Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Review Article50th Anniversary Celebration Collection Special Section on New and Emerging Areas and Technologies in Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Part I—Minireview

Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry-Based Spatially Resolved Molecular Imaging of Drug Disposition and Metabolomics

Yu Chen, Ying Liu, Ximei Li, Yan He, Weiwei Li, Ying Peng and Jiang Zheng
Drug Metabolism and Disposition October 2023, 51 (10) 1273-1283; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.122.001069
Yu Chen
State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutics of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); School of Basic Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); Division of Pain Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C.); and Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, P.R. China (Y.P., J.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ying Liu
State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutics of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); School of Basic Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); Division of Pain Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C.); and Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, P.R. China (Y.P., J.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ximei Li
State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutics of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); School of Basic Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); Division of Pain Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C.); and Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, P.R. China (Y.P., J.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan He
State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutics of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); School of Basic Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); Division of Pain Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C.); and Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, P.R. China (Y.P., J.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weiwei Li
State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutics of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); School of Basic Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); Division of Pain Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C.); and Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, P.R. China (Y.P., J.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ying Peng
State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutics of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); School of Basic Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); Division of Pain Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C.); and Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, P.R. China (Y.P., J.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiang Zheng
State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutics of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); School of Basic Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C., Y.L., X.L., Y.H., W.L.); Division of Pain Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, P.R. China (Y.C.); and Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, P.R. China (Y.P., J.Z.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mass spectrometric imaging is a nontargeted, tag-free, high-throughput, and highly responsive analytical approach. The highly accurate molecular visualization detection technology enables qualitative and quantitative analyses of biologic tissues or cells scanned by mass spectrometry in situ, extracting known and unknown multiple compounds, and simultaneously assessing relative contents of targeting molecules by monitoring their molecular ions and pinpointing the spatial locations of those molecules distributed. Five mass spectrometric imaging techniques and their characteristics are introduced in the review, including matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry, secondary ion mass spectrometry, desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, laser ablation electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The mass spectrometry-based techniques provide the possibility for spatial metabolomics with the capability of high throughput and precision detection. The approaches have been widely employed to spatially image not only metabolome of endogenous amino acids, peptides, proteins, neurotransmitters, and lipids but also the disposition of exogenous chemicals, such as pharmaceutical agents, environmental pollutants, toxicants, natural products, and heavy metals. The techniques also provide us with spatial distribution imaging of analytes in single cells, tissue microregions, organs, and whole animals.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The review article includes an overview of five commonly used mass spectrometers for spatial imaging and describes the advantages and disadvantages of each. Examples of the technology applications cover drug disposition, diseases, and omics. Technical aspects of relative and absolute quantification by mass spectrometric imaging and challenges for future new applications are discussed as well. The reviewed knowledge may benefit the development of new drugs and provide a better understanding of biochemical processes related to physiology and diseases.

Introduction

The main imaging techniques traditionally used are autoradiography, fluorescent imaging, immunohistochemical staining, and magnetic resonance imaging. Autoradiography images whole bodies or organ systems of experimental animals. This method provides information about radioactivity localization in histologic preparations at the cellular level but without chemical structural identity. This technique, although sensitive, requires tedious and costly radiolabeling and organic synthesis (Solon et al., 2010; Solon, 2015). Additionally, operators performing experiments could face harmful effects due to exposure to radioactivity. Fluorescence often involves the detection of analytes labeled with fluorescent probes, but it is challenging to simultaneously provide high resolution, speed, large volume, and good biocompatibility in a single imaging technique (Hobson and Aaron, 2022). Neither of the two can distinguish drugs from their metabolites, and they are expensive to use and have long experimental cycles. Immunohistochemical staining requires reagents specific to the targets and a low-throughput procedure (Schwamborn and Caprioli, 2010). Visualization of antibody-antigen pairs can be done by optical or fluorescent imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging is an in vivo visualizing technique used for clinical diagnosis, mainly for soft tissue imaging, without ionizing radiation (Chabanova et al., 2014). Other imaging methods, such as positron emission tomography/computed tomography, provide little structural information using a wide range of molecular probes and metabolic parameters requiring a radiotracer (Gao et al., 2022b). These imaging tools lack spatial information or lack specificity. For example, further analysis after tissue homogenization using high-performance liquid chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry can easily lead to an inability to distinguish the spatial distribution of parent drugs from their metabolites (Prideaux and Stoeckli, 2012). It is also necessary to know the target molecules of interest in advance and to label the molecules with probes, such as radioisotopes, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, and other tracers. These techniques often are time-consuming, which severely drags research progress.

MSI is a powerful label-free approach that simultaneously offers multiplexed images through acquiring hundreds of molecules and the capability to map those molecules in a sophisticated system with high flexibility and subcellular space analysis in technical terms (Buchberger et al., 2018; Unsihuay et al., 2021). MSI can provide a spatial distributional approach lacking in traditional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods and determine chemical specificity for endogenous and exogenous substances with good discrimination and selectivity for rapid screening and evaluating.

Mass Spectrometric Imaging

Principles

MSI was initially proposed by Caprioli and coworkers in 1997 (Caprioli et al., 1997) with the workflow as shown in Fig. 1. Samples need to be processed properly (e.g., tissue sections are embedded in paraffin after formalin treatment or frozen at optimal cutting temperature). The areas of the selection are simultaneously scanned by use of high-energy ion beams or lasers. Biologic specimens are rasterized by label-free ionization using an ion detector to produce charged material for mass spectrometric analysis. A mass spectrometric map generates for each virtual raster pattern position. Mass analyzers can determine the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) and measure intensity of ions on sample surfaces. Mass spectrometry software is used to perform the analysis, and a heat map of ion density can be generated for each m/z value detected to visualize its spatial localization and relative intensity. A two-dimensional (2D) spatial dispersion of multiple molecules or ions on the sample surface builds a map. In this model, a three-dimensional (3D) spatial distribution of analytes can be generated from the 2D distributed maps of the successive slices of continuously processed samples (Ye et al., 2012; Buchberger et al., 2018; Qin et al., 2018) enabling the establishment of qualitative and quantitative maps accompanied by localization functions (He et al., 2018).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Schematic workflow of MSI. Created with BioRender.com.

Ionization Techniques

The selection of ionization method is closely related to MSI's spatial resolution and signal intensity. Several ionization techniques are commonly used: matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) mass spectrometry, laser ablation electrospray ionization (LAESI) mass spectrometry, and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma (LA-ICP) mass spectrometry.

MALDI-MSI

MALDI involves mixing a solution of analyte molecules with a resolution of matrix molecules that are then evaporated and dried on a MALDI target plate to form cocrystals of matrix molecules and analytes. When irradiating the crystal with laser light, the matrix crystals sublimate as the matrix molecules absorb energy from the radiation and cause rapid heat production. The mass analysis measures ions' m/z and ionic intensity at pixel points on the sample surface by expanding the matrix and analytes. In combination with the MSI software, the signal intensity and location of an ion on the surface of the sample can be determined, and the map is constructed by establishing the 2D distribution of complementary molecules or ions on the surface of the sample (Cornett et al., 2007; Flatley et al., 2014).

MALDI-MSI is a tagless, innovative, and nascent technology that generates a 2D map of analytes in histopathologic tissue samples. This technique has the main advantage of determining spatial distribution of hundreds of analytes in a single imaging run without requiring markers or prior knowledge (Schnackenberg et al., 2022). The MALDI-MSI technique can record the lateral diffusion of many biomolecules concurrently, but the limited ionization restricts its sensibility. To provide high efficiency and mass precision, the most common mass analyzers for MALDI interface consist of time-of-flight (TOF), quadrupole ion trap, Orbitrap, and Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance (Cornett et al., 2008; Römpp et al., 2010; Alexandrov, 2012).

It is currently possible for MALDI-MSI to image spatial dispersion of biomolecules and xenobiotics in cell samples (Bien et al., 2021), spheroids (3D cultures consisting of cell polymers generated from single cell types or cell mixtures) (Ahlf Wheatcraft et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2020), organ tissue sections (Goodwin, 2012), and whole body sectioning (Saigusa et al., 2019) in the form of formalin frozen and paraffin embedded tissue sections (Möginger et al., 2020). The sample preparation process mainly consists of four parts: tissue sectioning, matrix overlying, mass spectrometry analyzing, and image processing. Tissues or organs are usually snap-frozen at the point of collection with liquid nitrogen or dry-ice chilled isopentane. Freshly frozen tissues are sliced 5 to 15 μm thick, followed by drying to stabilize tissue samples (Goodwin, 2012; Sun et al., 2019). Some tissues need fixing with formalin solution. The resulting tissues are dehydrated with a serial dilution of ethanol or other organic solvents and embedded in paraffin for sectioning. Appropriate matrixes, such as cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, sinapinic acid, and dihydroxybenzoic acid (Jang and Kim, 2018), are sprayed onto the resultant slices, which are sequentially subjected to mass spectrometric analysis. The workflow is illustrated in Fig. 2 (Zhu et al., 2022).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Schematic diagram of preparation of various specimens, inducing cells, spheroids, organs, whole-body sections, and paraffin-embedded tissue sections for MSI constructions. Reprinted with permission from Zhu et al. (2022). Copyright © 2022 Zhu, Xu, Peng and Wu. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35186891).

SIMS-MSI

SIMS uses a single beam of primaries injected onto the sample interface to perform measurements under a high vacuum condition, which causes the atoms on the surface to be electrostatic. The resulting secondary ions are sputtered and desorbed on the material's texture, followed by analysis using mass spectrometry and imaging by magnetic and electric fields to accurately measure the signals on the surface to be explored. The primary ion beam's energy is usually high so that the sputtering technique breaks covalent bonds by analyzing removed samples analytes. During the detection, many atomic and molecular debris obtained are characterized by an ion beam sputtering the surface components within each volumetric element, a small part of which is ionized as either positive or otherwise negative ions. SIMS is, therefore, generally suitable for the analysis of inorganic analytes as well as that of substances that are chemically bonded at the surface. The mass analyzer is also used for elemental and inorganic analysis as well as the detection of small molecules. SIMS has the advantages of high lateral resolutions in the micron or submicron range (Crecelius et al., 2014). The analyzers can be TOF-SIMS (Van Nuffel and Brunelle, 2022), Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance-SIMS, and nano secondary ion mass spectrometry (Mayali, 2020).

The procedure for tissue sectioning is the same as that for MALDI mass spectrometric analysis. Both require frozen sample sectioning, and tissue samples for SIMS can be analyzed directly without additional processing.

DESI-MSI

MALDI and SIMS mass spectrometry techniques generally require a vacuum environment and are inconvenient to use. For this reason, Cooks’ group introduced DESI (Takáts et al., 2004) and developed it for atmospheric pressure mass spectrometric analysis. DESI is an environmental ionization technology that requires no substrates or specimen preparation. The basic principle includes a droplet-carrying mechanism that impinges an atomized solvent droplet on the surface of tissue sections to directly desorb and ionize analytes for qualitative and quantitative detection, followed by sputtering into the gas phase and desolvation of the charged droplet by nitrogen purging and forming gas-phase ions, which enter the mass spectrometric interface for analysis. The DESI technique is generally considered a combination of electrospray ionization and desorption. The approach is widely used for atmospheric pressure MSI. The analyzer produces mass spectra similar to electron spray ionization, mainly displaying the analyte's single or multicharged molecular ions (Cooks et al., 2006; Beneito-Cambra et al., 2020).

Solvents play a crucial role in the quality and efficiency of DESI mass spectrometry. This instrument can extract information about the distributions of different compounds on the sample surface optimized by changing the solvent systems (Eberlin et al., 2010). The distance and angle between the DESI nebulizer, the specimen surface, and the mass spectrometry entrance affects the resolution and signal intensity of imaging. In recent years, several novel techniques have been developed, such as DESI-MSI combined with ion flow separation for rapid qualification of analytes (Pierson et al., 2020). Ion mobility spectroscopy has been merged into MSI. The relatively new technique allows the separation of isomers with the same molecular weight, which has been employed for imaging particular isomers, e.g., lipids and lipopeptides (McCann et al., 2021).

Airflow assisted desorption electrospray mass spectrometry imaging (AFADESI-MSI) improves the sensitivity of DESI-MSI detection by introducing a high-rate airflow into the ion source to strengthen the in situ collection to increase the sampling of liquid droplets. The modified DESI-MSI system is equipped with tissue homogenization to optimize the spray solvent for analyte detection and a high-quality resolution orbital mass spectrometer with custom-developed highly discriminative imaging software MassImager. The system improves sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility and is suitable for identifying functional molecules and tissue architecture.

Sample preparation is similar to that for MALDI-MSI analysis. Again, DESI-MSI does not require a matrix coated on sample's surface, reducing the possibility of analytes leaving the domain before analysis (Kertesz et al., 2008). Following the collection and rapid tissue freezing, sections are placed on slides and stored in a dry environment pending tests.

LAESI-MSI

LAESI is an innovated technology with high-throughput ability and distinctive potential for nontargeted analysis and spatial location in intact plant samples without the need of extraction or extensive specimen preparation (Kulkarni et al., 2018). The technique uses a medium infrared laser beam to stimulate the water molecules in the samples, and the target area absorbs laser beam energy, resulting in the evaporation of the water molecules. When the energy density exceeds a critical value, a small fraction of the sample is sputtered, intercepted at right angles by the conical spray current, and ablated into gas-phase ions, which then enter the mass spectrum analyzer for group spectrometric analysis, enabling recording units of pixels at its origin. LAESI eschews the need for a remarkably flat surface, high-precision sample preparation, and matrix as a solvent. Due to these properties, it might be a good choice for spatially resolved food analysis (Nielen and van Beek, 2014). The practice of sample analysis by LAESI is similar to that of DESI. However, models do not need to be dried, and plant samples should not be sectioned before analysis.

LA-ICP-MSI

The LA-ICP technique is used for elemental analyses of solid materials and tissues. Liquid samples are first atomized in a sample introduction system to produce a fine aerosol and transfer it into the argon plasma applied. The high-heat plasma atomizes and electrically ionizes samples, producing ions pulled through the interfacial area and into a group of electrostatic mirrors called ion optical. The ion optomechanics focuses and guides the ion bunch into the four-pole mass spectrometer. The massive analyzer segregates the ions depending on their m/z and measures them on the detection unit (Wilschefski and Baxter, 2019). LA-ICP can detect and quantify proteins bound with metal-labeled antibodies (Sussulini et al., 2017). Electrophoretic protein segregation (PAGE or SDS) allows analysis of metal-containing proteins to be visualized in 2D gels. LA-ICP with multiple element ability enables the accurate measurement and visualization of metals in tissues with high spatial resolution, flexibility, quantitative capability, and excellent repeatability (Weiskirchen et al., 2019). In the analysis of biologic samples, LA-ICP combined with TOF allows identification of proteins labeled with a trace of elements.

The five techniques have their own characteristics as listed in Table 1 and Fig. 3. With a high resolution, SIMS-MSI can offer 3D imaging without requiring matrixes. However, the method is only suitable for detecting small molecules with low sensitivity, making it more difficult to provide quantitative data. DESI-MSI requires neither complex sample pretreatment nor matrixes, facilitating the expansion of the analysis to liquid and gas samples. However, the technique has the weakness of relatively poor resolution and low signal susceptibility to external environmental interference. LAESI-MSI sample preparation is simple, compassionate, and matrix-free but requires aqueous and relatively stable samples and shows poor resolution. The MALDI-MSI technique provides high resolution and is suitable for all biologic tissue samples with no molecular weight limitation. However, sample presentation and matrices can disturb the detection of analytes (Porta Siegel et al., 2018). LA-ICP-MSI offers elemental imaging, trace metal detection, and quantification of metal-labeled antibodies, but isobaric interference lacks matrix-matched standards for quantification (Spruill et al., 2022).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Characteristics of different mass spectrometry images

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Comparison of several MSI ionization techniques. Reprinted with permission from Spruill et al. (2022). Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc. The figure was created with the addition of LAESI and using BioRender.com. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006295222001745).

Spatially Resolved Imaging and Applications

Drug Disposition

Various methods for measuring and visualizing medication uptake, distribution, and excretion have been explored for MSI. Nilsson and coworkers studied propranolol, metoprolol, and atenolol absorption in small intestines of rats using a quantitative MALDI-MSI technique (Nilsson et al., 2017). They identified the sites for intestinal absorption of the three b-blockers. Chen and coworkers used MALDI-TOF-MSI to visualize detailed distribution of five central nervous system drugs in the brain of mice after intraperitoneal administration with these agents (Chen et al., 2020). Gruner and coworkers evaluated erlotinib, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor for the therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and found that the agent was spatially distributed in healthy pancreas and unhealthy pancreas of mice using MALDI-MSI (Gruner et al., 2016). Cesca and coworkers employed MALDI-MSI to examine the potentiating effect of bevacizumab on paclitaxel-mediated anticancer activity and succeeded in establishing 3D distribution of the two antitumor agents in tumor sections (Cesca et al., 2016).

The information about fixation-related effects on MSI of metabolomics and drug disposition is limited. Dannhorn and coworkers assessed the changes in endogenous metabolome and xenobiotics in rat liver and kidney tissues using DESI- and MALDI-MSI. DESI does not require a complicated pretreatment process. The mass spectra of small molecules, such as amino acids, organic amines, lipids, and fatty acids, can be directly detected on freshly frozen sections. However, the technique does not work well for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, due to low sensitivity. The MALDI-based technique has the ability to analyze exogenous substances and metabolites as well as endogenous lipids and proteins with high sensitivity. Little difference in sensitivity of detection is obtained between the analysis of formalin-fixed samples and that of freshly frozen samples. No significant changes in the sensitivity to detect diphenhydramine, dextromethorphan, and terfenadine distributed in liver and kidney were observed in formalin fixed and freshly frozen organs obtained from animals after the treatment of the antihistamine agents (Dannhorn et al., 2022). However, freshly frozen tissues are recommended for imaging the distribution of low abundant analytes, such as metabolites of losartan, terfenadine, and fexofenadine (Schnackenberg et al., 2022).

Seneviratne and coworkers successfully imaged the distribution of tenofovir and its active metabolites in colorectal biopsies in healthy volunteers, using MALDI-MSI (Seneviratne et al., 2018). Later, they examined the spatial distribution of emtricitabine, tenofovir, efavirenz, and rilpivirine, alone with some endogenous biomolecules, in the heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and brain in mice treated with the four anti-human immunodeficiency virus agents and succeeded in detecting these antiretroviral agents in the organs analyzed (Seneviratne et al., 2020). Ntshangase and coworkers used MALDI-MSI combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to assess the pharmacokinetics and spatial distribution of efavirenz, tenofovir, and emtricitabine in the brain in rats after intraperitoneal injection of the three agents. Tenofovir was mainly located in the cortex; emtricitabine was mainly distributed in the thalamus, corpus callosum, and hypothalamus; and efavirenz was found in the brain (Ntshangase et al., 2019).

