zhang, Ivan Zlatev and Jing-Tao Wu
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 1, 2022, 50 (6) 781-797; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.121.000428

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleMinireview

Predictable Cross-Species Translation of GalNAc-Conjugated siRNA

Robin McDougall, Diane Ramsden, Sagar Agarwal, Saket Agarwal, Krishna Aluri, Michael Arciprete, Christopher Brown, Elena Castellanos-Rizaldos, Klaus Charisse, Saeho Chong, Joseph Cichocki, Kevin Fitzgerald, Varun Goel, Yongli Gu, Dale Guenther, Bahru Habtemariam, Vasant Jadhav, Maja Janas, Muthusamy Jayaraman, Jeffrey Kurz, Jing Li, Ju Liu, Xiumin Liu, Steven Liou, Chris Maclauchlin, Martin Maier, Muthiah Manoharan, Jayaprakash K. Nair, Gabriel Robbie, Karyn Schmidt, Peter Smith, Christopher Theile, Akshay Vaishnaw, Scott Waldron, Yuanxin Xu, Xuemei Zhang, Ivan Zlatev and Jing-Tao Wu
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 1, 2022, 50 (6) 781-797; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.121.000428
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Overview
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Transcription of SLC drug transporters
  • Impact of inflammation on placental amino acid transporters
Show more Minireview

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics