Substrate | Metabolite | Best-Fit Modela | Vmax (pmol/min/mg protein) | Km (µM) | Efficiency (Vmax/Km) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R-warfarin | RS-warfarin alcohol | Michaelis-Menten | 155 ± 18 | 710 ± 160 | 0.22 |
RR-warfarin alcohol | Michaelis-Menten | 0.63 ± 0.18 | 560 ± 330 | 0.0011 | |
S-warfarin | SR-warfarin alcohol | NAb | NAb | NAb | NAb |
SS-warfarin alcohol | Michaelis-Menten | 41 ± 18 | 3500c | 0.012 | |
Rac-warfarin | Alcohol 2 (RS/SR-warfarin alcohols) | Michaelis-Menten | 78 ± 10 | 710 ± 170 | 0.11 |
Alcohol 1 (RR/SS-warfarin alcohols) | Michaelis-Menten | 4.8 ± 0.7 | 330 ± 130 | 0.015 | |
Rac-warfarin (Malátková et al., 2016) | Alcohol 2 (RS/SR-warfarin alcohols) | Michaelis-Menten | 76.4 ± 6.0 | 746 ± 93 | 0.10 |
Alcohol 1 (RR/SS-warfarin alcohols) | Michaelis-Menten | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 248 ± 51 | 0.0080 |
NA, not applicable.
↵a Best fit of data was determined between hyperbolic (Michealis-Menten) and nonhyperbolic (Hill equation) models using extra sum-of-squares F test in GraphPad Prism.
↵b SR-warfarin alcohol was consistently quantifiable only at S-warfarin concentrations of 600 µM or greater, yet data could not be reliably fit to any kinetic model.
↵c The predicted Km was greater than the highest substrate concentration used in this study (1000 μM) owing to solubility limits; thus, there is more error in the kinetic constants than predicted by a fit, hence the exclusion of S.E. from the table.