Diseases

Tumors

The metabolic reprogramming of carcinoma cells, a new hallmark of cancer, occurs during tumor growth and progression. Cancer cells independently alter their throughput by various metabolic pathways to meet the elevated bioenergetic and biologic synthetic demands and to reduce the oxidative stress required for cancer cell multiplication and survival. Besides the known cytologic and molecular resistance mechanisms, other factors can influence the distribution and concentration of chemotherapeutic agents in tumors (Dey et al., 2021). The metabolism of the tumor-immune micron environment by off-tumor cells, including endothelium, fiber, and immune cells, should be considered in targeting cancer therapy (Martinez-Reyes and Chandel, 2021; Stine et al., 2022).

Guenther and coworkers found higher levels of fatty acids and phospholipids in patients with breast tumors using the DESI-MSI technique. The metabolomic work attempted to define the association of endogenous substances, such as estrogens, progesterones, fatty acids, and phospholipids, with the tumor's gradings (Guenther et al., 2015). Abliz's team identified abnormal expressions of six enzymes, including pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 2, glutaminase, uridine phosphorylase 1, histidine decarboxylase, fatty acid synthase, and ornithine decarboxylase in 256 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by use of AFADESI-MSI (Fig. 4) (Sun et al., 2019). The spatial integration of distinguished enzymes and the corresponding downstream metabolites would facilitate the understanding of tumor metabolism and discovery of new metabolic pathways.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Six abnormally expressed metabolic enzymes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by AFADESI-MSI. (A–F) Quantification of immunohistochemistry signals of the six enzymes, including pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 2, glutaminase, uridine phosphorylase 1, histidine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, and fatty acid synthase in cancer, paired epithelium, and muscle tissues obtained from 256 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Reprinted with permission from Sun et al. (2019). Copyright © 2019 the author(s). Published by PNAS. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30559182).

Recently, MSI technologies combined with MALDI, SIMS, and DESI have been quickly applied in animal and clinical studies of breast, kidney, ovarian, prostate, colon, brain, lung, thyroid, skin, pancreatic, and esophageal cancers. Similarly, rapid development has been achieved in metabolomic (e.g., lipids, fatty acids, amino acids, and glucose) imaging of various tumors (Cho et al., 2017; Inglese et al., 2017; Jirásko et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017; Bluestein et al., 2018; Paine et al., 2019; Zang et al., 2021). These techniques may be beneficial for the development of biomarkers and metabolic pathway discovery. High-resolution MSI is an invaluable tool for metabolomic analysis of cancer tissues, recording the differential production of biomolecules, and specifying the spatial distribution within the samples, which facilitates precise treatment of tumors.

Other Diseases

MSI has been used to identify disease-related pathologic features, diagnose diseases, and evaluate the effectiveness of intervention. The technique is employed in neurologic diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (Cruz-Alonso et al., 2019), Parkinson's disease (Shariatgorji et al., 2014), Huntington's disease (Hunter et al., 2018), multiple sclerosis (Maccarrone et al., 2017), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Hanrieder et al., 2013), and frontotemporal dementia (Agrawal et al., 2022). Kaya and coworkers observed colocalized lipids such as ceramide, sulfatides, phosphatidylinositol, and lysophosphatidylcholine with plaque-associated Aβ subtypes in the hippocampal region of Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice using MALDI-MSI (Kaya et al., 2017). These findings suggested a definite link between amyloid accumulation and lipid metabolism alterations in response to oxidative stress, inflammation, demyelination, and the death of cells. The MSI technique is also used in the study of rheumatic immune diseases, and images of articular cartilage, synovium, and bone have been successfully constructed. This facilitates the better understanding of joint destruction and further characterizing and diagnosing of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoporosis (Rocha et al., 2017) as well as developing predictive biomarkers for these rheumatic immune diseases. The technology is also employed in kidney and aging-related diseases, providing detailed diagnostic information by recording ion imaging of the spatial distribution of endogenous molecules and proteins as well as exogenous substances in specimens and by distinguishing the differential distribution of those small and large molecules in humans and experimental animals (Abbas et al., 2019; Rossiter et al., 2022).

Omics

Metabolome

Grove and coworkers investigated the mechanistic action of the hepatotoxicity of amodiaquine, a well-known antimalarial agent, using MALDI-MSI. Depletion of glutathione, along with the production of amodiaquine-derived glutathione conjugate, was visualized in the central lobular region of the liver in rats given amodiaquine. Additionally, accumulated parent amodiaquine was observed in the periportal area relative to the centrilobular area (Grove et al., 2019). The spatial imaging findings provided histologic details for the metabolic activation of amodiaquine responsible for the reported idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. bis-Choline tetra thiomolybdate is a therapeutic agent for various cancers, Wilson's disease, and multiple sclerosis. Foster and coworkers determined the distribution of the agent in different organs and tissues, such as suprarenal gland, liver, spleen, kidney, brain, and testis, using LA-ICP mass spectrometry, and they found the accumulation of molybdenum in these organs of animals receiving a high dose of the metal agent (Foster et al., 2022). The team also defined the correlation between the accumulation of molybdenum and its toxicities.

Resistance to clinic-associated bacterial specimens, including enterobacteriaceae, non-ferme strains, and other bacteria, has become an issue of concern. Florio and coworkers successfully developed several methods for rapid detection of metabolites of antibiotics associated with antimicrobial resistance using a combined MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry approach. In-depth studies of the most common methods include the mapping of particular distribution of β-lactamase by visualizing hydrolytic products of β-lactam antibiotics (Florio et al., 2020).

MSI is also a powerful tool for new drug discovery. This technique allows us to directly visualize the distribution of drug candidates as well as their metabolites, which are necessary for quick decisions in drug development. Using the AFADESI-MSI technique, He and coworkers constructed spatially resolved imaging of N6-(4-hydroxy benzyl)-adenosine, an anti-insomnia drug candidate, in the brain of rats, which allowed them to image the spatial distribution of the drug candidate, facilitating the understanding of the pharmacologic action of this particular candidate (He et al., 2015).

Metabolomics often refers to the collective study of endogenous small biomolecules within cells, biofluids, tissues, or organisms and of their interactions within a biologic system. It has been developed rapidly in recent decades and shown remarkable promise in multiple fields, such as chemistry, life sciences, and clinical medicine. In 2020, Nature Methods named “Tools for Metabolomics” as one of the methods to look forward to (Singh, 2020). Spatial multiomics, including spatial metabolomics, was named by Nature in 2022 as one of the top seven technologies of the year, with a greater emphasis on spatial distribution in the xyz axis. Integration of MSI technology with metabolomics is called spatially resolved metabolomics. The advantage is mainly to study the space distributional characteristics and spatiotemporal dynamics of biomolecules in tissue sections to visualize the overall metabolome in situ (Fox and Schroeder, 2020).

In 2015, He and coworkers combined AFADESI-MSI technology with metabolomics and proposed a new methodology for MSI with metabolomics (He et al., 2015). In the same year, Guenther and coworkers employed the DESI-MSI technique for the detection of endogenous substances to diagnose breast cancer (Guenther et al., 2015). These laid the groundwork for the application of spatially resolved metabolomics.

In 2019, Abliz and coworkers established an entire body spatial resolution imaging approach for monitoring the distribution of YZG-331 and YZG-330, two isomeric sedative and hypnotic drug candidates, and their metabolites. The same technique was employed to image the changes in the allocation of neurotransmitters in the brain of rats administered individual epimers. They succeeded in defining the correlation between the distribution of each epimer in the brain versus stomach with their efficacy. Additionally, they found the changes in levels of glutamate and glutamine in the cerebral brain of rats (Fig. 5) (Luo et al., 2019) were consistent with the effectiveness of the two isomeric drug candidates. The team continued to mine the distribution of other drugs regarding spatial metabolomic dynamics and related pharmacologic properties (Zhang et al., 2020). Additionally, the team used AFADESI and MALDI to image the location of endogenous sugars, amino acids, nucleotides, fatty acids, lipids, vitamins, peptides, and metal ions associated with diabetic nephropathy across renal tissues in a rat model of diabetic nephropathy. Visualization of the improvement of metabolic disorders was observed in the animal model after 12-week administration of oral astragaloside IV (Wang et al., 2021).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

MSI of stomach and brain in vehicle or YZG-331/YZG-330 treated rats. (A) Distribution of Glu (m/z 148.0604) and Gln (m/z 147.0764); (B) relative intensity of Glu and Gln in the stomach and brain; (C) relative intensity ratio of Glu versus Gln in the stomach and brain. Reprinted with permission from Luo et al. (2019). Copyright © 2019 the authors. Published by ElsevierB.V. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31171170).

Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate.

Recently, He and coworkers determined the 3D distributional changes in metabolome resulting from the exposure to exogenous substances, such as drug candidates, toxicants, and herbal medicines. Those endogenous substances monitored included amino acids and their metabolites, lipids, neurotransmitters, and biomolecules associated with energy metabolism. Furthermore, the team succeeded in defining the correlation of those xenobiotics with multiple endogenous substances from the perspective of specific locations (Liu et al., 2020; Pang et al., 2021; Cong et al., 2022; Gao et al., 2022a; Jiang et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022). 3D-MSI has been used to visualize the distribution of pharmaceutical agents and enabled the establishment of the relationship between the structural heterogeneity of the microenvironment and the distribution of drugs within the tissues (Giordano et al., 2016). It is anticipated that more 3D studies will be performed with the development of sophisticated and advanced computational systems and bioinformatic methods.

Proteome

Spatial mapping of the distribution of proteins has become possible by using mass spectrometry. The method of mass spectrometry lies on incorporating ionizable metal attached to specific antibodies. Angelo’s team used a multiplexed ion beam imaging technique, a secondary ion mass spectrometry method for imaging antibodies labeled with isotopically pure elemental metals. They succeeded in spatially localizing estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, e-calmodulin, Ki67 protein, vimentin, actin, keratin, and receptor tyrosine-protein kinase human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 stained with metal-coupled antibodies to analyze paraffin-embedded sections of human breast tumor tissues (Angelo et al., 2014). Giesen and coworkers employed imaging mass cytometry technology combined with a high-resolution laser ablation system and cytometry-TOF—a TOF LA-ICP-MS instrument mass cytometry—to visualize human mammary epithelial cells and human breast cancer samples by simultaneously imaging 32 proteins and their modifications at a cellular resolution of 1.0 μm (Giesen et al., 2014).

Rendeiro and coworkers analyzed 36 proteins expressed in cultured primary pneumocytes and lung tissues obtained from patients with COVID-19 and constructed spatial distribution of these proteins by mass spectrometric cytometry with high Query String imaging. The success provided comprehensive and spatial pictures of the human lung responses to the viral infection from macro to single-cell levels. Specifically, infiltrated monocytes with the expression of interleukin-1 beta were found in the lung of patients with early COVID-19 infection, while high degrees of inflammation, macrophage infiltration, complement activation, and fibrosis were observed in the lungs of individuals with COVID-19 late stages. The findings not only provided structural, immunologic, and clinical insights into lung pathology but also plotted a landscape of lung pathologic changes (Rendeiro et al., 2021).

Hamidi and coworkers used MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to distinguish bacteria Brucella abortus from Brucella melitensis. Additionally, significant protein mass signals were successfully identified for ribosomal and structural proteins for each vaccine and virulent strain represented by the corresponding biomarker peaks (Hamidi et al., 2022). Mass spectrometry-based spatial proteomics can determine the nature of proteoform and subcellular localization, which enables a better understanding of the complexity of protein morphology, along with the significance of exploring unknown functions (Lundberg and Borner, 2019).

Single Cell

Single-cell analysis is a single-cell-based study of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and cell–cell interactions (Wang and Bodovitz, 2010; Merouane et al., 2015). Single-cell spatial imaging may be used to detect the colocalization of the distribution of specific molecular species, such as particular lipids and proteins, and to define the association with morphologic characteristics of tissue sections, both of which are crucial for molecular pathology and cancer treatment (Rappez et al., 2021). Small-size cells require high resolution for imaging. Due to analyte delocalization and degradation, matrix crystal size, laser focusing limitation, and detector sensitivity are hurdles for spatial resolution (Ščupáková et al., 2020). The latest SpaceM, an open-source system for in situ single-cell metabolomics based on MALDI and light microscopy, can detect more than 100 molecules per hour in > 1,000 individual cells with fluorescent readouts and morpho spatial features. The developed technique is currently applied to identify the metabolic state within genetic cell lines, such as differentiated human hepatocytes (Rappez et al., 2021).

Yuan and coworkers developed a spatial single nuclear metabolomics approach, a multiscale spatial resolution platform combining wet experiments with computational algorithms, to characterize metabolic intra- or intercellular features. This technique allowed them to visualize the tissue architecture of cultured primary hepatic cells and to distinguish hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and endothelial cells of mouse liver sections by monitoring various biomolecules responsible for those individual types of cells. Furthermore, the technique enabled them to image the elevated transmembrane transport of amino acids in human fibrotic liver tissue (Yuan et al., 2021).

Single-cell imaging is a growing technology in biomedical sciences in three aspects, including single-cell microscopy combined with microfluidics, MSI for subcellular compound localization, and imaging mass cytometry. The operations of the approach not only require centralized identification and maintenance of cell culture conditions while being able to receive high-resolution imaging for extended periods of time but also necessitate the development of new and advanced equipment (Skylaki et al., 2016). The challenges of single-cell imaging include the complexity of data acquired and the requirement of more advanced computational analysis and bioinformatic methods for data processing, due to their multivariate nature (Pomerantz et al., 2019).

Conclusion and Perspectives

The MSI technique provides label-free and in situ imaging with high coverage and wide detection ranges. This relatively new analytical approach has been widely employed in biomedical research and clinical practice. The imaging with spatial information is achieved by mass spectrometry-based detection of various endogenous and exogenous substances. The endogenous substances include amino acids, peptides, proteins, neurotransmitters, lipids, and other biomolecules (Goodwin et al., 2008; Luan et al., 2019; Denti et al., 2020; Nachtigall et al., 2020). Varieties of exogenous chemicals, such as pharmaceutical agents (their metabolites), environmental pollutants, toxicants, natural products, heavy metals, and others, have been analyzed for molecular imaging. The most important and advantageous features of the technology is that the mass spectrometry-based molecular imaging allows us to establish spatial distribution and accumulation of the detected molecules in a variety of organisms. Those mass analyzers include MALDI, SIMS, DESI, LAESI, LA-ICP, and their combinations. These applications can certainly benefit life sciences in the future. However, these techniques are currently limited by the low spatial resolution of DESI and even MALDI. The instrument conditions, sample preparation, and data processing all need to be improved (Heeren et al., 2009). In particular, increases in detection sensitivity and resolution will be the focus of immediate efforts in the future (Hou et al., 2022).

Quantitation is an important issue for any analytical approach. Unfortunately, limited literation of absolute quantitative MSI is available so far. During the sample processing phase, an authentic standard of known concentration is often deposited onto an adjacent untreated control sample that is being processed and analyzed simultaneously, allowing the estimation of absolute quantification. This method was applied to determine the abundance of tiotropium bromide in rat lung tissue sections (Goodwin, 2012). Relative quantification relies on internal standards or selected endogenous molecules in samples to obtain relative changes in the concentration of other molecules in different samples. This approach is commonly used for the nontargeted analysis of systematic phenotypic changes under different conditions (Unsihuay et al., 2021).

The rapid development of metabolomics provides room for the improvement of spatial metabolomics imaging. This would allow us to visualize the metabolome in situ to picture the spatial distribution of characteristic biomolecules and to construct a more accurate foundation for biochemical processes in the whole living species (Fox and Schroeder, 2020). Tumor heterogeneity and its microenvironment are biologically responsible for tumor staging, grading, and classification. Spatial metabolomics provides a novel approach not only to precisely diagnose tumors by identifying tissue metabolic heterogeneity and cellular microenvironment but to provide new strategies for targeting treatment of cancers. Molecular imaging also offers a powerful tool for the determination of the spatial distribution of pharmaceutical agents and their metabolites, dramatically facilitating new drug discovery (Miao et al., 2018; Vitale et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023).

The disposition of medicinal herbs is more complicated than that of a pure pharmaceutical agent. Little progress has been achieved in the application of MSI to spatial mapping distributed chemical components in animals after exposure to traditional Chinese medicines. The MSI technique is certainly able to provide spatial qualitative and quantitative identities of multiple chemical components distributed in tissues, organs, and whole body in animals given herbal medicines. Such a technique would facilitate the understanding of mechanisms of therapeutic and toxic actions of medicinal herbs with increasing consumption.

Single-cell imaging, 3D targeted imaging, and quantitative metabolomics will play an increasingly important role in future standardization and translation for clinical practice (Chen and Abliz, 2017; Blutke et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020), and the merge of multidimensional mass spectrometry, biochip, artificial intelligence, and other technologies will promote the development of life sciences and other related fields (Li et al., 2022).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yimin Ren for assistance with figures.

Authorship Contributions

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Chen, Liu, X. Li, He, W. Li, Peng, Zheng.

Footnotes

    • Received August 14, 2022.
    • Accepted May 17, 2023.
  • This work was supported by the Guizhou Postgraduate Research Foundation [Grant YJSKYJJ2021148] and Guizhou Education Department Youth Science and Technology Talents Growth Project [Grant KY2022239].

  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • dx.doi.org/10.1124/dmd.122.001069.

Abbreviations

2D
two-dimensional
3D
three-dimensional
AFADESI
airflow-assisted desorption electrospray ionization
DESI
desorption electrospray ionization
LAESI
laser ablation electrospray ionization
LA-ICP
laser ablation inductively coupled plasma
m/z
mass-to-charge ratio
MALDI
matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization
MSI
mass spectrometric imaging
SIMS
secondary ion mass spectrometry
TOF
time-of-flight
  • Copyright © 2023 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abbas I,
    2. Noun M,
    3. Touboul D,
    4. Sahali D,
    5. Brunelle A, and
    6. Ollero M
    (2019) Kidney lipidomics by mass spectrometry imaging: a focus on the glomerulus. Int J Mol Sci 20:1623.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Agrawal I,
    2. Tripathi P, and
    3. Biswas S
    (2022) Mass spectrometry based protein biomarkers and drug target discovery and clinical diagnosis in age-related progressing neurodegenerative diseases. Drug Metab Rev 54:22–36.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Ahlf Wheatcraft DR,
    2. Liu X, and
    3. Hummon AB
    (2014) Sample preparation strategies for mass spectrometry imaging of 3D cell culture models. J Vis Exp 94:52313.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Alexandrov T
    (2012) MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: statistical data analysis and current computational challenges. BMC Bioinformatics 13(Suppl 16):S11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Angelo M,
    2. Bendall SC,
    3. Finck R,
    4. Hale MB,
    5. Hitzman C,
    6. Borowsky AD,
    7. Levenson RM,
    8. Lowe JB,
    9. Liu SD,
    10. Zhao S et al.
    (2014) Multiplexed ion beam imaging of human breast tumors. Nat Med 20:436–442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bai H,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Gao D,
    5. Jiang Y,
    6. Liu H, and
    7. Cai Z
    (2016) Localization of ginsenosides in Panax ginseng with different age by matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry imaging. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1026:263–271.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bartels B and
    2. Svatoš A
    (2015) Spatially resolved in vivo plant metabolomics by laser ablation-based mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) techniques: LDI-MSI and LAESI. Front Plant Sci 6:471.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bartels B and
    2. Svatoš A
    (2022) Influence of ion source geometry on the repeatability of topographically guided LAESI-MSI. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 33:265–272.
    OpenUrl
    1. Becker JS,
    2. Breuer U,
    3. Hsieh HF,
    4. Osterholt T,
    5. Kumtabtim U,
    6. Wu B,
    7. Matusch A,
    8. Caruso JA, and
    9. Qin Z
    (2010a) Bioimaging of metals and biomolecules in mouse heart by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and secondary ion mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 82:9528–9533.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Becker JS,
    2. Zoriy M,
    3. Matusch A,
    4. Wu B,
    5. Salber D,
    6. Palm C, and
    7. Becker JS
    (2010b) Bioimaging of metals by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Mass Spectrom Rev 29:156–175.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Beneito-Cambra M,
    2. Gilbert-López B,
    3. Moreno-González D,
    4. Bouza M,
    5. Franzke J,
    6. García-Reyes JF, and
    7. Molina-Díaz A
    (2020) Ambient (desorption/ionization) mass spectrometry methods for pesticide testing in food: a review. Anal Methods 12:4831–4852.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Bien T,
    2. Bessler S,
    3. Dreisewerd K, and
    4. Soltwisch J
    (2021) Transmission-mode MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of single cells: optimizing sample preparation protocols. Anal Chem 93:4513–4520.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Bluestein BM,
    2. Morrish F,
    3. Graham DJ,
    4. Huang L,
    5. Hockenbery D, and
    6. Gamble LJ
    (2018) Analysis of the Myc-induced pancreatic β cell islet tumor microenvironment using imaging ToF-SIMS. Biointerphases 13:D402.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Blutke A,
    2. Sun N,
    3. Xu Z,
    4. Buck A,
    5. Harrison L,
    6. Schriever SC,
    7. Pfluger PT,
    8. Wiles D,
    9. Kunzke T,
    10. Huber K et al.
    (2020) Light sheet fluorescence microscopy guided MALDI-imaging mass spectrometry of cleared tissue samples. Sci Rep 10:14461.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Buchberger AR,
    2. DeLaney K,
    3. Johnson J, and
    4. Li L
    (2018) Mass spectrometry imaging: a review of emerging advancements and future insights. Anal Chem 90:240–265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Caprioli RM,
    2. Farmer TB, and
    3. Gile J
    (1997) Molecular imaging of biological samples: localization of peptides and proteins using MALDI-TOF MS. Anal Chem 69:4751–4760.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Cesca M,
    2. Morosi L,
    3. Berndt A,
    4. Fuso Nerini I,
    5. Frapolli R,
    6. Richter P,
    7. Decio A,
    8. Dirsch O,
    9. Micotti E,
    10. Giordano S et al.
    (2016) Bevacizumab-induced inhibition of angiogenesis promotes a more homogeneous intratumoral distribution of paclitaxel, improving the antitumor response. Mol Cancer Ther 15:125–135.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Chabanova E,
    2. Larsen L,
    3. Løgager VB,
    4. Møller JM, and
    5. Thomsen HS
    (2014) [Use of magnetic resonance imaging]. Ugeskr Laeger 176:50–54.
    OpenUrl
    1. Chen J,
    2. Wang R,
    3. Ma M,
    4. Gao L,
    5. Zhao B, and
    6. Xu M
    (2022) Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)-based strategies applied for the analysis of metal-binding protein in biological samples: an update on recent advances. Anal Bioanal Chem 414:7023–7033.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Chen Y and
    2. Abliz Z
    (2017) Mass spectrometry in metabolomics: what lies ahead. Bioanalysis 9:155–157.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Tang W,
    3. Gordon A, and
    4. Li B
    (2020) Development of an integrated tissue pretreatment protocol for enhanced MALDI MS imaging of drug distribution in the brain. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 31:1066–1073.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Cho YT,
    2. Su H,
    3. Chiang YY,
    4. Shiea J,
    5. Yuan SF,
    6. Hung WC,
    7. Yeh YT, and
    8. Hou MF
    (2017) Fine needle aspiration combined with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight/mass spectrometry to characterize lipid biomarkers for diagnosing accuracy of breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 17:373–381.e1.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Cong L,
    2. Wan Z,
    3. Li P,
    4. Liu D,
    5. He J,
    6. An Z, and
    7. Liu L
    (2022) Metabolic, genetic, and pharmacokinetic parameters for the prediction of olanzapine efficacy. Eur J Pharm Sci 177:106277.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Cooks RG,
    2. Ouyang Z,
    3. Takats Z, and
    4. Wiseman JM
    (2006) Detection technologies. Ambient mass spectrometry. Science 311:1566–1570.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Cornett DS,
    2. Frappier SL, and
    3. Caprioli RM
    (2008) MALDI-FTICR imaging mass spectrometry of drugs and metabolites in tissue. Anal Chem 80:5648–5653.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Cornett DS,
    2. Reyzer ML,
    3. Chaurand P, and
    4. Caprioli RM
    (2007) MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: molecular snapshots of biochemical systems. Nat Methods 4:828–833.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Crecelius AC,
    2. Vitz J, and
    3. Schubert US
    (2014) Mass spectrometric imaging of synthetic polymers. Anal Chim Acta 808:10–17.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Cruz-Alonso M,
    2. Fernandez B,
    3. Navarro A,
    4. Junceda S,
    5. Astudillo A, and
    6. Pereiro R
    (2019) Laser ablation ICP-MS for simultaneous quantitative imaging of iron and ferroportin in hippocampus of human brain tissues with Alzheimer’s disease. Talanta 197:413–421.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Dannhorn A,
    2. Swales JG,
    3. Hamm G,
    4. Strittmatter N,
    5. Kudo H,
    6. Maglennon G,
    7. Goodwin RJA, and
    8. Takats Z
    (2022) Evaluation of formalin-fixed and FFPE tissues for spatially resolved metabolomics and drug distribution studies. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 15:1307.
    OpenUrl
    1. Debois D,
    2. Hamze K,
    3. Guérineau V,
    4. Le Caër JP,
    5. Holland IB,
    6. Lopes P,
    7. Ouazzani J,
    8. Séror SJ,
    9. Brunelle A, and
    10. Laprévote O
    (2008) In situ localisation and quantification of surfactins in a Bacillus subtilis swarming community by imaging mass spectrometry. Proteomics 8:3682–3691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Denti V,
    2. Piga I,
    3. Guarnerio S,
    4. Clerici F,
    5. Ivanova M,
    6. Chinello C,
    7. Paglia G,
    8. Magni F, and
    9. Smith A
    (2020) Antigen retrieval and its effect on the MALDI-MSI of lipids in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 31:1619–1624.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Dey P,
    2. Kimmelman AC, and
    3. DePinho RA
    (2021) Metabolic codependencies in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Discov 11:1067–1081.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dong Y,
    2. Li B, and
    3. Aharoni A
    (2016) More than pictures: when MS imaging meets histology. Trends Plant Sci 21:686–698.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Eberlin LS,
    2. Ifa DR,
    3. Wu C, and
    4. Cooks RG
    (2010) Three-dimensional vizualization of mouse brain by lipid analysis using ambient ionization mass spectrometry. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49:873–876.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Flatley B,
    2. Malone P, and
    3. Cramer R
    (2014) MALDI mass spectrometry in prostate cancer biomarker discovery. Biochim Biophys Acta 1844:940–949.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Florio W,
    2. Baldeschi L,
    3. Rizzato C,
    4. Tavanti A,
    5. Ghelardi E, and
    6. Lupetti A
    (2020) Detection of antibiotic-resistance by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: an expanding area. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:572909.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Foster JR,
    2. Billimoria K,
    3. Del Castillo Busto ME,
    4. Strekopytov S,
    5. Goenaga-Infante H, and
    6. Morley TJ
    (2022) Accumulation of molybdenum in major organs following repeated oral administration of bis-choline tetrathiomolybdate in the Sprague Dawley rat. J Appl Toxicol 42:1807–1821.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Fox BW and
    2. Schroeder FC
    (2020) Toward spatially resolved metabolomics. Nat Chem Biol 16:1039–1040.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Gao S,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Huang J,
    4. Zhu Y,
    5. Zhang R,
    6. He J, and
    7. Abliz Z
    (2022a) Development and validation of a sensitive and reliable targeted metabolomics method for the quantification of cardiovascular disease-related biomarkers in plasma using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 36:e9292.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Gao Y,
    2. Wu C,
    3. Chen X,
    4. Ma L,
    5. Zhang X,
    6. Chen J,
    7. Liao X, and
    8. Liu M
    (2022b) PET/CT molecular imaging in the era of immune-checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Front Immunol 13:1049043.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Giesen C,
    2. Wang HA,
    3. Schapiro D,
    4. Zivanovic N,
    5. Jacobs A,
    6. Hattendorf B,
    7. Schüffler PJ,
    8. Grolimund D,
    9. Buhmann JM,
    10. Brandt S et al.
    (2014) Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nat Methods 11:417–422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Giordano S,
    2. Morosi L,
    3. Veglianese P,
    4. Licandro SA,
    5. Frapolli R,
    6. Zucchetti M,
    7. Cappelletti G,
    8. Falciola L,
    9. Pifferi V,
    10. Visentin S et al.
    (2016) 3D mass spectrometry imaging reveals a very heterogeneous drug distribution in tumors. Sci Rep 6:37027.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Goodwin RJA
    (2012) Sample preparation for mass spectrometry imaging: small mistakes can lead to big consequences. J Proteomics 75:4893–4911.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Goodwin RJ,
    2. Pennington SR, and
    3. Pitt AR
    (2008) Protein and peptides in pictures: imaging with MALDI mass spectrometry. Proteomics 8:3785–3800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Grove KJ,
    2. Hoque S, and
    3. Rudewicz PJ
    (2019) Investigation of amodiaquine localization in liver lobules using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 33:252–258.
    OpenUrl
    1. Grüner BM,
    2. Winkelmann I,
    3. Feuchtinger A,
    4. Sun N,
    5. Balluff B,
    6. Teichmann N,
    7. Herner A,
    8. Kalideris E,
    9. Steiger K,
    10. Braren R et al.
    (2016) Modeling therapy response and spatial tissue distribution of erlotinib in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 15:1145–1152.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Guenther S,
    2. Muirhead LJ,
    3. Speller AV,
    4. Golf O,
    5. Strittmatter N,
    6. Ramakrishnan R,
    7. Goldin RD,
    8. Jones E,
    9. Veselkov K,
    10. Nicholson J et al.
    (2015) Spatially resolved metabolic phenotyping of breast cancer by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Cancer Res 75:1828–1837.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Hamidi H,
    2. Bagheri Nejad R,
    3. Es-Haghi A, and
    4. Ghassempour A
    (2022) A combination of MALDI-TOF MS proteomics and species-unique biomarkers’ discovery for rapid screening of brucellosis. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 33:1530–1540.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Hanrieder J,
    2. Ekegren T,
    3. Andersson M, and
    4. Bergquist J
    (2013) MALDI imaging of post-mortem human spinal cord in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurochem 124:695–707.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. He J,
    2. Huang L,
    3. Tian R,
    4. Li T,
    5. Sun C,
    6. Song X,
    7. Lv Y,
    8. Luo Z,
    9. Li X, and
    10. Abliz Z
    (2018) MassImager: a software for interactive and in-depth analysis of mass spectrometry imaging data. Anal Chim Acta 1015:50–57.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. He J,
    2. Luo Z,
    3. Huang L,
    4. He J,
    5. Chen Y,
    6. Rong X,
    7. Jia S,
    8. Tang F,
    9. Wang X,
    10. Zhang R et al.
    (2015) Ambient mass spectrometry imaging metabolomics method provides novel insights into the action mechanism of drug candidates. Anal Chem 87:5372–5379.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Heeren RM,
    2. Smith DF,
    3. Stauber J,
    4. Kükrer-Kaletas B, and
    5. MacAleese L
    (2009) Imaging mass spectrometry: hype or hope? J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 20:1006–1014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Hobson CM and
    2. Aaron JS
    (2022) Combining multiple fluorescence imaging techniques in biology: when one microscope is not enough. Mol Biol Cell 33:tp1.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hölscher D,
    2. Shroff R,
    3. Knop K,
    4. Gottschaldt M,
    5. Crecelius A,
    6. Schneider B,
    7. Heckel DG,
    8. Schubert US, and
    9. Svatos A
    (2009) Matrix-free UV-laser desorption/ionization (LDI) mass spectrometric imaging at the single-cell level: distribution of secondary metabolites of Arabidopsis thaliana and Hypericum species. Plant J 60:907–918.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Hou JJ,
    2. Zhang ZJ,
    3. Wu WY,
    4. He QQ,
    5. Zhang TQ,
    6. Liu YW,
    7. Wang ZJ,
    8. Gao L,
    9. Long HL,
    10. Lei M et al.
    (2022) Mass spectrometry imaging: new eyes on natural products for drug research and development. Acta Pharmacol Sin 43:3096–3111.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Hunter M,
    2. Demarais NJ,
    3. Faull RLM,
    4. Grey AC, and
    5. Curtis MA
    (2018) Subventricular zone lipidomic architecture loss in Huntington’s disease. J Neurochem 146:613–630.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Inglese P,
    2. McKenzie JS,
    3. Mroz A,
    4. Kinross J,
    5. Veselkov K,
    6. Holmes E,
    7. Takats Z,
    8. Nicholson JK, and
    9. Glen RC
    (2017) Deep learning and 3D-DESI imaging reveal the hidden metabolic heterogeneity of cancer. Chem Sci (Camb) 8:3500–3511.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Jang KS and
    2. Kim YH
    (2018) Rapid and robust MALDI-TOF MS techniques for microbial identification: a brief overview of their diverse applications. J Microbiol 56:209–216.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Jiang HY,
    2. Gao HY,
    3. Li J,
    4. Zhou TY,
    5. Wang ST,
    6. Yang JB,
    7. Hao RR,
    8. Pang F,
    9. Wei F,
    10. Liu ZG et al.
    (2022) Integrated spatially resolved metabolomics and network toxicology to investigate the hepatotoxicity mechanisms of component D of Polygonum multiflorum Thunb. J Ethnopharmacol 298:115630.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Jirásko R,
    2. Holčapek M,
    3. Khalikova M,
    4. Vrána D,
    5. Študent V,
    6. Prouzová Z, and
    7. Melichar B
    (2017) MALDI orbitrap mass spectrometry profiling of dysregulated sulfoglycosphingolipids in renal cell carcinoma tissues. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 28:1562–1574.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Johnson J,
    2. Sharick JT,
    3. Skala MC, and
    4. Li L
    (2020) Sample preparation strategies for high-throughput mass spectrometry imaging of primary tumor organoids. J Mass Spectrom 55:e4452.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Kaya I,
    2. Brinet D,
    3. Michno W,
    4. Başkurt M,
    5. Zetterberg H,
    6. Blenow K, and
    7. Hanrieder J
    (2017) Novel trimodal MALDI imaging mass spectrometry (IMS3) at 10 μm reveals spatial lipid and peptide correlates implicated in Aβ plaque pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Chem Neurosci 8:2778–2790.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kertesz V and
    2. Van Berkel GJ
    (2008) Improved imaging resolution in desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 22:2639–2644.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Kertesz V,
    2. Van Berkel GJ,
    3. Vavrek M,
    4. Koeplinger KA,
    5. Schneider BB, and
    6. Covey TR
    (2008) Comparison of drug distribution images from whole-body thin tissue sections obtained using desorption electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and autoradiography. Anal Chem 80:5168–5177.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Korte AR,
    2. Yandeau-Nelson MD,
    3. Nikolau BJ, and
    4. Lee YJ
    (2015) Subcellular-level resolution MALDI-MS imaging of maize leaf metabolites by MALDI-linear ion trap-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:2301–2309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Kulkarni P,
    2. Wilschut RA,
    3. Verhoeven KJF,
    4. van der Putten WH, and
    5. Garbeva P
    (2018) LAESI mass spectrometry imaging as a tool to differentiate the root metabolome of native and range-expanding plant species. Planta 248:1515–1523.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Lin Z,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Ju S,
    5. Wu H,
    6. Jin H,
    7. Ma S, and
    8. Zhang B
    (2022) Unraveling the mystery of efficacy in Chinese medicine formula: new approaches and technologies for research on pharmacodynamic substances. Arab J Chem 15:104302.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Liu D,
    2. An Z,
    3. Li P,
    4. Chen Y,
    5. Zhang R,
    6. Liu L,
    7. He J, and
    8. Abliz Z
    (2020) A targeted neurotransmitter quantification and nontargeted metabolic profiling method for pharmacometabolomics analysis of olanzapine by using UPLC-HRMS. RSC Advances 10:18305–18314.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Liu D,
    2. Huang J,
    3. Gao S,
    4. Jin H, and
    5. He J
    (2022) A temporo-spatial pharmacometabolomics method to characterize pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the brain microregions by using ambient mass spectrometry imaging. Acta Pharm Sin B 12:3341–3353.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Luan H,
    2. Wang X, and
    3. Cai Z
    (2019) Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: targeting the crosstalk between gut microbiota and brain in neurodegenerative disorders. Mass Spectrom Rev 38:22–33.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Lundberg E and
    2. Borner GHH
    (2019) Spatial proteomics: a powerful discovery tool for cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20:285–302.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Luo Z,
    2. Liu D,
    3. Pang X,
    4. Yang W,
    5. He J,
    6. Zhang R,
    7. Zhu C,
    8. Chen Y,
    9. Li X,
    10. Zhang J et al.
    (2019) Whole-body spatially-resolved metabolomics method for profiling the metabolic differences of epimer drug candidates using ambient mass spectrometry imaging. Talanta 202:198–206.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Maccarrone G,
    2. Nischwitz S,
    3. Deininger SO,
    4. Hornung J,
    5. König FB,
    6. Stadelmann C,
    7. Turck CW, and
    8. Weber F
    (2017) MALDI imaging mass spectrometry analysis-A new approach for protein mapping in multiple sclerosis brain lesions. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1047:131–140.
    OpenUrl
    1. Martínez-Reyes I and
    2. Chandel NS
    (2021) Cancer metabolism: looking forward. Nat Rev Cancer 21:669–680.
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Mayali X
    (2020) NanoSIMS: microscale quantification of biogeochemical activity with large-scale impacts. Annu Rev Mar Sci 12:449–467.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. McCann A,
    2. Kune C,
    3. La Rocca R,
    4. Oetjen J,
    5. Arias AA,
    6. Ongena M,
    7. Far J,
    8. Eppe G,
    9. Quinton L, and
    10. De Pauw E
    (2021) Rapid visualization of lipopeptides and potential bioactive groups of compounds by combining ion mobility and MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Drug Discov Today Technol 39:81–88.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Merouane A,
    2. Rey-Villamizar N,
    3. Lu Y,
    4. Liadi I,
    5. Romain G,
    6. Lu J,
    7. Singh H,
    8. Cooper LJ,
    9. Varadarajan N, and
    10. Roysam B
    (2015) Automated profiling of individual cell-cell interactions from high-throughput time-lapse imaging microscopy in nanowell grids (TIMING). Bioinformatics 31:3189–3197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Miao D,
    2. Margolis CA,
    3. Vokes NI,
    4. Liu D,
    5. Taylor-Weiner A,
    6. Wankowicz SM,
    7. Adeegbe D,
    8. Keliher D,
    9. Schilling B,
    10. Tracy A et al.
    (2018) Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint blockade in microsatellite-stable solid tumors. Nat Genet 50:1271–1281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Möginger U,
    2. Marcussen N, and
    3. Jensen ON
    (2020) Histo-molecular differentiation of renal cancer subtypes by mass spectrometry imaging and rapid proteome profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections. Oncotarget 11:3998–4015.
    OpenUrl
    1. Moore KL,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. van de Meene AML,
    4. Hughes L,
    5. Liu W,
    6. Geraki T,
    7. Mosselmans F,
    8. McGrath SP,
    9. Grovenor C, and
    10. Zhao FJ
    (2014) Combined NanoSIMS and synchrotron X-ray fluorescence reveal distinct cellular and subcellular distribution patterns of trace elements in rice tissues. New Phytol 201:104–115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Nachtigall FM,
    2. Pereira A,
    3. Trofymchuk OS, and
    4. Santos LS
    (2020) Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasal swabs using MALDI-MS. Nat Biotechnol 38:1168–1173.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. ↵
    1. Nielen MW and
    2. van Beek TA
    (2014) Macroscopic and microscopic spatially-resolved analysis of food contaminants and constituents using laser-ablation electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:6805–6815.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Nilsson A,
    2. Peric A,
    3. Strimfors M,
    4. Goodwin RJA,
    5. Hayes MA,
    6. Andrén PE, and
    7. Hilgendorf C
    (2017) Mass spectrometry imaging proves differential absorption profiles of well-characterised permeability markers along the crypt-villus axis. Sci Rep 7:6352.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Ntshangase S,
    2. Mdanda S,
    3. Naicker T,
    4. Kruger HG,
    5. Baijnath S, and
    6. Govender T
    (2019) Spatial distribution of elvitegravir and tenofovir in rat brain tissue: application of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 33:1643–1651.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. ↵
    1. Paine MRL,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Huang D,
    4. Ellis SR,
    5. Trede D,
    6. Kobarg JH,
    7. Heeren RMA,
    8. Fernández FM, and
    9. MacDonald TJ
    (2019) Three-dimensional mass spectrometry imaging identifies lipid markers of medulloblastoma metastasis. Sci Rep 9:2205.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Pang X,
    2. Gao S,
    3. Ga M,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Luo Z,
    6. Chen Y,
    7. Zhang R,
    8. He J, and
    9. Abliz Z
    (2021) Mapping metabolic networks in the brain by ambient mass spectrometry imaging and metabolomics. Anal Chem 93:6746–6754.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Pierson EE,
    2. Midey AJ,
    3. Forrest WP,
    4. Shah V,
    5. Olivos HJ,
    6. Shrestha B,
    7. Teller R,
    8. Forster S,
    9. Bensussan A, and
    10. Helmy R
    (2020) Direct drug analysis in polymeric implants using desorption electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry imaging (DESI-MSI). Pharm Res 37:107.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Pomerantz AK,
    2. Sari-Sarraf F,
    3. Grove KJ,
    4. Pedro L,
    5. Rudewicz PJ,
    6. Fathman JW, and
    7. Krucker T
    (2019) Enabling drug discovery and development through single-cell imaging. Expert Opin Drug Discov 14:115–125.
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Porta Siegel T,
    2. Hamm G,
    3. Bunch J,
    4. Cappell J,
    5. Fletcher JS, and
    6. Schwamborn K
    (2018) Mass spectrometry imaging and integration with other imaging modalities for greater molecular understanding of biological tissues. Mol Imaging Biol 20:888–901.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    1. Prideaux B and
    2. Stoeckli M
    (2012) Mass spectrometry imaging for drug distribution studies. J Proteomics 75:4999–5013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Qin L,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. He H,
    5. Han M,
    6. Li Y,
    7. Zeng M, and
    8. Wang X
    (2018) Recent advances in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) for in situ analysis of endogenous molecules in plants. Phytochem Anal 29:351–364.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Rappez L,
    2. Stadler M,
    3. Triana S,
    4. Gathungu RM,
    5. Ovchinnikova K,
    6. Phapale P,
    7. Heikenwalder M, and
    8. Alexandrov T
    (2021) SpaceM reveals metabolic states of single cells. Nat Methods 18:799–805.
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. Rendeiro AF,
    2. Ravichandran H,
    3. Bram Y,
    4. Chandar V,
    5. Kim J,
    6. Meydan C,
    7. Park J,
    8. Foox J,
    9. Hether T,
    10. Warren S et al.
    (2021) The spatial landscape of lung pathology during COVID-19 progression. Nature 593:564–569.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Rocha B,
    2. Ruiz-Romero C, and
    3. Blanco FJ
    (2017) Mass spectrometry imaging: a novel technology in rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 13:52–63.
    OpenUrl
  81. ↵
    1. Römpp A,
    2. Guenther S,
    3. Schober Y,
    4. Schulz O,
    5. Takats Z,
    6. Kummer W, and
    7. Spengler B
    (2010) Histology by mass spectrometry: label-free tissue characterization obtained from high-accuracy bioanalytical imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49:3834–3838.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Rossiter H,
    2. Copic D,
    3. Direder M,
    4. Gruber F,
    5. Zoratto S,
    6. Marchetti-Deschmann M,
    7. Kremslehner C,
    8. Sochorová M,
    9. Nagelreiter IM,
    10. Mlitz V et al.
    (2022) Autophagy protects murine preputial glands against premature aging, and controls their sebum phospholipid and pheromone profile. Autophagy 18:1005–1019.
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. Saigusa D,
    2. Saito R,
    3. Kawamoto K,
    4. Uruno A,
    5. Kano K,
    6. Aoki J,
    7. Yamamoto M, and
    8. Kawamoto T
    (2019) Conductive adhesive film expands the utility of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging. Anal Chem 91:8979–8986.
    OpenUrl
  84. ↵
    1. Schnackenberg LK,
    2. Thorn DA,
    3. Barnette D, and
    4. Jones EE
    (2022) MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: an emerging tool in neurology. Metab Brain Dis 37:105–121.
    OpenUrl
  85. ↵
    1. Schwamborn K and
    2. Caprioli RM
    (2010) Molecular imaging by mass spectrometry—looking beyond classical histology. Nat Rev Cancer 10:639–646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Ščupáková K,
    2. Balluff B,
    3. Tressler C,
    4. Adelaja T,
    5. Heeren RMA,
    6. Glunde K, and
    7. Ertaylan G
    (2020) Cellular resolution in clinical MALDI mass spectrometry imaging: the latest advancements and current challenges. Clin Chem Lab Med 58:914–929.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  87. ↵
    1. Seneviratne HK,
    2. Hamlin AN,
    3. Heck CJS, and
    4. Bumpus NN
    (2020) Spatial Distribution profiles of emtricitabine, tenofovir, efavirenz, and rilpivirine in murine tissues following in vivo dosing correlate with their safety profiles in humans. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci 3:655–665.
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. Seneviratne HK,
    2. Hendrix CW,
    3. Fuchs EJ, and
    4. Bumpus NN
    (2018) MALDI mass spectrometry imaging reveals heterogeneous distribution of tenofovir and tenofovir diphosphate in colorectal tissue of subjects receiving a tenofovir-containing enema. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 367:40–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. ↵
    1. Shariatgorji M,
    2. Nilsson A,
    3. Goodwin RJ,
    4. Källback P,
    5. Schintu N,
    6. Zhang X,
    7. Crossman AR,
    8. Bezard E,
    9. Svenningsson P, and
    10. Andren PE
    (2014) Direct targeted quantitative molecular imaging of neurotransmitters in brain tissue sections. Neuron 84:697–707.
    OpenUrl
    1. Shariatgorji M,
    2. Nilsson A,
    3. Källback P,
    4. Karlsson O,
    5. Zhang X,
    6. Svenningsson P, and
    7. Andren PE
    (2015) Pyrylium salts as reactive matrices for MALDI-MS imaging of biologically active primary amines. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 26:934–939.
    OpenUrl
  90. ↵
    1. Singh A
    (2020) Tools for metabolomics. Nat Methods 17:24.
    OpenUrl
  91. ↵
    1. Skylaki S,
    2. Hilsenbeck O, and
    3. Schroeder T
    (2016) Challenges in long-term imaging and quantification of single-cell dynamics. Nat Biotechnol 34:1137–1144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Solon EG,
    2. Schweitzer A,
    3. Stoeckli M, and
    4. Prideaux B
    (2010) Autoradiography, MALDI-MS, and SIMS-MS imaging in pharmaceutical discovery and development. AAPS J 12:11–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Solon EG
    (2015) Autoradiography techniques and quantification of drug distribution. Cell Tissue Res 360:87–107.
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    1. Spruill ML,
    2. Maletic-Savatic M,
    3. Martin H,
    4. Li F, and
    5. Liu X
    (2022) Spatial analysis of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and toxicology using mass spectrometry imaging. Biochem Pharmacol 201:115080.
    OpenUrl
  95. ↵
    1. Stine ZE,
    2. Schug ZT,
    3. Salvino JM, and
    4. Dang CV
    (2022) Targeting cancer metabolism in the era of precision oncology. Nat Rev Drug Discov 21:141–162.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Sturtevant D,
    2. Lee YJ, and
    3. Chapman KD
    (2016) Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) for direct visualization of plant metabolites in situ. Curr Opin Biotechnol 37:53–60.
    OpenUrl
  96. ↵
    1. Sun C,
    2. Li Z,
    3. Ma C,
    4. Zang Q,
    5. Li J,
    6. Liu W,
    7. Zhao H, and
    8. Wang X
    (2019) Acetone immersion enhanced MALDI-MS imaging of small molecule metabolites in biological tissues. J Pharm Biomed Anal 176:112797.
    OpenUrl
    1. Sun C,
    2. Li T,
    3. Song X,
    4. Huang L,
    5. Zang Q,
    6. Xu J,
    7. Bi N,
    8. Jiao G,
    9. Hao Y,
    10. Chen Y et al.
    (2019) Spatially resolved metabolomics to discover tumor-associated metabolic alterations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:52–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  97. ↵
    1. Sussulini A,
    2. Becker JS, and
    3. Becker JS
    (2017) Laser ablation ICP-MS: application in biomedical research. Mass Spectrom Rev 36:47–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  98. ↵
    1. Takáts Z,
    2. Wiseman JM,
    3. Gologan B, and
    4. Cooks RG
    (2004) Mass spectrometry sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science 306:471–473.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tillner J,
    2. Wu V,
    3. Jones EA,
    4. Pringle SD,
    5. Karancsi T,
    6. Dannhorn A,
    7. Veselkov K,
    8. McKenzie JS, and
    9. Takats Z
    (2017) Faster, more reproducible DESI-MS for biological tissue imaging. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 28:2090–2098.
    OpenUrl
  99. ↵
    1. Unsihuay D,
    2. Mesa Sanchez D, and
    3. Laskin J
    (2021) Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging of biological systems. Annu Rev Phys Chem 72:307–329.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  100. ↵
    1. Van Nuffel S and
    2. Brunelle A
    (2022) TOF-SIMS imaging of biological tissue sections and structural determination using tandem MS. Methods Mol Biol 2437:77–86.
    OpenUrl
  101. ↵
    1. Vitale I,
    2. Shema E,
    3. Loi S, and
    4. Galluzzi L
    (2021) Intratumoral heterogeneity in cancer progression and response to immunotherapy. Nat Med 27:212–224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    1. Wang D and
    2. Bodovitz S
    (2010) Single cell analysis: the new frontier in “omics.” Trends Biotechnol 28:281–290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Kunzke T,
    3. Prade VM,
    4. Shen J,
    5. Buck A,
    6. Feuchtinger A,
    7. Haffner I,
    8. Luber B,
    9. Liu DHW,
    10. Langer R et al.
    (2022) Spatial metabolomics identifies distinct tumor-specific subtypes in gastric cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 28:2865–2877.
    OpenUrl
  104. ↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Fu W,
    3. Huo M,
    4. He B,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Tian L,
    7. Li W,
    8. Zhou Z,
    9. Wang B,
    10. Xia J et al.
    (2021) Spatial-resolved metabolomics reveals tissue-specific metabolic reprogramming in diabetic nephropathy by using mass spectrometry imaging. Acta Pharm Sin B 11:3665–3677.
    OpenUrl
    1. Watrous JD and
    2. Dorrestein PC
    (2011) Imaging mass spectrometry in microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:683–694.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Weiskirchen S,
    2. Kim P, and
    3. Weiskirchen R
    (2019) Determination of copper poisoning in Wilson’s disease using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Ann Transl Med 7(Suppl 2):S72.
    OpenUrl
  106. ↵
    1. Wilschefski SC and
    2. Baxter MR
    (2019) Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: introduction to analytical aspects. Clin Biochem Rev 40:115–133.
    OpenUrl
  107. ↵
    1. Ye H,
    2. Greer T, and
    3. Li L
    (2012) Probing neuropeptide signaling at the organ and cellular domains via imaging mass spectrometry. J Proteomics 75:5014–5026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Yuan Z,
    2. Zhou Q,
    3. Cai L,
    4. Pan L,
    5. Sun W,
    6. Qumu S,
    7. Yu S,
    8. Feng J,
    9. Zhao H,
    10. Zheng Y et al.
    (2021) SEAM is a spatial single nuclear metabolomics method for dissecting tissue microenvironment. Nat Methods 18:1223–1232.
    OpenUrl
  109. ↵
    1. Zang Q,
    2. Sun C,
    3. Chu X,
    4. Li L,
    5. Gan W,
    6. Zhao Z,
    7. Song Y,
    8. He J,
    9. Zhang R, and
    10. Abliz Z
    (2021) Spatially resolved metabolomics combined with multicellular tumor spheroids to discover cancer tissue relevant metabolic signatures. Anal Chim Acta 1155:338342.
    OpenUrl
  110. ↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Du Q,
    3. Song X,
    4. Gao S,
    5. Pang X,
    6. Li Y,
    7. Zhang R,
    8. Abliz Z, and
    9. He J
    (2020) Evaluation of the tumor-targeting efficiency and intratumor heterogeneity of anticancer drugs using quantitative mass spectrometry imaging. Theranostics 10:2621–2630.
    OpenUrl
  111. ↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Rector J,
    3. Lin JQ,
    4. Young JH,
    5. Sans M,
    6. Katta N,
    7. Giese N,
    8. Yu W,
    9. Nagi C,
    10. Suliburk J et al.
    (2017) Nondestructive tissue analysis for ex vivo and in vivo cancer diagnosis using a handheld mass spectrometry system. Sci Transl Med 9:eaan3968.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  112. ↵
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Bao C,
    3. Jiang L,
    4. Wang S,
    5. Wang K,
    6. Lu C, and
    7. Fang H
    (2023) When cancer drug resistance meets metabolomics (bulk, single-cell and/or spatial): progress, potential, and perspective. Front Oncol 12:1054233.
    OpenUrl
  113. ↵
    1. Zhou Z,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Gao Y,
    4. Bi N,
    5. Yue X,
    6. He J,
    7. Zhang R,
    8. Wang L, and
    9. Abliz Z
    (2020) Development of a high-coverage metabolome relative quantitative method for large-scale sample analysis. Anal Chim Acta 1109:44–52.
    OpenUrl
  114. ↵
    1. Zhu X,
    2. Xu T,
    3. Peng C, and
    4. Wu S
    (2022) Advances in MALDI mass spectrometry imaging single cell and tissues. Front Chem 9:782432.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 51 (10)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 51, Issue 10
1 Oct 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry-Based Spatially Resolved Molecular Imaging of Drug Disposition and Metabolomics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Review Article50th Anniversary Celebration Collection Special Section on New and Emerging Areas and Technologies in Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Part I—Minireview

Mass Spectrometry-Based Imaging of Drug Disposition

Yu Chen, Ying Liu, Ximei Li, Yan He, Weiwei Li, Ying Peng and Jiang Zheng
Drug Metabolism and Disposition October 1, 2023, 51 (10) 1273-1283; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.122.001069

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Review Article50th Anniversary Celebration Collection Special Section on New and Emerging Areas and Technologies in Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Part I—Minireview

Mass Spectrometry-Based Imaging of Drug Disposition

Yu Chen, Ying Liu, Ximei Li, Yan He, Weiwei Li, Ying Peng and Jiang Zheng
Drug Metabolism and Disposition October 1, 2023, 51 (10) 1273-1283; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.122.001069
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Mass Spectrometric Imaging
    • Spatially Resolved Imaging and Applications
    • Conclusion and Perspectives
    • Acknowledgments
    • Authorship Contributions
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • High-Throughput Assays for Investigating CYP-Mediated DDIs
  • P450s in the Eye
Show more 50th Anniversary Celebration Collection Special Section on New and Emerging Areas and Technologies in Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Part I—Minireview

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics