Comparison of predicted drug-drug interaction (DDI) liabilities from in vitro data to in vivo clinical studies
Hepatobiliary clearances, after in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), can be used to identify the rate-determining step (RDS) of a drug, such as if the CLmet + bile/CLsef ratio is > or < than the tipping point (eq. 2), then the drug will have RDSuptake or RDSall, respectively. If a drug has RDSuptake, then the PImet + bile can be quantified (eq. 5) to predict when a significant DDI should be expected owing to inhibition of metabolic/biliary efflux clearance. An expanded analysis is shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Drug | Hepatobiliary Clearance (ml/min per kg) | fubCLsin/Qha | CLmet + bile/CLsef | Tipping Point | PImet + bile | RDS In Vitro | RDS In Vivo | Reference | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLsin | CLsef | CLmet | CLbile | ||||||||
Atorvastatin | 61b | 24.9 | 58.3 | 4.3 | 0.12 | 2.52 | 3.59 | — | All | Uptakec | Varma et al. (2014) |
1194d | 24.9 | 58.3 | 4.3 | 2.27 | 2.52 | 1.22 | >51% | Uptake | Camenisch and Umehara (2012) | ||
405e | 24.9 | 58.3 | 4.3 | 0.77 | 2.52 | 2.26 | >10% | Uptake | Kunze et al. (2015) | ||
198b | 359 | 64.6 | 11.8 | 0.80 | 0.21 | 2.22 | — | All | Maeda et al. (2011) | ||
198b | 57.7 | 64.6 | 11.8 | 0.80 | 1.32 | 2.22 | — | All | |||
Bosentan | 132b | 28.9 | 19.5 | 5.8 | 0.36 | 0.87 | 2.95 | — | All | Uptakec | Varma et al. (2014) |
142d | 28.9 | 19.5 | 5.8 | 0.38 | 0.87 | 2.90 | — | All | Jones et al. (2012) | ||
1117e | 28.9 | 19.5 | 5.8 | 3.02 | 0.87 | 0.99 | — | All | Yoshikado et al. (2017) | ||
35b | 12.1 | — | 39f | 0.02 | 3.24 | 3.93 | — | All | |||
2035g | 14 | — | 5.0f | 1.09 | 0.36 | 1.91 | — | All | |||
Repaglinide | 166b | 63.6 | 128 | 0.3 | 0.19 | 2.01 | 3.35 | — | All | Uptakec allh | Varma et al. (2014) |
1983d | 63.6 | 128 | 0.3 | 2.32 | 2.01 | 1.21 | >40% | Uptake | Jones et al. (2012) | ||
1151e | 63.6 | 128 | 0.3 | 1.35 | 2.01 | 1.71 | >15% | Uptake | Yoshikado et al. (2017) | ||
299b | 223 | 125 | 0.0 | 0.22 | 0.56 | 3.27 | — | All | |||
3671g | 352 | 125 | 0.0 | 2.73 | 0.35 | 1.07 | — | All |
↵a The fub and Qh values as noted in each reference were used for analysis; note that fub may vary for the same drug across different references.
↵b In vitro quantified + IVIVE.
↵c RDSuptake was established in vivo for atorvastatin and bosentan since there was no significant AUC change to victim drugs when coadministered with intravenous itraconazole (CYP3A inhibitor) which resulted in 33% and 73% CYP3A inhibition, respectively (Maeda et al., 2011; Yoshikado et al., 2017). Midazolam, a CYP3A probe, was used to assess magnitude of CYP3A inhibition. RDSuptake was established for repaglinide via whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of complex transporter- and enzyme-mediated DDIs (Varma et al., 2013).
↵d In vitro quantified + IVIVE + empirical scaling factor for active uptake transport (individual scaling factor).
↵e In vitro quantified + IVIVE + empirical scaling factor for active uptake transport (geometric mean scaling factor).
↵f Composite CLmet + bile.
↵g Fitted parameters from in vivo using PBPK model.
↵h RDSall was established in vivo for repaglinide even though there was no change to systemic AUC by intravenous itraconazole because CYP2C8 is the major hepatic drug-metabolizing enzyme (Yoshikado et al., 2017). In a different study, oral trimethoprim, a selective CYP2C8 inhibitor, increased repaglinide AUC by 1.8-fold (Kim et al., 2016).