Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Drug Metabolism & Disposition
  • Other Publications
    • Drug Metabolism and Disposition
    • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
    • Molecular Pharmacology
    • Pharmacological Reviews
    • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
    • ASPET
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Drug Metabolism & Disposition

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Fast Forward
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Sections
    • Archive
  • Information
    • Instructions to Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • FAQs
    • For Subscribers
    • Terms & Conditions of Use
    • Permissions
  • Editorial Board
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Virtual Issues
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Visit dmd on Facebook
  • Follow dmd on Twitter
  • Follow ASPET on LinkedIn
Research ArticleCommentary

Prediction of Flow Effects on Intestinal (FI) and Systemic Availability (Fsys) in PBPK Intestine Models: The Traditional Model (TM), Segregated Flow Model (SFM) and QGut Model

K. Sandy Pang and Edwin C. Y. Chow
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 27, 2012, dmd.112.045872; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.045872
K. Sandy Pang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ks.pang@utoronto.ca
Edwin C. Y. Chow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PBPK models for the intestine, comprising of different flow rates perfusing the enterocyte region, were revisited in the appraisal of flow effects on the intestinal availability (FI) and in turn, the systemic availability (Fsys) and intestinal vs. liver contribution to the first-pass effect during oral drug absorption. The traditional model (TM), the segregated flow model (SFM) and the QGut model, respectively, stipulate that 1.0x, ~0.1x to 0.3x and 0.484x of the total intestinal flow reach the enterocyte region which houses metabolically-active and transporter-enriched enterocytes. The fractional flow rate to the enterocyte region, fQ, when examined under varying experimental conditions, was found to range from 0.024 to 0.2 for the SFM and 0.065 to 0.43 for the QGut model. Appraisal of these flow intestinal models, when used in combination with whole body-physiological-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, showed the ranking was SFM < QGut model < TM in the description of FI, and the same ranking existed for the contribution of the intestine to first-pass removal. But the ranking for the predicted contribution of hepatic metabolism to first-pass removal was opposite: SFM > QGut model > TM. The findings suggest that the fQ value strongly influences the rate of intestinal metabolism, FI and Fsys, and indirectly affects the rate of liver metabolism due to substrate sparing effect. Thus, the fQ value in the intestinal flow model poses serious implications on the interpretation of data on the first-pass effect and oral absorption of drugs.

  • absorption
  • bioavailability
  • drug secretion
  • gastrointestinal cytochrome P450
  • intestinal bioavailability
  • physiologically-based modeling
  • physiologically-based pharmacokinetics
  • regional blood flow
  • transporters
  • Received April 2, 2012.
  • Accepted June 27, 2012.
  • The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Next
Back to top

In this issue

Drug Metabolism and Disposition: 51 (4)
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Vol. 51, Issue 4
1 Apr 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Drug Metabolism & Disposition article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prediction of Flow Effects on Intestinal (FI) and Systemic Availability (Fsys) in PBPK Intestine Models: The Traditional Model (TM), Segregated Flow Model (SFM) and QGut Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Drug Metabolism & Disposition
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Drug Metabolism & Disposition.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Research ArticleCommentary

Prediction of Flow Effects on Intestinal (FI) and Systemic Availability (Fsys) in PBPK Intestine Models: The Traditional Model (TM), Segregated Flow Model (SFM) and QGut Model

K. Sandy Pang and Edwin C. Y. Chow
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 27, 2012, dmd.112.045872; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.045872

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Research ArticleCommentary

Prediction of Flow Effects on Intestinal (FI) and Systemic Availability (Fsys) in PBPK Intestine Models: The Traditional Model (TM), Segregated Flow Model (SFM) and QGut Model

K. Sandy Pang and Edwin C. Y. Chow
Drug Metabolism and Disposition June 27, 2012, dmd.112.045872; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.112.045872
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • kcat Assessment of UGT Enzymes across Different Organs
  • Clearance Models: The Case for Status Quo
  • Reporting Data Analysis and Statistical Methods
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Advertisement
  • Home
  • Alerts
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Fast Forward by date
  • Fast Forward by section
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive
  • Search for Articles
  • Feedback
  • ASPET

More Information

  • About DMD
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions to Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Customized Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions
  • Terms & Conditions of Use

ASPET's Other Journals

  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Molecular Pharmacology
  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
ISSN 1521-009X (Online)

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics