Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleSpecial Section on Pharmacokinetics and ADME of Biological Therapeutics

The In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Block Copolymers Containing Polyethylene Glycol Used in Nanocarrier Drug Delivery Systems

Lei Yin, Yiling Pang, Lin Shan and Jingkai Gu
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 2022, 50 (6) 827-836; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.121.000568
Lei Yin
Research Center for Drug Metabolism, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China (L.Y., Y.P., L.S., J.G.); School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, China (L.Y.); and Beijing Institute of Drug Metabolism, Beijing, China (Y.P., L.S., J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yiling Pang
Research Center for Drug Metabolism, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China (L.Y., Y.P., L.S., J.G.); School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, China (L.Y.); and Beijing Institute of Drug Metabolism, Beijing, China (Y.P., L.S., J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lin Shan
Research Center for Drug Metabolism, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China (L.Y., Y.P., L.S., J.G.); School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, China (L.Y.); and Beijing Institute of Drug Metabolism, Beijing, China (Y.P., L.S., J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingkai Gu
Research Center for Drug Metabolism, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China (L.Y., Y.P., L.S., J.G.); School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, China (L.Y.); and Beijing Institute of Drug Metabolism, Beijing, China (Y.P., L.S., J.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is one of the most commonly used synthetic macromolecular polymers for modifying small molecule drugs, peptides, proteins, or nanodrug delivery systems to improve their water solubility, biocompatibility, and stability. Block copolymers containing PEG have been widely used in nanodrug delivery systems such as solid lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, polymeric micelles, and liposomes. To date, although numerous PEGylated nanodrug delivery systems have been developed, only a few have been approved for clinical application. Poor safety and effectivity are important reasons for the high failure rate of nanodrug delivery system clinical trials. These factors are not only related to the loaded drugs and released drugs but are also related to the nanocarriers. Therefore, investigating the in vivo spatiotemporal fate of block copolymers containing PEG used in nanodrug delivery systems is necessary and important for evaluating their safety, efficacy, and toxicity. In this article, we will review the information that has been reported about the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of block copolymers containing PEG. We believe this review is helpful to understand the biologic fate of block copolymers containing PEG.

This review describes pharmacokinetic study of block copolymers containing polyethylene glycol. The main focus of this paper is the in vivo fate of these polyethylene glycol-related copolymers after their release from nanocarriers. This review is helpful for understanding of the in vivo fate of block copolymers containing polyethylene glycol used in nanocarrier drug delivery systems.

Introduction

During these years, great progress has been made in the development of nanodrug delivery systems (NDDSs) (Fan et al., 2021; Rai et al., 2021). NDDSs are specially designed as drug delivery vehicles to deliver active pharmaceutical ingredients to their target locations, which have numerous advantages such as improved targeting, decreased toxicity, and prolonged circulation time (Aggarwal et al., 2022). Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is composed of repeating oxyethylene subunits. It is one of the most commonly used synthetic macromolecular polymers for modifying drugs with various molecular mass or NDDSs to improve their water solubility, stability, and biocompatibility (Fu et al., 2021). Furthermore, block copolymers containing polyethylene glycol such as polyethylene glycol-polylactic acid (PEG-PLA), polyethylene glycol-polycaprolactone (PEG-PCL), poloxamers, polyethylene glycol-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PEG-PLGA), and polyethylene glycol-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (PEG-DSPE) have been commonly used as pharmaceutical excipients in the preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles, polymeric micelles, polymeric nanoparticles, and liposomes (Owens and Peppas, 2006; Markovsky et al., 2012). These macromolecular polymers containing PEG could offer sterical barriers to other NDDSs and blood components such as opsonin proteins, preventing their macrophage phagocytosis and prolonging their circulation time in blood, consequently as ‘invisible features’ in vivo. In particular, the end groups of these synthetic macromolecular polymers can be connected to different targeting ligands, which could enhance the bioavailability, decrease the side effects, and especially target specific locations. Figure 1 is the overview of PEGylated carrier systems for drug delivery. However, to date, although numerous PEGylated nanodrug delivery systems have been developed, only a few of them (e.g., Genexol, Doxil, Krystexxa, and several marketed LNP formulations) are clinically approved (Kim et al., 2001; Gabizon et al., 2003; Li et al., 2020). Moreover, many problems of these approved PEGylated nanodrug delivery systems have not been fully explained, especially the in vivo fate of loaded drugs and polymer excipients, which are very important for the safety and effectivity of these PEGylated nanodrug delivery systems. Furthermore, numerous reasons contribute to the high failure rate of clinical trials of the NDDSs, such as potential toxicity and unsatisfactory pharmacokinetic behavior. These defects are associated with both NDDSs and the nanocarriers that are released in vivo. Therefore, investigating the in vivo spatiotemporal fate of block copolymers containing PEG used in NDDSs (i.e., their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) is necessary and important for evaluating their safety, effectivity, and toxicity.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Overview of PEGylated carrier systems for drug delivery.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Chemical structures of PEG (A), PEG-PLA (B), PEG-PCL (C), Poloxamer (D), PEG-PLGA (E), and PEG-DSPE (F).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of PEG-related copolymers.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Distribution and excretion of PEG-related copolymers.

In this article, we have concentrated on the following PEG-related block copolymers: PEG, PEG-PLA, PEG-PCL, poloxamers, PEG-PLGA, and PEG-DSPE. The chemical structures of these synthetic macromolecular polymers are illustrated in Fig. 2. The existing information related to the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of these block copolymers containing polyethylene glycol in vivo are summarized in Fig. 3. PEG and PEG copolymers can be absorbed into blood across the gastrointestinal, nasal epithelia, lung epithelial membranes, and skin. PEG-related block copolymers are relatively easy to be accumulated in the liver, spleen, lung, and kidney. These polymers can be eliminated in urine, bile, and feces. The summary of ADME information for these block copolymers containing PEG is shown in Table 1. Distribution and excretion of these PEG-related copolymers are shown in Fig. 4. We believe that this review is helpful for understanding the pharmacokinetics of block copolymers containing PEG.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Summary of ADME information for block copolymers containing PEG

Pharmacokinetics of PEG

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymers are composed of repeating ethylene oxide units, and their general formula is HO-(CH2CH2O)nH. Hydrophilic and neutral polymers of this kind have been authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration for human oral, dermal, and intravenous applications. PEG-related polymers are widely used in pharmaceutical industry as solubilizers, stabilizers, and control releasing modifiers or conjugated with small molecular compounds or proteins (PEGylation) and drug delivery systems, which can increase the hydrophilicity, prolong residence time in circulation, and reduce the immunogenicity and antigenicity of these chemicals. The in vivo pharmacokinetics of PEGylated drug delivery systems are usually well characterized during their development phases. However, information about the in vivo pharmacokinetics of PEG polymers is relatively sparse. During these years, it has been reported that PEG can cause vacuolation in animal tissues (Irizarry Rovira et al., 2018; Fletcher et al., 2019). Some studies also indicated that adverse reactions of PEG polymers usually occur through complement (C) activation, resulting in hypersensitivity reactions that can cause anaphylactic shock (Chanan-Khan et al., 2003; Fruijtier-Polloth, 2005; Szebeni, 2005). Moreover, Wang et al. (2020) reported that PEG can act as P-glycoprotein inhibitors, which may influence the absorption and efflux of the medical compounds taken at the same time. The uptake of PEG polymers with small molecular mass (<2 kDa) occurs through passive diffusion, whereas the uptake of PEG polymers with large molecular mass (>5 kDa) occurs through both passive diffusion and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Fasinu and coworkers (2013) found that PEG10K and PEG20K were able to act as CYP3A4 inhibitors and inhibit the metabolism of felodipine. Therefore, PEG may not be as nontoxic and bioinert as we usually think. Detailed information about the pharmacokinetics of PEG polymers is necessary and important for evaluating the safety, effectivity, and toxicity of PEGylated drug delivery systems in their clinical applications. It is helpful for establishing a relationship to the functional effects of the PEGylated drug delivery systems, particularly when administered chronically.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of different sized PEG polymers in various species with different administration routes have previously been reported (Soderholm et al., 1993; 1996; 1997; He et al., 1998; Webster et al., 2007; Pelham et al., 2008; Baumann et al., 2019; Su et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020). PEG polymers can be absorbed across the gastrointestinal, nasal epithelia, lung epithelial membranes, and skin. Absorption of PEG polymers is size dependent, decreasing with increasing molecular mass. For example, He and colleagues (1998) studied the oral bioavailability of PEG400 and PEG900 in rats and dogs after oral and intravenous administrations. In their study, the mean oral bioavailability of PEG400 in rats and dogs is 23.8% and 112.2%, respectively. The mean oral bioavailability of PEG900 in rats and dogs is 3.24% and 16.4%, respectively. Oral bioavailability decreased with increasing molecular mass in the same species. Amidon and colleagues (Donovan et al., 1990) examined the absorption of PEG600, PEG1000, and PEG2000 across the gastrointestinal and nasal epithelia in rats. For PEG600, the extent of absorption is less than 60% after intranasal and gastrointestinal administrations; for PEG1000, the extent of absorption is about 14% and 9% after intranasal and gastrointestinal administrations; for PEG2000, the extent of absorption is about 4% and 2% after intranasal and gastrointestinal administrations. The permeabilities of both the gastrointestinal and the nasal mucosae showed similar molecular mass dependencies for PEG polymers. Furthermore, Gursahani and coworkers (2009) studied the absorption behavior of fluorescently labeled PEG polymers with different molecular mass across epithelial membranes in rat lung. Their results indicated that PEG synthetic polymers could be absorbed across epithelial membranes with first-order kinetics after intratracheal administration to rats. They also found that PEG polymers with small molecular mass (<2 kDa) were effectively cleared within 48 hours, whereas large PEG polymers (>5 kDa) remained in lung cells and tissues for 7 days. The size of PEG polymers plays an important role in controlling their absorption rate and absorption mechanism. The same absorption results were found in humans. For example, Shaffer and coworkers’ (1950) study showed that the oral absolute bioavailability of PEG500 and PEG1000 in human volunteers is about 57% and 9.8%, respectively, whereas the oral bioavailability of PEG6000 in human volunteers is basically zero. Moreover, Pelham et al. (2008) found that oral absolute bioavailability of PEG3350 in healthy individuals is only 0.17%; most of the PEG3350 was not absorbed into the blood but excreted in the feces. As for the transdermal administration route, PEG polymers with small molecular mass can only be absorbed minimally through the intact skin, and PEG polymers with large molecular mass (≥4 kDa) cannot be absorbed through the intact skin at all (Fruijtier-Polloth, 2005). However, PEG polymers can penetrate through injured skin regardless of their molecular mass (Herold et al., 1982).

The tissue distribution of PEG polymers depends on many factors, such as size and route of administration. Extravascularly, PEG polymers with small molecular mass may permeate tissues more quickly than PEG polymers with higher molecular mass. In particular, large PEG synthetic polymers have relatively slower renal clearance and greater potential to accumulate within tissues and cells. It was observed by standard histologic examination that the intracellular PEG synthetic polymers can be accumulated within the lysosome, eventually leading to vacuolation and distension (Baumann et al., 2014). Several studies about the tissue distribution of PEG polymers have been reported. For instance, (Longley and coworkers (2013) found that PEG40K polymers administered by i.v. injection with a dose of 1250 mg/kg to mice could be monitored in most tissues like liver, lung, kidney, heart, gastrointestinal tract, spleen, fat, bladder, testes, eyes, muscle, and brain. The concentrations of PEG40K polymers were relatively high in liver, kidney, lung, and heart, and the maximum concentration of PEG40K was detected in the kidney. Rudmann and colleagues (2013) used immunohistochemical assay to study the cellular distribution of PEG10K, PEG20K, and PEG40K after i.v. injection of 100 mg/kg in rats. In their study, 3 months after i.v. administration, they found that PEG10K, PEG20K, and PEG40K were still detected in liver, lung, heart, spleen, kidney, and choroid plexus. Moreover, the concentrations of both PEG10K and PEG20K polymers were higher in hepatic Kupffer cells, alveolar macrophages, and renal tubule epithelium than in the other tissue cells. In contrast, the concentrations of PEG40K polymers were higher in choroid plexus epithelial cells, renal interstitial macrophages, and splenic subcapsular red pulp macrophages. Yamaoka and coworkers (1994) examined the tissue distribution of PEG polymers after i.v. administration to mice. Their results indicated that large PEG polymers were retained longer in blood circulation compared with small PEG polymers. With the increasement of the molecular mass of PEG polymers from 6 kDa to 190 kDa, the half-life of the synthetic PEG polymers in blood circulation was extended from 18 minutes to 24 hours. The concentrations of these related PEG polymers in the tissues such as liver, muscle, skin, and bone are higher than those in other tissues. Vascular permeability is an important factor for the time dependence of the accumulation of PEG polymers in tissues. Their results also showed that small PEG polymers tended to translocate freely from blood to various tissues and return to blood again via diffusion, whereas large PEG polymers transferred more slowly from blood circulation to different tissues. Their results indicated that chronic administration of high molecular mass PEG polymers may lead to serious accumulation and cause potential toxicity in related tissues. Generally speaking, PEG polymers are relatively easy to be accumulated in the following tissues: highly perfused tissues; tissues containing mononuclear phagocyte system, and neovascular tissues with low lymphatic drainage (Markovsky et al., 2012).

So far, there have been some reports on metabolism of PEG polymers (Hunt et al., 1982; Webster et al., 2007; Su et al., 2019). Shaffer and coworkers’ (1950) study with PEG400 synthetic polymers showed that the subunit ethylene glycol is not generated as the metabolite of PEG synthetic polymers in humans. The main metabolic pathway of PEG polymers is the oxidation of the terminal alcohol group to carboxylic acid group. For instance, Hunt et al. (1982) developed an analytical method based on triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry technique and detected both the diacid and hydroxyl acid metabolites of PEG polymers in urine and serum samples of a burn patient who was treated with an antibacterial cream containing PEG. Friman et al. (1990; 1993) detected carboxylic acid metabolites of PEG900 in cat bile after intravenous injection. They also calculated the percentages of both PEG polymers and their carboxylic acid metabolites in cat bile. Their results indicated that 74% of PEG molecules were excreted in cat bile unchanged and 26% of PEG molecules were oxidized to carboxylic acids. Moreover, PEG polymers can be metabolized by sulfotransferases. Roy and colleagues (1987; 1988) observed the sulfated metabolites of PEG400 and PEG1000 in rat and guinea pig in vitro liver preparations. It was also reported that a small amount of oxalic acid can be released after PEG metabolism (Fruijtier-Polloth, 2005). In general, the phase I oxidation of PEG polymers is mainly mediated by alcohol dehydrogenase in mammalian systems. It was also reported that the oxidation of PEG synthetic polymers can be mediated by CYP450s (Herold et al., 1989; Veronese and Pasut, 2005). Compared with alcohol dehydrogenase, CYP450s play a lesser role for the oxidation of PEG polymers. Furthermore, it was reported that the acid metabolites of PEG polymers are related to their adverse effects such as acidosis and hypercalcemia (Bruns et al., 1982).

PEG polymers can be eliminated in urine, bile, and feces. The excretion of PEG polymers is associated with many factors such as size, shape, and administration routes. For intravenous administration, urinary excretion is the main excretion pathway for PEG polymers. He et al. (1998) studied the excretion of PEG400 and PEG900 in rats and dogs after i.v. administration. In their study, PEG400 and PEG900 were mainly excreted unchanged in urine. Mean 24-hour urinary recoveries of total radioactivity of [14C]PEG400 and [3H]PEG900 after i.v. administration to rats and dogs were 85.1%, 82.5%, 85.1%, and 81.9%, respectively. Shaffer et al. (1950) found that 86% of PEG1000 polymers and 96% of PEG6000 polymers were excreted in urine within 12 hours after i.v. administration to humans. Friman and Svanvik (1997) found that almost 100% of PEG1000 was excreted in urine after i.v. administration to rats. Urinary excretion of PEG polymers is also size dependent, as it occurs by passive glomerular filtration. Yamaoka and coworkers’ (1994) study in mice indicated that urinary clearance decreased significantly when the molecular mass of PEG polymers exceeded 20 kDa. Biliary excretion is another excretion pathway for PEG polymers. It is also molecular mass dependent. Yamaoka et al. (1994) found that liver clearance decreased with the increase of PEG molecular mass when the PEG molecular mass was less than 50 kDa, whereas liver clearance increased with the increase of PEG molecular mass when the PEG molecular mass was larger than 50 kDa. PEG polymers with smaller and larger molecular mass have greater hepatobiliary clearance. However, for PEG polymers with very small molecular mass, their bile excretion is not high. Shaffer et al. (1950) found that PEG400 is not excreted into bile after i.v. administration to dogs. Friman et al. (1995) found that the bile excretion of PEG900 was high in patients with T-tube cholecystectomy and that the concentrations of PEG900 in bile samples were 31 times higher than those detected in human plasma samples. They also observed high bile-plasma ratio of PEG450, PEG900, PEG2500, and PEG4000 in pigs and cats after i.v. administration (Friman et al., 1988; 1990). Carpenter et al. (1971) found that 61% of PEG4000 was excreted into urine and that 20% of PEG4000 was detected in feces after i.v. administration to rats. Their data indicated that biliary excretion plays a lesser role for elimination of PEG4000 compared with urinary excretion. Generally speaking, both the kidney and liver are important for elimination of PEG in vivo. Urinary excretion is the major elimination route of PEG polymers. As for oral administration, fecal excretion is the main excretion pathway of PEG polymers. For example, Pelham et al. (2008) studied pharmacokinetics of PEG3350 in humans after oral administration. The oral absolute bioavailability of PEG3350 in healthy individuals was only 0.17%; 93% of the PEG3350 was excreted in the feces and only 0.19% to 0.25% of the PEG3350 was excreted in urine.

Pharmacokinetics of PEG-PLA

Polylactic acid (PLA), also known as polylactide, is a kind of polyester polymer derived from the polymerization of lactic acid as the main raw material. PLA is too hydrophobic and has certain defects as an excipient for hydrophilic drugs, but the properties of PLA can be improved by connecting with hydrophilic PEG. The molecular formula of PEG-PLA is H[OCH(CH3)CO]mO(CH2CH2O)nH. PEG-PLA block copolymers such as diblock polymers (PEG-PLA) and triblock polymers (PLA-PEG-PLA) have a wide range of effects, which can be used to increase the drug load of hydrophobic drugs, prolong blood circulation time, and improve drug bioavailability and efficacy (Xiao et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2014; Ghasemi et al., 2018; Goudarzi et al., 2018; Amani et al., 2019; Girard et al., 2021; Massadeh et al., 2021). Although in vivo fate studies of triblock PLA-PEG-PLA polymers have not been reported, pharmacokinetic studies of diblock PEG-PLA polymers in rats after intravenous administration have previously been reported (Shi et al., 2019; Meng et al., 2021). Specifically, Meng et al. (2021) studied the pharmacokinetics of PEG-PLA copolymers in rats by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique. They found that the concentration of PEG-PLA was high in plasma and extracellular fluid after i.v. administration. Most of the PEG-PLA polymers were eliminated from plasma within 48 hours. Small amounts of PEG-PLA were excreted into bile (<0.8%). PEG-PLA polymers can be metabolized into PEG and lactic acid; 86% of PEG-PLA polymers were metabolized into PEG and then excreted in urine. For tissue distribution study, the concentrations of PEG-PLA synthetic polymers were higher in liver, kidney, spleen, and fat and lower in muscle and brain. PEG-PLA has a low permeability to the brain, possibly due to the blood-brain barrier. In addition, Meng (2019), also studied the inhibitory effects of PEG-PLA synthetic polymers on human CYP450s. They found that PEG-PLA had a weak inhibitory effect on CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 in the range of 0.075–250 μM, whereas it had no inhibitory effect on CYP1A2, CYP2B6, and CYP2C19. Shi et al. (2019) characterized the pharmacokinetics of mPEG2000-PLA2500 in Sprague Dawley rats after i.v. injection of 5 mg/kg. The extrapolated concentration (C0) of mPEG2000-PLA2500 in rat plasma was 25.3 ± 2.78 μg·ml−1 after i.v. administration. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0–t) of mPEG2000-PLA2500 was 44.9 ± 2.95 μg·h·ml−1. The in vivo elimination of mPEG2000-PLA2500 was found to be fast. Its plasma elimination half-life (t1/2) was only 1.31 ± 0.155 h. Moreover, Stolnik and coworkers (2001) also studied the pharmacokinetics of PEG-PLA polymers in rats. They found that PEG-PLA copolymers with small molecular mass were quickly cleared from the systemic circulation after i.v. administration. High molecular mass PEG-PLA copolymers could reduce liver intake by half and increase blood circulation time after i.v. administration. PEG-PLA particles were mainly distributed in liver parenchymal cells.

Pharmacokinetics of PEG-PCL

PCL is a biodegradable hydrophobic aliphatic polyester formed by ring-opening polymerization of 2-caprolactone monomer (da Silva et al., 2009). The biocompatibility of drug-loaded PCL polymer is poor due to its strong hydrophobicity (Zhang et al., 2006). The introduction of hydrophilic polymer PEG to construct the amphiphilic PEG-PCL copolymer can compensate for this deficiency. PCL(A) modified with PEG(B) in different proportions can be divided into AB diblock, ABA or BAB triblock, star block, multiblock, and graft polymer (Liu et al., 2008). The drug delivery systems based on PEG-PCL, PCL-PEG-PCL and PEG-PCL-PEG present good potential benefits (Gou et al., 2009; Feng et al., 2012; Han et al., 2015; Luo et al., 2016; Lee and Jeong, 2020; Singh et al., 2020; Di Trani et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021). However, recent studies suggested that PEG-PCL micelles may be involved in nanocarrier-drug interaction by influencing the activity of cytochrome P450 (Qiu et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019). In addition, Zhang et al. (2021) found that mPEG2k-PCLx micelles can reduce the plasma concentration of metformin by inhibiting the uptake function of organic cation transporters in rats, indicating that there are potential risks of drug interaction between PEG-PCL carrier system and organic cation drugs. Therefore, revealing the in vivo fate of PEG-PCL polymers is crucial for its medical application. To date, pharmacokinetic differences in vivo between small molecular drugs and PEG-PCL loaded particles have been extensively studied (Feng et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014; Manjili et al., 2018; Kurd et al., 2019). However, in vivo fate studies of triblock polymers such as PCL-PEG-PCL or PEG-PCL-PEG have not been reported, and only a few studies have focused on the in vivo fate of PEG-PCL monomers (Liu et al., 2007; Kao et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2018).

Specifically, Liu et al. (2007) studied the pharmacokinetics of mPEG5000-b-PCL5000 micelles and mPEG5000-b-PCL5000 monomer in mice by isotope labeling method. Their results of the interaction between mPEG5000-b-PCL5000 copolymer monomer and plasma protein showed that the copolymer monomer did not bind to plasma protein. Therefore, the existence of plasma protein would not likely affect the critical micelle concentration of mPEG5000-b-PCL5000 significantly. After i.v. administration of mPEG5000-b-PCL5000 monomer (lower than critical micelle concentration), due to its low molecular mass and amphipathicity, the monomer had a faster distribution to tissues compared with micelles. The concentrations of mPEG5000-b-PCL5000 monomer in tissues within 1 hour from high to low were as follows: liver, kidney, and spleen. Compared with monomer, mPEG5000-b-PCL5000 micelles had a longer blood circulation time and a slower elimination rate.

Kao et al. (2013) studied the in vivo pharmacokinetics of 131I benzyl PEG-PCL micelles and 131I benzyl PEG-PCL monomer in mice after i.v. injection by isotope labeling method. The radiation accumulation of monomer and micelle in tissues reached the highest values after 1 hour, and significant radiation retention was detected in reticuloendothelial system tissues. At the same time, the PEG-PCL monomers and micelles had a large radioactive accumulation in urine, indicating that they were excreted mainly through the kidneys. Sun et al. (2018) explained why PEG-PCL monomer has a faster blood clearance compared with PEG-PCL micelles. This is due to the fact that intact PEG-PCL micelles are not easily captured by Kupffer cells, although the exposed hydrophobic fragments of PEG-PCL monomers can be quickly identified and captured by Kupffer cells.

In summary, at present, there is no information about the absorption of PEG-PCL in vivo. The administration route used in current pharmacokinetic studies of PEG-PCL polymers is intravenous injection. PEG-PCL polymer monomer has a rapid plasma elimination and faster distribution to reticuloendothelial system tissues such as liver and spleen compared with micelle. PEG-PCL mainly excretes out of the body in urine. Although there is no study to reveal the metabolism process of PEG-PCL in vivo right now, we speculate that the ester bonds between PEG and PCL would break in vivo. PEG-PCL can be metabolized into PEG and PCL under the action of esterase.

Pharmacokinetics of Poloxamers

Poloxamers, also called Pluronics or Tetronics, are amphiphilic nonionic triblock copolymers composed of polyoxyethylene (PEO) and polyoxypropylene (PPO) (PEOm-PPOn-PEOm). The triblock copolymers can self-assemble into micelles. The hydrophobic core (PPO) of such micelles can carry different drugs, and the hydrophilic shell (PEO) guarantees the micelles’ stability (Kabanov et al., 2002). Poloxamer polymers are widely used in drug delivery (Das et al., 2010; Sahu et al., 2011; Basak and Bandyopadhyay, 2013; Chen et al., 2013; Nguyen et al., 2017). In the past, poloxamers were traditionally considered ‘inert.’ However, recent studies suggest that poloxamers may have biologic effects (Blonder et al., 1999; Ren et al., 2009). Specifically, Blonder et al. (1999) demonstrated that poloxamer407 would result in hyperlipidemia. Ren et al. (2009) found that poloxamer188 may have an inhibitory effect on cytochrome P450 3A. The cytochrome P450 3A family is the main metabolic enzyme that accounts for more than 70% of the cytochrome P450 in the small intestine. Substances that inhibit cytochrome P450 3A activity can increase plasma concentration of the substrate drugs and may result in toxicity. These results indicate that there are potential risks of interaction between poloxamer carrier systems and drugs. Therefore, it is necessary to reveal the in vivo fate of poloxamer polymers for their medical application.

There have been some reports on the in vivo fate of poloxamer polymers. For example, Feng et al. (2021a,b) studied the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of poloxamer188 in rats after i.v. injection of 5 mg/kg. The pharmacokinetic parameters of poloxamer188 were as follows: AUC0–t was 3.0 ± 0.6 μg/l*h, mean residence time (MRT) was 0.6 ± 0.1 h, clearance (CL) was 1.7 ± 0.3 l/h/kg, t1/2 was 2.0 ± 1.1 h, and volume of distribution (Vd) was 5.1 ± 3.2 l/kg. The results of tissue distribution study indicated that poloxamer188 could be rapidly distributed to tissues with a high clearance rate. Poloxamer188 was mainly distributed in kidney (26.8 μg/g at 0.2 h and 11.63 μg/g at 4 h). A small amount of poloxamer188 was detected in the other tissues such as stomach, liver, lung, muscle, and spleen. Poloxamer188 could not pass through the blood-brain barrier into brain. Moreover, Li et al. (2021) studied the pharmacokinetics of poloxamer124 in rats after i.v. injection of 10 mg/kg. The pharmacokinetic parameters of poloxamer124 were as follows: AUC0–t was 9.84 ± 3.02 mg/l*h, Vd was 2.89 ± 1.14 l/kg, MRT was 0.7 ± 0.08 h, t1/2 was 2.06 ± 1.04 h, and CL was 0.98 ± 0.21 l/h/kg. Their results indicated that poloxamer124 could be rapidly eliminated in rat plasma after i.v. injection. Willcox et al. (1978) studied the distribution and excretion of poloxamer188 in dogs by radioisotope labeling method. After i.v. injection of 3H labeled poloxamer188, nearly 75% of poloxamer188 circulated in plasma was in free form, and 25% tended to be bound to albumin. Within 24 hours after i.v. administration, about 40% of poloxamer188 was excreted through urine and some remained in extravascular fluid and tissues. The highest concentration of poloxamer188 was found in bile after 24 hours. These results demonstrated that poloxamer188 was mainly excreted through kidney and bile. Grindel et al. (2002) studied the pharmacokinetics of purified poloxamer188 in rats, pregnant rats, pregnant rabbits, dogs, and humans by gel permeation chromatography. They found that the plasma clearance of poloxamer188 in rats and rabbits was faster than that in dogs and humans. Moreover, the plasma clearance of poloxamer188 was not related to dose or gender. Their study indicated that poloxamer188 polymers are mainly distributed in highly vascularized tissues and extracellular fluid after continuous i.v. infusion of purified poloxamer188. They also found a single metabolite HW1 of poloxamer188 in both dog plasma and human plasma. The metabolite was a block copolymer, and its molecular mass was 16 kDa. Compared with the parent compound, the clearance rate of the metabolite was slower. Their study also indicated that renal clearance accounted for 90% of total plasma clearance in humans. Urinary excretion is the major route of elimination for poloxamer polymers (Jewell et al., 1997; Grindel et al., 2002). Wang and Stern (1975) studied the distribution and excretion of poloxamer108 (P108) in rats by isotope labeling assay. Immediately after i.v. administration, P108 polymers were detected highly in kidney and lung. And 20 hours after i.v. administration, only a small part of P108 polymers remained in kidney, liver, small intestine, and carcass. P108 polymers were found in urine as unchanged form. About 94% of the initial dose of P108 polymers was excreted in urine and 6% of the initial dose of P108 was excreted in feces within 72 hours after i.v. administration. Batrakova et al. (2004) examined the effects of micelle formation on the distribution kinetics of poloxamer85 in mice by radioisotope labeling method. The results of their study indicated that the aggregation state of poloxamer85 would affect its half-life time in vivo, ranging from 60 to 90 hours. Poloxamer85 could remain in the blood for a long time in both monomer and micellar state. The micellar form of poloxamer85 had a longer circulation time and an increased exposure to the tissues compared with the unimer, but the formation of micelles could reduce the uptake of poloxamer85 in liver. In their study, after i.v. administration to mice, poloxamer85 was detectable in several tissues and its concentrations decreased in the following order: liver > spleen > kidney > lung > brain. Furthermore, they also found that the micelle formation reduced the uptake of poloxamer85 in liver but had no effect on the total clearance of poloxamer85, which suggested that the elimination of poloxamer85 depended on the renal elimination of poloxamer85 unimers rather than the rate of micelle disposition or disintegration.

In summary, so far, there is no information about the absorption of poloxamers in vivo. The route of administration used in current pharmacokinetic studies of poloxamer polymers is intravenous injection. Most poloxamers would not bind to plasma proteins when released to the blood. Poloxamers are mainly distributed in highly vascularized tissues such as liver, kidney, spleen, and lung. The primary elimination of poloxamers is renal excretion.

Pharmacokinetics of PEG-PLGA

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) is a biodegradable functional organic compound from the random polymerization of two monomers: lactic acid and glycolic acid. PLGA also has strong hydrophobicity. Due to its poor biocompatibility with hydrophilic drugs, its application is limited. However, it can be combined with PEG to form the coblock polymer PEG-PLGA, and the connection with hydrophilic PEG can change the properties of PLGA. PEG-PLGA block copolymers are widely used in drug delivery systems for improving the drug bioavailability, prolonging the half-life of drugs in vivo, and so on (Ahmed and Badr-Eldin, 2020). So far, only a few studies have reported the biologic fate of PEG-PLGA in vivo. For instance, Avgoustakis and coworkers (2003) studied the biologic distribution of mPEG-PLGA in mice. mPEG-PLGA was labeled with radioactive labeling, and 2 minutes after i.v. administration, significant radioactivity was detected in liver and muscle. The amount of radioactivity in blood was about 75.8%. Over time, the radioactivity of mPEG-PLGA was slowly eliminated from the blood circulation and accumulated in liver and spleen. There was little change in other tissues. The excretion of mPEG-PLGA in intestine and urine increased with time, and the excretion of mPEG-PLGA was 6%–8% of the total at the end of sampling. The effects of different PLGA-mPEG ratios on biologic distribution were also studied. When the PLG-mPEG ratio ranged from 256 to 153, mPEG content increased, and blood clearance rate decreased. The ratio was further reduced from 153 to 61 and 34, and blood clearance increased. Panagi et al. (2001) studied the biologic distribution of mPEG-PLGA nanoparticles in mice by radioactive labeling assay. A large proportion of mPEG-PLGA was found in liver and spleen after i.v. injection. About 70%–80% of the proportion was detected in blood, liver, and spleen, and about 20%–30% of the proportion was detected in the other tissues. The half-life of mPEG-PLGA was about 7 hours. The distribution of mPEG-PLGA was not affected by dose.

Generally speaking, PEG-PLGA polymers are mainly distributed in liver and spleen and excreted through the bile and urine after intravenous administration. Although there is no detailed study to reveal the metabolism process of PEG-PLGA in vivo, we speculate that the ester bonds between PEG and PLGA would break in vivo. PEG-PLGA can be metabolized into PEG, lactic acid, and glycolic acid under the action of esterase.

Pharmacokinetics of DSPE-PEG

DSPE-PEG is a PEGylated phospholipid. It can be used as a carrier material for nanoformulations to extend the circulation time and improve the biocompatibility and stability of the drug in vivo. DSPE-PEG is an amphiphilic macromolecule with good water solubility and has received extensive attention in recent years. Although DSPE-PEG is widely used, its safety and bioactivity in vivo have not been studied in detail. It has been reported that after injection of pharmaceutical preparations containing DSPE, the human body will have adverse reactions, such as increased blood pressure, difficulty breathing, chest pain, etc. (van den Hoven et al., 2013). Su et al. (2019) studied pharmacokinetics of DSPE-PEG2000 and DSPE-PEG5000 in rats after i.v. injection with a dose of 25 mg/kg. The pharmacokinetic parameters of DSPE-PEG5000 in rats after i.v. administration were: AUC0–t was 271.8 ± 14 μg/ml*h, MRT0–t was 2.064 ± 0.069 h, Vd was 0.198 ± 0.038 l/kg, C0 was 104.8 ± 13.6 μg/ml, t1/2 was 1.54 ± 0.339 h, and CL was 0.09 ± 0.005 l/h/kg. The pharmacokinetic parameters of DSPE-PEG2000 in rats after i.v. administration were: AUC0–t was 104.9 ± 13.4 μg/ml*h, MRT0–t was 1.027 ± 0.034 h, Vd was 0.327 ± 0.062 l/kg, C0 was 83.6 ± 4.2 μg/ml, t1/2 was 0.981 ± 0.078 h, and CL was 0.23 ± 0.026 l/h/kg. The results of tissue distribution study indicated that DSPE-PEG2000 and DSPE-PEG5000 were mainly distributed in lung, fat, liver, and spleen. The highest concentration of both DSPE-PEG2000 and DSPE-PEG5000 were detected in lung. Furthermore, both DSPE-PEG2000 and DSPE-PEG5000 could be detected in brain, indicating that they can pass through the blood-brain barrier. Su (2019) also studied the inhibitory effects of both DSPE-PEG2000 and DSPE-PEG5000 on CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4. The IC50 values of both DSPE-PEG2000 and DSPE-PEG5000 were greater than 100 μg/ml for these CYP450 enzymes. These results indicated that both DSPE-PEG2000 and DSPE-PEG5000 did not significantly inhibit the activities of CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4. DSPE-PEG can be metabolized into DSPE and PEG by esterase in vivo and excreted as PEG in urine. The cumulative excretion of DSPE-PEG2000 at 0–168 hours after i.v. administration was 24.21% in urine and 3.82% in feces. The cumulative excretion of DSPE-PEG5000 at 0–168 hours after i.v. administration was 40.37% in urine and 8.79% in feces.

In summary, up to present, the route of administration used in current pharmacokinetic studies of DSPE-PEG polymers is intravenous injection; there is no information about the absorption of DSPE-PEG in vivo right now. DSPE-PEG polymers are mainly distributed in lung, fat, liver, and spleen and are excreted through the bile and urine after intravenous administration. DSPE-PEG can be metabolized into PEG and DSPE under the action of esterase in vivo.

Current Challenges and Future Perspectives

This review describes the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of block copolymers containing polyethylene. The main focus of this paper is the in vivo fate of these PEG-related copolymers after their release from nanocarriers. Safety and efficacy are two important considerations for the materials of PEGylated nanomedicine, as the PEG-related copolymers are present in large quantities in nanocarriers and may cause serious toxicity and adverse reactions when released in vivo. For example, high molecular mass PEG-related copolymers can accumulate in liver, spleen, lung, kidney, and other tissues and eventually cause toxic reactions. The polymers used in nanomedicine should be biodegradable and easily excreted. Furthermore, some PEG-related copolymers and their metabolites are biologically active and may cause toxic or adverse effects. For instance, the metabolites of polylactic acid can cause inflammation in relevant tissues; the acid metabolites of PEG can cause hypercalcemia and acidosis. Furthermore, PEG-related polymers and their metabolites may also influence the biologic functions of relevant transporters and metabolic enzymes such as P-glycoprotein and CYP450s, resulting in drug-nanocarrier interactions and potential adverse reactions. Therefore, biologic inertness is another required feature of pharmaceutical polymers used in nanomedicine. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the in vivo fate of nanodrug pharmaceutical preparations and their excipients is very important for the safety and effectiveness of their clinical application. However, most of the current studies only focus on the in vivo pharmacokinetics of the free drug of nanomedicine and pay little attention to the excipients, especially the polymers. The research and comprehensive understanding of in vivo fate of the nanocarriers is not adequate. This is also the reason why numerous tested nanomedicines like Ferrugose and Resovist have been withdrawn from clinical use. Although a large number of studies have been carried out on nanocarriers, more studies are needed to deeply understand their pharmacokinetic behavior in vivo. More advanced and modern biotechnologies such as bioimaging and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry techniques should be used to strengthen the research on the transport mechanism of nanocarriers in vivo, so as to ensure their reasonable design, safety, and effectiveness. We believe this review will contribute to the understanding of the pharmacokinetics of block copolymers containing PEG used in nanocarrier drug delivery systems.

Authorship Contributions

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Yin, Pang, Shan, Gu.

Footnotes

    • Received June 4, 2021.
    • Accepted January 5, 2022.
  • This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 82030107, 81872831, and 81603182], the National Science and Technology Major Projects for ‘significant new drugs creation’ of the 13th five-year plan [Grant 2017ZX09101001 and 2018ZX09721002007, China] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant DUT21RC(3)057].

  • No author has an actual or perceived conflict of interest with the contents of this article.

  • https://dx.doi.org/10.1124/dmd.121.000568.

Abbreviations

ADME
absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
AUC0–t
area under the plasma concentration-time curve
C0
initial plasma concentration
CL
clearance
DSPE
distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine
MRT
mean residence time
NDDS
nanodrug delivery system
P
poloxamer
PCL
polycaprolactone
PEG
polyethylene glycol
PEO
polyoxyethylene
PLA
polylactic acid
PLGA
poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)
PPO
polyoxypropylene
t1/2
plasma elimination half-life
Vd
volume of distribution
  • Copyright © 2022 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aggarwal N,
    2. Sachin,
    3. Nabi B,
    4. Aggarwal S,
    5. Baboota S, and
    6. Ali J
    (2022) Nano-based drug delivery system: a smart alternative towards eradication of viral sanctuaries in management of NeuroAIDS. Drug Deliv Transl Res 12:27–48.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Ahmed OAA and
    2. Badr-Eldin SM
    (2020) Biodegradable self-assembled nanoparticles of PEG-PLGA amphiphilic diblock copolymer as a promising stealth system for augmented vinpocetine brain delivery. Int J Pharm 588:119778.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Amani A,
    2. Kabiri T,
    3. Shafiee S, and
    4. Hamidi A
    (2019) Preparation and characterization of PLA-PEG-PLA/PEI/DNA nanoparticles for improvement of transfection efficiency and controlled release of DNA in gene delivery systems. Iran J Pharm Res 18:125–141.
    OpenUrl
    1. Avgoustakis K,
    2. Beletsi A,
    3. Panagi Z,
    4. Klepetsanis P,
    5. Livaniou E,
    6. Evangelatos G, and
    7. Ithakissios DS
    (2003) Effect of copolymer composition on the physicochemical characteristics, in vitro stability, and biodistribution of PLGA-mPEG nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 259:115–127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Basak R and
    2. Bandyopadhyay R
    (2013) Encapsulation of hydrophobic drugs in Pluronic F127 micelles: effects of drug hydrophobicity, solution temperature, and pH. Langmuir 29:4350–4356.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Batrakova EV,
    2. Li S,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Alakhov VY,
    5. Elmquist WF, and
    6. Kabanov AV
    (2004) Distribution kinetics of a micelle-forming block copolymer Pluronic P85. J Control Release 100:389–397.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Baumann A,
    2. Piel I,
    3. Hucke F,
    4. Sandmann S,
    5. Hetzel T, and
    6. Schwarz T
    (2019) Pharmacokinetics, excretion, distribution, and metabolism of 60-kDa polyethylene glycol used in BAY 94-9027 in rats and its value for human prediction. Eur J Pharm Sci 130:11–20.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Baumann A,
    2. Tuerck D,
    3. Prabhu S,
    4. Dickmann L, and
    5. Sims J
    (2014) Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and distribution of PEGs and PEGylated proteins: quo vadis? Drug Discov Today 19:1623–1631.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Blonder JM,
    2. Baird L,
    3. Fulfs JC, and
    4. Rosenthal GJ
    (1999) Dose-dependent hyperlipidemia in rabbits following administration of poloxamer 407 gel. Life Sci 65:PL261–PL266.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Bruns DE,
    2. Herold DA,
    3. Rodeheaver GT, and
    4. Edlich RF
    (1982) Polyethylene glycol intoxication in burn patients. Burns 9:49–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Carpenter CP,
    2. Woodside MD,
    3. Kinkead ER,
    4. King JM, and
    5. Sullivan LJ
    (1971) Response of dogs to repeated intravenous injection of polyethylene glycol 4000 with notes on excretion and sensitization. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 18:35–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Chanan-Khan A,
    2. Szebeni J,
    3. Savay S,
    4. Liebes L,
    5. Rafique NM,
    6. Alving CR, and
    7. Muggia FM
    (2003) Complement activation following first exposure to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil): possible role in hypersensitivity reactions. Ann Oncol 14:1430–1437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Chen A,
    2. Dang T,
    3. Wang S,
    4. Tang N,
    5. Liu Y, and
    6. Wu W
    (2014) The in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor effects of MTX-Fe3O 4-PLLA-PEG-PLLA microspheres prepared by suspension-enhanced dispersion by supercritical CO2. Sci China Life Sci 57:698–709.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Sha X,
    3. Jiang X,
    4. Chen Y,
    5. Ren Q, and
    6. Fang X
    (2013) Pluronic P105/F127 mixed micelles for the delivery of docetaxel against Taxol-resistant non-small cell lung cancer: optimization and in vitro, in vivo evaluation. Int J Nanomedicine 8:73–84.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. da Silva GR,
    2. da Silva Cunha Jr A,
    3. Ayres E, and
    4. Oréfice RL
    (2009) Effect of the macromolecular architecture of biodegradable polyurethanes on the controlled delivery of ocular drugs. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20:481–487.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Das RK,
    2. Kasoju N, and
    3. Bora U
    (2010) Encapsulation of curcumin in alginate-chitosan-pluronic composite nanoparticles for delivery to cancer cells. Nanomedicine (Lond) 6:153–160.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Di Trani N,
    2. Liu HC,
    3. Qi R,
    4. Viswanath DI,
    5. Liu X,
    6. Chua CYX, and
    7. Grattoni A
    (2021) Long-acting tunable release of amlodipine loaded PEG-PCL micelles for tailored treatment of chronic hypertension. Nanomedicine (Lond) 37:102417.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Donovan MD,
    2. Flynn GL, and
    3. Amidon GL
    (1990) Absorption of polyethylene glycols 600 through 2000: the molecular weight dependence of gastrointestinal and nasal absorption. Pharm Res 7:863–868 DOI: 10.1023/a:1015921101465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Fan Z,
    2. Liu Q,
    3. Lu F,
    4. Dong Z, and
    5. Gao P
    (2021) Application of abdominal imaging based on nano drug delivery system for diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 21:824–832.
    OpenUrl
    1. Fasinu P,
    2. Choonara YE,
    3. Khan RA,
    4. Du Toit LC,
    5. Kumar P,
    6. Ndesendo VMK, and
    7. Pillay V
    (2013) Flavonoids and polymer derivatives as CYP3A4 inhibitors for improved oral drug bioavailability. J Pharm Sci 102:541–555.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Feng R,
    2. Song Z, and
    3. Zhai G
    (2012) Preparation and in vivo pharmacokinetics of curcumin-loaded PCL-PEG-PCL triblock copolymeric nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 7:4089–4098.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Feng Y,
    2. Li L,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Zhou X,
    5. Lin X,
    6. Cui Y,
    7. Zhu H, and
    8. Feng B
    (2021a) A MSALL quantitative method for the determination of Poloxamer 188 in rat plasma by UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS and its application to pharmacokinetic study. Biomed Chromatogr 36:e5265.
    OpenUrl
    1. Feng Y,
    2. Li L,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Zhou X,
    5. Lin X,
    6. Cui Y,
    7. Zhu H, and
    8. Feng B
    (2021b) Tissue distribution study of Poloxamer188 in rats by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time of flight/mass spectrometry with MSALL-based approach. Molecules 26:5644.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Fletcher AM,
    2. Tellier P,
    3. Douville J,
    4. Mansell P,
    5. Graziano MJ,
    6. Mangipudy RS,
    7. Brodie TA, and
    8. Achanzar WE
    (2019) Adverse vacuolation in multiple tissues in cynomolgus monkeys following repeat-dose administration of a PEGylated protein. Toxicol Lett 317:120–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Friman S,
    2. Egestad B,
    3. Sjövall J, and
    4. Svanvik J
    (1993) Hepatic excretion and metabolism of polyethylene glycols and mannitol in the cat. J Hepatol 17:48–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Friman S,
    2. Leandersson P,
    3. Tagesson C, and
    4. Svanvik J
    (1990) Biliary excretion of different sized polyethylene glycols in the cat. J Hepatol 11:215–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Friman S,
    2. Rådberg G, and
    3. Svanvik J
    (1988) Hepatic clearance of polyethylene glycol 900 and mannitol in the pig. Digestion 39:172–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Friman S and
    2. Svanvik J
    (1997) Biliary excretion of 400- to 1,000-d polyethylene glycol will influence the calculation of small intestinal absorption in portacaval-shunted rats. Hepatology 25:500.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Friman S,
    2. Thune A,
    3. Nilsson B, and
    4. Svanvik J
    (1995) Medication with ursodeoxycholic acid enhances the biliary clearance of polyethylene glycol 900, but not mannitol. Digestion 56:382–388.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Fruijtier-Pölloth C
    (2005) Safety assessment on polyethylene glycols (PEGs) and their derivatives as used in cosmetic products. Toxicology 214:1–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Fu Y,
    2. Ding Y,
    3. Zhang L,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Liu J, and
    6. Yu P
    (2021) Poly ethylene glycol (PEG)-related controllable and sustainable antidiabetic drug delivery systems. Eur J Med Chem 217:113372.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Gabizon A,
    2. Shmeeda H, and
    3. Barenholz Y
    (2003) Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: review of animal and human studies. Clin Pharmacokinet 42:419–436.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Ghasemi R,
    2. Abdollahi M,
    3. Emamgholi Zadeh E,
    4. Khodabakhshi K,
    5. Badeli A,
    6. Bagheri H, and
    7. Hosseinkhani S
    (2018) mPEG-PLA and PLA-PEG-PLA nanoparticles as new carriers for delivery of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). Sci Rep 8:9854.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Girard E,
    2. Chagnon G,
    3. Moreau-Gaudry A,
    4. Letoublon C,
    5. Favier D,
    6. Dejean S,
    7. Trilling B, and
    8. Nottelet B
    (2021) Evaluation of a biodegradable PLA-PEG-PLA internal biliary stent for liver transplantation: in vitro degradation and mechanical properties. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 109:410–419.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Gou M,
    2. Zheng X,
    3. Men K,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Zheng L,
    6. Wang X,
    7. Luo F,
    8. Zhao Y,
    9. Zhao X,
    10. Wei Y, et al.
    (2009) Poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanoparticles: preparation, characterization, and application in doxorubicin delivery. J Phys Chem B 113:12928–12933.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Goudarzi F,
    2. Asadi A,
    3. Afsharpour M, and
    4. Jamadi RH
    (2018) In vitro characterization and evaluation of the cytotoxicity effects of nisin and nisin-loaded PLA-PEG-PLA nanoparticles on gastrointestinal (AGS and KYSE-30), hepatic (HepG2) and blood (K562) cancer cell lines. AAPS PharmSciTech 19:1554–1566.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Grindel JM,
    2. Jaworski T,
    3. Emanuele RM, and
    4. Culbreth P
    (2002) Pharmacokinetics of a novel surface-active agent, purified poloxamer 188, in rat, rabbit, dog and man. Biopharm Drug Dispos 23:87–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gursahani H,
    2. Riggs-Sauthier J,
    3. Pfeiffer J,
    4. Lechuga-Ballesteros D, and
    5. Fishburn CS
    (2009) Absorption of polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymers: the effect of PEG size on permeability. J Pharm Sci 98:2847–2856.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Han Q,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Li X,
    4. Peng R,
    5. Li A,
    6. Qian Z, and
    7. Yu L
    (2015) Effects of bevacizumab loaded PEG-PCL-PEG hydrogel intracameral application on intraocular pressure after glaucoma filtration surgery. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26:225.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. He YL,
    2. Murby S,
    3. Warhurst G,
    4. Gifford L,
    5. Walker D,
    6. Ayrton J,
    7. Eastmond R, and
    8. Rowland M
    (1998) Species differences in size discrimination in the paracellular pathway reflected by oral bioavailability of poly(ethylene glycol) and D-peptides. J Pharm Sci 87:626–633.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Herold DA,
    2. Keil K, and
    3. Bruns DE
    (1989) Oxidation of polyethylene glycols by alcohol dehydrogenase. Biochem Pharmacol 38:73–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Herold DA,
    2. Rodeheaver GT,
    3. Bellamy WT,
    4. Fitton LA,
    5. Bruns DE, and
    6. Edlich RF
    (1982) Toxicity of topical polyethylene glycol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 65:329–335.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Hunt DF,
    2. Giordani AB,
    3. Rhodes G, and
    4. Herold DA
    (1982) Mixture analysis by triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry: metabolic profiling of urinary carboxylic acids. Clin Chem 28:2387–2392.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Irizarry Rovira AR,
    2. Bennet BM,
    3. Bolon B,
    4. Braendli-Baiocco A,
    5. Chandra S,
    6. Fleurance R,
    7. Garman R,
    8. Hutto D,
    9. Lane J,
    10. Romeike A, et al.
    (2018) Scientific and regulatory policy committee points to consider: histopathologic evaluation in safety assessment studies for PEGylated pharmaceutical products. Toxicol Pathol 46:616–635.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Jewell RC,
    2. Khor SP,
    3. Kisor DF,
    4. LaCroix KA, and
    5. Wargin WA
    (1997) Pharmacokinetics of RheothRx injection in healthy male volunteers. J Pharm Sci 86:808–812.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Kabanov AV,
    2. Batrakova EV, and
    3. Alakhov VY
    (2002) Pluronic block copolymers as novel polymer therapeutics for drug and gene delivery. J Control Release 82:189–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Kao HW,
    2. Chan CJ,
    3. Chang YC,
    4. Hsu YH,
    5. Lu M,
    6. Shian-Jy Wang J,
    7. Lin YY,
    8. Wang SJ, and
    9. Wang HE
    (2013) A pharmacokinetics study of radiolabeled micelles of a poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(caprolactone) copolymer in a colon carcinoma-bearing mouse model. Appl Radiat Isot 80:88–94.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Kim SC,
    2. Kim DW,
    3. Shim YH,
    4. Bang JS,
    5. Oh HS,
    6. Wan Kim S, and
    7. Seo MH
    (2001) In vivo evaluation of polymeric micellar paclitaxel formulation: toxicity and efficacy. J Control Release 72:191–202.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Kurd M,
    2. Sadegh Malvajerd S,
    3. Rezaee S,
    4. Hamidi M, and
    5. Derakhshandeh K
    (2019) Oral delivery of indinavir using mPEG-PCL nanoparticles: preparation, optimization, cellular uptake, transport and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 47:2123–2133.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Lee HJ and
    2. Jeong B
    (2020) ROS-sensitive degradable PEG-PCL-PEG micellar thermogel. Small 16:e1903045.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Huo J,
    3. Sun D,
    4. Jiang L,
    5. Hu C,
    6. Bai Y,
    7. Ma X,
    8. Zhang H,
    9. Shi X,
    10. Zhao Z, et al.
    (2020) Pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycol-modified canine uricase following single and multiple intravenous injections in cynomolgus monkeys. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 45:445–451.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Li Q,
    2. Sun M,
    3. Li G,
    4. Qiu L,
    5. Huang Z,
    6. Gong J,
    7. Huang J,
    8. Li G, and
    9. Si L
    (2019) The sub-chronic impact of mPEG2k-PCLx polymeric nanocarriers on cytochrome P450 enzymes after intravenous administration in rats. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 142:101–113.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Cui Y,
    3. Li L,
    4. Lin X,
    5. Zhou X,
    6. Zhu H, and
    7. Feng B
    (2021) Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry method for quantifying polymer poloxamer 124 and its application to pharmacokinetic study. J Sep Sci 44:3822–3829.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Liu CB,
    2. Gong CY,
    3. Huang MJ,
    4. Wang JW,
    5. Pan YF,
    6. Zhang YD,
    7. Li GZ,
    8. Gou ML,
    9. Wang K,
    10. Tu MJ, et al.
    (2008) Thermoreversible gel-sol behavior of biodegradable PCL-PEG-PCL triblock copolymer in aqueous solutions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 84:165–175.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Zeng F, and
    3. Allen C
    (2007) In vivo fate of unimers and micelles of a poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(caprolactone) copolymer in mice following intravenous administration. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 65:309–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Longley CB,
    2. Zhao H,
    3. Lozanguiez YL, and
    4. Conover CD
    (2013) Biodistribution and excretion of radiolabeled 40 kDa polyethylene glycol following intravenous administration in mice. J Pharm Sci 102:2362–2370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Luo Z,
    2. Jin L,
    3. Xu L,
    4. Zhang ZL,
    5. Yu J,
    6. Shi S,
    7. Li X, and
    8. Chen H
    (2016) Thermosensitive PEG-PCL-PEG (PECE) hydrogel as an in situ gelling system for ocular drug delivery of diclofenac sodium. Drug Deliv 23:63–68.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Manjili HK,
    2. Malvandi H,
    3. Mousavi MS,
    4. Attari E, and
    5. Danafar H
    (2018) In vitro and in vivo delivery of artemisinin loaded PCL-PEG-PCL micelles and its pharmacokinetic study. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 46:926–936.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Markovsky E,
    2. Baabur-Cohen H,
    3. Eldar-Boock A,
    4. Omer L,
    5. Tiram G,
    6. Ferber S,
    7. Ofek P,
    8. Polyak D,
    9. Scomparin A, and
    10. Satchi-Fainaro R
    (2012) Administration, distribution, metabolism and elimination of polymer therapeutics. J Control Release 161:446–460.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Massadeh S,
    2. Almohammed I,
    3. Barhoush E,
    4. Omer M,
    5. Aldhawi N,
    6. Almalik A, and
    7. Alaamery M
    (2021) Development of epirubicin-loaded biocompatible polymer PLA-PEG-PLA nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, stability, and in vitro anticancerous assessment. Polymers (Basel) 13:1212.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Meng X
    (2019) Pharmacokinetic Study of Polymeric Micelle Nanocarrier Material PEG-PLA. PhD thesis (in Chinese), Jilin University, Changchun, PR China.
  57. ↵
    1. Meng X,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Tong J,
    4. Sun H,
    5. Fawcett JP, and
    6. Gu J
    (2021) The biological fate of the polymer nanocarrier material monomethoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(d,l-lactic acid) in rat. Acta Pharm Sin B 11:1003–1009.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Nguyen TTC,
    2. Nguyen CK,
    3. Nguyen TH, and
    4. Tran NQ
    (2017) Highly lipophilic pluronics-conjugated polyamidoamine dendrimer nanocarriers as potential delivery system for hydrophobic drugs. Mater Sci Eng C 70:992–999.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Owens 3rd DE and
    2. Peppas NA
    (2006) Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 307:93–102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Panagi Z,
    2. Beletsi A,
    3. Evangelatos G,
    4. Livaniou E,
    5. Ithakissios DS, and
    6. Avgoustakis K
    (2001) Effect of dose on the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of PLGA and PLGA-mPEG nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 221:143–152.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Pelham RW,
    2. Nix LC,
    3. Chavira RE,
    4. Cleveland MV, and
    5. Stetson P
    (2008) Clinical trial: single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycol (PEG-3350) in healthy young and elderly subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28:256–265.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Qiu L,
    2. Li Q,
    3. Huang J,
    4. Wu Q,
    5. Tu K,
    6. Wu Y,
    7. Zhang X,
    8. Qian J,
    9. Zhang R,
    10. Li G, et al.
    (2018) In vitro effect of mPEG2k-PCLx micelles on rat liver cytochrome P450 enzymes. Int J Pharm 552:99–110.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Rai S,
    2. Singh N, and
    3. Bhattacharya S
    (2021) Concepts on smart nano-based drug delivery system. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 16:67–89.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Ren X,
    2. Mao X,
    3. Cao L,
    4. Xue K,
    5. Si L,
    6. Qiu J,
    7. Schimmer AD, and
    8. Li G
    (2009) Nonionic surfactants are strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A biotransformation activity in vitro and in vivo. Eur Journal Pharm Sci 36:401–411.
    OpenUrl
    1. Roy AB,
    2. Curtis CG, and
    3. Powell GM
    (1987) The metabolic sulphation of polyethyleneglycols by isolated perfused rat and guinea-pig livers. Xenobiotica 17:725–732.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Roy AB,
    2. Curtis CG, and
    3. Powell GM
    (1988) The inhibition by chlorate of the sulphation of polyethyleneglycol in the isolated perfused guinea pig liver. Xenobiotica 18:1049–1055.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Rudmann DG,
    2. Alston JT,
    3. Hanson JC, and
    4. Heidel S
    (2013) High molecular weight polyethylene glycol cellular distribution and PEG-associated cytoplasmic vacuolation is molecular weight dependent and does not require conjugation to proteins. Toxicol Pathol 41:970–983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Sahu A,
    2. Kasoju N,
    3. Goswami P, and
    4. Bora U
    (2011) Encapsulation of curcumin in Pluronic block copolymer micelles for drug delivery applications. J Biomater Appl 25:619–639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Shaffer CB,
    2. Critchfield FH, and
    3. Nair 3rd JH
    (1950) The absorption and excretion of a liquid polyethylene glycol. J Am Pharm Assoc Am Pharm Assoc 39:340–344.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Shi M,
    2. Jiang H,
    3. Yin L,
    4. Liu Y, and
    5. Xu M
    (2019) Development of an UPLC-MS/MS method coupled with in-source CID for quantitative analysis of PEG-PLA copolymer and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in rats. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1125:121716.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Singh S,
    2. Alrobaian MM,
    3. Molugulu N,
    4. Agrawal N,
    5. Numan A, and
    6. Kesharwani P
    (2020) Pyramid-shaped PEG-PCL-PEG polymeric-based model systems for site-specific drug delivery of vancomycin with enhance antibacterial efficacy. ACS Omega 5:11935–11945.
    OpenUrl
    1. Söderholm J,
    2. Olaison G,
    3. Sjödahl R, and
    4. Tagesson C
    (1993) Smoking and intestinal absorption of oral polyethylene glycols in Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 28:163–167.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Söderholm JD,
    2. Olaison G,
    3. Franzén L, and
    4. Borch K
    (1996) Increased gastric absorption of polyethylene glycols in atrophic gastritis. Digestion 57:191–195.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Söderholm JD,
    2. Olaison G,
    3. Kald A,
    4. Tagesson C, and
    5. Sjödahl R
    (1997) Absorption profiles for polyethylene glycols after regional jejunal perfusion and oral load in healthy humans. Dig Dis Sci 42:853–857.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Stolnik S,
    2. Heald CR,
    3. Neal J,
    4. Garnett MC,
    5. Davis SS,
    6. Illum L,
    7. Purkis SC,
    8. Barlow RJ, and
    9. Gellert PR
    (2001) Polylactide-poly(ethylene glycol) micellar-like particles as potential drug carriers: production, colloidal properties and biological performance. J Drug Target 9:361–378.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Su C
    (2019) Pharmacokinetic Study of Nanocarrier Material DSPE-PEG. PhD thesis (in Chinese), Jilin University, Changchun, PR China.
  69. ↵
    1. Su C,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Li R,
    4. Wu W,
    5. Fawcett JP, and
    6. Gu J
    (2019) Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of the biomaterials used in nanocarrier drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 143:97–114.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Sun X,
    2. Wang G,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Hu S,
    5. Liu X,
    6. Tang J, and
    7. Shen Y
    (2018) The blood clearance kinetics and pathway of polymeric micelles in cancer drug delivery. ACS Nano 12:6179–6192.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. ↵
    1. Szebeni J
    (2005) Complement activation-related pseudoallergy: a new class of drug-induced acute immune toxicity. Toxicology 216:106–121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. van den Hoven JM,
    2. Nemes R,
    3. Metselaar JM,
    4. Nuijen B,
    5. Beijnen JH,
    6. Storm G, and
    7. Szebeni J
    (2013) Complement activation by PEGylated liposomes containing prednisolone. Eur J Pharm Sci 49:265–271.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Veronese FM and
    2. Pasut G
    (2005) PEGylation, successful approach to drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 10:1451–1458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Wang T,
    2. Guo Y,
    3. He Y,
    4. Ren T,
    5. Yin L,
    6. Fawcett JP,
    7. Gu J, and
    8. Sun H
    (2020) Impact of molecular weight on the mechanism of cellular uptake of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) with particular reference to P-glycoprotein. Acta Pharm Sin B 10:2002–2009.
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Tan L,
    4. Zhao Q,
    5. Luo F,
    6. Wei Y, and
    7. Qian Z
    (2014) PEG-PCL based micelle hydrogels as oral docetaxel delivery systems for breast cancer therapy. Biomaterials 35:6972–6985.
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    1. Wang ZY and
    2. Stern IJ
    (1975) Disposition in rats of a polyoxypropylene-polyoxyethylene copolymer used in plasma fractionation. Drug Metab Dispos 3:536–542.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  77. ↵
    1. Webster R,
    2. Didier E,
    3. Harris P,
    4. Siegel N,
    5. Stadler J,
    6. Tilbury L, and
    7. Smith D
    (2007) PEGylated proteins: evaluation of their safety in the absence of definitive metabolism studies. Drug Metab Dispos 35:9–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Willcox ML,
    2. Newman MM, and
    3. Paton BC
    (1978) A study of labeled pluronic F-68 after intravenous injection into the dog. J Surg Res 25:349–356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Xiao RZ,
    2. Zeng ZW,
    3. Zhou GL,
    4. Wang JJ,
    5. Li FZ, and
    6. Wang AM
    (2010) Recent advances in PEG-PLA block copolymer nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 5:1057–1065.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Yamaoka T,
    2. Tabata Y, and
    3. Ikada Y
    (1994) Distribution and tissue uptake of poly(ethylene glycol) with different molecular weights after intravenous administration to mice. J Pharm Sci 83:601–606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Yang JG,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Chen XJ, and
    4. Zhou G
    (2021) Stable loading and delivery of icaritin using PEG-PCL micelles for effective treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Drug Deliv 18:975–983.
    OpenUrl
  82. ↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Wang L-Q,
    3. Wang H, and
    4. Tu K
    (2006) Micellization phenomena of amphiphilic block copolymers based on methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) and either crystalline or amorphous poly(caprolactone-b-lactide). Biomacromolecules 7:2492–2500.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Sun M,
    3. Jian S,
    4. Huang J,
    5. Xiao C,
    6. Zhang X,
    7. Hu R, and
    8. Si L
    (2021) mPEG2k-PCLx polymeric micelles influence pharmacokinetics and hypoglycemic efficacy of metformin through inhibition of organic cation transporters in rats. Mol Pharm 18:2586–2599.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 50 (6)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 50, Issue 6
1 Jun 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Block Copolymers Containing Polyethylene Glycol Used in Nanocarrier Drug Delivery Systems
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleSpecial Section on Pharmacokinetics and ADME of Biological Therapeutics

Pharmacokinetics of PEG-Related Copolymers

Lei Yin, Yiling Pang, Lin Shan and Jingkai Gu
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 1, 2022, 50 (6) 827-836; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.121.000568

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleSpecial Section on Pharmacokinetics and ADME of Biological Therapeutics

Pharmacokinetics of PEG-Related Copolymers

Lei Yin, Yiling Pang, Lin Shan and Jingkai Gu
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 1, 2022, 50 (6) 827-836; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.121.000568
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Current Challenges and Future Perspectives
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • PK and Biodistribution of Therapeutic Proteins
  • PK Models for Protein Therapeutics
  • ADRs and Toxicity of the FDA-Approved ASO Drugs
Show more Special Section on Pharmacokinetics and ADME of Biological Therapeutics

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2022 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics