Abstract
The human gut is home to trillions of microorganisms that are responsible for the modification of many orally administered drugs, leading to a wide range of therapeutic outcomes. Prodrugs bearing an azo bond are designed to treat inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer via microbial azo reduction, allowing for topical application of therapeutic moieties to the diseased tissue in the intestines. Despite the inextricable link between microbial azo reduction and the efficacy of azo prodrugs, the prevalence, abundance, and distribution of azoreductases have not been systematically examined across the gut microbiome. Here, we curated and clustered amino acid sequences of experimentally confirmed bacterial azoreductases and conducted a hidden Markov model–driven homolog search for these enzymes across 4644 genome sequences present in the representative Unified Human Gastrointestinal Genomes collection. We identified 1958 putative azo-reducing species, corroborating previous findings that azo reduction appears to be a ubiquitous function of the gut microbiome. However, through a systematic comparison of predicted and confirmed azo-reducing strains, we hypothesize the presence of uncharacterized azoreductases in 25 prominent strains of the human gut microbiome. Finally, we confirmed the azo reduction of Acid Orange 7 by multiple strains of Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides fragilis, and Clostridium clostridioforme. Together, these results suggest the presence and activity of many uncharacterized azoreductases in the human gut microbiome and motivate future studies aimed at characterizing azoreductase genes in prominent members of the human gut microbiome.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This work systematically examined the prevalence, abundance, and distribution of azoreductases across the healthy and inflammatory bowel disease human gut microbiome, revealing potentially uncharacterized azoreductase genes. It also confirmed the reduction of Acid Orange 7 by strains of Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides fragilis, and Clostridium clostridioforme.
Footnotes
- Received March 14, 2022.
- Accepted August 18, 2022.
D.B. was supported in part by the National Science Foundation [DGE-1632976] and in part by B.H. startup funding from the University of Maryland. X.J. was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine. M.P. was supported by National Institutes of Health [Grant R01-AI-100947]. B.H., G.M.N., A.W., S.L., and S.A. were supported by startup funding from the University of Maryland.
No author has an actual or perceived conflict of interest with the contents of this article.
↵
This article has supplemental material available at dmd.aspetjournals.org.
- U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright
DMD articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years.Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page.
|