PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gregory S. Walker
AU  - Tim F. Ryder
AU  - Raman Sharma
AU  - Evan B. Smith
AU  - Amy Freund
TI  - Validation of Isolated Metabolites from Drug Metabolism Studies as Analytical Standards by Quantitative NMR
AID  - 10.1124/dmd.110.036343
DP  - 2011 Mar 01
TA  - Drug Metabolism and Disposition
PG  - 433--440
VI  - 39
IP  - 3
4099  - http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/content/39/3/433.short
4100  - http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/content/39/3/433.full
SO  - Drug Metab Dispos2011 Mar 01; 39
AB  - In discovery and development, having a qualified metabolite standard is advantageous. Chemical synthesis of metabolite standards is often difficult and expensive. As an alternative, biological generation and isolation of metabolites in the nanomole range are readily feasible. However, without an accurately defined concentration, these isolates have limited utility as standards. There is a significant history of NMR as both a qualitative and a quantitative technique, and these concepts have been merged recently to provide both structural and quantitative information on biologically generated isolates from drug metabolism studies. Previous methodologies relied on either specialized equipment or the use of an internal standard to the isolate. We have developed a technique in which a mathematically generated signal can be inserted into a spectrum postacquisition and used as a quantitative reference: artificial signal insertion for calculation of concentration observed (aSICCO). This technique has several advantages over previous methodologies. Any region in the analyte spectra, free from interference, can be chosen for the reference signal. In addition, the magnitude of the inserted signal can be modified to appropriately match the intensity of the sample resonances. Because this is postacquisition quantification, no special equipment or pulse sequence is needed. Compared with quantitation via the addition of an internal standard (10 mM maleic acid), the signal insertion method produced similar results. For each method, precision and accuracy were within ±5%, stability of signal response over 8 days was ±5%, and the dynamic range was more than 3 orders of magnitude: 10 to 0.01 mM.